Showing posts with label ocean. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ocean. Show all posts

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Stop Massive World Bank (IFC) Supported Expansion of PNG Industrial Tuna Fish Harvest

ACTION ALERT
PLEASE SHARE WIDELY!

Stop Massive World Bank (IFC) Supported Expansion of PNG Industrial Tuna Fish Harvest

By Asples PNG (People of Papua New Guinea), a project of Ecological Internet
October 15, 2009

Over-fishing comes to Madang, Papua New Guinea, as local peoples prepare to resist 10 tuna canneries. Support indigenous South Pacific coastal peoples as they are peacefully protesting right now!

TAKE ACTION HERE NOW:
http://www.ecoearth.info/shared/alerts/send.aspx?id=png_tuna


In the peaceful South Pacific town of Madang, Papua New Guinea (PNG), the local indigenous people are being inundated with foreign industrial "development" projects -- mines, logging and fisheries -- for which they have not been properly consulted, have not given their informed consent, and from which they are unlikely to meaningfully benefit. This includes the PNG government's and World Bank/IFC's plans with China and Japan's governments to facilitate and invest in the construction of ten new tuna fish canneries and a large central warehouse and worker settlement along Madang's beautiful coconut lined north coast. A tranquil village culture -- living simply but well from small-scale fishing -- will be decimated.
A US$300 million (K990m) Pacific Marine Industrial Zone (PMIZ) is planned that will greatly increase industrial harvest of Madang, PNG and the Pacific Islands' rich tuna resources. Canneries and dock and storage facilities are to be constructed to service foreign fishing vessels that would dump their tuna catch. It will bring tens of thousands of unskilled Asians into Papua New Guinea when local unemployment is high. And it most certainly will lead to fishery depletion and collapse. Unless this expansion of an already socially and ecologically failed industrial tuna industry is resisted, overfishing and piracy will destroy PNG and most of the world's remaining tuna and other fisheries.

WATCH THE YOUTUBE VIDEO:
"Surviving the Cannery"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLkUPCci2QA&feature=player_embedded


MORE INFORMATION AND TAKE ACTION NOW:
http://www.ecoearth.info/shared/alerts/send.aspx?id=png_tuna


DISCUSS THIS ALERT:
http://www.ecoearth.info/blog/

Sunday, October 4, 2009

UK and EU countries condemn Iceland for whale hunting



The UK and 25 other countries have officially condemned Iceland's recent decision to kill endangered whales.

By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent
Published: 6:48PM BST 02 Oct 2009

Iceland has been killing fin whales according to conservationists Photo: PÁDRAIG WHOOLEY
Iceland recently killed around 125 fin whales, more than at any time since an international ban on commercial whaling was brought in more than 20 years ago.

In addition 79 minke whales were killed making it the largest commercial whale hunt in North Atlantic waters for decades.


Related Articles
Fewer fin whales spotted in Biscay, prompting fears for fish stocks
Blue whales going deaf The UK and 25 other countries including the US, Germany, France, Portugal and Spain issued a formal diplomatic position to the Icelandic ambassador in the UK against the decision to hunt the whales. The démarche as it is known will put pressure on Iceland just as the country is hoping to restore its damaged economy by joining the EU.

Huw Irranca-Davies, the UK wildlife minister, was deeply disappointed that Iceland has failed to overturn a quota of up to 200 fin and 200 minke whales for the 2009/2010 season.

He pointed out that the animals are endangered and that Iceland could make more money from whale watching.

"I am extremely disappointed to hear that nearly 200 whales have been taken so far this year," he said.

Animal welfare groups are incensed that most of the whales slaughtered will not even be consumed in Iceland but will be exported to Japan.

Friday, September 11, 2009

DAVID HASSELHOFF'S SHARKWATCH-THE UNDERWATER CHANNEL


Hasselhoff goes Shark Diving on The Underwater Channel! Watch David Hasselhoff's Sharkwatch series which premieres exclusively on The Underwater Channel

The Hoff in Baywatch
David Hasselhoff's Sharkwatch premieres today on The Underwater Channel the web TV Channel for divers. This remarkable series of three video webisodes follows cult Baywatch and Knight Rider star and America's Got Talent judge David Hasselhoff in what he describes as the "most incredibly awesome experience of my life".
To make the series The Underwater Channel took Hasselhoff to South Africa to introduce him to shark diving - in the wild and unprotected! Once there he was persuaded to accept the challenge of hand-feeding a tiger shark, the second most dangerous ocean predator to the great white!
To read more,visit the website:http://www.theunderwaterchannel.tv

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Numbers of dolphins killed in Japan -Calendar Year 2007

Japan Progress Report On Small Cetacean Research (Calendar Year
2007)

http://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/j/whale/w_document/pdf/h19_progress_report.pdf


Please check the link below for more information.
http://www.all-creatures.org/ha/saveWhaleDolphinE.html

Horrific slaughter of Japanese dolphins

Every year, over 20,000 smaller whales, dolphins and porpoises are cruelly slaughtered in Japanese waters. The meat is sold for human consumption, even though it is tainted with toxic industrial pollutants such as mercury, DDTs and PCBs, all known to be hazardous to human health. Those that have witnessed these hunts first hand, or watched our secretly filmed footage, will never forget the appalling brutality and suffering inflicted upon these beautiful, intelligent creatures.

Save Japan Dolphins Coalition

Campaign Whale is the sole UK representative of the 'Save Japan Dolphins Coalition', which
is fighting to end the slaughter of dolphins and porpoises in Japan. Within our ranks is Ric O’Barry, former trainer of ‘Flipper’ the dolphin (a hugely popular sixties TV series and later Hollywood film). In reality, Flipper was not one, but five animals that all died during the run of the show – a sad reality for these intelligent animals when held in captivity. Ric O’Barry is now working with us, determined to stop the slaughter in Taiji and other Japanese coastal villages, as well as highlight the shocking link between the dolphin hunts and the captive industry for dolphins around the world.

Watch out for ‘The Cove’

Now at last the appalling truth of Japan’s secret dolphin slaughter may be coming to a cinema near you. The slaughter of dolphins has been captured by hidden cameras in a feature length drama-documentary called ‘The Cove’ that has received standing ovations at the Sundance and other film festivals this year.

A trailer of the film can be viewed (and also the code to embed onto a website is) at: http://www.thecovemovie.com/


The film is currently being shown in cinemas across the USA and will be released in the UK and the rest of the world in October. The film focuses on Taiji, a Japanese coastal town where around 2,300 dolphins are speared to death every year for their meat. Each dead dolphin sells for about US $600, but those few captured alive are worth as much as US $200,000 when sold to aquariums and dolphin ‘swim’ parks around the world.

The dolphin slaughter in Taiji takes place between September and March in a heavily-guarded coastal inlet. Taiji has become the epicentre of our campaign, and an undercover team secretly filmed the hunts using cameras disguised as rocks, to expose an ongoing tragedy that is covered up by the local authorities and the Japanese government. What they filmed was truly horrific. After driving the dolphins into the cove by hammering on metal poles, the fishermen repeatedly stab the helpless animals until the water turns blood red. Some of the dolphins, traumatised by witnessing the horrific slaughter of their pod members, are captured alive to be sold to aquaria and ‘swim with dolphins’ programmes around the world. The Japanese government tell the fishermen that dolphins are “pests” that eat too many fish, but the real reason for fishery declines is human over-fishing, climate change and pollution.
A deadly diet

‘The Cove’ also focuses on a major element of our campaign within Japan: to expose the serious health threat posed to the people that eat the dolphin and porpoise meat, many unwittingly as it is often deliberately mislabeled as whale meat. Sadly, dolphins and porpoises carry a massive level of toxic contaminants, such as mercury and PCBs, that build up in their bodies through the food chain. Taiji Town Councillors that bravely warned of the threat of mercury poisoning from eating dolphin meat have now been ostracised in a community they have lived in all their lives, but at least the publicity has forced local schools to stop serving dolphin meat in school lunches. Meanwhile, elsewhere in Japan that problem, hopefully soon to be exposed as a national scandal, continues.

Campaign Whale

Campaign Whale is a well-respected campaigning organisation and the only UK based member of the 'Save Japan Dolphins' coalition. We are working hard stop this cruel slaughter and we will never compromise over the killing of these beautiful, intelligent creatures.

Further details about 'The Cove' and 'Campaign Whale' are available at:
http://www.campaign-whale.org/


Thank you ever so much,

Kind regards

Anna-Lisa Nagel
Campaign Whale

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Interview with the makers of the documentary film ''THE COVE''

Interview with the makers of the documentary film ''THE COVE'', about the dolphin slaughter in TAIJI, Japan (read the film review as well)




MoJo Interview: The Cove's Louie Psihoyos and Ric O'Barry
By Kiera Butler
There's something fishy about the coastal town of Taiji, Japan: Statues and murals of dolphins line the streets, yet every year, the town's fishermen kill thousands of dolphins and sell their meat. That’s a whole lot of dead dolphins—you' d think some enterprising activist journalist would have blown Taiji's cover long ago. They tried, but no one could penetrate the heavily guarded cove where the killing takes place. Until now. When photographer Louie Psihoyos heard about Taiji, he teamed up with marine mammal activist (and former Flipper TV dolphin trainer) Ric O'Barry. Together, the two launched a high-tech espionage mission to infiltrate the cove and expose the slaughter. We spoke with O'Barry and Psihoyos about making The Cove, assembling an Ocean's Eleven-style team, and why a little paranoia can be a good thing.

Mother Jones: Louie, you're a photographer by training. How did you get involved with making a documentary?

Louie Psihoyos: Jim Clark—the guy who financed the movie—he and I have been dive buddies for years. He's a serial entrepreneur— he started Netscape. We'd been diving around the world and watching the degradation of the oceans. During a trip to the Galápagos in October 2005, Jim said, We should do something about this. So he had the idea of starting the Oceanic Preservation Society. Two months later I met Ric at a marine mammals conference. He was banned from talking. I called him, and he started telling me about the dolphin slaughter in Taiji. He said, "I'm going next week. Want to come?" I took a three-day crash course on how to make a film. And I went to Taiji.

MJ: What were your first impressions of Taiji?

LP: It was like walking into a Stephen King novel. Everywhere you go there are statues of whales and dolphins. There are signs that say, "We love dolphins." But in the center of town is this horror show. Right between the whaling museum and City Hall. It's in a national park! If you were to write this as a novel, people would say it was too over the top. My journalistic instincts turned on. I thought, this is a great story. But here's the problem: All the dirty business happens in this secret cove, but you can't see it. People have been coming for decades to try to document it. At that point, I realized I was no longer just a journalist covering a story. By trying to get into the cove, I was becoming an activist.

MJ: Louie, in the film, you say you were feeling like you had gone halfway around the world to end up in a car with this paranoid guy (meaning O’Barry). Ric, how did you convince Louie that you weren't just some wacko?

Ric O’Barry: [Laughs.] Well I never did!

LP: First of all, the cops were behind us. The paranoia was well founded.

RO: If you're a Westerner and you're in Taiji and you're not paranoid, you're not paying attention. It really is dangerous there. The police aren't our enemy. Neither are the fishermen, though they are very angry, and there's always a chance one of them will get drunk and do something stupid. But the real danger is the Yakuza, the Japanese mafia. They're always lurking around. Some of the fishermen are connected. The Yakuza is very involved in the fishing and whaling industry, so they know what’s going on. They normally don't bother with Westerners, but this is a special situation. So being on high alert all the time is the safe thing to do.

MJ: The Yakuza didn't really make it into the movie. Why not?

LP: They were following us around for a bit. After a while we had identified the cars, determined who was in which car. The Yakuza really stood out in that community. Slicked-back hair, wraparound glasses; they looked like they came out of central casting. A Japanese version of The Sopranos. But the police were the ones that were following us around 24-7. We had five hotel rooms; the police had five hotel rooms. We would go out; they would go out. Even in the middle of the night, they'd follow us. They would stay four or five blocks behind. We would set up decoys to throw them off. We had a car that was rented by a Japanese assistant, in his name. We'd park it outside of town; we'd go around a corner and all hop out of the van and hide behind it. The police would follow this other car, and we'd just take them on a wild goose chase for a few hours outside of town while some members of our team were at the cove.

MJ: But in the movie, you never have a real run-in with the police.

LP: But we did have run-ins. They were really curious about what we were doing late at night. After a few weeks of that the chief of police asked us what we were doing. I said, "We're looking for a place to live." He said, "What are you here for?" I said, "That's kind of a rude question to ask of a foreigner. Why do you want to know?" He said, "I need to get some sleep." The 24-hour surveillance was really cramping his style. We got run out of the prefecture once. The chief of police said, "You have to go right now or I'm going to arrest you." He was obviously under a lot of pressure to find out what we were doing there. He couldn’t figure it out. Two months later I was back again.

MJ: They couldn't figure out why you were there? They must have known it had something to do with the dolphin slaughter.

LP: A lot of times, our high-tech cameras, hidden in rocks, were rolling while we were back at the hotel. So they couldn't figure it out. We tried never to be seen at the cove.

MJ: What was the hardest part of the whole operation?

LP: Just getting it all together was the hardest part. There were so many moving parts. It was like an Ocean's Eleven team. We had 60 cases of high-tech surveillance gear that we had to get through customs, and a lot of this stuff wasn't off the shelf; we actually had to make it. And we had to bring all these people together. The joke of the movie was that we're all professionals, just not at this. We had a world champion free diver who could go down to 300 feet, and now she's setting up microphones and underwater cameras for us. Implementing it was hard, too. A lot of it was done in the middle of the night: You're awake, you're afraid, you've been up for days getting all this gear together, and now it's go time. You know the cops are out there. If the cops had searched our car that probably would have been enough to put us in jail for several months. We had runners whose only job was to get the footage off the camera, back it up, then get it out of the country. We didn't want to be caught with more than one day's footage. It's a lot of stress. I stopped drinking for fourteen months. It would have been too easy to have a glass of wine at the hotel every night. But I wanted to be completely aware of what was going on.

MJ: Were there scenes that got edited that you wish had stayed in?

LP: There was one scene I fought for so hard: We had this rock camera in front of a campfire scene. These fishermen were sitting around on the beach and talking about how you used to be able to kill the large whales, just like the dolphins. These guys are responsible for killing blue whales, which still haven't recovered from the '70s. Now they’re about to do the same thing with dolphins. Another great scene that didn’t make the cut: One of those same fishermen said, "I was trying to watch TV last night but I couldn't hear it. I turned up the sound all the way. My wife and son said, 'Why do you even bother watching TV? You can't hear it anyway.'" We're thinking, he has mercury poisoning.

MJ: What do you think are the chances that once this film is released in Japan, dolphin slaughter will end?

RO: I think that's going to happen. If the film does well, that kind of external pressure will be hard for the Japanese government to deal with.

MJ: Have you had any reaction from the Japanese government to the film?

LP: Last year I was going down to Santiago, Chile. Sitting next to me on the plane was the head of the Japanese fisheries. I showed him a preview of the movie. So he had the information, but a year has gone by and he hasn't done anything about it. So it seems like he is complicit.

MJ: The fishermen at the cove say that killing dolphins is the Japanese way of life, something they've been doing for generations. Is there any cultural or economic legitimacy to that claim?

RO: How can it be the culture if the Japanese people don't even know about it? We interviewed a hundred people on the streets of Kyoto. They simply don't know. The reason they don't know is that there's a media blackout on all whale and dolphin stories. But for a moment, let's assume they're right and I'm wrong, that it is their culture. It doesn't mean it's okay.

LP: And it's not just an animal rights issue. These animals are so toxic that it becomes a health issue. Their mercury levels are through the roof. Some of the meat tested had 5,000 times more mercury than is allowed by Japanese law. One of the great ironies of this movie is that dolphins are one of the only animals that will come to the aid of human beings. What's going to save the dolphins is that humans have made them toxic. That's the one thing that's going to save them from being eaten.

Read the Mother Jones review of The Cove here.

http://www.motherjones.com/interview/2009/08/cove-dolphin-japan



"The Cove" (http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/19/the-cove-sundance-film-exposes-japanese-dolphin-slaughter-in-grisly-footage/ ) shows the cruelty, ignorance and stupidity that guides the behavior of nations and people all around the globe as we march "eyes wide shut" into the abyss of extinction.



From: Taffy Lee Williams
To: tlwilliams@optonline.net



Taffy Lee Williams
New York Whale and Dolphin Action League
PO Box 273
Yonkers, NY 10707 USA
www.ny4whales.org

914-793-9186 / 407-404-2046 cell
Because when we save whales, we save ourselves.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Human Pollution Causes Cancer in Wildlife




Cancer in wildlife caused by human pollution is on the rise, according ot Newsweek. Our impact on the environment is leading to health problems in wild animals, especially considering much of our trash contains carcinogens. A report titled “Wildlife Cancer: a Conservation Perspective” published in Nature Reviews Cancer found “mounting evidence of human’s contribution to carcinogenesis in wild-animal populations across the globe, thanks to man-made toxins dumped into wildlife’s natural habitats.”

» See also: Do Hot Dogs Cause Cancer? Jersey Residents Demand Warning Labels

Last year, it was discovered that Tasmanian devils may become extinct in 20 years due to an infectious cancer called devil facial tumor disease, but many other species are also experiencing increased rates of cancer. For example, 17 percent of San Francisco’s famous sea lions die from renal failure or paralysis caused by genital carcinoma. A majority of these sea lions’ bodies contained high concentrations of PCBs and DDT. The report’s lead author Denise McAloose warns:

I am concerned that we as humans continue to impact the environment quite significantly,. As the human population continues to grow and utilize resources and damage the environment, I do believe that we will continue to see the emergence of disease, including cancer in wildlife.

If pollutants are causing cancer in wildlife, imagine what it is doing to the human population as well.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

SEA SHEPHERD:THE RULES

By Captain Paul Watson
“When this ship becomes a democracy, you’ll be the first to know”
- Captain James Tiberius Kirk
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society does not have any chapters or branches in the United States. The Society is headquartered in Friday Harbor, Washington. The official website is www.seashepherd.org and the official MySpace page is http://www.myspace.com/seashepherd . The official Sea Shepherd Facebook address is: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=2235468991&ref=ts.
All other websites, Myspace and Facebook pages are NOT authorized. The official websites for Sea Shepherd International are listed on the homepage at www.seashepherd.org . The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society does not recognize nor endorse any Sea Shepherd chatlines. It is our position that chatlines are counter productive and a breeding ground for gossip, slander and mis-information.
There is no Sea Shepherd California chapter and the Sea Shepherd California MySpace page is unauthorized. Aaron McCollum’s statement on Sea Shepherd California’s Myspace page that he is an official representative of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is false. His statement that he is or will be a crewmember on the next campaign to oppose the Japanese whaling operations in ..Antarctica.. is false.
No one is allowed to solicit funds for Sea Shepherd on any websites, Facebook or MySpace pages. Appeals for funding can only be posted on the official sites.
The use of the Sea Shepherd logo on any website, Myspace or Facebook page is not allowed without permission. Sea Shepherd holds and maintains legal copyrights on the Sea Shepherd logos. Unauthorized use of the logo is forbidden by law. Distortion of the Sea Shepherd logo is forbidden by law. The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society will file a lawsuit against any party that uses the Sea Shepherd name and logo without permission.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society respects and listens to the opinions of legitimate supporters only. We are not interested in criticisms from non-supporters. The definition of a supporter is someone who supports the operations of the campaigns through donations or direct participation as a volunteer.
Captain Paul Watson, the directors of the Society and the crew of the Sea Shepherd ships will not tolerate any interference, gossip or discussion about their personal and private lives.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is not a protest organization and we do not organize protests. We are an interventionist organization specializing in intervening against unlawful activities that exploit marine habitats and wildlife as defined under international conservation law. The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is an anti-poaching organization specializing in opposition to marine wildlife poaching operations.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is NOT an animal rights organization. We are a marine conservation organization. The Society operates Sea Shepherd vessels as vegan vessels because the exploitation of marine wildlife has reached critical levels and the Society sets an example by not consuming fish and not consuming meat products onboard because one-third of the annual take of marine species by worldwide fisheries is fed to domestic livestock in the form of fishmeal. We are not in the business of advocating for animal rights or animal welfare. Our business is the defence of ALL marine organisms from plankton to the whales from illegal exploitation.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society works in alliance with the following:
Surfers worldwide.
Scuba divers worldwide.
National Environmental Police organizations.
National Park Rangers.
International and national conservation organizations.
International and national environmental organizations.
Certified Green corporations.
International and national animal rights organizations.
International and national animal welfare organizations.
International and national vegetarian and vegan organizations.
In the field the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society maintains the following rules
We do not take any action that will cause injury to our opposition. In our three decades of operations we have never caused a single injury.
We operate within the context of International law. In our three decades of operations we have never had a crewmember convicted of a felony while engages in a Sea Shepherd activity.
We do not compromise with the law. If it is illegal we oppose it. We do not discriminate on the application of the law because of nationality, race or belief.

Saturday, July 25, 2009

OCEANA'S CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT SEA TURTLES



Sea turtles have been swimming the world's oceans for more than 100 million years, persisting through natural predators, climatic events and even the mass dinosaur extinction. However, their existence on Earth is now in jeopardy from human threats that are proving to be too much for turtle populations to handle. Sea turtle populations have declined all over the world as humans push them to the brink of extinction.

With the advent of new gear and boat technologies, fishing has become one of the greatest sources of mortality to sea turtles around the globe. Each of the six sea turtle species found in United States waters is listed as either ‘Endangered' or ‘Threatened' under the Endangered Species Act - which means that they may go extinct in the foreseeable future.

Even with protection under the Endangered Species Act, longlines, trawls, gill nets, dredges and other types of fishing gear in and around United States waters kill thousands of turtles and injure even more each year. Other human, or ‘anthropogenic,' threats to turtles include ingestion of or entanglement in marine debris, pollution, coastal development, poaching, vessel strikes, climate change and predation by invasive species.

For decades sea turtle conservation has focused on promoting gear modifications in key fisheries and protecting sea turtle nesting habitats. The efforts have begun to pay off. Some sea turtle populations appear to be in the beginning stages of recovery. For other populations,though the outlook is grim, and more proactive government policies are urgently needed.

It is not too late to get turtles off the hook - but we need to act fast!

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

San Diego will seek lifting of seal removal order





A seal moves in to investigate activity along the rocks at the Children's Pool beach where seals have gathered for years in the La Jolla section of San Diego Monday, July 20, 2009. A judge has given the city 72 hours to begin chasing harbor seals out of the Children's Pool at La Jolla beach or face heavy daily fines, ruling firmly for humans in a decade-long battle over who should win exclusive use of the cove. San Diego County Superior Court Judge Yuri Hofmann ordered the city to comply with a 2005 order by another judge to restore the Children's Pool cove to its original condition. (AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi) By GILLIAN FLACCUS
Associated Press Writer

SAN DIEGO (AP) - The city of San Diego said Tuesday it will go to court to ask a state judge to lift an order requiring the immediate removal of a colony of federally protected harbor seals from a La Jolla cove.

The announcement by City Attorney Jan Goldsmith was the latest development in an emotional and yearslong battle over who should have exclusive use of the protected cove _ children or seals _ in the posh seaside neighborhood of La Jolla.

On Monday, a San Diego Superior Court judge ordered the city to begin chasing away the creatures from the cove, called the Children's Pool, by Thursday or face heavy fines in order to comply with a 2005 ruling in a lawsuit brought by a disgruntled swimmer.

The city said it would blast recordings of barking dogs to scare away the pesky pinnipeds at the cost of $688,000 a year. San Diego cannot use force because the seals are a federally protected marine species.

But just hours later, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that added a marine mammal park to the list of permissible uses for the Children's Pool _ giving the city a legal tool that could allow the seals to stay put.

Goldsmith said the city will go to court on the matter Thursday.

"It's like saying the seals in the zoo are a nuisance," he said.

Children's Pool was created by a sea wall built in 1931 through a gift by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps. The state, which owns the cove, subsequently placed the beach in a trust and granted the trust to the city of San Diego. The trust lists several possible public uses for it, including a children's beach and a park.

At a pro-seal rally Tuesday evening, a few dozen supporters lined the cove and shouted, "Take a stand, share the sand." Several dozen harbor seals lounged below them in the late afternoon sun.

Supporter Jennifer Rogge, 43, who lives nearby, said she was horrified by efforts to remove the seals.

"We should let them have it," she said. "They've been having their babies on this beach now for 15 years. It's a little late now to start shooing them off when there's generations of pups that don't know any other place to go."

Sukey Rice Ridgway, 65, who also lives nearby, said she remembered swimming in Children's Pool before the seals took over. She opposes their presence, even though she swam with the seals as a child.

"This was a beautiful pool and it was fabulous to swim down here and learn to snorkel and everything," she said. "It's unnatural now, it's man-made. It should not be for the seals."

Goldsmith said litigation over the cove's use has cost San Diego millions of dollars and could drag on for many more years unless the newly worded bill is allowed to take precedent.

Attorney Paul Kennerson, who represents the disgruntled swimmer, said Senate Bill 428 does not absolve the city of its responsibility to maintain the cove exclusively for the use of children.

Thursday's hearing is scheduled just 90 minutes before the city's deadline to begin chasing the seals away.

If the order is allowed to stand, Goldsmith said the city will be ready to begin removing the seals while simultaneously filing an emergency writ with California 4th District Court of Appeal.

Attorneys representing pro-seal groups have also filed emergency legal papers in both federal and state courts.


(Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
By GILLIAN FLACCUS
Associated Press Writer

SAN DIEGO (AP) - The city of San Diego said Tuesday it will go to court to ask a state judge to lift an order requiring the immediate removal of a colony of federally protected harbor seals from a La Jolla cove.

The announcement by City Attorney Jan Goldsmith was the latest development in an emotional and yearslong battle over who should have exclusive use of the protected cove _ children or seals _ in the posh seaside neighborhood of La Jolla.

On Monday, a San Diego Superior Court judge ordered the city to begin chasing away the creatures from the cove, called the Children's Pool, by Thursday or face heavy fines in order to comply with a 2005 ruling in a lawsuit brought by a disgruntled swimmer.

The city said it would blast recordings of barking dogs to scare away the pesky pinnipeds at the cost of $688,000 a year. San Diego cannot use force because the seals are a federally protected marine species.

But just hours later, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that added a marine mammal park to the list of permissible uses for the Children's Pool _ giving the city a legal tool that could allow the seals to stay put.

Goldsmith said the city will go to court on the matter Thursday.

"It's like saying the seals in the zoo are a nuisance," he said.
Full story:

Monday, July 20, 2009

SHARK RESCUE CAMPAIGN!(NZ)

Painted as predatory, blood-thirsty creatures in headlines and horror films, sharks are one of the world's most misrepresented creatures. Now they're in trouble of being lost from our oceans forever.
Shark Pledge
So far over 4500 people have signed our shark pledge. Click here to sign the pledge and support a ban on finning in NZ
Pre-dating dinosaurs, sharks have swum through our waters for more than 400 million years and have evolved not just five senses, but seven.
Sharks have an incredibly highly developed sense of smell and night vision that rivals cats - and a reputation among divers as being remarkably shy.
They are so sensitive to electric fields that some scientists believe that they can detect the Earth’s magnetic field, and they use this to navigate during long migrations.
Long-lived and slow to mature and breed, these ancient creatures are incredibly vulnerable to over-fishing. Over the last 10 years or so, shark fishing has increased dramatically, largely because their fins are a prized ingredient in shark fin soup.
Finning - stripping a dead shark of its fins and dumping its body - is banned in several countries, including Australia, the EU, the USA, South Africa, Ecuador, Mexico and Brazil. However finning is still legal in New Zealand waters.
Once stripped from the body of the shark, fins are lightweight, compact and highly lucrative (fins can reach $US700 per kilo), making them a very attractive by-catch. It is estimated that 100 million sharks are killed each year worldwide – in the time it takes you to read this article more than 1800 sharks will have been killed.
The New Zealand situation – why is finning still allowed?
New Zealand has 112 species of shark recorded in our waters. Of these 79 species are known to be caught in our fisheries, including 28 that are listed as threatened by the World Conservation Union (IUCN). Only one threatened shark species – the Great White Shark – is protected in New Zealand.
On average 24,000 tonnes of shark are caught each year in New Zealand (Ministry of Fisheries figures) - the equivalent of 300,000 people.
Most of the shark species landed in our fisheries are used for their meat. And to avoid waste, the fins of some species are used. However, seven percent of all sharks landed are taken just for their fins according to Ministry of Fisheries data. A further 1% are taken just for their livers – to extract liver oil.
Finning live sharks is illegal in New Zealand under the Animal Welfare Act, but if the shark is dead it is legal.


Anecdotal reports suggest that shark fins are an increasingly common target among commercial fishers because of soaring demand and prices for the fins, and recent newspaper reports indicate that live finning (video) occurs in New Zealand waters, even though this practice is illegal.
In October 2007 the Ministry of Fisheries released a draft National Plan of Action for sharks. Calls to ban the practise of finning in New Zealand were made by Forest & Bird, other Environmental NGOs, leading shark scientists, the NZ Recreational Fishing Association, the Big Game Fishing Council, chefs, food critics and thousands of New Zealanders outraged that we condone such a practise.
Despite our efforts in October 2008, the 5 year NPOA-Sharks was signed off by the outgoing government condoning the practise of shark finning.
Sharks: we don’t know enough
The Ministry of Fisheries has good records on the population figures of only three shark species, despite the fact 79 species are caught in our fisheries.
Claims that our fisheries Quota Management System are sufficient to protect shark stocks are therefore clearly unjustified. With such a lack of data it is hard to determine the degree of damage we are inflicting on our shark populations and what levels of action are needed to protect them.
However, data on recent by-catch numbers and anecdotal reports form recreational and game fishers suggest that shark populations are declining.
Keep our sharks in our oceans and out of the soup
As the guardians of a sea area that is more than 15 times bigger than New Zealand’s land mass, New Zealanders have an international obligation to protect sharks from extinction, and prevent the inevitable ecological disruption that will be created if these ancient creatures are wiped out.
To stop the decimation of our shark population Forest & Bird believes we must follow South Africa, the USA, the EU and others and make it mandatory that sharks be landed whole as a disincentive to stop the lucrative and wasteful business of shark finning.
STOP SHARK FINNINGSo that:• Any sharks taken must be landed with the whole carcass.* * Forest & Bird supports some processing (bleeding and gutting) at sea to prevent ammoniation of the flesh of some shark species.
For Forest & Bird's full position on shark finning - clickhere
Campaign Details
More campaigns in this region
National
Take Action!
What You Can Do In 5 minutes
Support Forest & Bird’s campaign by organising a public display or awareness event. To help you contact our marine conservation advocate Kirstie Knowles (k.knowles@forestandbird.org.nz
Make a pledge to support the banning of shark finning.
Say no to shark fin soup and other shark products.
Share the knowledge - tell your friends about your concerns about shark finning.
What You Can Do In 20 minutes
Email the Minister of Fisheries (phil.heatley@parliament.govt.nz
and Minister of Conservation (tim.groser@parliament.govt.nz
or write to them (Parliament Buildings, Wellington - freepost) asking for a ban on shark finning and better protection for our threatened sharks.
Visit your local MPs asking them to push for a ban on shark finning.

SEA LIONS OF NEW ZEALAND!INFORMATION AND CAMPAIGN UPDATES

Our sea lion is a champion deep-sea diver, reaching depths of 600 metres and clocking up dives of up to 12 minutes.

NZ Sea Lion Facts
Find out how many sea-lions have been killed this season by clicking here.
Repeatedly hunted throughout history for their skin, meat & blubber, New Zealand sea lion populations were on the verge of extinction by the 1800s.
Most New Zealand sea lions live in the sub-Antarctic islands.
Sea lions travel huge distances for food – up to 175km from the coast.
Sea lions once ranged throughout the North, South and Chatham Islands, but numbers have been drastically reduced due to hunting.
Only recently have sea lions started breeding on the Otago Peninsula.
In the last 10 years, squid trawl nets have killed between 14 and 123 sea lions every year.
In 2001, sea lion exclusion devices (SLEDs) were introduced into the squid trawl fishery to assist sea lions to escape from nets. However, the effectiveness of SLEDs in increasing sea lion survival is unknown.
As well as holding the title as the deepest diver amongst sea-lions, these marine mammals can lay claim to a less trumpeted title - as one of the world's most endangered sea-lions.

The population demise of our sea-lions began in the 1800s, when they fell victim to sealers’ clubs bringing them to the brink of extinction and leaving only scattered populations on remote sub-Antarctic islands.

These populations have not been able to recover due to disease and continued pressure from the modern squid fishery, as many sea lions are killed as by-catch in nets.

Today, New Zealand sea lions are estimated to number between 10,200 and 13,600 individuals, including just 5000 adults. Most breeding (86%) occurs on the Auckland Islands.

Such concentrated populations of nursing mothers make these sea lions particularly vulnerable to epidemics such as the devastating bacterial infections that swept through these populations in 1998, 2002 and 2003. The worst of these events in 1998 killed more than 50% of pups and 20% of the adult population.

Over the last eight years, the number of pups produced has declined significantly – thought to be a knock-on effect from a decline in the number of breeding adults.

The seal specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (a group of 7000 international specialists) of IUCN (the World Conservation Union), ranks the New Zealand sea lion as a vulnerable threatened species (see http://www.redlist.org


Threats : Trawlers
As well as suffering a huge population blow from these recent epidemics, each year dozens of sea lions die in the gigantic trawl nets of the Auckland Islands squid trawl fishery. The nets resemble giant socks, with openings between 4 - 60 metres high and stretching 150-200 metres in length.

Since the squid fishing season coincides with the sea lions' breeding season, many of the victims are pregnant and nursing mothers. Unborn pups follow the fate of their pregnant mothers, and pups are left to starve onshore, significantly increasing the death toll from trawl fishing.

In 2006, all females captured in the squid trawl fishery had recently given birth and were pregnant again. And in the 2008-09 season, scientists on New Zealand’s sub-Antarctic islands reported a 31% decrease in the amount of sea-lion pups being born, heightening fears about the impact of by-catch deaths.

In the last 10 years, more than 700 sea lions are estimated to have been killed in the sub-Antarctic squid trawl fishery alone – this does not include pups on shore and unborn babies. And these are the recorded deaths from the squid fishery alone - there are other fisheries in the Auckland Islands area that also catch sea lions, but they are not restricted under current fisheries management.

Save our sea lions: what is being done.
Sea Lion Distribution



Zoom in
IN 1995, a Marine Mammal Sanctuary (MMS) was established in the Auckland Islands to help protect sea lions. Stretching for 12 nautical miles from nearest shore, this sanctuary will allow the government to implement fishing regulations in these areas.

In 2003, an overlapping no-take marine reserve was establishing in this area, giving further protection to our sea lions. However, neither the marine reserve nor the marine mammal sanctuary covers the whole range of any NZ sea lion.

Forest & Bird believe that the MMS should be extended so that it protects the areas where the only breeding strong hold of NZ sea lions are found.

The sanctuary should be extended to the 500m continental shelf edge. The fishing method of jigging, which does not harm sea lions, would still be allowed.

Extending the sanctuary would not only increase protection for New Zealand sea lions, but also enhance the protection of 52 breeding marine bird species – many of which are listed as vulnerable by the IUCN. It would also protect New Zealand fur seals, southern elephant seals and threatened southern right whales, all of which forage and/or breed around the Auckland Islands.

Forest & Bird also supports:
Establishment of a marine mammal sanctuary around the Campbell Islands to protect another small breeding population of sea lions.
Reduction of sea lion deaths to zero in all fisheries. (This season, 113 sea-lions are legally allowed to be killed as by-catch - this is 40% more than the previous year. For a pictorial representation of this click here. Update: A 30% decrease in the amount of sea-lion pups for this season has prompted fisher ).
Transfer of squid quota in the Auckland Islands trawl fishery to other areas or to jig fisheries, which do not harm sea lions.
Current Policies
Ministry of Fisheries: Operational Plan. Each year an Operational Plan for the Auckland Islands squid trawl fishery (SQU6T) is set under the Fisheries Act to avoid, remedy or mitigate the effects of the fishery on New Zealand sea lions. This plan establishes an allowable ‘kill quota’ or number of sea lions allowed to be killed by the fishery each year. Submissions on the 2008-09 Operational plan are due on 31 October 2008
- Draft SQU6T Operational Plan
- F&B Submission on the 2008-09 Operational Plan (Word Document)
The Department of Conservation is working on a new policy to protect New Zealand sea lions. This would take the responsibility of protecting sea lions out of the direct control of the Minister of Fisheries and into the hands of the Minister of Conservation (with the agreement of the Minister of Fisheries). Forest & Bird submissions are as follows:
Submission by Forest & Bird on: Draft population management plan for New Zealand sea lion (Dec 2007)(PDF)
Submission by Forest & Bird on: Draft New Zealand sea lion species management plan: 2007-2017 (Dec 2007)(PDF)
Campaign Details
Branches working on this campaign
DunedinSouthlandMore campaigns in this region
National
For further details visit:http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/what-we-do/campaigns/save-our-sea-lions

Saturday, July 18, 2009

New rules for safe shipping may save the whales




End of the line ... Nisshin Maru runs into threatening waters.
THE world's only factory whaling ship may be driven from the Antarctic by tighter regulations.

The Nisshin Maru is vital to the operations of the Japanese whaling fleet, but it will run foul of new rules imposed by the United Nations' International Maritime Organisation, an investigation by the Herald has found.

The ship will fall foul of three new measures that will apply in Antarctic waters: the heavy fuel oil it uses will be banned; its hull-strength and safety will fail new requirements; and its annual dumping of thousands of tonnes of offal at sea will be rejected in the global nature reserve.

The regulations were backed by the Antarctic Treaty System after a series of accidents involving tourism cruise ships, including the sinking of the MS Explorer.

They pose a dilemma for Japan, one of the world's largest and most law-abiding shipping nations, and threaten to make the operation of its heavily subsidised whaling fleet even more costly.

The 22-year-old Nisshin Maru weighs 8000 tonnes. It is owned by Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha, a company in Tokyo that is owned by the government-funded Institute of Cetacean Research.
Full story:


Friday, July 17, 2009

Ian Campbell Calls for Boycott of Japanese Bid for the 2016 Olympics

eIan Campbell Calls for Boycott of Japanese Bid for the 2016 Olympics

Sea Shepherd Advisor Calls Japanese Dolphin Slaughter a “Travesty”
Former Australian Senator and Environment Minister Ian Campbell is calling for a boycott of Tokyo's bid for the 2016 Olympics, in protest at Japan's alleged annual slaughter of 23,000 dolphins.

Ian Campbell is now an advisor to the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.



From the Melbourne Age

Boycott Japan Olympics bid: ex-minister

July 15, 2009 - Former federal environment minister Ian Campbell wants a boycott of Tokyo's bid for the 2016 Olympics, in protest at Japan's alleged annual slaughter of 23,000 dolphins.

Allowing Japan to host the Summer Games only 300 nautical miles from Taiji, the Japanese port where the killings occur, would be a "travesty", Mr Campbell says.

"Japan is trying to pitch its bid for the 2016 Summer Games as a `Green Olympics' whilst just across the bay one of the greatest acts of environmental vandalism on our planet paints the waters red," he said in a statement on Wednesday.

The dolphin killing allegedly occurs every September off Taiji on Japan's south coast.

Mr Campbell was environment minister from 2004 to 2007 in the Howard government and joined the International Advisory Board for the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society in January 2008.

An anti-whaling activist, he rejected Japan's claims their whaling efforts were scientific, calling them `sick' and `absurd' in a 2005 ABC interview.

The Sea Shepherd Society says the Taiji dolphin killings have been filmed by the Oceanic Preservation Society for a documentary called The Cove, to be released in Australia on August 20.

Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Chicago have also entered bids to host the 2016 Olympics. A decision will be made at the International Olympic Committee's meeting in Copenhagen on October 2 this year.



The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society first exposed the horrific slaughter of the dolphins in 2003 when our photographs and videos of the massacre appeared on the front pages of newspapers and on the evening news of media around the world. That was the same year that Allison Lance and Alex Cornelissen were jailed for three weeks for saving the lives of 15 dolphins and pilot whales by cutting the nets at Taiji Bay.

Since then the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has been working with Surfers for Cetaceans and the Oceanic Preservation Society to end the slaughter of 23,000 dolphins by Japanese fishermen every year.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Feds ban krill fishing to save it for the whales

Feds ban krill fishing to save it for the whales
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/50687252.html


by JEFF BARNARD AP Environmental Writer
Originally printed at http://www.komonews.com/news/local/50687252.html


No one fishes for krill off the West Coast, and federal fisheries managers want to keep it that way so the tiny shrimp-like creatures remain as plentiful as possible as food for whales, salmon, and seabirds.

NOAA Fisheries Service on Monday issued a final rule barring krill fishing inside the 200-mile limit in the Pacific off California, Oregon and Washington.

Krill are taken primarily off Antarctica, where scientists have raised concerns the fishery has upset the food web, making life tougher for penguins and other marine life. A smaller fishery has been going since the 1970s off British Columbia. The catch is processed into food for salmon farms, as well as home aquariums, and an oil consumed by people.

The idea to save krill for marine life originally came from managers of the national marine sanctuaries off California, who became concerned in 2003 after rockfish populations declined, and later in 2005 when a downturn in krill populations was blamed for starving sea birds and other West Coast marine life.

"Krill is a critical prey for a huge number of vertebrate species there," including whales, salmon and rockfish, said William Douros, NOAA's West Coast regional director of marine sanctuaries.

The Pacific Fishery Management Council sets ocean fishing limits, and staffer Mike Burner said they shared the sanctuary managers' concerns.

The council has had to severely cut back harvests of rockfish and salmon, both of which depend on krill for food, and it made no sense to further reduce that food supply by opening a new fishery, Burner said.

The decision was praised by environmentalists as a new approach to fisheries management based on maintaining the overall health of an entire ecosystem, rather than just focusing on population numbers of one species at a time.

"It's proactive and precautionary taking action now before there is a crisis, rather than waiting for a big problem to occur and then having to deal with it," said Oceana spokesman Ben Enticknap.


__________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.animalsinthewild.org

Monday, July 13, 2009

Watching Whales Watching Us

By CHARLES SIEBERT
On the afternoon of Sept. 25, 2002, a group of marine biologists vacationing on Isla San José, in Baja California Sur, Mexico, came upon a couple of whales stranded along the beach. A quick assessment indicated that they had died quite recently. The scientists radioed a passing vessel and sent a message to a colleague at a nearby marine-mammal laboratory, who came to the beach to do an examination.

They were beaked whales, of which there are 20 known species. Relatively small members of the cetacean family, they resemble outsize dolphins, and because of their deep-diving ways, they are among the least observed and understood. Curiously, the stranding on Isla San José followed by just one day the stranding of at least 14 other beaked whales 5,700 miles away along the Canary Islands beaches of Lanzarote and Fuerteventura. Rescuers there worked feverishly to water down the whales and keep them cool. They all eventually died, however, and some of their bodies were immediately sent to the nearby city Las Palmas de Gran Canaria for analysis.

It is nearly impossible to pinpoint the precise cause of a whale's stranding. Theories invariably include factors like the straying of a sick and dying whale leader, faithfully followed by the members of his pod, or sudden shallows along the shores of a migratory route. The two strandings in September 2002, however, did have something intriguing in common. It was noted by the Canary Islands rescuers that naval vessels were carrying out exercises that day not far offshore, a situation that had accompanied four other mass whale strandings on Canary Islands beaches since 1985. And while no such military exercises were being conducted off the beaches of Isla San José, the vessel that the scientists radioed turned out to be a research ship dragging an array of powerful underwater air guns that were repeatedly set off the previous morning in the course of seismic tests of the region's ocean floor.

The suspicion of a causal relationship between whale strandings and either seismic tests or the use of new high-tech sonar tracking devices in military-training exercises had been mounting for some time. Similar coincidences had been noted off the coasts of Brazil, the Bahamas, the Galápagos Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Japan, as well as in the waters off Italy and Greece. Necropsies performed on a number of the whales revealed lesions about their brains and ears. The results of the examinations performed on the Canary Islands whales, however, added a whole other, darker dimension to the whale-stranding mystery. In addition to bleeding around the whales' brains and ears, scientists found lesions in their livers, lungs and kidneys, as well as nitrogen bubbles in their organs and tissue, all classic symptoms of a sickness that scientists had naturally assumed whales would be immune to: the bends.

It might sound like something out of a bad sci-fi film: whales sent into suicidal dashes toward the ocean's surface to escape the madness-inducing echo chamber that we humans have made of their sound-sensitive habitat. But since the Canary Islands stranding in 2002, similar necropsy results have turned up with a number of beached whales, and the deleterious effects of sonar and other human-generated sounds on ocean ecosystems have been firmly established.

Full story

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12whales-t.html?hpw=&pagewanted=print


or http://tiny.cc/Py6Jz

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Save the Western Gray Whale from Extinction!Take Action!

Save the Western Gray Whale from Extinction!
In a recent victory, oil companies Gazprom, Shell, Mitsui, and Mitsubishi (Sakhalin II project sponsors) agreed to halt seismic testing on Sakhalin Island, Russia to protect a critically endangered whale population. This is an incredible victory that we couldn’t have done without your help!However, Exxon, BP, and Rosneft are still planning to operate in this sensitive whale habitat. Your quick action can save the Western Gray Whale from extinction. If allowed to continue, these activities could force the critically endangered Western Gray Whales from their primary feeding area.The Western Gray Whale is one of the most critically endangered whale populations on earth. Only about 120 individuals, and 25 breeding females, remain. These imperiled whales feed only in the summer and autumn, and almost exclusively near Piltun Bay in northeast Sakhalin. Unfortunately, in 2008, large Russian and international oil and gas companies’ operations in the area coincided with a sharp decline in whales observed in their primary feeding area.As a result, internationally recognized scientists of the Western Gray Whale Advisory Group (WGWAP) have urgently warned oil and gas companies operating in the area to implement a moratorium on all industrial activities in or near the whales’ main feeding area for summer and autumn of 2009. Failure to heed these scientists’ warnings could be devastating for the whale population.Gazprom, Shell, Mitsui, and Mitsubishi (Sakhalin II project sponsors) have already agreed to the urgent moratorium. However, Exxon, BP, and Rosneft have not yet complied with the moratorium. Please join us in urging the remaining companies operating in the area to join the moratorium and to support the proposed Sakhalin Marine Federal Wildlife Reserve.
Rex W. Tillerson, Chairman and CEO, ExxonMobil Tony Hayward, Chief Executive, BP Group Sergey Bogdanchikov, President, Rosneft RE: MORATORIUM NEEDED TO PROTECT WESTERN GRAY WHALE FROM EXTINCTION I call on you to join other corporations to implement a moratorium on onshore and offshore exploitation in and around the summer and autumn feeding habitat of the critically endangered Western Gray Whale near Russia’s Sakhalin Island. With only about 120 individuals remaining--including only about 25 breeding females--the Western Gray Whale is already on the verge of extinction. These whales feed only in the summer and autumn and their primary feeding ground lies in and adjacent to your company’s Piltun Bay area of operations. The number of observed Western Gray Whales in their primary feeding area declined sharply in 2008, according to the Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel (WGWAP), comprised of 11 prominent international scientists convened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). This decline coincided with disruptive oil and gas industrial activity in the area. Additional displacement of the whales from their primary feeding area in 2009 could be devastating for the population. As a result, the WGWAP urges a moratorium on all industrial activities on or near the whales’ main feeding area for summer and autumn of 2009. Gazprom, Shell, Mitsui, and Mitsubisi (Sakhalin II project sponsors) have taken a responsible course of action and have suspended their proposed 2009 seismic survey in the area. However, your company continues with plans for industrial exploitation activities that threaten the Western Gray Whale with extinction. Additionally, your company’s refusal thus far to cooperate with the WGWAP threatens to undercut the responsible actions taken by others. I urge you to join the growing call of scientists, local citizens, and companies to suspend these perilous operations and to support the creation of the proposed Sakhalin Marine Federal Wildlife Reserve. Sincerely,

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Action Alert!Whales in Danger!

Urge the Obama administration to reject a last minute Bush administration rule that would barrage whales along the Eastern Seaboard, the Gulf of Mexico, California and Hawaii with Navy sonar.

July 5, 2009

Dr. Jane Lubchenco, Under Secretary of Commerce & NOAA Administrator
cc: NOAA Fisheries Service
cc: President Barack Obama

Subject:


Dear Administrator Lubchenco,

(Edit Letter Below)

I strongly oppose rules, issued by the Bush administration in its final days, that would allow the Navy to harass or injure marine mammals more than 10 million times during naval training with mid-frequency active sonar.

I urge your agency and NOAA Fisheries, which is under your authority, to review and reissue the three rules authorizing the Navy to take marine mammals in its Hawaii Range Complex ("Hawaii") and Southern California Range Complex ("SOCAL"), and during Atlantic Fleet Active Sonar Training ("AFAST") along the entire east coast of the United States.

In issuing these rules, the Fisheries Service relied on the Navy's faulty estimations of harm, and did not meaningfully analyze the cumulative impacts of millions of sonar exposures on populations of marine mammals. In addition, the Fisheries Service did not impose adequate protections for marine mammals as required by the Marine Mammal Protection Act. It is critical that you adopt effective safeguards for marine life, given the extensive, long-term environmental impacts of the Navy's sonar training.

For these reasons, I urge you to reissue the AFAST, SOCAL and Hawaii rules after properly analyzing take estimates, accounting for cumulative impacts, and imposing meaningful safeguards for marine mammals.

I know that good science and environmental protection are hallmarks of the new administration. Please make sure the Navy upholds our environmental laws and protects marine mammals.
Sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your address]

Sincerely,

Sunday, June 28, 2009

FOR THE WHALES WE WEEP BEFORE FOREVER WE SLEEP

By Captain Paul Watson




From Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.







The sons of Adam descended upon the water

Without thought, devoid of love they began the slaughter

The children of Ahab baptized in hot gentle blood

Mercilessly seeking revenge for the ancient flood

.. ..



I am writing this on a tropical hillside over-looking the Atlantic Ocean. Behind me is the Pestana Casino Park Hotel on the island of Madeira. The 61st annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission is over. The hundreds of delegates have departed the island like guilty shadows back to their respective nations, leaving a foul taste and stench in the air over Funchal, from yet another IWC meeting that accomplished absolutely nothing.




After a week spent observing delegates to the International Whaling Commission in Funchal, Madiera, I have come to recognize just what it is that is missing from this annual bureaucratic orgy of inaction.




Whales!




The talk around the bar in the evening or at the tables in the restaurant during meals is your usual banter about football, kids, politics and the economy. I did not detect much concern for the whales. The African and ..Caribbean.. delegates in town on a Japanese funded junket in exchange for their votes, were more interested in the night life and most of the NGO’s were chit chatting about pretty much nothing.




The whalers were as usual getting stupidly drunk. I was most amused to see Icelandic whaling boss Krisj..ian.. Loftson trying to drunkenly impersonate the Jazz singer. It was eerie indeed to be sitting so close to such a serial killer. I had seen the pictures of him perversely shoving his entire arm into a raw open wound in a Fin whale. The man literally wallows in the blood of the whales and yet here he was sipping girly pink fruity drinks with little apricot coloured umbrellas. The contrast was chilling.




The entire conference was devoid of empathy, compassion and respect, reduced to purely utilitarian.. discussions that viewed the whale as nothing more than mindless objects to be bartered, and statistics to be debated.




Overall the impression that I was left with is that whales are some sort of vague abstraction and although they were the reason for this annual luxury fest, they did not seem to occupy much of a presence in the minds of, and certainly not in the hearts of most of these delegates.




As the delegates met and mumbled incoherently about all sorts of assorted nonsense in the windowless conference room, I was forced, due to being officially banned from the conference, into sitting around the lobby intimidating Japanese whalers or standing on the lawn over-looking the spectacular vista of the Desertas islands across the rich deep blue of the Atlantic.



I was recalling that in 1865, behind those very islands the Confederate commerce raider Shenandoah was covertly outfitted with the guns she would use to destroy the Yankee whaling fleet, when suddenly I saw a flash of white in the bay and a tingle of excitement ran up my spine as I saw a whale breach and spout.




There it was, a member of the most evolved group of minds in the sea, a real in the flesh whale and I wondered what that whale would think and feel about the collection of arrogant primates in the building behind me sitting around talking about his species and cousins as if they were little more than mindless unfeeling slabs of meat in the marketplace.




Although governments are funding scientists to explore the galaxy in search of extraterrestrial intelligence, they are spending nothing to explore the possibility of communicating with intelligent life forms on our very own planet. It occurred to me that even discussing the possibility of inter-species communication would be incomprehensible to most of the delegates in the conference room.




I was lamenting the fact that there were so few protestors appearing at these meetings compared to the thousands that once blocked the doors and threw blood on the Japanese delegates in years gone by. Even last year, courageous Chileans were carried off by soldiers as armoured vehicles stood guard with machine guns to keep emotion from contaminating the cold calculations of the discussions over scientific kill permits and aboriginal slaughter allowances.




Only two groups were openly opposing the slaughter this year in the streets of Funchal. Sea Shepherd crew members and Surfers for Cetaceans. There was not a Greenpeace, IFAW or WWF sign or tee shirt to be seen. The mainstream NGO delegates in their suits and ties had been blended into the domesticated uniformity of the delegate crowd.



Greenpeacers who once stood beside me to block harpoons and seal clubs were now dutifully boarding buses to have cocktails and polite conversation with whalers and swivel servants to discuss such mundane matters as compromises and reduced quotas, concessions and special cultural dispensations. It was plain that they had forgotten the horrific screams of the whales and the gut-wrenching plea in the eye of the whale for us to champion their cause before humanity.




Arne and Christine who flew in from Germany at their own expense to stand before the hotel with a banner pleading for the lives of whales and those sterile suits on the inside being paid to sip tea and pretending to be effective was an enlightening contrast. On the outside there reigned compassion, a human emotion, that the Portuguese police were determined was not going to pollute the goings on of those officially designated as dignitaries on the inside.




World class free surfer Dave “Rasta” Rastovich arrived and took his board to the sea to mediate on the chilly petty pseudo dramas of those in the darkened enclosed room of fears and jeers. He and his fellow surfers were the link between us on land and those awesome cetacean minds offshore.




When someone commented that it seemed strange that Rasta would come all the way to the IWC from Australia just to surf, the thought struck me that perhaps he was accomplishing much more out there on the water than any of the great pretenders on the inside with their spongy straw heads babbling garbled inanities about a majestic life form they knew absolutely nothing about.




Of course not all of them on the inside are unfeeling machines with their heads completely up their posteriors. They were divided into three colours. The blue of official delegations, the green of the non governmental organizations (NGO’s) and the red for the media.




The red represented a spectrum of postures from pseudo objectivity to propagandists with a sprinkle of genuine truth seekers like ..Andrew Darby.. and Mick McIntyre. The green represented another spectrum of diversity from banner wavers to socially acceptable activists and amongst the blue were politic..ian..s and bureaucrats who were not completely without feeling. Many of them in the pro-whale conservation delegations like Australia, the USA, Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, Monaco, the Netherlands and New Zealand etc, were quite genuine in their concern for the whales but trapped in the crippling corporate and governmental controlled vice of IWC protocols that render decision making practically impossible. I’m sure that Austral..ian.. Environment Minister Peter Garrett would like to see whaling ended in the Southern Ocean but the political and economic obstacles tossed in his way force him to stumble and appear ineffective. United States Commissioner Bill Hogarth to his credit did succeed in saving the lives of 100 Humpbacks over the last two years and for that he is to be commended but he also failed to budge the dead weight of IWC uselessness. But did he ever have a chance? The Japanese and their little bought and paid for puppet nations have managed to throw cog after cog into the workings of the machinations of the IWC to the point that the entire organization has become moribund and for all intends and purposes – dead.




The rank smell left drifting over Funchal in the wake of the IWC was simply the smell of years of rot and decay as the cancerous zombie like body once known as the International Whaling Commission has wasted away into bureaucratic slime and internal corruption, stumbling sightlessly towards nowhere with the scarlet blood of the whales dripping from gangrenous greyish black lips.




This organization at the age of 63 is quite simply a dead entity haunting a different luxury hotel every year. Toothless, useless and covered in bureaucratic boils, administrative hives, and ulcerous corporatepuscular tumours all of it reeking of greed and ecological ignorance.




This emasculated dog and pony show stumbles tediously on and will meet next year not far from where it failed this year, in Morocco where the delegates from St. Lucia, St. Kitts and all those other silly Saint whorish places that dare to call themselves real countries holding a vote, will descend for yet another Japanese paid holiday, this time with hashish and camel rides.




And meanwhile the gentle whales keep dying as the Japanese monstrously blow their sensitive guts apart with the burning shrapnel of their insidious harpoons and the Icelanders, Greenlanders and Norweg..ian..s, like cold blooded Nordic beserkers strike grisly and merciless death into the mighty hearts of endangered Fins and Humpbacks and defenceless Minkes.




These delegates cannot see, they cannot feel, nor can they understand the enduring pain that we, who love the whales, experience when we witness the deaths of these gentle g..ian..ts, these great armless Buddha’s, these maritime music..ian..s and poets. Where we see intelligence, family bonds and beauty, those on the darker side of humanity merely see materialistic profit. For us it’s music and magic, grace and beauty and for those cold blooded others it is simply blubber and meat, money and power.




In the hotel where the IWC were meeting, Charles Hambleton of the Oceanic Preservation Society aired the film The Cove to any delegate who cared to see it and unfortunately most who did care to see it already cared. Perhaps if the Japanese, Norweg..ian..s and their globe trotting gigolos were strapped down and forced to watch the malicious mass murder of the dolphins they would be able to understand what drives the fiery passion of a Ric O’Berry or an ..Allison Lance.. (who freed 15 dolphins from Taiji in 2003).




If some of those delegates inside could actually have the opportunity to swim with the whales, perhaps they would understand, instead of saying as the delegate from Antigua did that she knew there were whales near ..Antigua.. because she saw one on television once.




How do we get such bureaucrats who speak bureaucratese to even begin to understand the gentle vision of artist Howie Cooke or the courage of a Sea Shepherd crewmember.




Most likely we can’t. Those of us who care about the whales find that we can communicate more effectively with whales and dolphins than with these alien suits whose behavioural patterns are leading the world to collective suicide. They don’t understand that if we can’t save the whales, we will fail to save the oceans and if the oceans die, then we all die, and all the great dreams of humanity will be blown away as dust in the winds of time.



And the Inuits, the Alaskans, the Greenlanders, the Makah and all those aboriginal communities that confuse the debate with their chauvinistic obsession to slaughter for culture, will they ever realize that the cultural values of the first nations, those other species who were here long before us should and must take precedence over the rights of any hominid to chew whale blubber in a world where whales are fast disappearing?




Why must a Bowhead whale, two centuries old, die in abject agony, just so a very small minority of people can continue to chew their fat pretending that their archaic cultures are still viable in a world gone ecologically insane?Preserving a culture of slaughter in a world of mass extinction should be the least of our collective priorities.



Preserving biodiversity in the midst of a major extinction event should be our greatest of priorities. These so called ancient hominid cultures were not wise nor were they sacred, and all human cultures without exception have contributed to the extinction of species. To allow so called aboriginal cultures to finish off the survivors is simply selfish, shallow, and short-sighted. To allow the Inuit to continue to murder and destroy the more ancient and far wiser culture of the whales is no different than if we allowed the cannibals of ..Borneo.. to have preserved their culture of culinary homicide.




To the Humpbacks, the Greenlanders are murderers, to the dolphins the fishermen of Taiji are ruthless serial killers and to the pilot whales the ferocious butchers of the Faeroe Islands are savage barbarians. The massacre last year of over 500 narwhals by the Inuit in Canada was a vicious crime against nature perpetuated by sadistic killers who hid behind the hypocritical skirts of political correctness.

.. ..

How do we even begin to communicate the incredible despair that we feel in trying to communicate the pain and suffering of whales and dolphins to a humanity grossly alienated from the living reality of nature and armoured in layers of anthropocentric fantasies that proclaim the human to be a divine legend in our own pathetic little minds?




The act of harpooning a whale, of spearing a dolphin, of clubbing a seal, are simply incomprehensible to those of us on the outside of these regulatory agencies. We are constantly amazed at the repetitive accusations of terrorism and violence from vicious killers as we seek to stop the killing. It is like there are two species of humanity on the planet – the ruthless anthropocentric killing machines who slaughter without mercy or remorse and those of us whose alleg..ian..ce is to the biocentric view that all Earthlings regardless of species, have the inalienable right to life and the pursuit of happiness.




I have heard the screams of dying whales. I have seen their hot steaming blood gush into the cold waters of the sea. I have heard the sickening thud of a seal club as it smashes the skull of a baby seal and I have seen dolphins, mad with fear, blood pulsing from gaping raw wounds as they desperately try to save the lives of their children from the insane spears and knives of their laughing human tormentors.




I have seen, heard, smelt, felt and experienced these horrors most of my life as I have done all in my power within the bounds of the law and non-violence to halt the killing, to exercise compassion and to promote an understanding of the rights and the dignity of those fellow Earthlings who suffer so tremendously from the blood-stained hands of my fellow humans.




I hope that next year will see the demise of the IWC. We need to remove this embarrassing posturing of an organization that pretends to regulate whaling and we need to replace it with an organization dedicated to the complete protection of all cetaceans, that will draft and enforce laws that will end the murder of the uniquely intelligent and socially complex communities of whales and dolphins.




The slaughter of these magnificent sentient beings has no place in the 21st Century, no place in any human culture and no place in this world of the homocene mass extinctions..




Somewhere, tens of millions of miles away, a manmade spacecraft is hurtling towards the outer reaches of the galaxy. Within that spaceship named Voyager, thanks to the wisdom of Dr. ..Roger Payne.. and Dr. Carl Sagan is a recording of a song by a Humpback whale. I wonder which voice, human or whale will entice a far distant intelligent extraterrestrial species? Will either whale or human even exist on this planet should visitors grace us with their presence?




And as for these horrific annual meetings, I wonder which voices will be remembered and respected hundreds of years, or even millions of years from now?




I smile to myself when I envision that song engraved on a disc of gold and released into the stream of infinity. Mick Jagger’s voice on that space wandering disc lamenting that humankind cannot get any satisfaction and the song of the whales bearing a message of magic and mystery to borders beyond the unknown.




Who will our own provincial history remember with respect? The whale killers or the whale defenders? If history is any guide at all, it will be the whale defenders that our ancestors will thank and not the villainous killers of such unique, graceful and intelligent sentient beings.




It will be the image of artist Howie Cooke gifting a mural to Funchal school children or Dave Rastovich surfing alongside a dolphin in the waters of Madeira or the ..Azores.. or Dr. Sidney Holt smiling in hope for a future for both whales and humans. It will be Dr. Bill Hogarth’s gift of a hundred Humpbacks to posterity and it will be Ric O’Berry walking courageously through the meeting at St. Kitt’s with the images of the reality of blood, gore and horror flashing in a nauseating flicker of delirium from a video screen on his chest. It will be ..Hannah Fraser..’s mermaid tail flashing like a beacon of hope at the Santiago meeting or little Skye Bortelli confronting Japanese whalers with children’s poems and art, as burly bodyguards stood ready to pounce on her as a suspected terrorist. It will be Peggy Oki’s thousands of origami whales displayed at the meeting in ..Anchorage.. or former Australian Environment Minister Ian Campbell returning to Santiago as an activist after experiencing the frustration of being a delegate.




The story of the IWC will be remembered for those who spoke for the whales and defended them and not for those who slew and destroyed them. Slavers, whalers and other serial killers, war mongers and dictators may enjoy power and prestige in the present but are invariably condemned in the future by more enlightened descendants. .





Where do we go from here? I intend to return to the Southern Ocean to mount a sixth expedition aimed at saving as many whales as possible from the illegal harpoons of the Japanese whaling fleet and if given the resources we will sail to the North Atlantic to see what we can do to stop the Nordic serial killers.




And if my body does not sink silently into the cold dark depths of the Southern Ocean or is confined to a dungeon under the shadow of Fujiyama, I will be back in Morocco next summer.




We cannot retreat. We can never surrender. We need to continue throwing documentaries like The Cove and television programs like Whale Wars into the faces of the ruthless practitioners of brutal cetacide. We need to continue to block the harpoons and we need to continue to sink outlaw whalers, and we must use our imaginations, our humour, our art, our music, our poetry, and our lives to defend and protect the graceful and gentle giants of the deep.




In the end we will triumph, we must triumph or at least we will have done all that we could with the resources available to us to defend and protect a legacy that we can bequeath to the future.




In doing so, we will have lived lives of honour and selflessness and when you think about it, what better endeavour is there than to devote one’s life to than bestowing the gift of life and survival to a species successfully protected into the future of our most wondrous jewel of a planet?




From dust we came and to dust we will go, but in between, we can create and fight for the light of beauty and truth against the forces of greed and darkness.



After all is said and done, the fact remains is that the forces of light were represented this year in Madeira, peering into the dungeon of darkness from the outside looking in, a reminder that a light of compassion still flickers within the heart of humanity, waiting for the darkness of the human heart to be illuminated with a new understanding that we are not alone on this planet, and that somewhere out there on the vast shroud of the ocean, in her mysterious depths, there swims whales and dolphins, and in their evolved brains dwells a separate reality and perhaps therein lies forgiveness for the lethal and obscene sins we have collectively inflicted upon their gentle souls.




For the ultimate truth is this – if we fail to save the great whales, we will fail to save ourselves and thus we weep for the whales in fear that if they disappear than so shall we – forever!