Showing posts with label spay-neuter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spay-neuter. Show all posts

Monday, June 4, 2012

Animals in Ukraine

In a clinic in the Ukrainian capital Kiev, two vets lean over a
sleeping puppy and deftly remove its ovaries and uterus.

After a storm sparked by the Euro 2012 co-host's alleged cull of the
stray dogs that plague the country's streets, animal rights
campaigners have stepped in to try to control the errant canines by
sterilising them.

At the helm is Austrian organisation Vier Pfoten (Four Paws), which is
launching a programme notably in the four cities hosting matches in
Euro 2012: Kiev, plus Lviv in the west and Donetsk and Kharkiv in the
east.

--
full story:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/euro-2012-host-ukraine-tries-stray-dogs-sterilisation-165039706--sow.html
 

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Pediatric Spay/Neuter

Spay/Neuter of Shelter Animals
Pediatric Spay/Neuter
Facts About this Safe and Effective Procedure
Pediatric spay/neuter is the subject of ongoing debates among veterinarians
that is fraught with misinformation, misconceptions and high emotions.
Although millions of domesticated animals have been surgically sterilized,
many veterinarians believe sufficient conclusive research has not been
conducted to determine the best age or reproductive stage of life to spay
and neuter dogs and cats.
However, studies have been conducted that show that pediatric spay/neuter is
safe and effective in both the short and long term. This information can
help allay many of the veterinarian's fears so they may embrace the concept
as readily as they embrace neutering at 6 months of age.

Early Age Spay/Neuter Defined
The harshest criticism by veterinarians of early age neutering is usually
reserved for surgeries performed on animals as young as 6-8 weeks of age or
under 2 pounds of body weight. But early age spay/neuter should be broadly
defined as surgical sterilization procedures performed on animals who are
6-16 weeks of age or under the traditional age of 6 months. Using that
definition, surgery performed on a 4-month old female animal would be
considered a pediatric spay.
Because the term "early" implies that the procedure is being performed
prematurely, some veterinarians proposed that alternative language might be
more acceptable. Some alternative terms for early age spay/neuter include:
* Juvenile spay/neuter
* Pediatric spay/neuter
* Prepuberal spay/neuter
* Prepubertal spay/neuter
* Prepubescent spay/neuter
History of Spaying and Neutering
Many veterinarians are not aware of the different theories that have been
advanced regarding the timing of spaying a female cat or dog. Both
veterinarians and the general public might be surprised to know that in the
early 1900s, veterinarians advocated spaying bitches between 3 and 6 months
of age, or even prior to weaning, and castration was done as early as 4
weeks of age. At one time it was believed that it was beneficial for animals
to have a litter before being spayed, while another prevailing school of
thought, until fairly recently, was that animals should go through one heat
before being spayed.
Many veterinary colleges are currently teaching that spaying and neutering,
also known as gonadectomy, can be done safely at any age, but believe that
pediatric spay/neuter is a tool mainly for population control for shelter
animals only. However, pediatric spay/neuter should be considered for
animals belonging to the general public as well.
Revisiting the Six-Month Recommendation
Six months of age is generally considered to be the standard recommendation
for spaying and neutering puppies and kittens. It is unclear from the
scientific literature how that conclusion was reached.
It is now known that spaying an animal before the first heat prevents the
development of mammary gland tumors later in life. Since kittens may go into
heat at 4 months of age, waiting until 6 months risks accidental pregnancy
and loses the protection against mammary gland cancer.
It would appear that decisions about when to spay and neuter are based more
on the individual practitioner's comfort level and familiarity with the
surgical technique and anesthesia rather than on any sound scientific or
medical evidence.
The six month age requirement for surgery came into question in the late
1970s when shelters encountered difficulty getting adopters to comply with
contractual agreements to neuter their newly adopted pets. Despite various
incentives, many adopters simply refused to abide by the agreements once
they had acquired the animals.
Some shelters found that litters from animals they had adopted out were
being brought back to them, and that they were thus actually contributing to
the overpopulation problem. They decided the best solution would be to
neuter the animals before they were adopted, but the six month age
restriction meant that puppies and kittens could not be altered.
Once it was determined that no compelling medical reason could be found in
the veterinary literature to wait until the animals were six months of age,
pediatric surgeries began to be performed. Dr. Leo Lieberman is the
acknowledged pioneer of pediatric spay/neuter. He began performing the
surgeries in the late 1970s, and they have been performed by shelters ever
since.
A Growing Body of Evidence
In 1993 Faggella and Aronsohn published surgical and anesthetic protocols in
the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (JAVMA) for
safely neutering animals as young as 6 weeks of age. Although the surgeries
had already been performed safely on thousands of shelter animals, these
articles provided the much-needed research data to prove that the procedures
were indeed safe to perform.
On July 18, 1993, the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) House
of Delegates approved a resolution on early age spay/neuter which stated:
"Resolved that the AVMA supports the concept of early (8-16 weeks of age)
ovariohysterectomies/ gonadectomies in dogs and cats, in an effort to stem
the overpopulation problem in these species."
Aware of the controversy surrounding this statement they also added:
"The concept is for the benefit of animal shelter and humane society
spay/neuter programs. Individual veterinarians have the right/responsibility
to decide at what age they will perform the procedure."
In 2004, the policy was revised and the "concept" portion of the statement
was removed.
Throughout the 1990s, groups such as the American Animal Hospital
Association (AAHA), American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals (ASPCA), American Humane Association (AHA), Cat Fanciers Association
(CFA), American Kennel Club (AKC), Humane Society of the United States
(HSUS), and the California Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) endorsed
pediatric spay/neuter.
Despite these endorsements and the body of evidence already gathered through
research and anecdotal information from over 25 years of performing
pediatric procedures, the debate still goes on. This information should help
resolve some of the problems and concerns.
Concerns about Pediatric Spay/Neuter
An often-cited concern regarding pediatric spay/neuter is a lack of
sufficient scientific data regarding long-term consequences. The following
are commonly discussed issues:
* Obesity
* Stunted growth
* Cranial cruciate ligament rupture
* Hip dysplasia
* Behavioral problems
* Lower urinary tract disease
* Secondary sex characteristics
* Urinary incontinence
* Infectious disease
* Hypothyroidism
* Diabetes mellitus
* Neoplasia
General Concerns about the Long-Term Effects
The results of studies of the long-term outcome of gonadectomies performed
at an early age or traditional age in cats and dogs were published in JAVMA
in the December 1, 2000 and January 15, 2001 issues, respectively. The
studies were performed at the Texas A&M Veterinary College by Dr. Lisa Howe
on 269 dogs and 263 cats from animal shelters.
The conclusion for dogs was that "with the exception of infectious diseases,
prepubertal gonadectomy may be safely performed in dogs without concern for
increased incidence of physical or behavioral problems during at least a
4-year period after gonadectomy."
Shelters that held puppies long-term encountered problems with parvovirus.
However, the authors of this paper did not conclude that prepubertal
gonadectomy caused parvovirus. The puppies in the study were at an age where
they were susceptible to parvovirus and housed in a shelter environment
where parvovirus can be common; they developed parvovirus for these reasons,
and not because they were sterilized as pediatric patients. (Studies have
also shown that, unrelated to surgery, the longer animals are held in
shelters, the more likely they are to become ill. Shelters that held puppies
short-term did not encounter similar disease problems.)
The conclusion for cats was that "prepubertal gonadectomy may be performed
safely in cats without concern for increased incidence of physical or
behavioral problems for at least a 3-year period after gonadectomy."
Another study addressing the long-term effects of pediatric spay/neuter was
published in JAVMA in the February 1, 2004 issue. This study was performed
at the Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine by Dr. Vic Spain,
who looked at the records of shelter animals (1,842 dogs and 1,660 cats) who
were sterilized as pediatric patients. This study provided follow-up for as
long as 11 years.
The conclusion for dogs was that "because early-age gonadectomy appears to
offer more benefits than risks for male dogs, animal shelters can safely
gonadectomize male dogs at a young age and veterinary practitioners should
consider recommending routine gonadectomy for client-owned male dogs before
the traditional age of 6 to 8 months. For female dogs, however, increased
urinary incontinence suggests that delaying gonadectomy until at least 3
months of age may be beneficial." It is important to note that the female
dogs with reported urinary incontinence remained in their homes and were not
relinquished to the shelter. The long-term Texas A&M study did not find
similar results about urinary incontinence, and another study from 1992
showed a higher incidence of urinary incontinence in female dogs spayed
AFTER the first estrus cycle.
The conclusion for cats from the Cornell study was that "Gonadectomy before
5.5 months of age was not associated with increased rates of death or
relinquishment or occurrence of any serious medical or behavioral condition
and may provide certain important long-term benefits, especially for male
cats. Animal shelters can safely gonadectomize cats at a young age and
veterinarians should consider recommending routine gonadectomy for
client-owned cats before the traditional age of 6 to 8 months."
It should be noted that similar focused studies have not been conducted to
establish the long-term safety of gonadectomies performed at 6 months of
age.
Obesity
Obesity is influenced by a number of factors, and while neutered animals do
have a tendency to weigh more than intact animals, it occurs regardless of
whether the surgery was performed prepubertally or at the conventional age
of six months. A published study in 1991 indicated that dogs did not develop
obesity when they were sterilized at either pre or post puberty. Another
study from 1996 showed that cats can gain weight after gonadectomy, but this
is for both gonadectomy at the traditional age as well as prepubertal.
It should be stressed again that obesity is a multi-factorial problem. Even
an intact animal can become obese if a proper diet and exercise regimen is
not followed. Just as in humans, dietary indiscretions and lack of activity
are the real culprits in this case.
Growth
Many veterinarians erroneously believe that pediatric spay/neuter will stunt
the growth of animals. In fact, the exact opposite is true. This concern
about stunted growth following prepubertal gonadectomy has been refuted by
multiple studies.
In contrast to intact dogs, pups spayed or neutered at 7 weeks of age and
male pups neutered at 7 months of age had greater final radius and ulna
lengths. The removal of hormonal influences on the growth plates of the long
bones results in delayed closure, resulting in bones that are actually a
little longer. However, no clinical significance to this difference in size
has been found.
In cats, although prepubertal gonadectomy had a similar effect of delayed
closure of the growth plates, this did not lead to clinically significant
differences in the final length of the long bones.
Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture
In humans, cranial cruciate rupture (CCL) is more common in women than men
and may be more likely to occur during certain phases of the menstrual
cycle, which may be due to a hormonal effect on joint stability (Root
Kustritz). Reported incidence of rupture of the CCL in dogs is 1.8%, and
this is reportedly more common in sterilized female and male dogs than in
intact dogs (Root Kustritz).
The exact cause and effect relationship has not yet been defined, but in
addition to the suspected hormonal influence, heredity, body weight, and
body condition score may all play a role in CCL rupture (Root Kustritz).
There have not been any studies that have shown that delayed closure of the
growth plates of the long bones results in asynchrony and/or abnormalities
in joint formation as a cause of CCL rupture in dogs.
Hip Dysplasia
Long term studies have looked at the incidence of hip dysplasia in dogs and
the association of hip dysplasia with pediatric spay/neuter (Howe, personal
communication). The reported incidence of hip dysplasia is 1.7% with an
increased incidence in large and giant-breed dogs (Root Kustritz). In the
long term Cornell study, puppies that underwent pediatric spay/neuter before
5.5 months of age had an increased incidence of hip dysplasia. However, an
additional finding of this study was that dogs that were gonadectomized at
the traditional age were three times more likely to be euthanized for the
hip dysplasia as compared to the early gonadectomized group. The authors
suggest that early age gonadectomy may be associated with a less severe form
of hip dysplasia (Howe, personal communication).
Behavior
The effects of pediatric spaying and neutering on behavior remain largely
unknown. Sterilization and the subsequent decrease in related hormones have
been correlated with a decrease in gender-specific behaviors. Neutering at
any age reduces the urge of male animals to spray urine to mark territory,
roam and fight with other male animals. The demonstration of sexual
behaviors in male cats can make them undesirable house pets, and a decrease
in such behaviors is a powerful benefit of having them neutered. Also, the
trainability of working dogs is not altered by gonadectomy and does not vary
with age of the dog at time of surgery (Root Kustritz).
The large Cornell study of dogs sterilized before 5.5 months of age
indicates an increase in noise phobias and sexual behaviors and a decrease
in escaping, separation anxiety, and urination in the house when frightened
(Spain, Scarlett, Houpt, 2004). However, a different study showed no
difference in the incidence of overall or specific behavioral problems
between early-age and traditional-age sterilization (Howe, 2001).
There is some early evidence that animals that are gonadectomized at 7 weeks
or 7 months of age are more active and excitable, and that male and female
cats may be more affectionate than those left intact, but this is a fairly
subjective observation that requires more research to substantiate. There
does not appear to be any clinical significance to any observed behavioral
differences.
Lower Urinary Tract Disease
Pediatric spay/neuter has not been found to contribute to a higher rate of
urinary tract obstructions in male cats. Studies have been conducted on male
cats to determine the incidence of urinary tract obstructions in all
populations. It was found that the diameter of the penile urethra did not
vary between animals neutered at 7 weeks or 7 months of age or from intact
male cats.
It was originally believed that castrated cats had a higher incidence of
urinary tract blockages, but this is not the case. The penis in male dogs
castrated at 7 weeks of age is smaller as is the os penis, and preputial
development is juvenile in comparison with dogs castrated at 7 months of age
or left intact, but there has been no clinical significance attached to

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Feral cat problem addressed with catch/release plan




Hundreds of feral cats roam the woods and stay behind restaurants and
horse farms throughout the Township of West Milford, creating a
problem that the West Milford Animal Shelter Society WMASS with
endorsement by the Township Council is addressing.

The Council has introduced an ordinance allowing for a "Trap, Neuter,
Return" (TNR) program for feral cats. There will be a public hearing
on the ordinance before a final vote for adoption is taken on Dec. 16.

The ordinance describes a feral cat as one who is completely or
substantially unsocialized to humans. "The usual and consistent
temperament of a feral cat is extreme fear and resistance to contact
with humans. Feral cats are (1) born in the wild. (2) offspring of
tame or feral cats and not socialized. Or (3) formerly tame cats who
have been abandoned and have reverted to an untamed state."

--
full story:
http://www.northjersey.com/community/70595177.html

Monday, August 17, 2009

PetPAC's Bill Hemby sued by California

PLEASE CROSS POST

Dear Friends:
PetPAC's "star witness" against spay and neuter legislation is in trouble.
Bill Hemby, Chairman of PetPAC and a chief opponent of SB 250, has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by the California Department of Justice, as part of a nationwide sweep called "Operation False Charity."

The complaint alleges that Mr. Hemby, serving as Director and in various positions of authority in the charity organization LEAP (Law Enforcement Apprenticeship Program Foundation) from 2004 to the present, along with the program's other directors, falsely promised contributors that their donations would be used to operate an apprenticeship program for at-risk youth.
According to the complaint, the program was never operated and no
students were ever enrolled in it. The donations were instead used to pay for non-charity related purposes, including the personal expenses of the charity's directors.

The lawsuit against Mr. Hemby and LEAP is one of eight lawsuits filed by Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. against "charities that 'shamelessly exploited' people's generosity and squandered millions of dollars of donations intended to help police, firefighters and veterans", according to the news release from the Attorney General's office.

Among the charges that the State of California makes directly against Mr. Hemby:

FILING AND DISTRIBUTING FALSE AND INCOMPLETE RECORDS
This cause of action claims that non-program expenditures were not properly disclosed, including one year where out of $372,623 in revenue, only $5,615 was spent on program services (less than 2%).

BREACH OF CHARITABLE TRUST
This cause of action claims that money20was solicited for charitable programs that were never even put in place.

UNLAWFUL BUSINESS ACTS OR PRACTICES
This cause of action claims the defendents (Mr. Hemby and LEAP), from 2001 to 2008, were "making false, deceptive, and misleading statements to donors to induce them to make charitable contributions" and "misrepresented how charitable donations would be used."
Bill Hemby and the COPS connection.
In the same Operation False Charity sweep, the State of California has sued the charity group COPS, where Mr. Hemby is currently the Director of Governmental Affairs. Ironically, the COPS website still contains a link to an interview described as "in this podcast, one of COPS founding members, Bill Hemby, discusses how LEAP, the Law Enforcement Apprenticeship Program, helps at-risk youth seek careers in law enforcement. " The actual podcast20 has been taken off the site.
SCIL has been warning about the fundraising tricks used by the COPS group since 2007, when COPS first came out against our spay and neuter legislation. The COPS area on our website www.PetPACNonsense. com details some of the tricks that the group uses to bring in donations. According to the DOJ lawsuit, donations to COPS in 2006 totaled $11.4 million.
What does this mean for Bill Hemby and PetPAC?
The State of California is requesting judgment against Mr. Hemby and the other LEAP defendants in the form of numerous damages and civil penalties, and a permanent injunction prohibiting Mr. Hemby from controlling or directing the operations of any California nonprofit public benefit corporation. <>
If the State is successful in their lawsuit, Mr. Hemby will presumably be required to either dissolve PetPAC or remove himself from association with the group, since he is currently Chairman of the group, and their sole lobbyist according to the California Secretary of State website. According to the DOJ website, donations to PetPAC in the 2007 fiscal year totaled $424,648.00.
What does this mean for spay and neuter legislation?
For years, we have been warning about the dangers of sending money to, or receiving information from, the special interest groups and individuals opposed to spay and neuter legislation. They consistently misrepresent the spay and neuter issue for their own personal or financial gain, while misrepresenting themselves as "responsible pet owners" instead of revealing who they really are. The fact that the primary mouthpiece for the opposition, Bill Hemby, is now being sued by the State of California is not a surprise. In hearing after hearing, we have seen Mr. Hemby misrepresent SB 250, and have come to expect that any information from PetPAC is not to be trusted.
In fact, we have come to expect that information from any breeder or animal industry group opposed to SB 250 is not to be trusted.

It is ironic that, at the same time Mr. Hemby and these groups have been increasing their distribution of phony charts and spreadsheets pretending that spay and neuter legislation does not work, the actual communities where these laws are in effect keep telling just the opposite story.

In fact, take a look at the following:
* Mr. Hemby and breeder groups have been distributing information and misleading graphs that claim spay and neuter legislation does not work in Santa Cruz. But according to Santa Cruz, the law has "resulted in a 64% drop in shelter impounds"! You can read the story directly from the Santa Cruz SPCA here.

* Mr. Hemby and breeder groups have been distributing information that claims spay and neuter legislation does not work in Lake County, CA. But, according to the Director of Lake County Animal Care & Control, "Since enacting the ordinance our numbers have gone down steadily each year. Our spay & neuter ordinance works! We have no increased cost related to the ordinance, in fact it has saved us money..."

* Mr. Hemby and breeder groups have been distributing false information that claims spay and neuter legislation does not work anywhere it is implemented. But in New York City, where a law nearly identical to SB 250 was passed in 2000, the results have been stellar. A recent letter from the Mayor's Alliance for NYC Animals states "we have experienced a steady decrease in the euthanasia rate over the past five years due to this legislation. " You can read their letter here.

Further reading.
If you want to learn more aboutOperation False Charity and the State of California's lawsuits against deceptive charities, please =2
0 click here to read the Attorney General's press release.
If you want to read the actual lawsuit against Mr. Hemby and LEAP, please click here.
If you want to read the actual lawsuit against COPS, please click here.
____________ _________ _________ __

Now, some great news about AB 241, The Responsible Breeder Act. The Appropriations Committee hearing scheduled for Monday, August 17th, has been waived under rule 28.8, because AB 241 does not incur significant costs for the state. That means AB 241 could be voted on in the full Senate at any time.
So, please visit www.YESonAB241.com
and follow the instructions to call your Senator in support of AB 241 this week.
____________ _________ _________ __

Lastly, here's the latest news on SB 250. SB 250 is going to be voted on soon in the Assembly Appropriations Committee, and then the full Assembly. I will be sending out specific req
uests for action to help it pass in the next few days. Please keep a look out for the email! We need you.
____________ _________ _________ __

Thank you for everything you do as a true animal advocate.
Best regards,
Judie Mancuso
President, Social Compassion In Legislation (SCIL)
A 501(c)(4) non-profit organization focused on reducing pet overpopulation through legislation.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

USA - Important Update for SB 250 and AB 241 from SCIL

Dear Friends:

This email is an update on where the bills sponsored by Social Compassion in Legislation (SCIL) currently stand.

The California Legislature is currently on recess, however they will be back in session soon, and both of our bills (SB 250 and AB 241) will be heard in committee later in August.

First, let me be honest about the primary purpose for this email. We need your help to reach out to all supporters of animal friendly legislation in California, and alert them that these important bills are almost to the finish line! We need dedicated support now more than ever. And, the battle is getting costly, because our opponents are pouring money into California, trying to kill these good bills.

So here's what I am asking:

Please forward this email to at least three people you know in California who love animals. Our hope is that they will visit www.YESonSB250. com and www.YESonAB241. com, fill out easy support letters, and join the thousands of supporters working towards making our state a better place for pets.

Please consider participating in our new 25 bucks for SB 250 campaign. SCIL is run completely by volunteers and has no paid staff. However, running legislative campaigns is very expensive.

You don't have to donate $25... any amount at all will help us fight towards our goal to reduce shelter euthanasia through spay and neuter legislation. Click here to donate.


This is a historic time for animal friendly legislation in California and it's supporters like you who have made it all possible. Thank you!


OK, now for the good stuff... here's the latest on the bills:

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

SB 250, The Pet Responsibility Act, authored by Senate Majority Leader Dean Florez, remains one of the biggest bills in Sacramento today. It has generated more support than any other bill this session. SB 250 simply requires that dogs be spayed or neutered unless their owner/guardian obtains an unaltered dog license when they license their animal. SB 250 also requires that roaming cats be spayed and neutered by their owner/guardian.

SB 250 will dramatically increase the number of pets who are spayed and neutered, thus reducing shelter overpopulation by decreasing the numbers of accidental pet pregnancies. In Santa Cruz County, where a similar law was passed over 10 years ago, shelter impounds dropped by over 64%! You can read about their success by clicking here. Santa Cruz is so successful that they are actually now taking in excess animals from other shelters to help ease overcrowding in those areas.

But the rest of the state is not so lucky. California shelters bring in approximately one million dogs and cats every year, and euthanize (kill) over half, simply because there are not enough homes. This enormous number of homeless pets actually means that every dog born in the state of California today has nearly a 1 in 4 chance of ultimately becoming homeless and dying in a shelter. Two-thirds of the cats entering California shelters are euthanized. And, the numbers are getting worse every year.

According to the State Controller's City and Counties Annual Reports for Fiscal Year 2006-07, California spends $300,000,000 per year housing and killing animals. This is a moral and financial crisis that we can finally begin to address with SB 250.

SB 250 will be voted on in the Assembly Appropriations Committee later in August, followed by the full Assembly vote, and then the Governor's desk. We will alert you shortly when it is time to contact your legislators.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

AB 241, The Responsible Breeder Act, authored by Assemblymember Pedro Nava, limits cruel puppy mills in a reasonable way, by simply limiting owners and breeders to a maximum of 50 unaltered animals.

While 50 unaltered animals may sound like a lot, in reality puppy mills in California today house up to 500 animals. They live in overcrowded, filthy, and inhumane conditions with inadequate shelter and care. Many puppy mill breeding dogs live on wire mesh and never touch the ground their entire life.

AB 241 will be voted on in the Senate Appropriations Committee on August 17th, followed by the full Senate vote, and then the Governor's desk. We will alert you shortly when it is time to contact your legislators.


OK, now for the not-so-good stuff... one of the most frequent questions I am asked about SB 250 is:

Who could be against this legislation?

The answer is: the vast majority of opposition to animal friendly legislation comes from one group - underground animal breeders who fear that new legislation will affect their unscrupulous businesses.

These backyard breeders are joined by hunting groups, fur farmers and other people who make their living off the backs of our animal friends.

The leaders of these groups rely on the most outrageous arguments and claims. They do this in order to rile up animal breeders and animal profiteers, compelling them to call, fax and visit legislators to complain against the bills.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Here are the two primary arguments used by opponents:

Spay and neuter legislation is actually designed to eliminate dogs and cats forever. The supporters of spay and neuter legislation are radicals who do not want anyone to own pets.

Pet overpopulation is a myth. Dogs and cats killed in shelters are unadoptable, and therefore cannot find homes anyway. And, the reason pets are killed in shelters is not overpopulation. .. it is actually the fault of uncaring shelter directors, shelter workers and rescue groups who just don't try hard enough.

It saddens and angers me just to type those words. The idea that the thousands of animal rescuers (including myself) working to pass these bills, most of us whom live with several pets and use our own money to rescue and place others, would want to eliminate pets is the most outrageous, insulting lie I have heard in my over 25 years of animal rescue.

The claim that there is no pet overpopulation problem defies logic. The 500,000 pets who die in California shelters each year are there because the pool of animals born each year is larger than the number of available homes... period.

In Their Own Words

Here are some of the most vocal opponents of spay and neuter laws, and some others opposed to animal laws in general, in their own words (shown in blue).

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

William Hemby, founder of PetPAC, describing who he thinks is behind SCIL legislation:

"...across the United States you have some of these animal rights extremist groups like the Animal Liberation Front... it started years and years ago, if you remember, about throwing the blood on fur coats and all that jazz....

Well now... these people want to eliminate all dogs and cats in California, and so they want everybody else to conform to their society."

As far as I can tell, it was PetPAC's Mr. Hemby who first coined the phrase "Pet Extinction Act" to describe spay and neuter laws. The term has inflamed breeders and presumably increased donations to PetPAC.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

PIJAC (Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council), on pet overpopulation:

The claims of pet overpopulation are "without sound basis" and "intended to alarm the public about an overpopulation problem that does not even exist".

Regarding the enormous number of pets euthanized in shelters "it is unclear where the evidence for such statements comes from, or whether it even exists".

A quick note... PIJAC is the primary lobby group representing pet stores in California, and these quotes are taken from a letter submitted by JK Pedrotti, a Government relations firm representing PIJAC.

Clearly, it is in pet stores best interest to pretend there is no overpopulation problem. If PIJAC will not believe the shelter admission and euthanasia numbers submitted to the State by the shelters themselves, then they will never believe that we have a problem, no matter how many pets we kill each year.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

We the People for Pets, an anti-pet legislation group:

Animal rights is a "staircase leading to pet extinction and total loss of pet owner rights", and spay and neuter laws are being pushed with tactics "used by the Nazi party to dehumanize their targets".

I can't really find words to address this lunatic fringe stuff...

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Nathan Winograd, author and shelter consultant, on pet overpopulation:

"Shelter killing is not the result of pet overpopulation; it is the result of shelter managers who find killing easier than doing what is necessary to stop it."

Nathan states that shelter workers are "content to kill animals" while "hiding behind the myth of pet overpopulation" .

I must take a moment to comment on this. I have spent much of the last four years meeting with shelter workers across California. I have seen their tears as they explain their anguish at having to put down healthy animals every day. I have seen the emotional toll, and I have seen their pain as they come to grips with the horrible task they are faced with every day, thanks to careless pregnancies and reckless overbreeding. You can watch interviews with many of these shelter workers at www.YESonSB250. com.

The claim that it is the shelter workers who are to blame for the number of pets flowing into our shelters, rather than the irresponsible pet owners and breeders who fill those shelters with their careless actions, is callous, shallow thinking.

Nathan is now selling books directly to breeders via a book tour with PetPAC, who advertise "Tour Dates" for him on the PetPAC website. And incredibly, he is now involved with radical underground breeder publications like The Animal Herald, a newsletter based partially on the idea that spay and neuter laws are "akin to genocide of dogs". The founder of this publication, cat breeder Diane Amble, appears to devote a lot of time trying to find ways to use the term "terrorist" in conjunction with the term "animal rights". This image is a capture from the latest edition of The Animal Herald... you can see a cartoon of Senator Florez, Assemblymember Nava and myself, dressed as "angels of death" for trying to pass animal protection laws. Nathan Winograd's contribution to this classy publication begins directly under the cartoon.

Ironically, or conveniently, pet breeders have become the biggest cheerleaders for Mr. Winograd, and they are often seen at the Capitol with a copy of Nathan's book clutched as their bible. Nathan has given backyard breeders an 'out' for a problem they directly contribute to, while blaming those who have to clean up the mess.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Gina Spadafori, regular contributor to AKC (American Kennel Club) Publications:

Pet breeders must "realize that we're all in this together, pet-owners against the forces of pet extinction".

Gina is a columnist and author of pet books. Shame on her for constantly pushing the bogus claim that pet owners are against spay and neuter legislation. The truth is that tens of thousands of pet owners have written and called in support of the bills. Those "pet owners" who come out against these bills consistently turn out to be people only looking out for their own self-interest (the "Me Me Me" crowd).

In fact, according to a 2008 poll by the well respected firm Zogby International, "California voters are strongly in support of a law that would enforce the spaying and neutering of pets." The Zogby poll found that 66% of California voters supported spay and neuter laws, and that after learning more about the laws, a full 80% of the voters supported them. The Zogby poll conclusion? Pet owners overwhelmingly support spay and neuter laws to reduce shelter euthanasias.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

From the scarier side of the breeder community... some breeders refer to violence as a possible answer to what they perceive as an intrusive government in league with animal rights "wackos":

Walt Hutchens, Timbreblue Whippets breeder in southwestern Virginia:

"We need to win as rapidly as possible, hopefully before there is any significant violence. The effect of violence on our chances of victory cannot be predicted." In general Mr. Hutchens seems to oppose violence, but he also slyly notes "By making the AR wars 'interesting, ' it will lead to much more media interest".

Joe Overlease, Cocker Spaniel breeder from Missouri who ships dogs nationwide:

"Every Breeder I know is armed to the teeth as well, hot lead is a good motivator even for the most sincere AR wacko... Welcome to Fort Cocker".

Walt Hutchens' writings appear on the website Rexano.org, which is devoted to keeping exotic animal ownership legal and unregulated. Rexano also offers the opportunity to download posters and purchase bumper stickers:

The posters are by artist Tamara Burnett, who envisions pet legislation as a PETA / HSUS plot to remove dogs and cats from society. Tamara has painted her depiction of me on the broom, wearing a PETA hat and stealing dogs from children. I included these posters to illustrate just how far out these folks are (and how much time they have on their hands!).

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

California Farm Bureau Federation writing about SB 250:

"Not all counties have provisions for intact [differential] licenses, and the amendments do not seem to allow dog owners to obtain an intact license if their cities or counties do not have them. This would force... dog owners residing in these counties to sterilize their dogs."

This statement from the Farm Bureau is completely wrong, and is one of the many scare tactics being used by opponents of animal legislation. In fact, statewide law for differential licenses have been in existence since 1973 (Food and Ag code 30804.5).

"Farm Bureau is also concerned about the potential for... actions taken against our members who may leave their dogs in the back of a pickup truck."

This is another example of outlandish hyperbole meant to scare Legislators. There is no provision in SB 250 that would allow animal control to seize a dog, and in the several California communities where similar laws are already in place, these hypothetical events do not occur.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Save Our Dogs, an anti-spay and neuter legislation group:

"...are the supporters trying hide the fact that the real goal of the bill is to eliminate all cats and dogs?"

The Save Our Dogs website, registered to someone in Oregon, also provides misleading graphs for download. The site consistently tries to influence opinion by presenting only part of the available data. In my opinion, this group was formed solely to provide misinformation about spay and neuter laws.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

John Yates, American Sporting Dog Alliance (in Pennsylvania) , on spay and neuter laws:

"Such is the murderous intent of [this]... movement, which seeks to gradually eliminate animals from American life. Its immediate goal is to force people to sterilize or euthanize as many dogs and cats as possible, and SB 250 was written for this reason."

Unbelievable. The delusions held by some of these people are downright ridiculous.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Last, but not least.

No overview of spay and neuter law opponents would be complete without mentioning the Oregon group National Animal Interest Alliance (NAIA). This group is front and center when it comes to opposing legislation that helps any type of animal, whether it is spay & neuter laws, curbs on puppy mills, or restrictions on animal cruelty.

Who are they? According to SourceWatch, who featured NAIA in their "FRONT GROUPS" project, "The NAIA is a front group and industry funded lobbying organization for animal commerce and agriculture based in Portland, Oregon. Agendas include financial interests, legislation and public perception related to farm animal agribusiness, commercial breeding, hunting, fishing, trapping, fur ranching, animal testing, horse slaughter, rodeos, circuses and entertainment. "



At this point, you may be asking yourself, are all pet breeders bad? My answer is no.

There are many types of pet breeders, including responsible ones who love their animals. Through this process I have been in contact with breeders who do abide by the law, and understand the suffering and expense of pet overpopulation. These breeders do feel that laws are needed to address the issue. And some of these breeders reported death threats when they started expressing their opinions. Today, these good breeders have learned not to speak out.

Ironically, if breeders license their animals and simply follow current laws, SB 250 will never even affect them.

I included all this information about our opponents because I wanted you to know what we are up against as we work to pass SB 250 and AB 241. Please forward this email to at least three friends who care about animals, and please consider making a donation if you can afford it.

Please do not let a group of extremists from around the United States hold back progress for animal welfare in California. We cannot allow the opposition to drown out our compassionate voices with their misinformation and paranoia.

Sincerely,

Judie Mancuso
President, Social Compassion In Legislation (SCIL)
A 501(c)(4) non-profit organization focused on reducing pet overpopulation through legislation.
www.YESonAB241.com
www.YESonSB250.com

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

(US/nj) Mount Olive moving toward spaying of feral cats

MOUNT OLIVE--The township council appears poised to overrule its own
board of health and support a trap, neuter and return (TNR) program.

A straw poll showed the measure passing 4-2 and the ordinance is
scheduled for a final vote at the council's next meeting on Aug. 4.

The program proposes to neuter and spay felines rather than euthanize them.

Mount Olive currently employs an animal control officer, who only
traps cats when responding to a specific complaint. The cats trapped
are held for at least seven days and if they are not adopted, they are
euthanized.

The proposed TNR program, sponsored by New Jersey Animal Rights
Alliance, would set up feral cat colonies monitored by volunteers.
Those volunteers would be responsible for feeding the colony, ensuring
any new cats in the colony are neutered and vaccinated, and tracking
the number of cats in the colony.

--
full story:
http://www.nj.com/news/local/index.ssf/2009/07/miount_olive_moving_toward_spa.html

Greece- Urgent Need Action and Foster Homes - FZ NF

Hello Everyone,

On Monday Kiki from the Shelter met with the Mayor of Athens regarding the Shelter. It was not a good visit. The Mayor is aware that the shelter is holding twice as many dogs are we are allowed and has demanded immediate action to reduce the numbers dramatically.

In the past month more than 15 dogs and puppies have been brought to the shelter, either injured or thrown over the fence. Yesterday two more small puppies were thrown over the fence.

This practice of dumping puppies will continue until the Municipality acknowledges that they need to play a more active role is convincing the inhabitants of Nea Filadelphia to sterilize their pets. The Shelter mission to to help sick and injured animals be well and find them homes and/or return them to their street homes. Our purpose is not to house all the unwanted puppies that are the result of non-sterilizing. We do not have the time, the energy, or the money to continue to do this..

We believe that Mayor Kontos should run an advertising campaign throughout the municipality, go on the radio, on television, and make interviews in the local newspapers, to get the message across that there are laws in Greece that require registration and sterilization of their animals and that his office is willing to stand behind this message and fund the sterilizing of all pets, especially the female dogs.

Contact the Mayors Office at 213-204-9000, fax 2132049006 or email neafiladelfeia@neafiladelfeia.gr and let him know that it is the responsibility of the government to educate its people on proper animal ownership and to provide the funding for a sterilization program in Nea Filadelphia and not to rely on the volunteers of the Filozoikos Nea Filadephia to do the governments job.

Obviously, a sterilization program will take a long time to implement, so in the meantime we are requesting anyone who has a garden and some shade, to foster one of our senior dogs until the end of September. We have many dogs that are very old and sleepy and literally just lay around all day. Some are deaf, blind, and have arthritis. They do not need supervision, playing, long walks or any kind of training. They are not 'house dogs' and do not need to be brought in at night. They need food, water, a shady place to lay down. We will provide food, bowls, house, blankets and any medicines they may need.

If we can find foster parents (until the end of September) for 10 - 20 of our current dogs, we will not have to choose who goes to the street and who is humanely euthanized. We will be able to stay at our maximum capacity of 35 dogs until the end of September when people return from vacation and start adopting again. Right now we have no adoptions and too many new ones coming in.

Please find it in your heart to think about the dogs this summer and figure out a way to help. Ask friends in the city or in the village about adopting or fostering. We are seriously in trouble and need all the resources possible to assist in keeping our Shelter open.

Best wishes,

Helen Siwak, Volunteer
www.friendsofanimals-nf.com
699-591-7437

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

SB250!PLEASE CALL!

PLEASE everyone, call! Today is the last day. You're probably tired of me sending out these alerts, but California is in a crisis right now. Our economy has collapsed. Employees are being paid with IOUs! Regardless of where you stand on mandatory spay/neuter, keep this in mind. Governor Schwarzeneggar plans to cut shelter hold time from 6 days down to 3! Add to that the failing economy, home foreclosures and rescues running out of money and closing down. If this bill doesn't pass, millions and millions of innocent dogs and cats will be killed. Euthanization is on the rise in California as it is:

New statistics from the California Department of Health (CDPH) show shelter euthanasias increasing again in 2008
July 3, 2009 - The CDPH this week released preliminary statistics for the 61 California jurisdictions that report under the Local Rabies Control Activities (LRCA) regulation. The statistics again show an increase in both the number of animals entering California municipal (city and county contracted) shelters, and an increase in total number of animals euthanized in those shelters.
Shelter euthanasia's rise 14% since 2004
According to the CDPH, in the last 5 years the total yearly number of dogs and cats entering California municipal shelters increased from 729,238 to 788,446, an 8% statewide increase. The total number of dogs and cats euthanized in those shelters also rose, from 378,445 in 2004 to 432,576, a 14% statewide increase.

The increase in animals entering shelters and the tragic increase in euthanasia rates is due to:
* People abandoning their pets because of financial problems
* Accidental litters from unaltered pets
* Over-breeding of dogs and cats
* Stray dogs and cats reproducing

SB 250 is a VERY reasonable step in the right direction! It exempts service dogs and feral cat caregivers. This bill will save MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of innocent lives!!!

The animal industry waited to do a last minute blitz of the following Assemblymembers with calls:

Kevin de Leon - Chair
916-319-2045

Jim Nielsen - Vice Chair
916-319-2002

Tom Ammiano
916-319-2013

Charles Calderon
916-319-2058

Joe Coto
916-319-2023

If you do nothing else, call those numbers.

Big ag, breeders, and the AKC are VERY strong and very well funded. They always win! Let's prove them wrong and send a strong message that we will no longer tolerate animal abuse and exploitation!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyEJlzUssis& feature=player_ embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXgQ_4oAm3E& feature=player_ embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSv4wHYP60M& feature=player_ embedded

SUNDAY NIGHT - URGENT ALERT!

We are almost to the finish line! Your phone calls and letters have been great, but please don't stop now.
We still need your help to get SB 250 through this final committee. The opposition to this bill (AKC, Farm Bureau, backyard breeders) are absolutely flooding the Capitol with misinformation. We need the Committee members to hear from good honest animal people!
Please call these committee members sometime before Tuesday night. The final Committee vote is Wednesday morning.If we win, we advance to the full Assembly vote and then to the Governor's desk. If we lose, the bill dies.

Assembly Appropriations Committee
Assemblymember Phone
Kevin de Leon - Chair 916-319-2045
Jim Nielsen - Vice Chair 916-319-2002
Tom Ammiano 916-319-2013
Charles Calderon 916-319-2058
Joe Coto 916-319-2023
Mike Davis 916-319-2048
Mike Duvall 916-319-2072
Felipe Fuentes 916-319-2039
Isadore Hall 916-319-2052
Diane Harkey 916-319-2073
Jeff Miller 916-319-2071
John Pérez 916-319-2046
Nancy Skinner 916-319-2014
Jose Solorio 916-319-2069
Audra Strickland 916-319-2037
Tom Torlakson
916-319-2011
When you reach someone (or leave a message), simply say:
"Hello, my name is, and I am calling to ask that the Assemblymember
PLEAS E SUPPORT SB20250 The Pet Responsibility Act in Committee on Wednesday."

<>
This is the final hearing - please come to the hearing if you can! The hearing is in the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Wednesday, July 15th, in room 4202 at 9:00 am in Sacramento.
Look how far we have come thanks to you:
____________ _________ _________ __

Judie Mancuso
President, Social Compassion In Legislation (SCIL)
A 501(c)(4) non-profit organization focused on reducing pet overpopulation through legislation.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

A HIGH KILL SHELTER OF FRESNO!ACTION NEEDED!

California's notorious central valley animal shelters are said to have the highest kill rate in the entire United States, according to many experts (some say as high as 80%). The Fresno City Council decided to cut the Fresno SPCA's budget a devastating 10%!! As if conditions weren't bad enough?!?!? Add to that Governor Schwarzenegger’s plan to euthanize innocent shelter animals in 3 days, shelter animals will have no chance to live the life they deserve:http://abclocal. go.com/kfsn/ story?section= news/local&id=6880735
PLEASE e-mail or fax the Fresno City Council members and let them know how you feel about this death sentence to innocent animals. Also, please e-mail or fax the city council members and implore them to PLEASE pass a mandatory spay and neuter law immediately in Fresno, just as Clovis did recently (http://www.yesonsb2 50.com/sb250- home.php)
Contact info can be found here:http://www.fresno. gov/Government/ CityCouncil/ Default.htm
Don't forget to cc your e-mail to the Mayor of Fresno:http://www.fresno. gov/Government/ MayorsOffice/ Default.htm
To help the animals at the Central Valley SPCA, go here: http://www.ccspca. com/
Please cross post! Thank you!

Monday, June 8, 2009

PET OWNERS RUSH TO USE NEUTER NOW PROGRAM

Veterinarians on Oahu have received numerous calls from pet ownerseager to get their pets spayed or neutered since the Hawaiian HumaneSociety took back control of the city program last week. "We receivedthe notice by mail, and the next day the phones started ringing," saidDr. Eric Ako, a veterinarian at the Pet Doctor clinic in Kahala."People are calling, asking, and setting up appointments. We receiveda lot of calls. I think a lot of people were waiting."
The Neuter Now program, which was restarted Wednesday, allows petowners to spay and neuter their pets for $50 for male and $75 forfemale animals. Owners can purchase certificates at the HawaiianHumane Society or any satellite city hall and redeem them atparticipating veterinarian clinics, saving hundreds of dollars.
"It is often the incentive that is stated for pet owners to get theiranimals sterilized and thereby reducing the number of homeless animalsor unintended litters of animals that are then a burden as a result ofanimals not being sterilized," said Pamela Burns, chief executiveofficer of the Hawaiian Humane Society.
--full story:
http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090607_pet_owners_rush_to_use_neuter_now_program.html

Friday, June 5, 2009

US- INTERVIEW WITH PETA OFFICIAL BRUCE FRIEDRICH

[Stanford Progressive]
Before becoming involved with PETA in 1996, Bruce Friedrich spent oversix years running a shelter for the homeless as well as WashingtonD.C.'s largest soup kitchen. Once in PETA, Bruce spearheaded some ofthe most success campaigns against fast-food restaurants engaging inanimal cruelty. In 2003, Detail magazine rated Bruce Friedrich as oneof the “50 Most Influential People under 38.” Bruce Friedrich is nowon the governing board of the Catholic Vegetarian Society and was afounding member of the Society of Religious and Ethical Vegetarians.Some of his more radical acts of protest include streaking in front ofBuckingham Palace shortly before the arrival of then-President GeorgeW. Bush and attacking an F-15 fighter plane with “a ball-peen hammer.”
Stanford Progressive: So what is your involvement with the PETA[People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]?
Bruce Friedrich: I am PETA's Vice President for Policy and GovernmentAffairs. Mostly, that entails working on a range of special projects,dealing with the media, coordinating some of our legislative effortsfocused on decreasing the number of animals used in vivisection inlaboratories, and changing the way the US government operatesvis-a-vis factory farms.
SP: When you refer to animal rights, you obviously don't mean theexact same thing as human rights. For instance, there is no voting. Doanimals have inalienable rights, and if so, what are they?
--full story:http://progressive.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/article.php?article_id=377

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

SB 250 HAS PASSED!PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Release Jennifer Hanson
June 2, 2009 916-651-4016
Senate reverses course on spay and neuter legislation
Majority Leader seeks to curb $250 million pet overpopulation crisis, reduce euthanasia
SACRAMENTO – After years of failed attempts to control the pet population and ease the strain
on California’s overburdened shelters and shelter workers, the California Legislature has reversed
course and passed Senate Bill 250 after much debate.
The California State Senate today approved the contentious measure by Senate Majority Leader
Dean Florez (D-Shafter), aimed at reducing the number of unwanted pets in California and
thereby greatly reducing the need for euthanasia, by a vote of 21-16.
California taxpayers spend more than $250 million a year to kill half a million unwanted pets and
house twice that number.
Senate Bill 250, so numbered to represent the high cost of this tragedy, calls on Californians to
spay or neuter their dogs or obtain a license to keep an unaltered animal. “The Pet Responsibility
Act” also requires that cats which are allowed to roam freely be spayed or neutered.
When the same sort of ordinance was adopted in Santa Cruz, euthanasia there dropped by 60
percent. Florez believes the bill will greatly reduce the need for euthanasia and allow muchneeded
tax dollars to be redirected to more positive and constructive purposes.
“I think we can all agree that the quarter of a billion dollars we spend to house and kill unwanted
pets could be much better spent protecting health care for the elderly and education for our
children,” Florez said.
Florez agreed today to exempt hunting and working dogs from the measure and to ensure it will
not apply to an animal escaping its yard for the first time.
“Critics of past efforts to encourage spaying and neutering have said clearly that any legislative
solution to our shelter crisis must focus on owner responsibility, and I believe this measure does
just that,” Florez said when introducing the bill.
“Those who own animals responsibly should be united in support of our effort to cut down on the
killing of pets in shelters, the financial strain current policy has on local governments and the
emotional toll on shelter workers.”
Senate Bill 250 now heads to the California State Assembly for consideration.

Monday, June 1, 2009

SB 250-PLEASE MAKE YOUR CALLS,URGENTLY!


Even if you don't live in California, PLEASE call the senators below and tell them how critical mandatory spay/neuter is to save animals' lives! Leave a message if you want.
The American Kennel Club http://www.akc.org/
and other very rich and powerful organizations are opposed to mandatory spay/neuter. They are mounting their campaign to defeat SB250. They were successful last year in killing a similar bill. This has to pass this year!!! If it passes in California, other states will follow!
We need as many people as possible to call the numbers below and REPOST FAR AND WIDE!

Sunday, May 31, 2009

YES on SB 250!CALL YOUR SENATOR TODAY!

PLEASE REPOST AND HELP STOP THE KILLING!

Dear Supporters: Guess how successful your SB 250 calls and letters have been?

So successful that faxes and calls have been coming in at an incredible rate for the last few days!!
So successful that Senate offices across Sacramento have reported a huge increase in "YES on SB 250!" phone calls and faxes!!
But, they are also so successful that a large number of backyard breeders are now panicking and have banded together to try to defeat the bill.
Responsible breeders produce healthy, purebred animals for show and sale in California. These responsible breed stewards follow the law, treat pets with respect, work to reduce euthanasia, and are ca
lling and writing in support of SB 250.
But, backyard (illegal) breeders are a different story - they sell dogs and cats out of their homes without paying sales and income tax, and without having the proper permits. And now, several organized groups representing these underground breeders have sent out a barrage of alarmist emails and blogs, trying to convince people that SB 250 "criminalizes pet ownership".
The dark side of underground pet breeding
Emails and blogs from groups opposed to SB 250 are reaching thousands of people. They use=2
0falsehoods and hyperbole to inflame readers against the bill.
Actual quotes from the opposition to SB 250:
"SB 250 and bills like it are meant to end all pet ownership in California".
SB 250 is a "free pass to radical animal rights goon squads"
Under SB 250, animal control will "TAKE YOUR ANIMALS AND MAKE YOU A CRIMINAL!"
"Senator Maldonado's office said previou
sly he was getting a lot of No on SB 250 e-mails. For some reason today, the calls are split 50/50. So we need to call, call, call him."
"Senate Pro Tem Leader Darrell Steinberg told us his office received only 94 phone calls for No on SB 250. Call Senator Steinberg today!"
"I am terrified of all legislators, whom I now view as irrational sadists."
SB 250 supporters are "fascists" who "will not stop until no one in our country is allowed to drink milk or eat eggs"
"Americans like me are hated for having a dog, and having been born in the U.S. and not a foreign country."
These groups are begging their readers, including people living out of state, to contact each and every Senator, and repeat talking points meant to scare Legislators away from supporting this reasonable bill.
Why are they doing this? Plain and simple... SB 250holds pet owners accountable by enforcing existing laws. And because many of these backyard breeders are operating illegally, enforcing existing lawsthreatens their underground business. Period.
PLEASE HELP US FIGHT this shameful assault on our Legislature. If you have not yet called your Senator, do it now, without delay.Leave a message if it is after hours. And if you cannot leave a message, try alternate numbers or call again Monday. Phone numbers are shown below.
We cannot let groups who hide their income, evade their taxes and fill our shelters with the results of their excess animal breeding scare our Legislators away from helping animals. SB 250will be voted on this week. Please join animal rescuers, responsible breeders, veterinarians and pet lovers by calling now! And if you have not yet sent an automatic letter (it only takes a few mouse clicks), please use our automatic letter tool.
____________ _________ _________ __

Simply call your Senator, be very polite and professional, and say:
"Hello, my name is, an
d I live in Senator NAME'S district.
I am calling to ask that the Senator to please support SB 250 The Pet Responsibility Act when it comes to the Senate floor for a vote."
Here are numbers for the Senators. If you don't know who your Senator is, you can find out here.
=2
0 < td> Palo Alto =2
0
20
District Senator Sacramento Phone Local Office Local Office Phone20
1 Dave Cox 916-651-4001 Roseville 916-783-8232
2 Patricia Wiggins 916-651-4002 Eureka 707-445-6508
3 Mark Leno 916-651-4003 San Francisco 415-557-1300
4 Sam Aanestad 916-651-4004 Nevada City 530-470-1846
5 Lois Wolk 916-651-4005 Sacramento 916-651-1511
6 Darrell Steinberg 916-651-4006 Sacramento 916-651-1529
7 Mark DeSaulnier 916-651-4007 Concord 925-602-6593
8 Leland Yee 916-651-4008 San Francisco 415-557-7857
9 Loni Hancock 916-651-4009 Oakland 510-286-1333
10 Ellen Corbett 916-651-4010 San Leandro 510-577-2310
11 Joe Simitian 916-651-4011 650-688-6384
12 Jeff Denham 916-651-4012 Modesto 209-577-6592
13 Elaine Alquist 916-651-4013 San Jose 408-286-8318
14 Dave Cogdill 916-651-4014 Fresno 559-253-7122
15 Abel Maldonado 916-651-4015 San Jose 408-277-9461
16 Dean Florez 916-651-4016 Fresno 559-264-3070
17 George Runner 916-651-4017 Lancaster 661-729-6232
18 Roy Ashburn 916-651-4018 Bakersfield 661-323-0443
19 Tony Strickland 916-651-4019 Thousand Oaks 805-494-8808
20 Alex Padilla 916-651-4020 Van Nuys 818-901-5588
21 Carol Liu 916-651-4021 Glendale 626-683-0282
22 Gilbert Cedillo 916-651-4022 Los Angeles 213-612-9566
23 Fran Pavley 916-651-4023 Los Angeles 310-441-9084
24 Gloria Romero 916-651-4024 Los Angeles 323-881-0100
25 Rod Wright 916-651-4025 Inglewood 310-412-0393
26 (Vacant)
27 Alan Lowenthal 916-651-4027 Long Beach 562-495-4766
28 Jenny Oropeza 916-651-4028 Redondo Beach 310-318-6994
29 Bob Huff 916-651-4029 Glendora 626-914-5046
30 Ron Calderon 916-651-4030 Montebello 323-890-2790
31 Robert Dutton 916-651-4031 Rancho Cucamon 909-466-4180
32 Gloria Negrete McLeod 916-651-4032 Montclair 909-621-2783
33 Mimi Walters20 916-651-4033 Laguna Hills 949-457-7333
34 Lou Correa 916-651-4034 Garden Grove 714-558-4400
35 Tom Harman 916-651-4035 Costa Mesa 714-957-4555
36 Dennis Hollingsworth 916-651-4036 Temecula 951-676-1020
37 John Benoit 916-651-4037 Moreno Valley 951-653-9502
38 Mark Wyland 916-651-4038 San Juan Capistrano 949-489-9838
39 Christine Kehoe 916-651-4039 San Diego 619-645-3133
40 Denise Ducheny 916-651-4040 Chula Vista 619-409-7690
Thank you, for all the dogs and cats who are saved through spay and neuter programs and legislation. Their voices cannot be heard, and you must speak for them.
Best regards,
Judie Mancuso
President, Social Compassion In Legislation (SCIL)
A 501(c)(4) non-profit organization focused on reducing pet overpopulation
=2
0 through legislation.
www.YESonSB250. com

Thursday, May 14, 2009

US-OH POLICE SAY CAT ADOPTION POLICY WORKS WELL

A group of cat lovers wants the city to release captured wild catsback on the streets once they have been spayed or neutered. But thepolice chief says the city’s current policy of placing captured catsup for adoption is largely successful. Most residents don’t want wildcats roaming the streets, he added.
Karen Fike, a Westlake resident, was joined by about 40 supporters atThursday evening’s regular City Council meeting in urging the city toswitch to a “trap, neuter and return” (TNR) policy for feral, or wild,cats. She presented council members with binders containinginformation on the policy and proposed legislation she would like tosee the city adopt.
“If you truly want a modern and progressive city in Westlake, then youneed to be willing to take the next step — the next step in doing whatis right for our animals and for our city,” Fike said.
Under the trap, neuter and return policy, a wild cat is trapped,vaccinated and neutered, then released where it was found. Because the city already traps and neuters stray cats, Fike argued changing the policy would not be burdensome.
--full story
http://www.westlifenews.com/2009/05-13/tnrcats.html

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Laguna Woods approves spay and neuter law

Laguna Woods approves spay and neuter law
Shelter coalition member calls decision 'kind of a landmark.'
By ALEJANDRA MOLINA


LAGUNA WOODS – Laguna Woods on Wednesday approved an ordinance that calls for dogs and cats 6 months and older to be spayed or neutered.

The City Council in front of a nearly full audience voted 4-1 in approval of the first reading of the ordinance. Councilman Bert Hack voted against it.

"I thought it was unnecessary for my community because in the last two years we've had less than a dozen dogs or cats picked up by the animal protective services," Hack said. "I don't think it's a problem for my city."

The ordinance the council approved includes an amendment that carries a kind of pet fix-it ticket.

If residents are fined for a first violation and they get their pet spayed or neutered within 30 days of receiving that fine, the city will provide a refund.

"It's an incentive program that encourages people to get their pet spayed and neutered," said Mayor Bob Ring.

According to a city report, current local laws prevent dogs from running loose in the city and the ordinance would make it illegal for cats to run loose in the community unless they are spayed or neutered.

Citations penalties are from $100 to $500 depending on frequency of violation.

Ring said he felt they made the right decision.

"I think the community is happy – at least the audience – seemed to be satisfied," Ring said. "Several came up and said 'thank you.'"

Last year, the county Board of Supervisors rejected grand jury calls to pass a mandatory spay-neuter law, but a pilot voluntary spay-neuter program is under way.

Jean Bland, a Laguna Hills resident with the South County Animal Shelter Coalition, found the nearly hour-long comment and discussion interesting – calling the decision "kind of a landmark."

"For him (Hack) it was just a practical issue," Bland said. "(Councilwoman) Cynthia Conners said it's not inappropriate to favor what citizens favor, and it's not a hardship on responsible pet owners and it's not a burden to the city. So she said, 'I'm in favor,' and I thought, wow, there's two interesting ways of thinking."


Contact the writer: amolina@ocregister.com or 949-454-7370

Saturday, January 31, 2009

LETTER FROM A SHELTER WORKER-USA

Education people, EDUCATION!! Let's pray that 2009 spares more lives than the 11 million killed this year...

(do not stop reading until you've reached the end)

A Letter from a Shelter Manager:

I think our society needs a huge " Wake-up" call.

As a shelter manager, I am going to share a little insight with you all. ..a view from the inside if you will.

First off, all of you breeders/sellers should be made to work in the "back" of an animal shelter for just one day.

Maybe if you saw the life drain from a few sad, lost, confused eyes, you would change your mind about breeding and selling to people you don't even know. That puppy you just sold will most likely end up in my shelter when it's not a cute little puppy anymore.

So how would you feel if you knew that there's about a 90% chance that dog will never walk out of the shelter it is going to be dumped at? Purebred or not! About 50% of all of the dogs that are "owner surrenders" or "strays" that come into my shelter are purebred dogs.

The most common excuses I hear are;

"We are moving and we can't take our dog (or cat)." Really? Where are you moving to that doesn't allow pets and why did you choose that place instead of a pet friendly home?

Or they say "The dog got bigger than we thought it would". How big did you think a German Shepherd would get?

"We don't have time for her". Really? I work a 10- 12 hour day and still have time for my 6 dogs!

"She' s tearing up our yard". How about making her a part of your family?

They always tell me: "We just don't want to have to stress about finding a place for her we know she'll get adopted, she's a good dog."

Odds are your pet won't get adopted & how stressful do you think being in a shelter is? Well, let me tell you, your pet has 72 hours to find a new family from the moment you drop it off. Sometimes a little longer if the shelter isn't full and your dog manages to stay completely healthy. If it sniffles, it dies.

Your pet will be confined to a small run/kennel in a room with about 25 other barking or crying animals. It will have to relieve itself where it eats and sleeps.

It will be depressed and it will cry constantly for the family that abandoned it.

If your pet is lucky, I will have enough volunteers in that day to take him/her for a walk. If I don't, your pet won't get any attention besides having a bowl of food slid under the kennel door and the waste sprayed out of its pen with a high-powered hose.

If your dog is big, black or any of the "Bully" breeds (pit bull, rottie, mastiff, etc) it was pretty much dead when you walked it through the front door. Those dogs just don't get adopted.

It doesn't matter how 'sweet' or 'well behaved' they are. If your dog doesn't get adopted within its 72 hours and the shelter is full, it will be destroyed.

If the shelter isn't full and your dog is good enough, and of a desirable enough breed it may get a stay of execution, but not for long.

Most dogs get very kennel protective after about a week and are destroyed for showing aggression. Even the sweetest dogs will turn in this environment.

If your pet makes it over all of those hurdles chances are it will get kennel cough or an upper respiratory infection and will be destroyed because shelters just don't have the funds to pay for even a $100 treatment.


Here's a little euthanasia 101 for those of you that have never witnessed a perfectly healthy, scared animal being "put-down".. ..

First, your pet will be taken from its kennel on a leash. They always look like they think they are going for a walk - happy, wagging their tails.

Until, they get to "The Room", every one of them freak out and put the brakes on when we get to the door. It must smell like death or they can feel the sad souls that are left in there, it's strange, but it happens with every one of them.

Your dog or cat will be restrained, held down by 1 or 2 vet techs depending on the size and how freaked out they are.

Then a euthanasia tech or a vet will start the process. They will find a vein in the front leg and inject a lethal dose of the "pink stuff".

Hopefully your pet doesn't panic from being restrained and jerk. I've seen the needles tear out of a leg and been covered with the resulting blood and been deafened by the yelps and screams.

They all don't just "go to sleep", sometimes they spasm for a while, gasp for air and defecate on themselves.

When it all ends, your pet's corpse will be stacked like firewood in a large freezer in the back with all of the other animals that were killed waiting to be picked up like garbage.

What happens next? Cremated? Taken to the dump? Rendered into pet food? You'll never know and it probably won't even cross your mind. It was just an animal and you can always buy another one, right?

I hope that those of you that have read this are bawling your eyes out and can't get the pictures out of your head I deal with everyday on the way home from work.

I hate my job, I hate that it exists & I hate that it will always be there unless you people make some changes and realize that the lives you are affecting go much further than the pets you dump at a shelter.

Between 9 and 11 MILLION animals die every year in shelters and only you can stop it. I do my best to save every life I can but rescues are always full, and there are more animals coming in everyday than there are homes.

My point to all of this: DON'T BREED OR BUY WHILE SHELTER PETS DIE!

Hate me if you want to. The truth hurts and reality is what it is.

I just hope I maybe changed one person's mind about breeding their dog, taking their loving pet to a shelter, or buying a dog.

I hope that someone will walk into my shelter and say "I saw this and it made me want to adopt." THAT WOULD MAKE IT WORTH IT!