Showing posts with label marine animal rescue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marine animal rescue. Show all posts

Sunday, November 29, 2009

NL-Volunteers Needed for Seal Rehabilitation




There is an immediate need for individuals with a marine mammal background to help with feeding and nursing seals back to health at one of the world's leading seal sanctuaries located in the Netherlands. This is an excellent opportunity for someone who has worked with marine mammals and knows how to feed seals, to enhance their knowledge by volunteering at the sanctuary.






Seal Research and Rescue Center Lenie 't Hart in The Netherlands is overwhelmed with seals. Currently 150 indidividual seals are staying at the center. Practically all are Harbor Seals suffering from longworms, but the season for Grey baby seals is approaching rapidly and more seals are expected.

All seals at the center are eventually released but not until a period of 3-6 months of recuperation.
Feeding young seals is not easy. To minimize the stress for the animals and increase their chances of survival experience is needed.

The Seal sanctuary in the Netherlands will pay for your airfare to The Netherlands and provide room and board for anyone who qualifies and has experience feeding seals. All you need is proper travel documents and pocket money.
More information at: http://zeehondencreche.nl/home/stages_vrijwilligers_e.htm


If interested or if you know of anybody who might be interested.
pass on and/or contact me privately wdekok@yahoo.com

Monday, August 24, 2009

Florida manatees aren't faring too well this year, according to state mortality counts.

While it's too early to tell whether the mortality rate will reach or surpass the 2006 record of 417 deaths in one year, as of Aug. 14 researchers accounted for 324 dead manatees discovered in Florida waters. The deaths surpass the number of manatee deaths during the same time period for every year since 2004.

In January, an annual aerial survey of manatees determined at least 3,807 manatees swim in Florida waters.

According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, 67 manatees died this year from water craft injuries, five from flood gate or lock injuries, five from other human causes, 88 from perinatal causes, 53 from cold stress, 22 from various natural causes, seven verified but unrecoverable carcasses, 67 from undetermined causes and 10 from "undetermined, other" causes.

Lee County remains an epicenter for manatee mortalities. Eighty-eight of the dead manatees this year were recovered from Lee County waters. This year, Charlotte County waters has seen seven manatee deaths to date, while Sarasota County is listed as having nine deaths to date.

From January 1975 to March 2009, 1,205 manatees died in Lee County. During the same time span, 290 died in Charlotte and 212 died in Sarasota County waters.

The perinatal mortalities refer to deaths of immature manatees. Those numbers are running high, too.

In June, the 3.5-foot carcass of a baby manatee, no more than a week or two old, was discovered in an Overbrook Gardens canal in Englewood. The dead manatee bore no prop wounds or other visible causes of death. After a necropsy performed on the manatee, scientists still couldn't determine the exact cause of death because the carcass was too decomposed. However, none of the infant manatee's bones were broken nor did it show any other signs of sustaining severe trauma before its death.

Why the number for perinatal deaths this year is so high remains a question for scientists, said Martine deWit, a researcher with the institute's pathology laboratory. The deaths may be a result of the cold stress, due to harsh cold days this past winter and drops in water temperatures. Manatee birth rates could also be a factor.

"We don't know," deWit said.

With the 20 percent of deaths due water craft injuries, the numbers tend to jump after holiday weekends, deWit said. After a holiday, more dead manatees show up at the pathology lab in St. Petersburg.


For more information on manatees and other marine life research, visit the Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Web site at http://research.myfwc.com/.


E-mail: reilly@sun-herald.com


By STEVE REILLY

Staff Writer
(http://www.sunnewspapers.net/articles/pnnews.aspx?NewsID=443004&a=newsarchive2/082209/tp1ch3.htm&pnpg=0)

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

SEA SHEPHERD:THE RULES

By Captain Paul Watson
“When this ship becomes a democracy, you’ll be the first to know”
- Captain James Tiberius Kirk
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society does not have any chapters or branches in the United States. The Society is headquartered in Friday Harbor, Washington. The official website is www.seashepherd.org and the official MySpace page is http://www.myspace.com/seashepherd . The official Sea Shepherd Facebook address is: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=2235468991&ref=ts.
All other websites, Myspace and Facebook pages are NOT authorized. The official websites for Sea Shepherd International are listed on the homepage at www.seashepherd.org . The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society does not recognize nor endorse any Sea Shepherd chatlines. It is our position that chatlines are counter productive and a breeding ground for gossip, slander and mis-information.
There is no Sea Shepherd California chapter and the Sea Shepherd California MySpace page is unauthorized. Aaron McCollum’s statement on Sea Shepherd California’s Myspace page that he is an official representative of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is false. His statement that he is or will be a crewmember on the next campaign to oppose the Japanese whaling operations in ..Antarctica.. is false.
No one is allowed to solicit funds for Sea Shepherd on any websites, Facebook or MySpace pages. Appeals for funding can only be posted on the official sites.
The use of the Sea Shepherd logo on any website, Myspace or Facebook page is not allowed without permission. Sea Shepherd holds and maintains legal copyrights on the Sea Shepherd logos. Unauthorized use of the logo is forbidden by law. Distortion of the Sea Shepherd logo is forbidden by law. The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society will file a lawsuit against any party that uses the Sea Shepherd name and logo without permission.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society respects and listens to the opinions of legitimate supporters only. We are not interested in criticisms from non-supporters. The definition of a supporter is someone who supports the operations of the campaigns through donations or direct participation as a volunteer.
Captain Paul Watson, the directors of the Society and the crew of the Sea Shepherd ships will not tolerate any interference, gossip or discussion about their personal and private lives.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is not a protest organization and we do not organize protests. We are an interventionist organization specializing in intervening against unlawful activities that exploit marine habitats and wildlife as defined under international conservation law. The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is an anti-poaching organization specializing in opposition to marine wildlife poaching operations.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is NOT an animal rights organization. We are a marine conservation organization. The Society operates Sea Shepherd vessels as vegan vessels because the exploitation of marine wildlife has reached critical levels and the Society sets an example by not consuming fish and not consuming meat products onboard because one-third of the annual take of marine species by worldwide fisheries is fed to domestic livestock in the form of fishmeal. We are not in the business of advocating for animal rights or animal welfare. Our business is the defence of ALL marine organisms from plankton to the whales from illegal exploitation.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society works in alliance with the following:
Surfers worldwide.
Scuba divers worldwide.
National Environmental Police organizations.
National Park Rangers.
International and national conservation organizations.
International and national environmental organizations.
Certified Green corporations.
International and national animal rights organizations.
International and national animal welfare organizations.
International and national vegetarian and vegan organizations.
In the field the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society maintains the following rules
We do not take any action that will cause injury to our opposition. In our three decades of operations we have never caused a single injury.
We operate within the context of International law. In our three decades of operations we have never had a crewmember convicted of a felony while engages in a Sea Shepherd activity.
We do not compromise with the law. If it is illegal we oppose it. We do not discriminate on the application of the law because of nationality, race or belief.

Saturday, July 25, 2009

OCEANA'S CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT SEA TURTLES



Sea turtles have been swimming the world's oceans for more than 100 million years, persisting through natural predators, climatic events and even the mass dinosaur extinction. However, their existence on Earth is now in jeopardy from human threats that are proving to be too much for turtle populations to handle. Sea turtle populations have declined all over the world as humans push them to the brink of extinction.

With the advent of new gear and boat technologies, fishing has become one of the greatest sources of mortality to sea turtles around the globe. Each of the six sea turtle species found in United States waters is listed as either ‘Endangered' or ‘Threatened' under the Endangered Species Act - which means that they may go extinct in the foreseeable future.

Even with protection under the Endangered Species Act, longlines, trawls, gill nets, dredges and other types of fishing gear in and around United States waters kill thousands of turtles and injure even more each year. Other human, or ‘anthropogenic,' threats to turtles include ingestion of or entanglement in marine debris, pollution, coastal development, poaching, vessel strikes, climate change and predation by invasive species.

For decades sea turtle conservation has focused on promoting gear modifications in key fisheries and protecting sea turtle nesting habitats. The efforts have begun to pay off. Some sea turtle populations appear to be in the beginning stages of recovery. For other populations,though the outlook is grim, and more proactive government policies are urgently needed.

It is not too late to get turtles off the hook - but we need to act fast!

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Governor Schwarzenegger signs our seal bill!

Rally tomorrow to uphold the new law!
Thank you to all who contacted Governor Schwarzenegger- -your efforts paid off! After Judge Yuri Hoffman gave San Diego 72 hours to chase away the La Jolla seals on Monday, the governor signed our bill to save them! However, the city must go back to Judge Hoffman tomorrow to ask him to reverse his order now that the law has changed.
We will be holding a rally at the courthouse followed by either a victory celebration or a protest at the beach if Judge Hoffman orders the city to disperse the seals anyway!
When: 8am, Thurs. July 23, 2009
Where: San Diego Superior Court, 330 W. Broadway St., San Diego, CA 92101
The hearing will be in Dept. 60 at 8:30am and is open to the public.
After the hearing, we will head to Casa Beach (aka the Children's Pool) 850 Coast Blvd., La Jolla, CA 92037, for either a victory celebration or a protest if the city begins trying to disperse the seals per Judge Hoffman's orders!
Monday's story was covered in the AP, LA Times, San Diego Union Tribune, and numerous other publications. The UT also did a great editorial.
Can't make the rally but want to stay infomed? Follow our Sealwatch campaign coordinator Dorota Valli and our attorney Bryan Pease on Twitter! Governor Schwarzenegger is now following both and tweeted that he signed our bill!
2) Join us: Bi-coastal foie gras protests!
Join APRL and IDA for protests in San Diego and NYC against this cruel delicacy that is becoming increasingly unavailable due to the efforts of dedicated volunteers like you!
NYC
When: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 7-9pm
Where: Momofuku Noodle Bar, 171 1st Ave. (btw 10th & 11th) NYC 10003
San Diego
When: Saturday, Aug. 1, 2009, 7-8pm
Where: Mille Fleurs, 6009 Paseo Delicias, Rancho Santa Fe 92091
FOLLOWED BY Delicias Restaurant from 8-9pm, 6106 Paseo Delicias
For more info on this campaign see http://m1e.net/c?100352189-Ovn./GnrMEyf2%404448915-WIzV08tAxSHCo.
3) Vote for APRL in the Veggie Awards!
APRL has been racking up victories for animals--from saving the La Jolla seals to banning foie gras to distributing tens of thousands of flyers about adopting a cruelty-free vegan diet! Please vote for APRL as your favorite nonprofit organization in the annual VegNews Veggie Awards!
4) Join us at Comic-con!
Join us for a feed-out of delicious vegan food at Comic-Con--the massive comicbook convention in San Diego. We will be handing out thousands of pro-veg flyers and free vegan food samples for people to try! This is a positive and rewarding way to show people that adopting a cruelty-free lifestyle can be quite tasty! We will be meeting at the Convention Center Trolley Stop on Saturday and Sunday, July 25th and 26th from 10am to 6pm. Email us to sign up for a shift!
As always, more information is available on our calendar at http://m1e.net/c?100352189-CQKy6yTMugdf2%404448916-T/UF1y2p44kPQ.

Monday, July 20, 2009

THE BENEFITS OF MARINE RESERVES CAMPAIGN! NEW ZEALAND



Where marine reserves have been established, there are many benefits for the environment and for all of us to enjoy:

Crayfish, Photo: Ian Skipworth
Crayfish Flourishing
The number and size of crayfish has increased significantly inside some of our marine reserves (e.g. Te Angiangi, Tonga Island, Piopiotahi reserves).
At Te Whanganui-a-Hei Marine Reserve, crayfish are 15 times more abundant than those in non-reserve areas.

Jewel anenomies, Kapiti island marine reserve. Photo: Ian Skipworth
Starfish, Snapper & Sea Squirts Thriving
By not taking marine life inside marine reserves, food webs and habitats can return to more natural states. At Cape Rodney-Okakari Point Marine Reserve, increasing numbers of crayfish and snapper are eating kina, whose number had exploded along the heavily fished coast and reduced the abundance of seaweed, which they eat. With fewer kina, seaweeds and other creatures living on and around it, such as starfish, sponges, byrozoans and ascidians, have bounced back.
To read more,please visit the website:

Friday, July 17, 2009

Ian Campbell Calls for Boycott of Japanese Bid for the 2016 Olympics

eIan Campbell Calls for Boycott of Japanese Bid for the 2016 Olympics

Sea Shepherd Advisor Calls Japanese Dolphin Slaughter a “Travesty”
Former Australian Senator and Environment Minister Ian Campbell is calling for a boycott of Tokyo's bid for the 2016 Olympics, in protest at Japan's alleged annual slaughter of 23,000 dolphins.

Ian Campbell is now an advisor to the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.



From the Melbourne Age

Boycott Japan Olympics bid: ex-minister

July 15, 2009 - Former federal environment minister Ian Campbell wants a boycott of Tokyo's bid for the 2016 Olympics, in protest at Japan's alleged annual slaughter of 23,000 dolphins.

Allowing Japan to host the Summer Games only 300 nautical miles from Taiji, the Japanese port where the killings occur, would be a "travesty", Mr Campbell says.

"Japan is trying to pitch its bid for the 2016 Summer Games as a `Green Olympics' whilst just across the bay one of the greatest acts of environmental vandalism on our planet paints the waters red," he said in a statement on Wednesday.

The dolphin killing allegedly occurs every September off Taiji on Japan's south coast.

Mr Campbell was environment minister from 2004 to 2007 in the Howard government and joined the International Advisory Board for the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society in January 2008.

An anti-whaling activist, he rejected Japan's claims their whaling efforts were scientific, calling them `sick' and `absurd' in a 2005 ABC interview.

The Sea Shepherd Society says the Taiji dolphin killings have been filmed by the Oceanic Preservation Society for a documentary called The Cove, to be released in Australia on August 20.

Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Chicago have also entered bids to host the 2016 Olympics. A decision will be made at the International Olympic Committee's meeting in Copenhagen on October 2 this year.



The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society first exposed the horrific slaughter of the dolphins in 2003 when our photographs and videos of the massacre appeared on the front pages of newspapers and on the evening news of media around the world. That was the same year that Allison Lance and Alex Cornelissen were jailed for three weeks for saving the lives of 15 dolphins and pilot whales by cutting the nets at Taiji Bay.

Since then the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has been working with Surfers for Cetaceans and the Oceanic Preservation Society to end the slaughter of 23,000 dolphins by Japanese fishermen every year.

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Help End Manatee Harassment in Citrus County Florida!Action Alert!


Each winter, over 100,000 people visit the Crystal River National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) to snorkel and dive with endangered manatees. Inevitably, many of these visitors want to touch the manatees or interact with them in some way.

Manatees are protected under the Endangered Species Act, so grabbing them, feeding, surrounding, or chasing them can be considered harassment and is therefore illegal. But due to budget cuts, there has been a severe staff reduction and law enforcement includes only one full-time officer who divides his time among 5 separate wildlife refuges, so there are many incidents of manatee harassment each year.

Recently, videographer Mark Santa-Maria won an award at an international underwater film competition for his video Choice for Change, which documents several incidents of manatee harassment at the refuge:

See the Video
See the award-winning video that documents manatee harassment at the Crystal River National Wildlife Refuge.

Read an Article
on the issue in the Citrus County Chronicle.



Manatees need this wildlife refuge for survival in the winter! When people try to touch or pursue manatees, they can alter the manatee's behavior in the wild, perhaps causing them to leave a warm water area, which makes them susceptible to potential harm. Also, people can inadvertently separate a mother and calf by trying to touch manatees. Manatee calves depend on the care of their mothers for up to two years, so a calf that is separated from his or her mother could ultimately die without her.

Get more background on the issue

How Close is Too Close When Humans Meet Manatees?
Read an article in the St. Petersburg Times
on the recent meeting in Crystal River, FL

Managing Manatees
Read an article on the manatee harassment
issue in the St. Petersburg Times

What You Can Do:
1. Please Submit Your Comments for the CCP
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is currently working on a new Comprehensive Conservation Plan for the Crystal River NWR. Please ask them to:

Strengthen law enforcement efforts in the areas or create a better monitoring system and prosecute appropriately those people who violate the rules.
Hold tour operators responsible for the actions of their customers and impose fines for those who don't monitor their customers.
Adopt a strict "no touch" policy when it comes to manatees.
Limit the number of people allowed near the sanctuary areas in the winter, unless harassment stops.
Protect the manatees in the refuge by expanding the no-entry sanctuary areas.
Require educational training for all those who may dive at this refuge in the winter.
Acquire the Three Sisters Springs and surrounding lands as refuge property.
Create additional staff positions, including a Public Use staff person and a Law Enforcement Officer for the Crystal River Refuge exclusively.
Allocate special endangered species funds for the Crystal River NWR.
Eliminate the Water Sports Zone in the Crystal River National Wildlife Refuge.
Send an e-mail to: (copy and paste into your e-mail message)
chassahowitzka@fws.gov, joyce_kleen@fws.gov

Your e-mail will be going to:
James Kraus, Refuge Manager,
Crystal River National Wildlife Refuge

Joyce Kleen, Wildlife Biologist
Crystal River National Wildlife Refuge

Suggested subject line: Comments on the Crystal River Management Plan


Thank you for your help on this important issue for manatees!


Additional Contact Information:
Joyce Kleen, Wildlife Biologist
Crystal River National Wildlife Refuge Complex
1502 S.E. Kings Bay Drive
Crystal River, FL 34429
E-mail: joyce_kleen@fws.gov

Action Alert!Whales in Danger!

Urge the Obama administration to reject a last minute Bush administration rule that would barrage whales along the Eastern Seaboard, the Gulf of Mexico, California and Hawaii with Navy sonar.

July 5, 2009

Dr. Jane Lubchenco, Under Secretary of Commerce & NOAA Administrator
cc: NOAA Fisheries Service
cc: President Barack Obama

Subject:


Dear Administrator Lubchenco,

(Edit Letter Below)

I strongly oppose rules, issued by the Bush administration in its final days, that would allow the Navy to harass or injure marine mammals more than 10 million times during naval training with mid-frequency active sonar.

I urge your agency and NOAA Fisheries, which is under your authority, to review and reissue the three rules authorizing the Navy to take marine mammals in its Hawaii Range Complex ("Hawaii") and Southern California Range Complex ("SOCAL"), and during Atlantic Fleet Active Sonar Training ("AFAST") along the entire east coast of the United States.

In issuing these rules, the Fisheries Service relied on the Navy's faulty estimations of harm, and did not meaningfully analyze the cumulative impacts of millions of sonar exposures on populations of marine mammals. In addition, the Fisheries Service did not impose adequate protections for marine mammals as required by the Marine Mammal Protection Act. It is critical that you adopt effective safeguards for marine life, given the extensive, long-term environmental impacts of the Navy's sonar training.

For these reasons, I urge you to reissue the AFAST, SOCAL and Hawaii rules after properly analyzing take estimates, accounting for cumulative impacts, and imposing meaningful safeguards for marine mammals.

I know that good science and environmental protection are hallmarks of the new administration. Please make sure the Navy upholds our environmental laws and protects marine mammals.
Sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your address]

Sincerely,

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

THE INTERNATIONAL WACKY WHALING COMMISSION GETS UNDERWAY IN MADEIRA

Report from Captain Paul Watson

Captain Watson lands in Portugal and is
promptly detained in Customs for four hours



The trip to the 61st annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission became an adventure as soon as the TAP airliner landed at Funchal airport and Deborah Bassett and I walked from the runway into the arrival lounge.

I had no reason to be concerned as I walked up to Immigration Control and handed them my passport. The officer took the passport, ran the electronic strip through the machine and then I saw a serious look cross his face.



“Excuse me sir, there appears to be a problem,” He said.” I think someone else may have a name similar to yours. Do you mind waiting until we process the rest of the passengers?”



So Deborah and I retreated to the end of the line. When we reached the officer, he requested that we follow him to a small room where we then proceeded to sit for nearly four hours as our case was being investigated.



At one point the officer came into the room and asked if I had ever been in trouble in Portugal and then added, “Something about a Dutch ship about 10 years ago?”



“Hmmm, I don’t know anything about a Dutch ship 10 years ago,” I answered.



A few moments later he returned and said, “Excuse me, did you do anything illegal in the 70’s in Portugal?”



“I don’t think so. I uphold laws I don’t break them,” I responded.



“Well, it appears that you did something in Northern Portugal in the 70’s,” He said.
“Oh, they’re probably referring to when I chased the pirate whaler Sierra into Lexioes Harbor and rammed it twice. I don’t think that was illegal, I was never informed of any charges. The Port Captain was going to charge me with gross negligence but I told him there was nothing negligent about it, I hit the ship exactly where I intended to hit it. He told me he could not determine who the owner of the Sierra was and that I was free to go.”



The officer looked at me in disbelief then said, “There seems to be an outstanding warrant for something in connection with an incident in Northern Portugal, please wait here until I can get more information.”



I did not have much choice so I took a seat again. Deborah asked me what I thought would happen.



“Well,” I said, “there are three options that I can see. I get arrested and we have a news story, I get deported and we have a news story, or they let us into Madeira and we will have a news story, and all three options have potential.”



Finally, the officer returned and said we were free to go and free to enter Madeira. Apparently there was indeed a warrant for my arrest, and it had been issued in 1980. The warrant was in connection with out total destruction of the pirate whaler Sierra that we rammed in 1979. On February 6th, 1980, after repairs of over one million dollars, the Sierra was sunk dockside in Lisbon harbor.”



The warrant however expired in 2008.



Deborah and I proceeded through Customs where two friendly officers who were Whale Wars fans inspected our bags and then it was a taxi ride to the hotel to check in for the conference.



The next morning we could see the dozens of Portuguese police guarding the entrance to the hotel. Ironically, the major opponents against Japanese whaling (ourselves) were on the inside. We had booked rooms a year before and as registered guests we could not be ousted from the hotel.



The Portuguese government had deliberately decided to host the meeting in Madeira to make it difficult for protestors to come from mainland Europe. The police had also been instructed to prevent anyone entering the hotel wearing Sea Shepherd logos.
The 61st annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission opened in the same boring manner as meetings in previous years. Dr. Roger Payne sarcastically commented that the same papers and discussions from 1971 would fit right into the present agenda.



On the bright side, the Australian delegation was actually talking tough for the first time since Senator Ian Campbell was Australia’s outspoken delegate to the Commission. The Japanese are muttering about putting Humpback whales on their kill list again. Greenland wants to kill humpbacks. Iceland wants to kill fin whales. Korea now wants to kill whales, Norway wants to kill more minke whales and Japan wants to kill everything that swims and breathes air.



Because Sea Shepherd is banned from attending the IWC meetings, the Sea Shepherd crew coming from Australia, Canada, Great Britain, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Germany and the United States hung around the entrance to the hotel and intimidated the whalers which is always fun.



A dozen members of the Japanese delegation were about to enter the outdoor poolside restaurant when they saw me sitting at the table. It was comical to see them stop, their jaws drop open wide, and then they quickly turned to scurry off in search of another restaurant.



The high point of the day for me was when Dr. Sydney Holt, one of the world’s leading and most distinguished authorities on whales and whaling and the IWC approached me to tell me how much he supported Sea Shepherd and accepted my invitation to become a member of the Sea Shepherd advisory board.



At the end of the day the delegates and approved NGO’s and media headed off in buses for the Portuguese government’s cocktail reception. We of course were not invited, but we stood by the door and saw them off with smiles to the Japanese delegation, one of which snuck a picture of me. The U.S. whaling commissioner Bill Hogarth stopped and shook my hand in public, much to the horror of the on-looking Japanese delegates.



And thus ended Day One. My prediction is that once again, nothing will be resolved and nothing will be decided. Japan will bring up another motion to condemn Sea Shepherd, the whalers will whine for more victims, the whale defending nations will posture and pose and the outlaw whalers will continue to kill whales without any opposition other than that of the Sea Shepherd crew.



It is both ironic and absurd that the only organization that is actually saving the lives of the whales, that is actually intervening against illegal whaling, is the one organization not officially allowed into the IWC meetings.



This evening as the whalers and the anti-whalers rubbed elbows and drank Portuguese wine and port and both mutually criticized Sea Shepherd’s excessive tactics, the Sea Shepherd crew was meeting to organize the announcement in the next two days of our 6th whale defense campaign to the Southern Ocean.



It’s a great thing being the Ladies of the Night of this movement. There are many delegates on the conservation side that agree with us but don’t want to be seen with us in the light of day. But the one great advantage of being banned from the IWC is that we don’t have to attend the boring meetings. We just need to monitor the rules and then head down to the Southern Ocean in December to kick the ass end of the Japanese whalers again.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Japanese dolphin killing in shock new film.

http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,27574,25638029-2761,00.html
Perth Now
Japanese dolphin killing in shock new film
PRESSURE will mount on Broome to dump its Japanese sister city, Taiji, after the Australian premiere of the new documentary The Cove.
American Louie Psihoyos's film reveals undercover footage from the Japanese port of the systematic annual capture and slaughter of thousands of dolphins for sale and consumption.
"It's like an Auschwitz for dolphins," said Psihoyos, in Australia for the documentary's Sydney Film Festival premiere.
"A lot of people who work in this industry feel it's going to put the nail in the coffin of the dolphin hunting industry," said the photographer for National Geographic and director of the Oceanic Preservation Society.
"There's no way it can keep going on, not just because of the inhumanity to animals but because of the inhumanity to man. People don't realise these dolphins they're eating are toxic."
Psihoyos's environmental film is also a thriller, as his team, bankrolled in part by Jim Clark, the American billionaire husband of Australian model Kirsty Hinze, infiltrates a guarded cove next to the whaling town, south of Osaka.
They are intimidated, followed and harassed by townsfolk trying to protect their livelihood.
The team's undercover footage, captured largely by cameras under fake rocks designed by a Hollywood special effects house, is unforgettable. It shows the herding and butchering of hundreds of dolphins in a secluded cove, turning the water red with blood.
Some of the netted dolphins will be sold for hundreds of thousands of dollars to aquariums, but most will be sold as dolphin meat or as a substitute for whale meat.
"The Taiji government and the Japanese government have done an excellent job so far of keeping quiet what goes on in that secret cove," Psihoyos said.
"Now the secret's out, and the question is what does the rest of humanity do."
The documentary has already had one win. Its revelation that dolphin meat is dangerously toxic with mercury, among other things, has resulted in dolphin meat being taken off the school menus in the Taiji area.
The director hopes the screenings at the Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane film festivals will build awareness in Australia, and result in Broome pressuring its "twisted sister city".
"Once it's revealed to Broome, to the people of Broome, what happens in their sister city, they've got to be shocked," Psihoyos said.
"Broome is an eco-destination - they celebrate dolphins and whales there, and here you have the equivalent of that celebration of dolphins happening in Taiji, but it's also this unimaginable killing field."
Psihoyos doubts the film will be commercially released in Japan, and he is considering raising money to have it subtitled in Japanese and put on YouTube.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

US/CA-CITY GAINS MONTH DELAY IN SEAL BATTLE

SAN DIEGO COURTS — San Diego yesterday won a monthlong reprieve in the long-running battle over dispersing a seal colony at Children's Poolbeach in La Jolla. The reprieve could give the state Legislature timeto adopt a bill that would let the seals stay.
Advocates for making the beach more suitable for people were frustrated by Superior Court Judge Yuri Hofmann's decision not topress the city into action, but animal-rights activists were relieved.
“I am very hopeful this delay will help to buy the city time until thelegislation passes,” said Dorota Valli, Seal Watch campaign coordinator for the non profit Animal Protection and Rescue League inSan Diego.
--full story:http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/16/1m16seals234847-city-gains-month-delay-seal-battle/

Saturday, May 23, 2009

ANOTHER DOLPHIN DEATH AT VANCOUVER AQAURIUM

Dolphin dies after only 4 years at Aquariumbringing death toll at Vancouver Aquarium to 35 dolphins!http://www.vancouversun.com/Travel/Dolphin+dies+Vancouver+Aquarium/1617784/story.html
Dolphin dies at Vancouver Aquarium

One of the Vancouver Aquarium's pacificwhite-sided dolphins, Laverne, has died. She'sshown here working with trainer Leonora Marquez.

Photograph by: ian lindsay, Vancouver Sun
VANCOUVER - Laverne, a Pacific white-sideddolphin who entertained crowds for years at theVancouver Aquarium, died Wednesday evening, according to Aquarium staff.
Laverne was about 31 years old, the oldestPacific white-sided dolphin in an aquarium in North America.
A necrocopsy ­ an animal version of autopsy ­revealed she suffered from intestinal torsion, ora twisting of the bowel. It releases bacteria andtoxins into the abdomen, and causes seriousinfections. She also suffered from skin infections and arthritis.
Intestinal torsion is often seen in large-breed dogs.
"Intestinal torsions are unpredictable,unpreventable, and, in most species, untreatableonce the intestine has been severely compromised," Dr. Marty Haulena, staff veterinarian at theVancouver Aquarium, said in a news release.
"Laverne received the best possible medical care,ensuring that her last few days of her life were as comfortable as possible."
Pacific white-sided dolphins are so named becauseof the white colouration on their sides andunderneath, according to the Vancouver Aquarium'swebsite. Adult females can weigh 85-145 kg, and reach lengths of 1.7-2.4 m.
They're usually found in the temperate waters ofthe northern Pacific Ocean from Japan to NorthAmerica, and from the coast of Alaska down to Baja, Mexico.
NOTE; New email address ---> bchorush@gmail.com

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Victory for Whale Sharks At Singapore Resort

Victory for Whale Sharks at Singapore Resort
In the face of growing opposition, the Resorts World at Sentosa (RWS) has opted against pursuing plans to install a major aquarium exhibit designed to display captive whale sharks. Sea Shepherd, in conjunction with other conservation-oriented groups, has been actively opposing this development in Singapore for months via an international whale shark petition. RWS sites these petitions amongst other reasons as affecting its decision to abandon its plans to keep whale sharks in captivity. Over 9,000 signatures have been collected to date (www.whalesharkpetition.com). RWS spokeswoman Krist Boo admits the aquarium may not be able to provide proper care for the creatures which can reach lengths of to 15-meters in the ocean, dive to depths below 980 meters, and migrate thousands of kilometers through open water. Whale sharks are vulnerable to extinction and often die in captivity. Multiple whale sharks have died in recent years at the Georgia Aquarium, raising concerns at efforts to keep whale sharks captive and emphasizing the need to protect the species in the wild from environmental devastation and the growing shark finning industry. Says Captain Paul Watson: “Over 24 whale sharks have died in captivity since they became fashionable aquarium exhibits. I am very pleased to see that World Resorts at Sentosa appears to be changing its decision to keep whale sharks in captivity, and hope that they stick with this important decision. This sets a precedent and will hopefully influence other aquariums to reconsider their whale shark exhibits, which are clearly death sentences for the sharks.”

Monday, May 18, 2009

THE TRUTH ABOUT "TRADITIONAL"JAPANESE WHALING

Commentary by Paul Watson


Japan argues that whaling is a cultural tradition practiced by the Japanese for centuries. As such they believe they have an inherent right to continue this tradition.

But how traditional is it?

There were a few isolated Japanese villages that had killed whales in the past, but Japan as a whole demonstrated very little interest in whaling until a man named Jura Oka made his way to Norway, the Azores, and Newfoundland in the mid 1890's to study whaling. He learned whaling and purchased the equipment from the Norwegians. Hence, modern, commercial whaling began in Japan in 1898 long after the industry had been established in Europe and the Americas.

That first year, the first Japanese whaling company Hogei Gumi with one vessel, the Saikai-maru, killed a total of three whales. The harpooner and crew were hired Norwegians. The company failed, so Oka started a new company the Nihon Enyo Gyogyo K.K. on July 20, 1899 in Yamaguchi. Again the company employed a Norwegian harpooner and crew.

Norway was later to regret all the assistance they gave to Japan to learn whaling. One newspaper wrote this prediction, "Once the Japanese have appeared on the scene in any whaling ground, then the Norwegians will soon be banished from it!"

Other whaling companies began and some failed, but in 1908 the Nihon Hogeigyo Suisan Kumiai was established otherwise known as the Japanese Whaling Association with Jura Oka as the first President. This association in 1908 included 12 companies with a total of 28 whaling vessels and they killed 1,312 whales that year. The average kill for the next 25 years would be around 1,500 whales.

Oka was as ruthless a visionary with regard to the whales as Hitler was to the Jews. He proudly boasted in 1910, "I am firmly convinced that we shall become one of the greatest whaling nations in the world. The day will come when we shall hear one morning that whales have been caught in the Arctic and in the evening that whales are being hunted in the Antarctic."

The Japanese whalers operating between Japan and Korea were largely responsible for practically wiping out the Western grey whale populations. By 1915, only 150 of these whales could be accounted for.

Norway, Britain, the Netherlands, and Germany were the largest whaling nations prior to World War II and they pursued the killing without regard to conservation. The 1930's was the greatest decade of whale slaughter in history. In 1931, 37,438 blue whales were massacred in the Southern Oceans. Japan sent its first ships to Antarctica in 1935. The sale of whale oil helped to finance the invasion of Manchuria and China. In 1937 alone, more than 55,000 whales were slaughtered yielding 3 million tons of animals.

Because of the excessive takes, the Geneva Convention for the Regulation of Whaling was ratified in 1935. Germany and Japan refused to sign, refused to abide by quotas and effectively became the first two outlaw whaling nations. By 1939, Germany and Japan were taking 30% of the world's whales.

The Convention actually declared a sanctuary for whales in Antarctica and called for complete protection of humpback whales, a species that many feared was close to extinction.

Despite all the efforts to regulate whaling, whale kills doubled as more unregulated ships engaged in whaling.

Luckily for the whales, humans turned to slaughtering each other in 1939 and this represented a 6-year reprieve from slaughter for the cetacean nation. After the war, even the whaling nations could look back at the devastation they had inflicted on the whales in the 1930's and the International Whaling Commission (IWC) was formed as an attempt to save the industry from destroying itself.

The war was the most significant conservation measure to stop the slaughter. One third of all whaling ships were destroyed in the conflict. Whaling did continue, however, and in the 1944-45 seasons, 6,000 whales were slaughtered. That number would begin to dramatically increase again after the war.

According to American Secretary of State Dean Acheson in 1946, "The world's whale stocks are a truly international resource in that they belong to no single nation, nor to a group of nations, but rather they are the wards of the entire world."

The problem was that there was one particular American who was a law unto himself in 1946 and that was the American Shogun of Japan, General Douglas MacArthur.

The modern day pelagic whaling fleet of Japan is actually the creation of the United States. In 1946, General Douglas MacArthur proposed the creation of a Japanese whaling fleet to secure protein for the conquered Japanese people. He did so in order to cut down on the United States' costs of transporting food to post war Japan.

It was on August 6th, 1946 that MacArthur signed the directive authorizing two factory ships and twelve catcher boats to begin whaling in the Antarctic for the 1946-47 season.

The deal was that Japan would get the meat and the oil would be turned over to the United States. The United States provided $800,000 in fuel for the ships and received over 4 million dollars in whale oil in return.

The two ships sent down to Antarctic waters were the Hashidate Maru and the Nishin Maru.

This initial whaling venture was ordered by MacArthur without permission of the newly formed IWC, which means that the very first Japanese Antarctic whaling expedition was illegal.

The ships carried American and Australian observers, but they were not there to enforce conservation regulations. Observer David R. McCracken, the author of Four Months on a Jap Whaler, regularly shot albatross for sport from the deck of the Hashidate Maru.

He wrote; "On the fourth shot of the second clip I winged a bird. The extreme end of his right wing dangled helplessly. It did not kill him, and he looked puzzled as he attempted to flap the crippled wing. Gradually he lost altitude. At the end of a long glide he hit the water and attempted to rise again. But he could not do it. A slow death from starvation awaited the poor victim and satisfied I put away my carbine for the day."

McCracken also caught a penguin, named it Penny ,and kept it for his amusement until the bird starved to death. He had tried to force feed the penguin and described it "as a riot to watch."

McCracken skinned Penny and had the pelt confiscated by U.S. Customs on his return to the United States. They let him keep a whale fetus in a jar of formaldehyde.

He did not have much to say about the whale killing except that he observed one harpooned fin whale dragging a 350-ton catcher boat at four knots until he weakened and they harpooned him again to kill him.

Japan killed whales outside of the inspection and the regulations of the IWC until they finally agreed to join in 1951. During that time, the United States profited greatly from the sale of illegal whale oil.

With the help of the United States Japan became the largest whaling operation in the world by the 1970's.

In a recent article in the New Zealand Herald, writer Lincoln Tan states that eating whale meat is part of Japan's cultural heritage. He writes, "So an attack on whaling is seen as an attack on Japanese tradition."

This is the public relations approach the Japanese are using, but it is not a fair one. Whaling was practiced by a very few remote Japanese villages as far back as the 16th Century, but this traditional whaling was isolated, small, and was carried out with nets from shore. Less than 1% of the Japanese people participated in whaling as consumers until 1908 and less than 10% participated as consumers until 1930. Today only a small percentage of Japanese people eat whale meat.

The Chinese should never forget that it was profits from whale oil sold by Japan that provided the war chest to invade Manchuria and China and led to the Rape of Nanking.

Modern whaling is a practice borrowed from the Norwegians because of a ruthless businessman named Jura Oka who hired Norwegians and bought Norwegian equipment to establish commercial whaling. There is nothing traditionally Japanese about modern whaling.

Today, Japan is leading an effort to slaughter more and more whales. Japanese whaling industry spokesman Joji Morishita has publicly stated that whaling is not about the money but about pride. Morishita vows that Japan will never surrender to the anti-whaling views of non-Japanese.

The brutal killing of whales has become an icon for the Japanese identity. This is not unusual. Japan has always closely identified with blood and slaughter. From the decapitations by the Samurai upon innocent peasants to the suicidal insanity of the Kamikaze, violence and self destruction have been a part of Japanese culture.

It is this killing - this willful slaughter not just of whales, but also of dolphins on Japanese beaches - that has become almost ritualistic. It is this ritualistic slaughter that is traditional.

"We kill therefore we are" is the best way of viewing this identity and it is not a healthy perspective. Japanese history has already demonstrated in fire and blood just how unhealthy this perspective really is.

The Japanese say that we must respect their culture. I can only respond by asking why? What is it about Japanese culture we MUST respect? We can choose to respect the tea ceremony and rightfully so. We can choose to respect origami, ikebana, bonsai, No plays, sumo, Zen, and Shintoism.

We can choose not to respect seppuku, class inequality, kamikazes, and the slaughter of whales and dolphins.

No Westerner, Chinese, Indian or Arab, is under a cultural imperative to accept inhumane slaughter and blood sports. All human beings have a right to disrespect killing of any kind without being condemned or vilified for it.

Japanese defenders of whaling have actually accused whale defenders of being racists for opposing the killing of whales. The opposition of the killing of anything cannot be dismissed as racist. There is no racial or cultural justification for slaughter. None.

Especially for a practise that is not, and has never been, a tradition.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Seal Barrier taken down at Children's pool US CA-Action Alert!

Children's Pool (850 Coast Boulevard) offers a walkway vantage point, a cement walkway with a protected guard rail that allows tourists and locals to basically walk out into the ocean and experience the sounds of the waves crashing. The walkway also provides a fantastic vantage point for the seals that have taken over this beach originally designed as a play area for children. Perhaps its protected cove location appeals to the water mammals much as it was designed for youth.
An article published in the San Diego Union newspaper, Harbor Seals in the Children's Pool, delved into the issues surrounding the location and the seals frequenting this beach. San Diego City Council voted to investigate an attempt to reduce the number of harbor seals that use the small pocket beach to rest, reproduce and molt, a behavior also known as "hauling-out. " San Diego Animal Advocates, the Institute for Animal Rights Law, the International Society and private citizen Marjane Aalam filed a lawsuit against the City of San Diego in reaction to the vote.
Children's Pool in La Jolla, a region of the city of San Diego, was once a coastal bluff called Seal Rock Point. Its features included a shallow water plus a large offshore rock called Seal Rock. La Jolla philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps donated the funds in 1931 to build a sea wall was in an attempt to close off the channel and create a safe bathing area for children. Seals began using the beach as a winter haul-out site during the 1970s. Seals and people shared the beach until 1997 when high bacteria levels from the seals' excrement deemed this beach unsafe for human use. It was roped off and seals have dramatically increased in numbers, dashing any hope of people gaining access to their once beloved Children's Pool and play beach. Children's Pool Beach offers the closest look at wild harbor seals anywhere on the west coast of North America. The only mainland California rookery south of Carpinteria is the southernmost harbor seal rookery in the United States. It offers the harbor seals their only high and low tide sheltered pupping and nursing haul out area. The harbor seal population has dropped slightly in California with one count around 27,500. Places such as Seal Beach 100 miles north of La Jolla in Orange County have tried to attract seals back to a place that even honored the seals by naming its city after the seals, cannot get them back again. Up to 100,000 visitors per month flock to Children's Pool Beach in the summer months, walking along the causeway with its vantage point to study the seal behavior up close.

SAN DIEGO -- A rope barrier that protects seals from humans at the Children's Pool in La Jolla was taken down Friday, 10News reported.
The removal was done because it is the end of seal pupping season.
The move to remove the barrier may likely add to the controversy surrounding the Children's Pool for decades.
Seal advocates are fighting to keep the Children's Pool as a seals-only area.
However, opponents say the seals need to be removed and the beach should be dredged for people to use.
http://www.10news. com/news/ 19474591/ detail.html
Babcock's Amazon.com Store

All of the following email addresses are @sandiego.gov
Councilmember Sherri Lightner E-mail: sherrilightner@ sandiego. gov

Council President Pro Tem Kevin Faulconer E-mail: kevinfaulconer@ sandiego. gov

Councilmember Todd Gloria E-mail: toddgloria@sandiego .gov

Councilmember Tony Young E-mail: anthonyyoung@ sandiego. gov

Councilmember Carl DeMaio E-mail: carldemaio@sandiego .gov

Councilmember Donna Frye E-mail: donnafrye@sandiego. gov

Councilmember Marti Emerald E-mail: martiemerald@ sandiego. gov

Council President Ben Hueso E-mail: benhueso@sandiego. gov

Saturday, May 9, 2009

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD REOPENED ON SEA OTTER CRITICAL HABITAT!

Contact: Douglas Burn (907) 786-3807 or Bruce Woods (907) 786-3695
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed the designation of a total of approximately 15,000 square kilometers of near-shore, shallow waters in five separate critical habitat units for the southwest Alaska Distinct.
Population Segment of the northern sea otter. Since 2005, this population of otters has been protected as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. The comment period on the proposed rule has been reopened and will remain open until July 1, 2009. The Service will hold one public hearing on June 18, 2009, at the Z.J. Loussac Library in Anchorage, Alaska. There will be an informational meeting with a questions and answer session from 7:00 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. and we will accept public comments verbally from 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.
Visit http://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/mmm/seaotters/criticalhabitat.htm to view the proposed rule and learn how to provide comments. A critical habitat designation identifies geographic areas that contain the specific habitat elements essential for the conservation of the species. The designation would have no influence on private land unless proposed> activities there are federally permitted or funded. The physical and biological features believed to be essential to sea otter conservation are those that provide cover and shelter from marine predators, especially killer whales. These areas primarily consist of shallow (less than 20 meters deep), nearshore (within 100 meters of the mean tide line) waters. The Service is proposing critical habitat in five discrete units considered important to the recovery of the otter. From west to east, these are: (1) Western Aleutian Unit;
(2) Eastern Aleutian Unit;
(3) South Alaska> Peninsula Unit;
(4) Bristol Bay Unit, and
(5) Kodiak, Kamishak, Alaska> Peninsula Unit. Sea otters are a member of the weasel family (Mustelidae) and live in the nearshore waters along the North Pacific Ocean. They are the smallest marine mammals, and are most closely related to river otters. Historically, sea otters occurred in near shore waters around the North Pacific rim from Hokkaido, Japan through the marine coastal areas of the Russian Far East and the Pacific coastal areas in the United States as far south as Baja California. The world-wide sea otter population was reduced to just a few hundred animals between 1742 and 1911, due to commercial harvest by the Russian and Russian/American fur trades. Three populations of sea otters> exist in Alaska today. The statewide population is believed to number> around 70,000 animals.
Once critical habitat has been designated, federal agencies that undertake, fund, or permit activities that may affect critical habitat are required to consult with the Service to ensure such actions do not adversely modify or destroy designated critical habitat. The designation of critical habitat does not affect land ownership or establish a refuge, wilderness, reserve, preserve, or other conservation area. It does not allow government or public access to private lands or limit public access to public or private> lands and waters. The Service does not anticipate that designation of critical habitat for the southwest Alaska DPS of the northern sea otter will result in any closure of commercial fishing in southwest Alaska. Sea otters eat primarily benthic (bottom-dwelling) invertebrates; for example, in the Aleutians their diet consists mostly of sea urchins, crabs, octopus, and some bottom fishes. Because of their dependence on benthic prey items, sea otters spend the vast majority of their time in shallow water, typically close to the shore, and this preference is reflected in those areas proposed for critical habitat designation. The Service recently worked with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game to analyze that agency’s commercial fishing database. The results indicated that the species which otters most often prey upon have little or no commercial interest. In addition, the areas proposed as critical habitat, as described above, are not areas where significant commercial fishing occurs. The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. We are both a leader and> trusted partner in fish and wildlife conservation, known for our scientific excellence, stewardship of lands and natural resources, dedicated professionals, and commitment to public service. For more information on> our work and the people who make it happen, visit www.fws.gov.

Monday, May 4, 2009

ACTIVISTS MAKE FIRST ATTEMPT TO CLEAN PACIFIC GARBAGE PATCH




A group of intrepid activists are making a bid to be the first to undertake a clean-up mission to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, also know as the Plastic Vortex.
Project Kaisei will sail to out of San Francisco to attempt to remove 40 tons of plastic waste from the 4 million tons believed to be clumped together in the patch. While others have traveled to the north Pacific gyre to raise awareness about plastics before, Project Kaisei is the first to attempt to bring back and recycle the waste on a large scale.
Read more of this story »

Monday, April 27, 2009

Whaling Ship Sunk Again by Agenda 21 in Norway

On the evening of the 23rd of April, Agenda 21 snuck onto a Norwegian
whaling ship making repairs, flooding the engine room to delay the killing
season. The activists reported - "WE SANK THE BASTARD"

"APRIL 24, 2009
HENNINGSVAER, NORWAY

WHALING SHIP SUNK

ON THE EVENING OF THE 23RD OF APRIL WE SNUCK ONTO A NORWEGIAN WHALING SHIP
MAKING REPAIRS IN THE LOFOTEN ISLANDS IN PREPARATION FOR THE 2009 WHALING
SEASON. TO DELAY THE KILLING SEASON AND TO PROTEST THE CONTINUED ILLEGAL
EXPORT OF WHALE MEAT TO JAPAN WE DISASSEMBLED A VALVE AND FLOODED THE
ENGINE ROOM.

UNFORTUNATELY LOCAL FIREFIGHTERS WERE ABLE TO RESPOND JUST MOMENTS BEFORE
THE SHIP SETTLED ON THE BOTTOM BUT NOT BEFORE THE SHIP HAD ALREADY BEEN
COMPLETELY FILLED WITH SEA WATER AND THE DAMAGE DONE.

FOR BOTH FISHERIES INVESTORS IN TOKYO AND INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS IN OSLO
INVESTING IN THE NORWEGIAN WHALING INDUSTRY CAN ONLY LEAD TO SUNKEN PROFITS.

AS A DIRECT RESULT OF A GROWING INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES WE
CAME TO HENNINGSVAER. WE SAW THE SKARBAKK. WE SANK THE BASTARD. -AGENDA 21"

http://news.infoshop.org:80/article.php?story=20090425165306564

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Sea Otter Acquires 1,000 FaceBook Friends



Written by Jake Richardson



While being nursed back to health, a sea otter was supported by a huge online gathering.
The California sea otter was found covered with oil, and stranded at Sunset Beach in Monterey. It was taken to the California Dept. of Fish and Game’s Wildlife Veterinary Care and Research Center in Santa Cruz. She was named ‘Olive’ while being cleansed of the oil stuck in and encompassing her fur. Oiled sea otters can die from hypothermia because the oil disrupts the furs capacity to retain heat. (Oil is also toxic when ingested). Olive spent about 6 weeks in rehab to get healthy. She was de-oiled using a combination of olive oil, dish soap and warm water repeatedly.


» See also: Sustainable Ecovillage Community in Nick News’ A Kid Off The Grid
» Get Planetsave by RSS or sign up by email.
During rehab a Facebook page was created for her. About 900 fans joined her page and sent get well messages while following her progress. One of the attending vets (Dave Jessup) remarked, “Olive has been a great patient. She has taught us a great deal and will likely teach us much more about the pollution-related problems sea otters face.”

She made a full recovery, and was released back into the Pacific Ocean in early April. Her Facebook page actually gained more friends after the release, and is still active with her fans. A most recent entry states, “As the father of a 14-year-old daughter, I am constantly reminded how quickly they grow up, but this is ridiculous ! Isn’t Olive a bit young for a serious boyfriend? She’s only been free for a little more than a week for crying out loud.”

There are only about 2,800 southern sea otters in California. They are stressed by constant amounts of pollution in their habitats. Sea otters are a keystone species, meaning their feeding habits actually help manage the kelp forests where they live. Without sea otters to eat the species (like sea urchins) that eat kelp, the kelp forests may be diminished to a degree they no longer support other forms of life, like they do in a balanced ecosystem. The keystone species concept was introduced by Robert Paine, a University of Washington professor. This page references the importance of sea otters, ”The return of the sea otter to southern California, for example, is restoring kelp beds and associated marine life there.”

Recently when an extremely rare sighting of a sea otter was confirmed off the coast of Oregon, it sparked jubilation among nature lovers. No confirmed sightings had taken place there for about 100 years.

Image Source: California Dept. of Fish and Game