Saturday, October 10, 2009
Scottish Marine Bill Report calls for changes to protect seals
The Stage 1 Report addresses a number of the concerns raised by Advocates for Animals and other seal welfare and conservation organisations about the suffering of seals being shot in Scotland. The report recommends:
• Including an offence of intentionally or recklessly harassing seals.
• Licences to kill or take a seal should only be issued if there is “no satisfactory alternative”.
• When a licence is issued to shoot seals, its conditions should include: the skill of the marksman, the type of firearm used, and the marksman’s proximity to the target.
• Fish farms that are not fitted with anti-predator nets but wish to shoot seals should explain on their licence applications why they do not have nets fitted.
• All licensees should report the taking or killing of seals at least quarterly.
Although many of Advocates for Animals’ recommendations have been accepted, the report does not comment on the possibility of banning the killing of seals during their breeding seasons.
Advocates for Animals’ Policy Director, Libby Anderson, said:
“The recommendations in the report reflect many of our aspirations for a more robust seal protection regime than was proposed in the draft Bill. Of course we would prefer to see no killing of seals in Scottish waters and there is still the crucial issue of killing during the breeding seasons that has not yet been addressed. Unless the Bill is amended, licences may still be granted to allow pregnant seals or those with dependent young to be shot – meaning that orphaned pups could be left to starve to death slowly around our coastline. We will be urging the Committee to support a number of amendments to give Scotland’s seals better protection from harm.”
Scottish Green MSP Robin Harper said:
"A prohibition on killing animals during close seasons is a fundamental animal welfare measure and is the case for most terrestrial mammals. At present, pregnant and nursing seals are being shot and dependent pups are starving to death or are being left at the mercy of the elements. It is imperative that we bring this unnecessary suffering to an end.
“Therefore, I will be lodging an amendment to the Marine Bill to ensure that licences to shoot seals are not granted during the breeding and moulting seasons of the grey seal or the common seal."
Scottish Labour MSP Elaine Murray, a member of the Committee, added:
"Scottish Labour would like to see greater protection for seals in the Marine Bill. The killing of any seal should be a last resort and only if all other methods of deterrence have failed, and applicants for a licence to kill seals must be able to demonstrate that all other possible non lethal methods have been tried unsuccessfully or would not work.
"We want the Bill to make it clear that a licence to kill will only be granted to people who can demonstrate a high level of marksmanship, using a suitable weapon and in sufficient proximity to the seal to avoid unnecessary suffering. We also believe that when a seal has been shot all incidents must be recorded and reported."
To read th rest visit:http://www.advocatesforanimals.org/content/view/629/696
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Take Action to Protect Scotland's Seal!
That one single bullet has the potential to end two lives. One bullet. Two lives.
However you and I can make a difference NOW. Please give a donation to the LOOK OUT for SEALS campaign and the ongoing work of Advocates for Animals. The Scottish Government is about to introduce a Marine Bill for Scotland and we want to ensure greater protection for seals is included in this Bill. A gift from you will ensure Advocates for Animals can run a public awareness and education campaign highlighting the plight of Scotland’s seals and secure time with MSPs and key decision-makers to ensure they hear the voices of our supporters. With your support, I know we can make a difference in engendering respect and compassion towards animals and ending this senseless slaughter on Scottish shores.
Saturday, August 8, 2009
EU Seal Ban Seen as Threat to Newfoundland Villages
depend on seal hunting for much of their livelihood are already
feeling a sharp economic pinch from a European ban on seal products
that went into effect last month.
For more than 20 years Eldred Woodford has taken part in the annual
seal "harvest" on the ice floes along the coast of Newfoundland and
Labrador, home to more than 80 percent of the country's sealing
industry. But the hunt now brings in much less money than it did only
a few years ago, he says.
To be sure, there are still plenty of seals to hunt, but they are
worth a lot less
--
full story:
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/08/07/world/international-uk-sealers.html
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
CANADA'S GOVERNOR GENERAL RAISES SEAL HUNT ISSUE
Dustin Rhodes
Capital Correspondent
Friends of Animals1010 Vermont Ave, NWSuite 509Washington, DC 20005
Phone: (202) 393-8450Fax: (202) 393-8454
Web Site: <http://www.friendsofanimals.org> www.friendsofanimals.org
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
CANADIAN GOVERNOR-GENERAL GUTS SEAL,EATS HEART
Article from: Agence France-Presse
From correspondents in Ottowa, Canada
CANADA'S governor general gutted a seal slaughtered for her during an official Arctic trip, cut out its heart and ate it to show solidarity with Inuit seal hunters, local media reports.
Hundreds of Inuit had gathered for a community feast in Rankin Inlet in Nunavut, the first stop on Governor General Michaelle Jean's trip to nine remote northern communities this week as Canada's head of state and representative of Queen Elizabeth II.
Jean reportedly knelt above the carcass of a freshly slaughtered seal and used a traditional ulu blade to slice meat off the skin. She then asked one of her hosts: ``Could I try the heart?''
According to broadcaster CTV, Jean said it was "absolutely delicious" and tasted "like sushi."
As she wiped her blood-soaked fingers with a tissue, she explained her support for Canada's traditional seal hunt and trade, which locals fear will be devastated by a European ban on seal products.
The European Parliament recently voted to endorse an EU ban on seal products in protest against commercial hunting methods, although it will only take effect in 2010.
The Canadian government maintains that the traditional hunt is crucial for some 6000 North Atlantic fishermen who rely on it for up to 35 per cent of their total annual income.
Northern Canadian aboriginals are exempt from the ban, but they worry it inevitably affect their livelihoods too. "Once you destroy a market for one group, it is destroyed for all," explained Inuit leader Mary Simon.
Ottawa authorized the kill of 338,000 seals this year, insisting the hunt does not threaten the species. But a slump in pelt prices has meant fewer hunters on ice floes off Canada's Atlantic coast.
Fewer than 65,000 seals were expected to be killed, generating a mere $8.5 million for sealers, a fisheries spokesman said
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
ARE NEWFOUNDLANDERS THROWING IN THE TOWEL?
Commentary by Captain Paul Watson with Ed Smith
I met Ed Smith back in 1976 the first time I went to Newfoundland to oppose the barbaric slaughter of the baby seals. He was then as he is now a reporter, and he is a good one although limited in expression by the dictates of his geographical circumstances.Today he writes a column for the St. John’s Telegram, the primary newspaper in the Canadian province of Newfoundland.He supported the seal slaughter in 1976, of course. He really had no choice. It would have been professional suicide for any journalist in Newfoundland to oppose the whacking of baby seals. Back in the 70’s and the 80’s a Newfoundlander had two choices: support the slaughter or shut up. Compassion for the seals was akin to spitting on the flag.I found Ed to be an intelligent man, despite being a hardcore defender of the slaughter, so I knew that if one day we could crack his faith in the importance of seal clubbing to the culture of Newfoundland that we would finally defeat this rapacious obscenity. Below is Ed Smith’s column for this last weekend and it is a very insightful perspective on how even the Newfoundlanders are giving up on defending this indefensible abomination. If nothing else Ed is a realist, and in this column he is admitting that the seal hunt is defeated.This does not mean that we should ever step down from being vigilant. The bloody cruelty that humankind has perpetuated for centuries against these innocent creatures has not been buried long. The corpse of the sealing industry is still warm and we must continue to hammer the wooden stake of kindness and ecological sanity through the blackened heart of this vampire-ish evil ritual of death. We may have to wait a generation before the culture of the baby killers of Newfoundland and the Magandertal Islands is forever eradicated from the civilized world.But in the meantime, the market for seal products is dead. Only 25% of the Canadian kill quota was taken leaving over 200,000 baby seals alive on the ice and free to live, to swim, to be seals, what nature intended them to be. Most of the sadistic club-swinging thugs that call themselves “swilers” chose to stay at home this year because they could not afford to make their way to the nurseries to inflict misery on the seals.This is Ed’s column from this week with my comments: The seal of disapproval By ED SMITH <http://www.thetelegram.com/index.cfm?cid=275&sc=86> The TelegramI have been a great supporter of the Olympics. Other Half and I spend many hours watching them, summer and winter, every two years. Can't wait for each year to pass so we can climb on the bandwagon or the sofa, whichever is more appropriate, and cheer on our Canadian teams.We even appreciate great performances from other countries. Nothing political about us - unless Canadians are involved. We do refuse to cheer for the Iraqi and Afghan marksmen squads. No, we haven't seen them, but we wouldn't cheer for them if we did. Please don't quibble over irrelevant details.Let's jump ahead to what is fast becoming the great non-event of our times: the annual seal hunt. For those of you who've been dead and buried for the past three weeks, I have to tell you that the commercial seal hunt is deader than you are.Captain Paul Watson: There we have it. Ed has declared the seal hunt dead.You may not like to hear that, especially if you're a seal hunter. On the other hand, sealers know the truth of it better than anyone. They know the price of pelts may buy you enough gas to get out of the harbour, but it sure as hell won't get you back in. The Europeans have seen to that.You do know by now that the EU Parliament has voted for a ban on all seal products, and no, they're not just talking about flippers. Not that many flipper dinners in France and Britain this time of year.Paul Watson: Despite the Europeans eating such disgusting things as diseased livers, horsemeat, and songbirds, they could never lower themselves to eating the flippers off baby seals. "All seal products" means primarily sealskin products. It does not include seal meat. You might as well try to sell cod tongues on the Riviera or fish and brewis in Paris.Captain Watson: I believe that Ed is wrong about this. I have seen cod tongues served on the Riviera. I know it's supposed to be crass to say it even if we are excused for thinking it. But yes, you're right. These are the same European countries for whom a generation of Newfoundlanders and Labradorians bought freedom and paid for it with their blood.Captain Watson: This is the most ingenuous argument that the Newfoundlanders have ever used to defend their brutality against the seals. Farley Mowat is a WWII war hero and he is opposed to the seal slaughter. My uncle Paul Watson was slain in WWII and I know many Canadians who are appalled by the slaughter who served or whose grandfathers or fathers fought in that war. I think it is outrageous to suggest that Canadian soldiers fought and died so that Europeans would respect the barbarism of the seal slaughter. A statement like this is the epitome of arrogance. Ed appears to be saying that the values of Newfoundlanders are more important than the values of the rest of Canada.I know the arguments against that attitude and normally I'd agree. But when I see the livelihood being wiped out of men whose fathers and uncles and grandfathers gave their lives - and would do so again - to preserve the way of life of these same people, my blood pressure starts to rise.Captain Watson: Sealing is an insignificant economic enterprise and this idea of livelihoods being wiped out is ludicrous. It’s all subsidized anyways. Sealing has no place in the 20th Century. World War II was fought to free the world of Nazi tyranny. It had absolutely nothing to do with defending the horrific and savage slaughter of seals. I wonder what my Uncle Ed, who gave his life when hardly out of his teens, would think if he were here today.Captain Watson: I wonder what my Uncle Paul Watson who gave his life in the North Atlantic in his early twenties would think of this arrogant statement by Ed Smith.OK, how long are they supposed to remain grateful? Seems to me to be the same question his followers asked Jesus: how often should one forgive another? Should we expect them to vote against their conscience? No, but we can expect them to listen carefully to our people before taking the word of the likes of Heather Mills or Paul McCartney or Brigitte Bardot.Captain Watson: That’s Sir Paul McCartney to you Mr. Smith and if the Queen of England has knighted him, who are you to refer to him as “the likes of”. What is so damn bad about Paul McCartney? Do you not like his music? Does his being a vegan offend you? The Europeans made a decision to ban seal products because it was the ethically correct thing to do. It is also a little strange to invoke the name of Jesus Christ when justifying the slaughter of what Labrador missionary Wilfred Grenfell once referred to the baby seals as “kotik,” the “lamb of God.” But they didn't, and for that I hold them accountable.Captain Watson: I’m sure that there are European Parliamentarians losing sleep over the fact that Ed Smith holds them accountable.One might have expected that the Prime Minister, out of his great love for this province and its people, might have put up a bit of a stronger argument to the Europeans when he talked to them about free trade last week. But, as he himself said, he couldn't jeopardize other areas of trade with Canada by coming on too strong about seals.Captain Watson: Even Prime Minster Stephen Harper is not so loony as to scuttle a 25 billion dollar trade deal to defend a 7 million dollar industry. The Canadian government spent millions defending the seal slaughter in Europe and they failed because they were defending the indefensible. That shouldn't surprise us too much. The same thing has been done over the years with foreign countries being allowed to rape and pillage our fish stocks. Fish were given away in their millions of metric tonnes in exchange for considerations for goods from other Canadian provinces.Captain Watson: It wasn’t just the foreigners who destroyed the cod and other species. The Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans oversaw this ecological disaster and Newfoundland fishermen did their part to add to the diminishment. Where was the support when I went out in 1993 to chase the foreign draggers off the Grand Banks? Perhaps you were as pleasantly surprised as I when the Members of Parliament voted to have Canadian athletes wear a patch of sealskin on their uniforms during the Winter Olympics next year in BC. Well done, boys and girls!Captain Watson: This was a display of sheer diplomatic lunacy. There was no way in hell that the international Olympic committee was going to allow the games to be used for political purposes. But then our athletes reacted, as did the Canadian Olympic Committee. No way Jose! A variety of reasons were given. One young stalwart stated in no uncertain terms that he would not wear anything that encouraged the killing of baby seals. Wow! Straight to heaven for that bit of animal ethics alone.Captain Watson: Yes, our athletes are Canadians, not club swinging Newfoundlanders, and of course they reacted. These young men and women are competing in the name of Canadians, all Canadians, and not just the knuckle draggers who bash in the heads of baby seals every year who seem to think that all Canadians owe them respect for their barbaric traditions. It goes without saying, of course, that this young man wouldn't be caught dead in ski boots or skates made of leather. Certainly not! None of these athletes will be eating lamb or veal. A side trip to a local slaughterhouse should keep them off chicken and beef, at least for the duration of their stay. They'll just have to eat fish for protein.Captain Watson: Ed, when did you last go skiing or perhaps you never have. Otherwise you would know that ski boots are not made of leather. And although I am an advocate of veganism, there can be no comparison between the slaughter of the seals and the slaughter of domestic animals. The killing that takes place on the ice fields off Eastern Canada is cruel and if an abattoir worker did what these men do on the ice, they would be fired. And Ed, fish are animals also. And one other thing Ed, I know some Canadian Olympic team members and they are, dare I say it – vegetarian. I don't mean to compare these youngsters with seasoned European parliamentarians. The kids are just ignorant. So are the Europeans, of course, but there's less excuse for them.It's been made clear on several occasions that the Canadian public isn't exactly enamored of the seal hunt. Given their druthers, they'd just as soon see everything east of Québec cut adrift. It's all "Down East" to them, anyway, and somewhat of an embarrassment when they visit abroad.Captain Watson: There we have it. In the words of a Newfoundland journalist we have the bold pronouncement that Canadian athletes are just ignorant. You see the definition of ignorance in Newfoundland is anyone who disagrees with a Newfoundlander. And by the way Ed, I was raised in a fishing village east of Quebec. Rebecca Aldworth was raised in Newfoundland. And yes, it is an embarrassment to be confronted by people in other nations over this despicable obscenity called the seal slaughter."Yes, my dear, those horrid little Newfoundlanders and Labradorians are still slaughtering those beautiful baby seals, but we don't have much to do with them, you know."Captain Watson: Gee Ed, you caught my sentiments exactly and I wish we did not have much to do with them but unfortunately the Canadian tax-payers have been forking over the dole to support the quaint and cruel traditions of you guys on the Rock and we will continue to do so because keeping Newfoundlanders in the style they have become accustomed to since 1949 is the price we have to pay for bringing you into the Dominion. If not for Newfoundland, Canadians would not have cause to feel ashamed of the thuggery on the ice every year.But then came the killer of them all. Some people in our own beloved capital city of St. John's were interviewed on the street. They were asked a simple question, "Would you give up (European) wines to protest their ban on seal products?"Captain Watson: This is like asking someone to give up eating something of real value in return for protecting something worthless and outdated.The answers from our fellow Newfoundlanders were the final nail in the seal hunt coffin. Incredibly, all but one said a definite and resounding "No!" No way would they switch to Israeli, or Australian or South African or Californian or even Canadian wines to support the seal hunt. How much can we expect them to sacrifice, after all?Captain Watson: Let me see, Canadian wines, what a temptation that is. Not! French and Italian wines are the very best and the whole world knows it; and what does Newfoundland have to offer? The bloody skins of baby animals ripped off their screaming backs by vicious barbaric killers.Any Newfoundlander with a modicum of common sense knows that the seal slaughter is dead and Ed, you are an intelligent man, and although you find it distasteful to say so, you at least have the integrity to admit that the slaughter has been defeated. How silly are we now in light of that to expect the support of anyone else in this whole wide Earth!Captain Watson: A very profound observation Ed.Silly and stupid to think that we even deserve it.Captain Watson: I have fought this savage slaughter all of my life and I cannot express adequately enough just how relieved and happy I am at this outcome. For the first time since I can ever remember I can honestly say I am no longer ashamed to be a Canadian.
Monday, May 4, 2009
INUIT HUNTERS CRITICIZE EU OVER SEAL PRODUCTS BAN-COMMENTS NEEDED!
The Inuits are trying to hang on to their blood tradition, why do they want to force other people to purchase their bloody merchandize? They should trade their stuff amongst themselves as they've been doing for as long as they exist.
The thing is, they will be meeting with MEP's to try and convince them to be sympathetic to their "cause", so please keep sending letters to MEP's:
http://www.antifursociety.org/ACTION_ALERTS_2009.html
Please politely edit the letter according to what you think about this article.Thanks!
Article:
Inuit hunters criticise EU over seal products banA Canadian Inuit delegation will make an eve-of-vote appeal to MEPs to reconsider plans for an EU ban on the commercial trade and importation of seal products.
The Inuit delegation, from Canada's Nunavut territory will have face-to-face meetings with MEPs ahead of Tuesday's plenary vote in Strasbourg, where deputies are expected to overwhelmingly back the ban.
Despite a limited exemption in the proposals aimed at protecting traditional hunting communities, the Inuit delegation are convinced that the wider scope of the ban will render the exemption meaningless.
One of the Inuit delegates, Joshua Kango, president of the Amarok hunters and trappers association, said he feared a repeat of what happened in 1983 when a commercial trade ban on the import of whitecoat and blueback seal pelts was introduced by the then European Economic Community, which Kango says had a devastating impact on the Inuit community.
" %3Cbr%20 %3E>Another member of the delegation, Inuit-rights activist and lawyer, Aaju Peter called the exemption for traditional hunting an insult to the Inuit community, and attacked MEPs' attitudes as patronising.
"For one, they [MEPs] don't acknowledge the rights of Inuit to earn a living from selling our products. It's like they want to relegate our trade to the past, and us with it, while the rest of the world is allowed to move forward," said Peter. "Why should we accept this form of cultural colonisation?"
The proposed EU ban has put a strain on transatlantic relations with Canada, ahead of Wednesday's EU-Canada summit.
A new Brussels-Ottawa trade deal could net around ?25bn in annual economic activity, dwarfing the economic impact of a seal product ban.
However the proposed ban is an emotive and high-profile issue in Canada, and was a key factor in the Arctic council's recent decision to oppose EU permanent observer status on the body, made up of Canada, Russia, the US, Norway, Finland, Denmark and Iceland.
Despite the last-ditch campaign by the five-strong Inuit delegation, UK Socialist MEP Arlene McCarthy was confident the new law will be adopted on Tuesday.
In an earlier statement, McCarthy, who put forward alternative amendments for a full ban following the defeat of proposals for a less restrictive labelling regime by UK Liberal MEP Diana Wallis, said, "We are determined to deliver this new law, which will be a victory for people power and a credit to the campaigners involved.
"The vast majority of people across Europe are horrified by the cruel clubbing to death of seals and this law will finally put an end to the cruel cull of nearly 300,000 seals a year.
"We have worked extremely hard over recent weeks in the face of heavy lobbying from countries that export this cruel trade. We took a tough line and are happy that the council and commission have backed our call for a ban.
"The original proposal for a weak regime of labelling of products put forward by the Lib Dem rapporteur, Diana Wallis was roundly defeated in committee and we are now on track to get a full ban."
But Peter indicated the Inuit delegation would be working round the clock to influence MEPs' views right up to the vote on Tuesday.
"So far they have ignored the facts that the anti-sealing movement is based on false information, that the seals are not endangered and that we hunt them with respect - they have ignored these facts easily because it is politically correct for them to yield to emotional campaigns and opinions based on images," said Peter.
"But now we are here, and we don't intend to be ignored."
Supporters of the ban will also be out in force this week in Strasbourg, with leading proponents the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) set to hold a Tuesday morning photocall with a giant inflatable seal alongside MEPs backing the ban.
Monday, April 27, 2009
EU NATIONS AGREE SEAL PRODUCT BAN, TRADE ROW LOOMS
Both seal-hunting nations have warned the EU in recent weeks that they could challenge the EU ban at the World Trade Organisation, the global trade watchdog, if it takes shape as currently foreseen.
"Nothing should now stand in the way of this ban being adopted," said an official from the EU's Czech presidency, which brokered a deal this week that will exclude hunts by the Inuit........
http://www.evana.org/index.php?id=43768&lang=en
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Norway threatens action if EU bans seal products

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Norway has threatened to challenge the European Union over plans to ban imports of furs and other products from seals.
The executive European Commission last year proposed banning the import of pelts from seals that have endured excessive suffering while being killed.
"In our view, the proposal cannot be justified under the WTO (World Trade Organization)," Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere wrote in a letter to EU trade Commissioner Catherine Ashton, a copy of which was seen by Reuters on Monday.
"A ban on trade in seal products will set a dangerous precedent in the matter of sustainable harvesting of renewable resources," Stoere wrote.
Canada has also threatened to challenge the EU's proposed ban.
Canada, Greenland and Namibia account for around 60 percent of the 900,000 seals hunted each year. The rest are killed in Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Britain and the United States.
The proposed ban is being discussed by the EU's 27 member states and the European Parliament before it becomes law. Norway, which is not an EU member state, said the drafts being discussed were unacceptable.
"The Norwegian government has decided to initiate consultations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, should the EU take a decision along the lines that now seems to be developing," Stoere wrote.
The WTO's dispute settlement understanding is intended to settle trade disputes when one country says another's action or trade policies violate WTO agreements.
The 15 seal species now hunted are not endangered but European politicians demanded action after finding what they said was evidence that many are skinned while still conscious.
The animals are usually first shot or bludgeoned over the head with a spiked club known as a hakapik.
Russia banned the hunting of baby harp seals last month, and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin called it a "bloody industry."
A European Food Safety Authority report last year highlighted various causes of unnecessary suffering, such as trapping seals underwater where they drown.
It recommended that seals first be shot or clubbed and then monitored to check they are dead before being bled and skinned, to ensure they never regain consciousness during the process.
(Reporting by Pete Harrison; Editing by Farah Master)
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Why Boycott the 2010 Winter Olympics?
Re-posted from My Space Blogs-Captain Paul Watson
10 Questions and Answers on the 2010
Winter Olympics Boycott to stop the
Canadian Seal Hunt
Q#1: Why choose the 2010 Winter Olympics? What connection is there with the Olympics and the slaughter of seals?
A: The connection is that the 2010 Winter Olympics is an international event hosted by Canada and this provides an opportunity to focus international attention on the slaughter of seals on the Canadian East Coast Canada is ignoring the majority of Canadians opposed to the seal slaughter but can they ignore the rest of the world?
Today, where we are in the midst of the largest extinction of species in over 65 million years, people's priorities continue to be defined by social circuses. The Olympics is the largest circus of all. It makes sense to utilize an international circus to focus attention on issues far more important than sports.
Q#2: Will the boycott be effective?
A: Back in 1986, a boycott was called for the World's Fair held in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The event was called Expo 86. The protest was called because of the government of British Columbia's policy of shooting wolves from helicopters. In response to the international protest and bad publicity, the British Columbian government canceled the wolf hunt.
Will it stop the Olympics? Of course not but a call for a boycott as and will continue to get the attention of the Canadian government
Q#3: The Olympics are to be held on the West coast of Canada. What has this got to do with the East coast seal hunt?
A: Canada is hosting the 2010 Winter Olympics and Canada is also responsible for the escalated quotas for seals on the East Coast. Additionally there are plans to have a commercial slaughter of harbor seals and sea lions on the coast of British Columbia The seals are being killed on both coasts. Every year, salmon farmers slaughter hundreds of seals and sea lions to protect the exotic predators they have introduced into the Pacific eco-system. Seals and sea lions belong on the coast of British Columbia and Atlantic salmon do not.
Q#4: Newfoundlanders are quick to respond to the seal protests with the accusation that Sea Shepherd does not protect other species like fish. "Where were you when the cod were being over-fished?" is the common complaint. Where was Sea Shepherd?
A: This is one of the most amusing accusations against us because it reveals how people and the media pass judgment without research.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society was warning both Canada and Newfoundland about the excessive over-fishing and the consequences if it was not brought under control. This was back in the earl 80's. In 1992, Captain Paul Watson brought his concerns about the cod to the United Nations Conference on the Environment in Brazil where he was told by Newfoundland Premier Frank Well's to mind his own business.
In 1993, Captain Watson took our ship the Cleveland Amory to the Nose and the Tail of the Grand Banks where they obstructed and chased Cuban and Spanish drag trawlers from the area. In response, Captain Watson was arrested and charged with Mischief by the Canadian government for interfering with foreign drag trawl operations. He was put on trial in 1995 and he was acquitted despite the Canadian and Newfoundland government's spending over three million dollars in their attempts to convict him.
Since then, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has developed a plan to drop "net-rippers" on the bank to discourage destructive bottom trawling.
In fact the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society actually has more projects involving fish conservation than seal conservation. The accusation that we don't do anything to protect fish is bogus.
Q#5: Former member of Parliament, John Efford, has said to the media that the story of "head hockey" is a lie and a fabrication by Sea Shepherd to libel the sealers of Newfoundland What is "head hockey" and what evidence do you have that this takes place?
A: On page 74 of the book "Over the Side Mickey" - a sealer's first hand account of the Newfoundland seal hunt by Michael J. Dwyer, "head hockey" is described in graphic detail. Below is an excerpt from the book.
"I had heard the anti-sealing protesters say that sealers were barbarians. They were right. You have to be a barbarian to survive it!"
"How barbaric one became depended on how long one was subjected to it. Once, after only a short time into play "head-ball".
"It was like hockey but instead of using sticks, we used our hakipiks to try to shoot the head between two twitching carcasses we used as goal posts.We all took turns in the net. By the time the game was over, eyeballs, teeth, fragments of skull bone and lower jawbones were scattered all over the rink. Darrell won but we all had a great bit of fun."
- Michael J. Dwyer, "From Over the Side Mickey"
Q#6: The Canadian media is portraying the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society as an American group forcing their attitudes onto Canadians. Is this true?
A: No, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is an international group with global representation, including Canada. In fact the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society was founded in Vancouver, British Columbia in August 1977 by a Canadian - Captain ..Paul Watson.Watson was raised in a fishing village in the Maritimes and comes from a family whose roots go back to the early 1700's in the Maritimes. Captain Watson has spent a great deal of time in ..Newfoundland.. and he has been fighting the Newfoundland seal hunt since 1975. In fact, Captain Watson has logged more ice and sea time with the seals than most Newfoundland
sealers.
The history of the opposition against the seal hunt is as Canadian as the hunt itself. Brian Davies, the founder of the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) and one of the first and most consistent opponents of the seal slaughter is also from New Brunswick. The Canadian seal campaign leader for HSUS is Rebecca Aldworth and she is a Newfoundlander born and raised. Farley Mowat, one of Canada's most famous writers and a man who has lived for years in Newfoundland, and now in Cape.Breton, is an ardent opponent of the seal slaughter. Farley Mowat is the International Chair of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.
Canadians who oppose the seal kill are not anti-Canadian... They are in fact standing up for Canada's honour in opposing a bloody cruel horrific needless slaughter that brings nothing but shame to Canada.
Q#7: Canadian and Newfoundland politicians are saying that the harp seals must be killed to conserve the dwindling populations of cod. Is
this true?
We can't blame the seals for the decline of the cod. If the cod are to come back, the answer is to increase the seal population - not decrease it. The primary predators of cod are other fish, the very fish that seals target. When you decrease seal populations, you increase predatory fish populations and therefore cause a further diminishment of cod. Isn't it strange that in 1500 there was an abundance of cod and there were some forty million seals on the East coast? Forty million seals and the fish were so plentiful. Explorer Jacques Cartier caught them in a basket thrown over the side. It was the greed of the dragger owners that destroyed the cod coupled with the incompetence of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. The seals are merely scapegoats for greed and incompetence.
The harp, hood, and grey seals have never been and are not a threat to the survival of the cod. The cod populations were destroyed by human greed and
incompetence.
Q#8: But Canadian government scientists say otherwise. They are the experts, aren't they?
There are scientists and there are scientific whores. Captain Paul Watson has long had a name for the marine biologists who work for the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans. He calls them biostitutes. They are paid by the Canadian government and they are paid to provide scientific justification for political policies. Because of these so called experts, fish species populations have crashed on both the Atlantic and the Pacific coasts. They have a proven record of incompetence.
In 1995, Captain Watson was debating a DFO marine biologist. Captain Watson said that in three years the Coho and the Chinook salmon would crash. The scientist responded by saying, "You are wrong Watson, you have absolutely no idea of what you are talking about. We have the best scientists in the world working on this and I can tell you that they know what they are doing and you do not. You are wrong, wrong, wrong Sir."
And Captain Watson was indeed wrong - he was too optimistic The Chinook and Coho population crashed within one year..
Q#9: The DFO have been telling the media that seals are no longer clubbed. They are shot instead. The Premier of Newfoundlabnd has
said that the club is no longer used and seal are now shot instead. Is this
true? John Efford the former Canadian Minister of Natural Resources said back in 2003 that the club was not used anymore. We proved him a liar then with our documentation although to do so meant we had to break the “Seal Protection Regulations” which makes it a crime to document or even witness a seal being killed.
A: The DFO apparently do not know what is actually goes on out on the ice. This year, Newfoundland sealers were observed, photographed and filmed clubbing seals to death.
And who is this John Efford by the way?
John Efford is a Newfoundland Member of Parliament who was a former Newfoundland Minister of Fisheries. He has used the seals as scapegoats to rise to power just as Hitler used the Jews. In fact it is a good comparison when you look at this direct quote from Efford.
On May 4, 1998, as recorded in Hansard, the transcript of the Newfoundland House of Assembly, Efford had delivered the following address '
"Mr. Speaker, I would like to see the 6 million seals, or what ever number is out there, killed and sold, or destroyed or burned. I do not care what happens to them. The fact is that the markets are not there to sell more seals; 286,000 were hunted and sold. If there was a market for more seals the commercial sealers would be hunting and selling seals. The special allowance was for the personal use of sealers, that they could take six seals for their personal use. What do they do with the pelts, Mr. Speaker, is up to them. They cannot sell them because the markets are not there. What they wanted was to have the right to go out and kill the seals. They have that right, and the more they kill the better I will love it."
Captain Paul Watson compared Efford to Goebbels in the ..Newfoundland.. media, and this comparison to the Nazi propaganda minister was met with a flurry of outraged Newfoundland editorials attacking him for calling Efford a Nazi. How could Watson dare to compare the slaughter of seals to the slaughter of Jews, they demanded.
Captain Watson responded that it was merely the same language and that it was ironic that Efford was calling for a "final solution" by killing "six million" seals. These were his words and not the words of Captain Watson.
Furthermore, Goebbels is famous for saying that if you tell a lie often enough, people will begin to believe it is the truth. This is exactly how Efford operates.
Efford further displayed his ignorance at Dalhousie University when asked why he did not call for the extermination of sharks for eating codfish. He answered that there were no sharks in ..Newfoundland waters, and this to an audience of astounded marine scientists who knew very well that white and Greenland sharks feed on seals and cod and are caught by Newfoundland fishermen.
And as if Efford's ignorance had no limits, he came up with the ridiculous idea to kill two million seals to feed refugees in Kosovo. A spokesperson for the refugees asked, "Was he serious?" When told that he was very serious, the spokesperson politely replied, "Thanks, but no thanks."
Conservation groups were not so polite. He was laughingly dismissed as an "idiot".
This did not faze Efford. "If saving people's lives by providing high protein value meat is being an idiot, then I guess that's what I am," he replied. It was the one thing that John Efford and Sea Shepherd agreed upon.
Q#10: Will the proposal to ban seal products into Europe end the commercial seal slaughter?
A: The banning of seal products by European nations has and will significantly hurt the sealing industry. Pelt prices have fallen dramatically as a result. Canada has responded by spitefully raising the quota by 55,000 seals to 338,000 seal pups. They are now killing seals without any real markets for the seal pelts.Canada is attempting to build markets in China and.Japan, the last of the wildlife barbarian
nations other than Norway, Iceland and Canada... So we must keep the pressure on and we must continue to destroy the markets for this vicious industry and it’s vile products. To do so we must seize every opportunity to use economic leverage against Canada.
– A boycott of the Olympics is an excellent tactic in this great crusade to stop the mindless slaughter of the most innocent creatures on earth – the baby harp, hood and grey seals.
Our objective is to peg the shame of the seal hunt to the prestige of the Olympic games to deliver a clear message - that Canada does not deserve to host the
Olympics until it puts an end to the largest slaughter of a marine mammal species on this planet. Until then we will see the red of the Canadian flag as blood and the white representing the innocence of the seals so brutalized and slaughtered by at the savage hands of Canadian sealers..
Friday, April 17, 2009
The Telegraph (U.K.) Week-end profile on Sea Shepherd

The Week-end Telegraph (U.K.)
Profile
Paul Watson: Sea Shepherd
eco-warrior fighting to stop whaling
and seal hunts
Flying the Jolly Roger, Paul Watson has sunk 10 whaling ships
and is gunning for more.
Richard Grant meets the buccaneering eco-warrior who patrols
the high seas on a relentless crusade to save the whale
16 Apr2009
The black ship is moored on the Brisbane river, taking on provisions for a two-month campaign against the Japanese whaling fleet in Antarctica. Once a Scottish fisheries patrol vessel, it now flies the Jolly Roger and belongs to the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, an aggressive, controversial, publicity-hungry environmental group that physically assaults whaling ships, and has been accused of eco-terrorism by both the Japanese government and Greenpeace.
The volunteer crew, male and female, drawn from a dozen countries and wearing matching black T-shirts, busy themselves on the dock with cranes, drums of fuel, and crate after crate of fruits, grains and vegetables. This is a vegan ship and in a sense this is the ultimate vegan hunting expedition.
Somewhere off the coast of Antarctica, in the storm-lashed, iceberg-ridden vastness of the Southern Ocean, the biggest, wildest place left in the world, the Japanese fleet is shooting whales with explosive-tipped harpoons, winching them out of the ocean still alive and screaming, electrocuting them, processing the meat for commercial sale to the Japanese public, and claiming that it is all in the interests of science. Since 1986 there has been an international moratorium on whaling but it makes an exception for lethal scientific research and Japan uses this loophole to take 1,000 whales a year, including endangered fin whales, humpbacks and pregnant females, from an area of ocean officially designated as a protected whale sanctuary.
The Sea Shepherds, making an equally dubious legal claim, say they have the authority to enforce international conservation laws by attacking whalers. Their tactics include fouling propellers with entangling lines, hurling aboard nausea-inducing stink bombs and cellulose powder to make the decks slippery, and direct high-speed ramming. Since it was founded in 1977, Sea Shepherd has rammed and disabled well over a dozen whaling and illegal fishing vessels on the high seas, and scuppered others in ports by sneaking aboard and opening valves to let in
seawater, and on occasion by blowing holes in the hulls with limpet mines.
On the backs of the volunteers' T-shirts, listed with dates, are the names of the 10 whaling ships that Sea Shepherd claims to have sunk – all without injury or loss of human life, and all without being convicted of a crime in any court of law. Perhaps more surprising, given that the volunteers tend to be inexperienced at sea, poorly trained and extraordinarily prone to bungles, mishaps and disasters, is the fact that none of the Sea Shepherds themselves has been killed in any of their campaigns.
The founder, lord and master of Sea Shepherd is a 58-year-old Canadian called Paul Watson. He sits in the captain's quarters firing off press releases, soundbites and statements from his ever-present laptop and telephone. He has just announced that Daryl Hannah, the Hollywood actress and environmental activist, will be sailing with Sea Shepherd this year. She will be going only as far as New Zealand, well short of the expected clash with the Japanese fleet in the Southern Ocean, but far enough to put Sea Shepherd and the whaling controversy in the global news cycle.
'People say I manipulate the media,' says Watson, who speaks calmly with an undertone of anger and lofty scorn for anyone who doubts or opposes him. 'Well, duh. We live in a media culture so why on earth wouldn't I? What we do is provide the media with the kind of stories they can't resist, even if they really try, and this is how we bring attention to what's happening to the whales, the seals, the sharks and the other marine conservation campaigns we're involved in. The oceans are dying in our lifetime and it's not for want of laws and regulations. The problem is enforcement. Governments are not enforcing the laws, so we have to.
Watson is a bold figure, the nearest thing the environmental movement has to an action hero, and he is revered by his supporters, who include Mick Jagger, Martin Sheen, Uma Thurman, Pierce Brosnan, William Shatner, Orlando Bloom, Edward Norton, Christian Bale and a number of other celebrities, who collectively supply most of Sea Shepherd's funding. John Paul DeJoria, the hair-products magnate behind Paul Mitchell Systems, has raised tens of thousands of dollars for the campaigns and custom-fitted Watson's luxurious sleeping quarters on the otherwise spartan ship. By his desk Watson keeps a small statue of Hayagriva, a wrathful scowling deity, that was given to him by the Dalai Lama with a letter of support.
Watson's staunchest enemies seem to be government officials from whaling nations (Norway, Denmark and Iceland are at it too on a small scale) and other more mainstream conservationists. Dr Sidney Holt, formerly of the International Whaling Commission and a chief architect of the 1986 moratorium, has called Watson's involvement an 'absolute disaster' for the cause: 'Almost everything he has been doing has had blowback for those who want to see an end to whaling. In too many cases, playing piracy on the ocean, and creating danger for other ships, is simply not liked.'
Greenpeace, which has called Watson a violent extremist and an eco-terrorist, will no longer comment on his activities, despite the fact that Watson was one of the founders of Greenpeace in 1972 and the first officer on its early campaigns against whaling and the clubbing and skinning of baby harp seals on the Canadian ice floes.
In 1977 Watson was voted off the Greenpeace board of directors for being generally troublesome, arrogant and difficult to work with, for opposing the incoming president ..Patrick Moore. (who has since gone to work for the nuclear and forestry industries, as Watson loves to point out), and for refusing to apologise for an incident on the Newfoundland pack ice. Watson grabbed a club away from a sealer and threw his pelts and the club into the sea, which was deemed a violation of Greenpeace's non-violent principles, bad publicity and an impediment to the organisation's ability to raise money. Later that year Watson founded Sea Shepherd and the two organisations, despite their shared goals, have been locked into a bitter sibling rivalry ever since.
'I once called them the Avon ladies of the environmental movement, and they didn't like that, but the real problem is that Greenpeace has turned into a gigantic self-perpetuating bureaucracy,' Watson says. 'They spend millions of dollars every year on advertising and direct-mail campaigns simply to raise more money. People feel good about giving money to Greenpeace. But holding up protest signs, taking pictures and "bearing witness" while whales are getting killed in front of you doesn't achieve anything at all, which is why I abandoned those tactics more than 30 years ago.'
In 1975 Greenpeace decided to confront a Soviet whaling fleet in the Pacific. Watson and a cameraman got into an inflatable Zodiac and sped out between the harpooners and a pod of sperm whales, hoping to form a human shield, but the harpooners simply fired over their heads. Then came the defining moment of Watson's life. He has told the story countless times and still gets emotional telling it again: 'They harpooned a female in the head. She screamed, and it's a sound like a woman screaming, and then this huge male slapped his tail on the water and hurled himself at the Soviet ship. They harpooned him and he fell back and swam right at us and reared up out of the water. We thought, "This is it, he's going to slam down on us, it's all over." But he didn't. He pulled back at the last moment and spared our lives, and as he slid back into the water we saw his eye, which was the size of a dinner plate, and in that whale's eye I saw recognition, compassion, empathy, an understanding. Something passed between us and it changed my life for ever.'
Watson has a well-established tendency for bending the truth to his purposes, but the cameraman, Fred Easton, remembers the incident in the same way. It moved Watson to write a 1,600-line poem, which begins, 'Leviathan's solitary eye haunts me still / I am obsessed and driven mad with anger.'
His first taste of vengeance came in 1979, when he went after a notorious pirate whaling ship called the Sierra, which was barred from many ports in the world for violating anti-whaling laws and non-payment of fuel bills. Most of its crew had outstanding arrest warrants, the ship kept changing its flag, and it was thought to have killed at least 25,000 whales.
It took Watson a year to hunt down the ship, and then he rammed it at full speed and ripped open its hull. The Sierra limped into port and its owners spent $1 million on uninsured repairs. Then it sank at the dockside after Sea Shepherd operatives blew holes in its hull with limpet mines. Watson went on to sink three Norwegian whaling ships, two Icelandic whalers in Reykjavik harbour and half the Spanish whaling fleet. So why hasn't he been convicted of a crime? ....
'Because all those vessels were operating illegally and criminals do not generally want to go to court, and because we have the legal authority to do what we do,' Watson says. 'The United Nations World Charter for Nature, section 21, empowers any nongovernmental organisation or individual to uphold international conservation law in areas beyond national jurisdiction and specifically on the high seas.' This is true but nowhere in the charter does it state that these laws can be enforced by ramming, disabling or sinking ships, and nowhere in the world are these activities considered legal.
The real reason Sea Shepherd has been able to get away with so much is that international law is vague and weak and rarely enforced on the high seas, and it is also why ..Japan.. is able to get away with its scientific research claim, and why Norway,Denmark and Iceland are able to ignore the moratorium completely. Watson is also a keen scholar of the law and a shrewd tactician. 'The Brer Rabbit ploy has been quite effective for me,' he says. 'When a country is talking about prosecuting me, I demand to be charged and put on trial and offer to pay my own airfare. They know that I'm going to bring a lot of international media with me and put their whaling programme on trial, and they decide it's better to keep quiet and do nothing.'
In 1983 Watson turned his sights on the Canadian seal hunt. He used his ship to blockade the port at St John's, Newfoundland, and announced he would ram any sealing ship that tried to leave. When the authorities threatened to storm his ship, he counter-threatened to sink it at the mouth of the harbour and thereby create an impassable barrier. Having brought the hunt to a near-standstill and cost the sealing industry millions of dollars, he then sailed away under cover of fog. The next year he returned with Brigitte Bardot and arranged for the famous photograph of her with a helpless, adorable baby seal. There was an international outcry and the seal hunt was banned for 10 years.
Now it is back with a vengeance. This year the Canadian government has issued a quota for 300,000 seal pups to be killed, and Watson will be there as usual to disrupt the hunt. Then he will take his ship down to the Galapagos to hunt hark-fin poachers. As the top predator, sharks are ..vita..l to marine ecosystems. Remove the sharks and you remove the check on the population of secondary predators, which then explode in numbers and wipe out the fish below them on the food chain. We, as a species, are currently killing 100 million sharks a year, mostly for
shark-fin soup in Asia.
Watson is not exaggerating when he says the oceans are dying in our lifetime. Grotesquely wasteful industrial fishing practices – bottom trawling, longlining, driftnetting – are the main culprits, followed by pollution and the decimation of sharks and other predators. The United Nations says that 70 per cent of the world's major fisheries are now fully or over-exploited, and if the trends continue, all the world's fisheries are expected to collapse by 2048.
In Watson's eyes, this is a crime that makes the Holocaust pale by comparison. He considers whales to be more intelligent than people, because they know how to live in harmony with their environment, and sees humankind as a viral menace to the planet, although capable of reforming and saving itself before it is too late.
Watson works 18-hour days and he doesn't take days off. In his spare time, such as it is, he writes books, essays and poetry, and trounces allcomers at Trivial Pursuit. He has a photographic memory and an encyclopaedic knowledge of history, biology, current affairs, literature, poetry and pop culture. Needless to say, all this hasn't been easy on his personal relationships. Watson has been married and divorced three times and but has a great relationship with his daughter, Lilliolani, from his first marriage, who works as a videogame producer in Seattle. 'To follow one's bliss is in my opinion the single most important example a father or a mother can set for their child,' he once wrote. 'I would never abandon my dreams for domestic enslavement.'
In short, Watson is a perfect man to lead a crusade: utterly fearless, ferociously determined, untroubled by doubt and already convinced that he will die for the sacred cause. To each new batch of wide-eyed volunteers, he imparts the same Lakota Sioux wisdom – hoka hey, it's a good day to die – and he has little compunction about risking their lives to save a whale or create a news story.
'If you're not willing to risk your life to save a whale, you don't belong on this ship and you won't get past our vetting process,' he says. 'But you also have to look at our record. We've never hurt anybody. We've never been convicted of a felony. We've never been sued. We don't destroy property unless it's been used in the commission of a crime. They can call us terrorists but it's really preposterous. To me an eco-terrorist is someone who brings terror into the natural environment, like a whaling fleet with explosive-tipped harpoons coming into a whale sanctuary to kill a thousand whales.'
The Japanese whaling programme is run by the government-subsidised Institute of Cetacean Research. It has produced no peer-reviewed scientific papers, and neither the International Whaling Commission (IWC) nor the scientific community takes seriously its claim to be conducting research in Antarctica. The IWC and numerous governments around the world have condemned and denounced Japan for its whaling, but none of them has initiated any legal proceedings, or moved to close the loophole.
The mounting diplomatic pressure on Japan has only strengthened its resolve to dig in its heels and assert its national pride. As the world's largest consumers of seafood, the Japanese do not want foreigners telling them what they can and can't take out of the ocean, especially as fisheries collapse and stocks get scarcer. So far, the main obstacle to the Japanese whaling programme has been the fact that the Japanese people don't much like eating whale meat. It contains mercury, and is not part of the traditional diet or culture. Whale meat was almost unknown in Japan until the food shortages hit after the Second World War, and the US general Douglas MacArthur encouraged them to start eating it.
Now, despite aggressive government marketing campaigns and subsidies, only one per cent of Japanese say they eat whale regularly. There is a huge glut of whale meat stockpiled in freezers and every year, when the fleet returns from Antarctica, it gets bigger. As a result, the whaling programme is losing money and public support. This year, for the first time, Sea Shepherd has a Japanese volunteer, a young woman who doesn't want her name used or her face to appear on camera.
In 2008 Watson persuaded the Discovery Channel to send a television crew to make a reality show documentary about his Antarctic campaign. It turned into a seven-part series called Whale Wars, which became a big hit in America and is about to be shown for the first time in Britain. Life aboard Watson's ship, as it dodges icebergs, crashes through enormous seas and howling storms, and finally reaches the Japanese fleet, makes for highly compelling television, although not for reasons that Watson can be proud of.
The dramatic tension comes mainly from watching his amateurish, incompetent, bickering crew make an incredible, agonising series of blunders. You watch it on the edge of your seat, shaking your head and clasping it from time to time, waiting to see what will go wrong next and if it will get someone killed.
Ultimately a kind of tragic absurdity shines through the whole enterprise Greenpeace went down to Antarctica too. Its volunteers held up their signs and took pictures as whales were slaughtered all around them. When the Sea Shepherds finally arrived, the whaling stopped because the Japanese were too busy defending themselves or running away. For all their bungling, Watson and crew did succeed in saving the lives of some 500 whales. The Japanese went home with only half of the 1,000 whales they had assigned themselves.
For the whales in the Southern Ocean sanctuary, whose brains are bigger than ours, not just in size but in proportion to bodyweight, who are known to be self-aware and experience suffering and grief, the best protection currently on offer is this ragtag crew of clumsy, mutinous vegans and their Ahab captain, sailing down to the bottom of the world in an old black ship and making a reality television show as they go.
'Whale Wars', Mondays from
April 27, Discovery Channel discoverychannel.co.uk/whalewars ....
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Canada threatens action if EU bans seal products
"Despite scientific evidence that supports humane harvesting techniques, and testimony from Inuit communities as to the harmful effect of the proposed ban, the EU continues to push forward with a proposal that will damage the livelihood of coastal and Northern Canadians and their families," Day said.
Canada is set a quota of 280,000 young harp seals for this year. A statement from Day said there are almost 6 million seals on Canada's east coast, three times as many as in the 1970s. the seals are hunted for their fur, meat and oil, rich in Omega 3 fatty acids. The European Union has been the main opponent of the seal hunt, with animal rights groups charging that the clubbing of the seals is inhumane.
Harp seals may not be hunted in Canada until they shed their white coats, at about two weeks of age, though they are not usually hunted until at least a week later. Animal rights activists say most are hunted between three weeks and three months.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2009/04/03/seal-pelt-prices.html
Expect rock-bottom prices for pelts, sealers told
Last Updated: Friday, April 3, 2009 | 2:52 PM NT Comments6
CBC News
Prices for seal pelts, used to make such products as these sealskin coats, have dropped dramatically in the last two years. (CBC)
One of the key buyers for seal pelts in Newfoundland and Labrador says sealers should expect to be paid half of what they earned last year.
Seal pelts sold for more than $30 apiece in 2008, which in itself was a far weaker price than preceding seasons.
Deon Dakins, manager of the Corner Brook-based Nutan Furs, said sealers should make sure they have buyers, even at just $15 a pelt, before going out. That's just a fraction of the $100-per-pelt prices earned only a few short years ago.
The largest phase of the Canadian harp seal hunt opens April 15 at what is called the Front, an area at sea off Newfoundland's northeast coast. The hunt in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, off the west coast of Newfoundland, opens Wednesday.
"We're also very concerned that we could see an oversupply on the shore," said Dakins.
"We don't need a complete landing of the total quota this year, and we're advising fishermen to make sure that they talk with their buyers, their traditional buyers or other buyers, before they leave to go and make sure they have a commitment for product."
Dakins said the global recession and a proposed ban by the European Union are the biggest problems affecting prices.
'I can't see for the life of me how you could break even, let alone make money, this year.'-Sealer Jack Troake
Federal Fisheries Minister Gail Shea raised the total allowable catch of harp seals this season to 280,000, even though many in the industry expect far fewer animals to be killed.
"It's a ridiculous price," Jack Troake, a veteran sealer based in Twillingate, told CBC News Friday.
"I can't see for the life of me how you could break even, let alone make money, this year. I can't see how you could do that. It's almost impossible."
Springdale fisherman Ray Newman said he cannot imagine how the quota will be met this year.
"It's doubtful," Newman, who does not yet have a buyer, said Friday. "We've killed them for less than that over the years, but things weren't as expensive as [they] are now."
Newman said many fishermen will have trouble hiring crews to assist with the hunt, particularly when prices are low. He said few people will sign on for a crew knowing there is a small chance of splitting a meagre income.
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Mohawk Traditional Council Supports the Harb Bill

The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is proud to be allied with the Traditional Council of the Mohawks in pursuing our struggle to defend and protect our mother, the Earth.
We are also pleased to post this declaration by the Mohawk Traditional Council in support of Canadian Senator Mac Harb's bill to end the massacre of hundreds of thousands of seals in Canada.
To read the declaration,click the title.
Spain Joins the War Against Canada's Cruel Slaughter of Seals
This week, Spain joined with the defenders of the seals in condemning the horrific slaughter, voting to support a total ban on all seal products in the European Union. The vote of March 25th follows the March 17th vote by Ireland to ban all seal products, joining the Netherlands, France, Germany and other nations in opposing the seal slaughter.
Canada is becoming increasing more isolated in their position in support of the annual massacre of hundreds of thousands of seal pups. Canadian Members of Parliament and Senators are receiving tens of thousands of e-mails condemning the killing.
Calls for boycotts of the 2010 Winter Olympics in Canada are increasing. Demonstrations are taking place in cities around the world sending clear messages to the Canadian government that it's time for Canada to join the 21st century and do away with barbaric industries like sealing.
Some Canadian politicians are complaining that foreigners should not be interfering in Canadian issues, yet these same politicians insist that foreigners buy seal products. Canada has even threatened trade retaliation against nations opposing the slaughter.
"As a Canadian citizen, I welcome and applaud people from around the world who are speaking up and demanding the end to the atrocities on the ice," said Captain Paul Watson. "The majority of Canadians are opposed to the slaughter but all the Canadian elected politicians save one (Senator Mac Harb) support the cruel industry because in Canada, politicians are obedient to the party line at the cost of ignoring the voice of the people who elected them. However, the politicians can't ignore the power of economics and thus the key to destroying the sealing industry is to remove the markets for seal products."
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society applauds the Spanish decision and welcomes Spain into the list of nations that condemn cruelty to these gentle creatures.
###
Monday, March 30, 2009
The End of the Despicable Commercial Canadian Seal Hunt is in Sight
or whatever number is out there, killed or sold, or destroyed or burned.
I do not care what happens to them.
The fact that the markets are not there to sell more seals.
What they (the fishermen) wanted was to have the right to go out and kill the seals. They have that right, and the more they kill, the better I will love it."
- John Efford
- -Former Newfoundland Minister of Fisheries
- Former Canadian Minister of Natural Resources
The surest sign that the horrific commercial slaughter of baby harp seals will soon be ended is the fact that in a fit of whining desperation and seething anger, Canadian politicians and bureaucrats this week raised the kill quota of harp seals by 55,000 to a high of 338,000 seals. Canada also intends to kill 55,000 grey seals and 8,500 hood seals.
The bloody clubs of Canada's East Coast barbarian culture will begin swinging this week upon the nursery ice floes in the Canadian Gulf of St. Lawrence.
This is the best response they can come up with after two weeks of heavy blows to their obscene and bloody industry.
The bureaucrats in the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans are throwing a temper tantrum after the announcement by President Vladimir Putin of Russia that the killing of baby seals by Russian sealers has been banned. Putin openly called it a "bloody business." The Irish Parliament banned all seal pelts without loopholes and exemptions. LUSH stores with 600 retail outlets around the world are displaying full window displays condemning the seal slaughter in partnership with the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and collecting petitions to send to the Canadian government. For the first time ever, a member of the Canadian Senate, Senator Mac Harb, has drafted a motion to end the slaughter although only the Green Party has had the courage to speak out against the killing. The boycott of Canadian seafood organized by the Humane Society of the United States is still going strong. Demonstrations have taken place against the Canadian slaughter in hundreds of cities worldwide.
And next month, Europe is posed to pass a bill banning all seal products into European markets. Seal products have been banned in the USA since 1972 and the Canadian government's negotiations with the Bush Administration to overturn the ban were shot down in flames with the election of President Barack Obama.
The Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans is a hornet's nest of hissy fits and nail-biting sore losers. They've lost and they know it, they just are refusing to accept the stark reality that their glorified welfare tradition of bashing out the brains of baby seals is an obscenity that will soon be tossed onto the immoral trash heap of history.
Over the last week, the Canadian government has been assaulting LUSH with their pathetic propaganda, whining that the seal defenders are being "unfair" in accusing Canadian sealers of killing baby seals. You see, it's all in the definition. The Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans defines a baby seal as any seal over two weeks of age even if they can't swim and are helpless on the ice as some cigarette smoking, beer chugging, club swinging, sadistic, immoral thug approaches and proceeds to kick, slash, club, and skin them alive.
The bureaucrats and the politicians are paid to deny reality. A few years ago I debated Senator Celine Hervieux-Payette on Canadian National television. She was angrily insistent that the seal slaughter was, in her words, "the most well managed, humane slaughter of animals in the world."
Yet when I asked her if she had ever gone to the seal hunt, she admitted she had not. She was just mindlessly parroting the party line.
In Canada, in order to kiss the rear posteriors of Newfoundland and Eastern Quebec voters, the politicians actually bicker with each other over who loves the killing of seals the most in a childish game of competitive viciousness.
I have opposed the seal slaughter since the early sixties. As a Canadian boy I deplored it and to this day I continue to oppose it. The government would have everyone believe that only city dwelling, primarily foreign, middle class or upper middle class people who know nothing about fishing communities oppose the slaughter of seals.
Yet the leadership of the anti-sealing movement has been very much from the Maritimes provinces. Rebecca Aldworth who leads the Humane Society of the United States efforts is from a Newfoundland out port. Brigitte Curran who led the demonstration in Halifax last week and has opposed the slaughter for years is a Nova Scotian. I myself was raised in a fishing village in New Brunswick as the eldest of seven children in a poor community, where the poor kids like us went to school with lobster sandwiches because lobster were free for the taking (not any longer of course). As Maritimers from Atlantic Canada, we opposed the slaughter for the simple reasons that it is cruel, unnecessary, barbaric, and a threat to the Atlantic marine eco-system.
I have actively intervened against the slaughter of seals since 1975, leading numerous expeditions by ship into the ice to block, harass, and interfere with the vicious business of killing seals. During that time I have seen horrific acts of cruelty and I've experienced the violence of the sealers against myself personally. I have been beaten, threatened, arrested, ridiculed, and persecuted by the government of Canada for almost forty years.
And now, finally, I can see the desperation in the eyes of the politicians, the bureaucrats, and the sealers. The world is changing and the barbarians are going to be left behind for there can be no place for the savage slaughter of seals, especially baby seals, in the 21st Century.
Yes, seals will die this year, but they will not get their ridiculously high quota for the simple reason that the money is simply not there anymore. Only taxpayer subsidies can motivate the seal killers to afford to kill anymore. The profits are not there and the cost of fuel and the operation of their boats, the insurance, the provisions just make it bad business. But the Canadian government, in their fanatic zeal to see seals killed, have been responsible for the deaths of four sealers last year and the loss of numerous boats by refusing to enforce safety regulations with the result that ships are heading into the ice that were not built to sustain the conditions of the sea and weather at this time of year.
Last year, Fisheries Minister Loyola Hearn's policy of killing as many seals as possible saw four men killed when their wooden hulled fishing boat was dragged under the ice by a powerful Canadian government ice-breaker. His reaction was to switch the focus to Sea Shepherd by sending a SWAT team to board and seize our ship the Farley Mowat for the "crime" of documenting the killing of seals. That act alone has cost the government over a million dollars in losses.
Canadian Fishery Ministers can always be counted on to over-react, as Loyola Hearn did last year. The now Minister of Fisheries Gail Shea has done to same with her hysterical announcement to increase the killing in the face of worldwide opposition. She knows that the sealers can't possibly kill that many seals. It's her way of saying that Canada will do whatever it wants, wherever it wants, however it wants with the seals and will never acknowledge that the slaughter of baby seals is the horrifically cruel massacre that the rest of the world views it. Instead of admitting defeat she has given the world the "finger" with this unscientific politically motivated increase in kill numbers.
Today, with the head of the former KGB Mr. Putin calling the seal slaughter cruel and disgusting, with people from dozens of nations demonstrating all around the world, with nation after nation banning obscene seal products, with Canada's name and reputation being dragged through the mud, with Ireland banning the pelts taken by Canadians of primarily Irish descent from Newfoundland, and with condemnation by the European Parliament, the writing is on the wall. The Canadian commercial seal hunt is on the ropes economically and will soon be going the way of other despicable practises throughout the ages like slavery, bear-baiting, cock-fighting, child labour, and scalp-hunting.
I don't expect the Canadian government and the sealers to surrender gracefully. Grace is a virtue for gentlemen and women and there is nothing gentle about the sealers or the Canadian politicians who have been defending them for years. I'm sure they will continue to torture and kill seals for spite and perverse sadistic pleasure, to shoot them on sight, and to whine about the unfairness of the seal defenders as they cry cowardly tears into their stale Labatt's beer. That is the behaviour I have come to expect from them - petty, vicious, whining, and cowardly. We're probably stuck with them until the next post-seal killing generation, when their children's children will look back in horror on the cruelty of their murdering ancestors.
But we will have the satisfaction of knowing that we will have crippled their sadistic industry with the result that far fewer seals will be killed in the future.
Last year, a Canadian reporter actually asked me if I was ready to apologize to the sealers for remarks I made accusing them of gross cruelty. I said that indeed I was, and looking into the live broadcast camera, I said, "I apologise for being a Canadian and being associated with the most vicious and barbaric slaughter on the planet - the Canadian seal hunt."
Perhaps soon, hopefully very soon, I won't have to continue to apologise for being a Canadian.
Friday, March 27, 2009
HARPSEALS.ORG-ACTION ALERT!


The seal 'hunt' began on Tuesday in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. The sealers in the first phase of the seal hunt hail from the Magdalen Islands of Quebec. This first phase ended on Thursday.
In just three days, sealers killed over 19,000 defenseless seal pups. However, this official number does not include the seals who were injured but got away.
In this massacre, seal pups witness the carnage all around them. One injured seal was photographed by observers in a path of blood.
Click here for the latest news and photos from the slaughter .
The second phase of the slaughter is set to begin in the next few days. In this phase, hundreds of thousands of seal pups will be killed in the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence and off the coast of Newfoundland and Labrador.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But the good news is that, with a final vote on banning seal product imports into the European Union just days away and the continued boycott of Canadian seafood in the U.S., the hunt's days are numbered.
Harpseals.org is working on promoting the Canadian seafood boycott. We believe that it is crucial to broaden awareness of and support for this boycott among American seafood consumers. That's why we're waging an advertising campaign for the seals.
In a few days, our large billboard will go up in Chicago (Tri-State Highway, I-294, south of 83rd St Toll Booth). We need your help put the nail in the coffin of this atrocity. You can help by making a donation today. You can even sponsor an ad in your city or town. Contact us for more information.
Please also visit our help pages. There, you will find many ways in which you can be a part of the movement to end sealing once and for all.
You can also get the tools you need to help the seals from our Toolbox. You'll find high-resolution photos for signs and placards, ready images for decals, banners, and stickers, templates for press releases, and much more.
Please continue to :
Write to Canadian politicians voicing your outrage at this slaughter
Write to European Union ministers encouraging them to ban seal imports now
Write to American seafood vendors asking them to join the boycott, and
Give American seafood vendors Harpseals.org Action Cards to show that you're serious about the Canadian seafood boycott
Be a walking billboard for the seals. Wear Harpseals.org t-shirts and other seal gear
Thank you for caring.
For the seals,
Diana Marmorstein, Ph.D.
CEO
Harpseals.org
STOP CANADA'S SEAL HUNT!ACTION ALERT!
ARAN's campaign to stop Canada killing seals is gaining momentum! This week,
Irish celebrities such as Eurovision winner and television presenter Linda
Martin, The Corr's band member Jim Corr, Fair City's Gerard Byrne along with
top Irish model and ARAN member Suzanne McCabe came out in force to launch a
new campaign for Animal Rights Action Network that aims to draw serious
attention to Canada's seal hunt in the run up to and during the Olympics
been held in Vancouver in 2010.
That's right, the compassionate foursome led an exciting, lively photocall
and protest with 30 ARAN members outside the Canadian Embassy on Thursday to
bring much needed attention to the Irish campaign. Major media outlets
covered the story including the Irish Mirror and Herald along with some
radio stations. Other newspapers also attended the photocall such as The
Irish Daily Mail, The Sun, The Star and Irish Independent! It seems to be
this recession is grabbing all the headlines these days and the animals are
once again being forgotten - but not if Animal Rights Action Network have
our way!
We've got a short video clip
for you to see. Please visit our website www.ARAN.ie in the coming days to
see a full report along with exciting pictures. As many of you will know,
Animal Rights Action Network is the leading Irish campaign group working
round the clock on the campaign in Ireland to stop Canada's seal slaughter.
We have effectively lobbied Irish government and MEP's to support an EU
trade ban and many will agree we're punching far above our weight on this
issue. We've got exciting plans for an effective campaign over the coming
weeks and months and we'll be there for all animals in need. Our plan of
action for the coming weeks would be to:
* Distribute vital educational leaflets and DVD's across the country
* Do school information talks about animal abuse and Canada's seal
hunt
* Travel to organize peaceful events and protests for the seals in
various Irish MEP constituencies
* Send out news release bulletins
* Organize further protests and eye-catching events to grab the
public's attention
* Support Animal Rights Action Network volunteers who are out on the
streets in hail, rain and snow trying desperately hard to raise awareness
* Distribute the new 2009 footage of the slaughter once it becomes
available to ARAN
Can we please ask that you send as generous donation as you can to help our
work right now to save Canada's seals and other animals in need? Please,
don't let it to someone else, send us a donation for whatever you can afford
and invite your family and friends to do the same. No one gets paid at ARAN,
we are all volunteers with a passion to see an end to Canada's seal hunt and
more. ARAN has a hard hitting reputation for our work for animal rights and
we don't give up until we win for the animals. We'll ensure your hard earned
donation is put to use immediately and in the best possible and most
effective manner we can think of. You'll be joining a special group of ARAN
members who will be kept personally up to date with all our work so that YOU
can see how we are using YOUR hard earned money to help animals.
Please make checks or postal orders made out to Animal Rights Action Network
and mail to
John Carmody
Animal Rights Action Network
120 Vale Avenue,
Carew Park,
Limerick,
Ireland.
Or you can donate online at www.ARAN.ie - for the seals and other animals we
thank you from the bottom of our hearts and the little baby seals too.
Thank you for caring,
John Carmody
Founder of Animal Rights Action Network
Ps, please remember ARAN's work is dedicated to ending cruelty to animals.
We work sometimes up to 14 hours a day trying to do whatever we can in the best possible and most effective and positive way to bring attention to the
animals plight, won't you please send us a donation today to help us out and help us do even more?
Paris Protesters Rail Against Canadian Seal Hunt
Thursday against the annual Canadian seal hunt, which began earlier in
the week.
About two dozen protesters distributed flyers and brandished Canada's
maple leaf flags printed with the word "Shame."
The European Parliament considers a possible ban on Canadian seal
products in the 27-nation organization.
Earlier this month, a committee of the European Parliament called the
Canadian seal hunt — the world's largest marine mammal hunt —
"inherently inhumane" and endorsed the bill, which could come up for a
vote as early as next month. The hunt exported around $5.5 million
worth of seal products such as pelts, meat and oils to the EU in 2006.
Demonstrators in Paris were optimistic about the chances for a ban.
--
full story:
http://www.iht. com/articles/ ap/2009/03/ 26/europe/ EU-France- Seal-Hunt. php
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Hovering Over Hell

Rebecca Aldworth, our lead campaigner against Canada’s cruel slaughter of baby seals, has just returned from a difficult day of documenting the hunt. I asked her to share her thoughts, since it’s so important that we tell this story to the world. Here’s her report.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today was very hard.
Sealers from the Magdalen Islands (map) had already killed most of the seals allotted to them in their quota by the end of yesterday. So it was likely they would kill the rest today very quickly.
We would only have a few hours to film the cruel reality of this slaughter.
Our helicopters left at dawn, battling gale force winds to reach the killing zone. On the horizon, I could see sealing vessels working their way through the ice floes, slaughtering as many seals as they could before the quota was filled. We came closer, and the blood began to appear. Giant pools of it, spread all across the ice. Every few hundred feet, dozens of carcasses were abandoned in macabre piles.
Once we reached the vessels and our cameras were rolling, it was only a minute before a sealer violated the Marine Mammal Regulations (guidelines intended to reduce cruelty). He didn’t bother to check to ensure the animal was unconscious before slicing her open. All around, terrified seals attempted to crawl away from the blows of the clubs, but they had no escape.
We filmed everything we could, but within an hour, the sealers had reached their quota.
As the vessels headed back to shore, we landed to film the aftermath. On the ice: silence. The sealers had clubbed to death almost every seal in sight. Open graves of skinned baby seals covered the ice in all directions. So many sightless eyes followed us across the ice as we moved through the area.
Just ahead of us, we saw two live seal pups—left alone in the carnage. These babies were saved by their white fur, which almost entirely covered them. But their salvation is temporary. On Friday, the hunting begins again, and hundreds of thousands more seals will die.
We passed one pup who had crawled into a small cave formed by ice. He hid his head as we approached, clearly terrified. I tried to talk softly to him, to let him know that it would be okay. But he just lay there, hiding his head. This three-week old seal pup had just seen hundreds of others beaten to death in front of him. To him, people now mean clubs and violence and pain.
Today, we filmed this horror—the tiny carcasses such a stark reminder that this is a slaughter for fur. They died by the thousands here, painfully, just to produce fur coats that no one needs.
On Friday, we leave for the second area of killing, and I know what we will see there. But I also know that we are close to ending this, and that we may never have to witness this kind of cruelty again.
As we get ready to leave for the remote area where this next phase will occur, please be a part of our team. Visit humanesociety.org/protectseals to find out what you can do to stop this cruelty forever, and help us spread the word.


