Showing posts with label laboratory animals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label laboratory animals. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Labs' cruelty-law exemption advances



An effort to exempt animal-research facilities from prosecution under
the state's animal-cruelty law got the support of the state Senate
National Resources, Infrastructure and Public Debt Committee Monday.
It now moves on to the Senate Rules Committee.

Senate Bill 1159 would exclude scientific experiments performed in
federally regulated research facilities from Arizona's law against
animal cruelty. Currently, activities related to the taking of
wildlife, animal agriculture and any activities regulated by the
Arizona Game and Fish Department or the Arizona Department of
Agriculture are exempt.

More than 40 other states have an exemption for scientific experiments.

Stephanie Nichols-Young, president of the Animal Defense League of
Arizona, said the bill is being heavily lobbied by Covance, a
drug-testing company that opened in Chandler last year amid heavy
opposition from animal-rights groups.

"Covance is new to our community and very different from the labs that
have been in our state for decades," she said. "Why would you give up
this right for a huge facility coming in when you don't know what
you're going to get?"

--
full story:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2010/02/02/20100202animal-cruelty-bill0202.html

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Primate Imports to the United States, 2009



IPPL has obtained from the US Government a LEMIS spread-sheet showing
the numbers of monkeys imported to the United States in 2009. Anyone
interested in receiving a copy of the full spread-sheet to work on it
some more, please contact IPPL (info@ippl.org). Each shipment is
reported separately. The crab-eating macaque is not native to China
and all animals exported from China were either wild-caught or
descended from wild-caught animals and there are suspicions that
wild-caught animals imported to China from other nations are imported
on false captive-born documents which is difficult to investigate or
prove. Attempts to obtain parallel data from Customs and CDC for
comparison have failed to date. Note that no baboons were imported
and no monkeys from India, Bangladesh, Malaysia, or Nepal. Some US
companies are establishing labs in Asia. The largest single exporter
is the Nafovanny company, Vietnam.

Total number of monkeys reaching the United States in 2009: 22,098

China 13158
Mauritius, 3199
Vietnam 3118
Cambodia 1080
Indonesia 480
Saint Kitts and Nevis 372
Philippines 300
Israel 240
Barbados 72
Peru 20
France 16
Guatemala 16
Guyana 14
Japan 6
New Zealand 3
Great Britain 2
United States (2, re-import)

Species (numbers under 10 omitted)

Crab-eating macaque, 19979
Rhesus macaque, 596
African green), 154
Owl monkey, 20
Spider monkey), 16
Mouse lemur, 15
Saki, 14

Sorted by Foreign Exporters (companies shipping less than 20 omitted)

Nafovanny 3118 (Vietnam)
Huazheng Laboratory Animal Breeding Centre 2558 (China)
Guangxi Weimei Bio-Tech 1800 (China)
Bioculture 1631 (Mauritius)
Guangzhou Blooming Spring Biotech 1460 (China)
Hainan Jinjang Lab Animal Co. 1149 (China)
Beijing Puliyuan Trading 1149 (China)
Angkor Primates Inc. 1080 (Cambodia)
Yunnan Lab Primate 1021 (China)
Noveprim 700 (Mauritius)
Biodia 588 (Mauritius)
Guangdong Landau Biotechnology 578 (China)
China National Scientific Instruments 540 (China)
Wing Freight 480 (China)
CV Inquatex 360 (Indonesia)
Fang Cheng Gang Spring Biotech 360 (China)
Scientific Primates Filipinas, 300 (Philippines)
Les Campeches 260 (Mauritius)
Gaoyao Kangda Lab Animals Science and Technology 252 (China)
B.F.C - Monkey Breeding Farm 240 (Israel)
Beijing Grandforest 240 (China)
Tianjin Jinxin Import/Export 240 (China)
Primate Resources International 214 (St. Kitts)
St. Kitts Biomedical Research Foundation 122 (St. Kitts)
Beijing Ultimate Bioscience Co. 120 (China)
Biomedical Research RESEARCH (GZ), 120 (China)
Guangdong Scientific Instruments and Materials 120 (China)
Guangxi Grandforest Scientific Primate Co. 120 (China)
Pt. Wanara Satwaloka 120 (Indonesia)
Suzhou Jin Nuo Import/Export Co. 120 (China)
Conghua City Yueyuan Animal Breeding Farm at Qigan 120 (China)
DF Import/Export 110 (China)
Yongfu County Xingui Yesheng 109 (China)
Barbados Primate Research Center 108 (Barbados)
Conghua City Yueyuan Animal Breeding Farm 61 (China)
Instituto de Investigaciones Tropicales y de Altura 20 (Peru)
Sanofi Pasteur, 20 (France)

Sorted by U.S. Importer (those importing under 20 animals omitted)

Covance Research Products 9436
Charles River Laboratories, BRF 6436
SNBL-USA Ltd. 2040
Worldwide Primates 1007
Primate Products 848
Harlan Labs 779
Shared Enterprises 420
New Iberia Research Center, University of Louisiana 300
Valley Biosystems 262
Buckshire Corporation 181
Alphagenesis Inc. 178
Three Springs Scientific, 80
Wake Forest Univ. School of Medicine 42
Sanofi Pasteur 20

By port of entry

Los Angeles, CA, 14623
Chicago, IL, 3717
New York, NY, 2914
Miami, FL, 454
San Francisco, CA 300
Buffalo, NY, 76
Atlanta, GA, 14

996 monkeys were reported as "wild-caught": 5277 "Born in captivity
(F1 + generations)" and 15825 as "captive-bred."


Dr. Shirley McGreal, OBE, Chairwoman
International Primate Protection League
PO Box 766
Summerville, SC 29484, USA
Phone - 843-871-2280, Fax- 843-871-7988

E-mail - smcgreal@ippl.org
Web: www.ippl.org

Working to Protect All Primates Since 1973

One of the advantages of being disorderly is that one is constantly
making exciting discoveries. ~ AA Milne

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

BUAV News Alert: Ricky Gervais and Chrissie Hynde join BUAV call to end shocking and cruel animal botox tests

For immediate release 15th December 2009 Ricky Gervais and Chrissie Hynde join BUAV call to end shocking and cruel animal botox tests The BUAV is delighted that Ricky Gervais and Chrissie Hynde have joined its call to end the cruelty and suffering inflicted on mice for botox products. The campaign has been launched following a BUAV investigation that has revealed for the first time graphic and disturbing evidence of the suffering inflicted on hundreds of thousands of mice for botox testing and is calling on botox manufacturers such as Ipsen, Allergan and Merz-Pharma, to put an end to this appalling cruelty. Botox is used by huge numbers of people worldwide for cosmetic or vanity purposes – temporarily smoothing away wrinkles to enable people to look younger. While botox products undoubtedly have medical uses, a major use is for cosmetic purposes whether they are licensed for this use or used 'off-label.' The revelations of the suffering involved with just about every batch of botox that hits the high street has shocked members of the public and celebrities alike. The animal test used is the archaic poisoning test LD50 (lethal dose 50 - this is the dose at which 50% of the mice would be expected to die when injected with the toxin), one of the cruellest and most controversial tests carried out on animals. The test involves injecting mice in the abdomen with the botulinum toxin (botox). Within hours, signs of poisoning start to show. Many mice suffer increasing paralysis and difficulty breathing and then, if left unattended, will eventually suffocate to death. The level of suffering is appalling. No pain relief is given. There are alternatives available that the BUAV believes can be used instead of the cruel LD50, including a test called the SNAP-25. This method does not use live animals but instead measures the activity of the toxin in a test tube, can be used to replace the mouse LD50 tests. BUAV spokesperson, Sarah Kite said: “We are grateful for the support of celebrities such as Ricky Gervais and Chrissie Hynde. Animals should not have to continue to pay for our vanity by suffering and dying in these horrendous tests. Please join our call to help put an end to this unacceptable cruelty once and for all.” For further information contact Carla Owen on +44 (0) 207 700 4888 or Sarah Kite at sarah.kite@buav.org http://www.buav.org/investigations/theuglytruthaboutbotox

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

A Legal Challenge to Animal Research

Animal rights law courses may threaten the use of animals in medical research.
...
Over half of US law schools now have animal law courses, including
many in universities with medical and research programs that utilize
animals protected by federal welfare laws. Courses that promote
standards for humane animal care and welfare are unlikely to provoke
conflict, but programs championing animal rights or “liberation” set
up adversarial potential on campuses and pose a serious risk to the
future of animal research. The use of the law instead of violence and
threats, however, should be acknowledged as a forward step.
...
The future may see an attempt to recognize Aristotle’s three
categories: things, animals, and persons. Animals may not ultimately
enjoy the rights of persons, but the law may become increasingly
specific about our obligation to care for them. If, on the other hand,
“personhood” for animals is achieved, this status is likely to be in
conflict with animal research.

Failure to address developments in the education of law students is
likely to have a long-ranging impact on the ability to develop new
treatments needed for human and animal well-being.

P. Michael Conn is Director of Research Advocacy at Oregon Health and
Sciences University and Oregon National Primate Research Center.

--
full story:
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/56167/

Anthrax research stopped over euthanasia

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/11/30/Anthrax-research-stopped-over-euthanasia/UPI-84841259619266/



OKLAHOMA CITY, Nov. 30 (UPI) -- Oklahoma State University administrators stopped a pending program testing anthrax vaccines on baboons because the apes would be euthanized, officials say.

The bioterrorism research was to be carried out in a multimillion dollar lab at the university set up specifically for that purpose, the Oklahoman reported Monday.

An internal faculty committee spent a year designing procedure for the use and care of the apes. University President Burns Hargis sent an e-mail to veterinary medicine researchers saying he would not allow the National Institutes of Health-funded project, the newspaper said.
HARGIS, VADEN (BURNS)
OFFICE OF PRESIDENT
405-744-6384
osupres@okstate.edu

"This research was not in the best interest of the university. The testing of lethal pathogens on primates would be a new area for OSU that is controversial and is outside our current research programs" said OSU spokesman Gary Shutt.

Veterinarian Michael Davis said using the primates for research is important because they are biologically similar to humans. But after they've been exposed to the anthrax virus they must be euthanized so as not to infect others, the Oklahoman said.

"We don't want to, but by the same token we don't want people to be killed by anthrax," Davis said. "Right now, this is the only way and the best way we have of preventing someone from getting killed by anthrax."

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Plan to breed lab monkeys splits Puerto Rican town

By JILL LASTER (AP) – 37 minutes ago

GUAYAMA, Puerto Rico — Puerto Rico has such a bad history with research
monkeys running amok, some residents are stunned that its territorial
government has approved a plan to import and breed thousands of primates for
sale to U.S. researchers.

Bioculture Ltd., with facilities at 19 sites around the world, has secured
permits to begin operating next summer in Guayama, a small, depressed
mountain district in southeastern Puerto Rico. They want to turn the
Caribbean territory into a major supplier of primates, much to the dismay of
islanders already dealing with a plague of patas monkeys — descendants of
lab escapees that run though backyards, stop traffic and destroy crops.

The company, based in the African island nation of Mauritius, says the
operation will employ at least 50 people and buy fruit from local farmers,
an important consideration on an island where unemployment is nearly 16
percent.

"This will help many people in the community," said Olga Colon, a local
school principal who has collected 300 signatures in support of the
facility. She said Bioculture has pledged to buy supplies for her school.

But the project is opposed by everyone from Guayama Mayor Glorimari Jaime to
Puerto Rican actor Benicio del Toro, who says it's unethical to breed
monkeys for research, and renowned primatologist Jane Goodall.

"We know now that monkeys have minds, personalities, and, above all, they
have feelings," Goodall said during a recent visit to Puerto Rico. "What we
do for monkeys in medical research — if you were a monkey, it would be
torture."

Local residents have filed a lawsuit supported by People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals that says Bioculture failed to submit a full
environmental impact statement or hold public hearings.

They say Bioculture allegedly paid fees for a $2 million project, when the
project costs $12 million. The company denies the allegations.

A judge could decide as early Monday whether to order an injunction to halt
construction. Either side could appeal the ruling to the state Court of
Appeals.

Bioculture's facility, the first in a U.S. jurisdiction, plans to start with
1,000 Crab-eating Macaques, natives of Southeast Asia, and eventually hold
up to 3,000.

Puerto Rico has long struggled to control hundreds of patas monkeys,
descendants of primates that escaped in recent decades from research
projects and now thrive in the lush tropical environment.

No labs want the patas monkeys because they're no longer right for research,
and many are diseased. There isn't much demand from zoos, either. So rangers
from the island's Department of Natural Resources trap and kill them.

Wilson Nazario Torres fears the people of Guayama will suffer like those in
his hometown, Lajas, which has been overrun by patas monkeys. The three that
live in his back yard are so used to humans, he can't scare them away.

"If this project was offered in any state in the United States, they
wouldn't allow it," said Roberto Cintron, a 46-year-old resident of Carmen,
a Guayama neighborhood close to the facility site. "So they come to an
isolated community, a neglected community, and offer jobs, and people buy
it."

Bioculture Vice President Moses Mark Bushmitz said some groups are just
trying to stir up panic. It happens at all new facilities.

The Guayama facility is one of many already inside the United States, he
said, where about 70,000 research monkeys were used in 2007, according to
the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The company assures people in Carmen and all of the Guayama district that
its monkeys can't escape multiple levels of security.

"You have monkeys in MIT, you have monkeys in Harvard," Bushmitz said. "So
why isn't it an issue if the monkey will escape in Harvard, but it is an
issue if a monkey will escape in Carmen?"

Bushmitz called the protesters a small minority.

"This area was neglected for so many years," he said. "The people here have
no chance. The young guys have no work."

But Carla Cappalli, a spokeswoman for the local PETA chapter, says opponents
will keep fighting, no matter what the judge rules.

"This is going to be a long case," she said. "We're going to fight this to
the end."

Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Related articles

Sunday, November 29, 2009

LSR GO PRIVATE AT SECRET MEETING

HLS/Life Sciences Research Inc. have announced that at a special secret meetingheld on Monday 23rd November, its stockholders voted to approve the merger ofLion Holdings Inc., and Lion Merger Corp. (Both solely owned by Andrew Baker,the CEO of LSR/HLS). The NYSE Arca listing for LSR has also been suspended andNYSE will remove LSR from their listing on December 7th 2009.LSR/HLS are now a wholly owned subsidiary of Lion Holdings Inc. Which is justanother newly formed 'company' to front the merger as HLS/LSR go private tostop shareholder protests and make their financial situation even lesstransparent. Only recently, HLS/LSR had got special permission for confidentiality inrelation to some of the filings with the Security Exchange Commission (SEC),because the SEC filings showed what a bad financial state HLS/LSR are in. Let'snot forget that Baker, with no other offers on the table, has gone down thisroute of a merger buy-out as a last resort to try to keep them afloat. See our financial subsite: www.shac.net/action/financial/baker.html andIndyMedia website: www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/08/436227.html for moredetails. But we don't give a damn HLS, Baker and apologists, as we're campaigning forthe animals you torture inside your labs. And while you continue to run andhide from your financial dealings, we know what is keeping you in business. Nowthat you have no shareholders, activists across the globe will be justconcentrating and re-doubling all their efforts on Fortress Investments andyour customers, thanks for making our job a lot easier!-------------------------------------Disclaimer and Information:The details in this action alert are provided for information purposes only,and should not be used for any illegal activities as defined by thejurisdiction you live in. SHAC does not support or encourage any form ofharassment; nothing in this alert has the purpose of inciting such behaviour,and we request that all communications are kept polite.To join, amend or unsubscribe to the SHAC email alerts, go to:http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/shac-uk, then click subscribe / unsubscribe.(You will need to unsubscribe any old email addresses that you have used andadd your new email address instead).Any problems, please contact us at: info@shac.netFor general information on the campaign to close Huntingdon Life Science,please visit our website www.shac.net

Friday, November 27, 2009

Animal group condemns cruel and unnecessary pain research at Newcastle University for 'health tea drink'

The BUAV, the UK's leading organisation campaigning to end animal experiments, has today criticised Newcastle University for allowing extremely cruel experiments to be carried out on mice. This follows the University's announcement of research into the pain-killing benefits of Brazilian mint (Hyptis crenata), claiming that a 'tea' made from the plant was as effective at providing pain relief as the common pain-killing drug Indometacin 1 .

Yet, in spite of robust evidence from patients in Brazil where it has long been prescribed for pain relief, and the existence of many investigative methods involving humans that could have been used to research its effects further, the researchers inflicted extremely cruel and scientifically questionable procedures on mice to 'confirm' the analgesic effects of the mint. The tests used included the 'Plantar test (Hargreaves method)' in which the hind paws of mice are exposed to heat to induce pain, and also the 'Acetic acid writhing test' in which acid is injected into the abdomens of mice to induce pain so severe that the animals 'contort' 2 , 3 . The frequency of these contortions is used as a measurement of the degree of pain being experienced.

The cruelty of these experiments is self-evident, but furthermore the scientific validity and human relevance of such research is highly dubious. An expert workshop on pain research in 2008 concluded that, 'Using animals to research pain has "limited value" and should be replaced by newer technologies,' based on a detailed report that asserted, 'Animal tests…are too simplistic' 4 . It cited the more humane and human-specific research methods available, including neuroimaging and electrophysiological investigations, many of which have been specifically to explore the effects of proposed new analgesics

These techniques are widely used and known to be powerful and effective 5, 6 , and are pivotal to cutting edge research taking place in pain research at Aston University in the UK, for example 7-9 .

BUAV's Scientific Co-ordinator, Dr Katy Taylor states: “The BUAV is very concerned that such cruel and outdated research continues to be approved by university ethics committees and the Home Office, when alternative scientific methods are clearly available.”

ENDS

For further information, please contact BUAV +44 (0)207 700 4888

NOTES:

[1] BBC News. Cup of mint tea 'can kill pain'. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr//1/hi/health/8373791.stm (Accessed 25-11-2009


[2] Rocha, GS (2009). Hyptis crenata Pohl (Brazilian mint) for pain relief. Available at: http://alfaobserv.org/porto2009/APRESENTACOES_Comunicacoes_PORTO2009/Sala4/Sessao1/CM3.ppt (Accessed 25-11-2009)
.

[3] Rocha, G. (2009). Brazilian mint for pain relief. Available at: http://www.vitae.ac.uk/policy-practice/92593/Graciela-Rocha-University-of-Newcastle.html (Accessed 25-11-2009).

[4] Langley, CK, Aziz, Q., Bountra, C., Gordon, N., Hawkins, P., Jones, A., Langley, G., Nurmikko, T., and Tracey, I. 2008. Volunteer studies in pain research--opportunities and challenges to replace animal experiments: the report and recommendations of a Focus on Alternatives workshop. Neuroimage. 42, 2, 467-473.

[5] Raichle, ME 2003. Functional brain imaging and human brain function. J Neurosci. 23, 10, 3959-3962.

[6] Borsook, D. and Becerra, LR 2006. Breaking down the barriers: fMRI applications in pain, analgesia and analgesics. Mol Pain. 2, 30.

[7] Watson, A., El-Deredy, W., Vogt, BA, and Jones, AK 2007. Placebo analgesia is not due to compliance or habituation: EEG and behavioural evidence. Neuroreport. 18, 8, 771-775.

[8] Hobson, AR, Furlong, PL, Sarkar, S., Matthews, PJ, Willert, RP, Worthen, SF, Unsworth, BJ, and Aziz, Q. 2006. Neurophysiologic assessment of esophageal sensory processing in noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology. 130, 1, 80-88.

[9] Hobson, AR, Furlong, PL, Worthen, SF, Hillebrand, A., Barnes, GR, Singh, KD, and Aziz, Q. 2005. Real-time imaging of human cortical activity evoked by painful esophageal stimulation. Gastroenterology. 128, 3, 610-619.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

U. spy also stung Oregon primate lab


The animal-rights activist who infiltrated the University of Utah's
animal-research labs this year is the same woman who was involved in a
similar operation at the Oregon National Primate Research Center two
years ago, The Salt Lake Tribune has learned.

Lindsay West, identified only as "LZ" in formal complaints filed
against the U. by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
(PETA), was hired as an animal support technician, then used hidden
cameras to document alleged violations of animal-welfare laws and
research standards at both institutions.

Oregon officials decided to name West this week because of her
involvement in an undercover operation at another research
institution. U. officials declined to name the Utah infiltrator, but
several university sources have confirmed West and "LZ" are one and
the same.

In addition to denying the substance of PETA's allegations, U.
officials say West was a "fraudulent" employee who trumped up key
elements of PETA's charges and used deception to gain employment. In
response, PETA produced two letters of recommendation from the U.,
describing West as an exemplary animal-care specialist, although her
name was redacted.

--
full story:
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_13853314

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

BUAV News Alert: Animal experiments rise in Northern Ireland



For immediate release

Tuesday 17th November 2009

Animal experiments rise in Northern Ireland

The BUAV has expressed its concern following a worrying 15% increase in the number of animal experiments carried out in Northern Ireland. The newly available statistics show that in 2008, 17,875 experiments took place compared to 15,525 in 2007.There was a large increase in the number of mice (54% total of animals used) and cattle (13% total of animals used). In 2008, 9,229 mice, 1,198 rats, 3,121 domestic fowl, 2,047 cattle, 93 rabbits and 38 horses/donkeys were used. Of those experiments carried out, 77% were done with no anaesthetic.

On a more positive note, the BUAV welcomes the fact that, as in previous years, no non-human primates were used in research during 2008. In addition, no testing on animals occurred for cosmetics, household products, chemicals, pesticides, tobacco or for education and training. The BUAV is calling on Northern Ireland to excise its own powers to make policy decision about animal experiments and ensure animals are never used for these purposes. However, the BUAV is concerned about the re-use of cats and dogs in veterinary research. In 2008, 8 cats were used in 42 procedures and 6 dogs were used in 140 procedures.

BUAV's Senior Parliamentary Officer, Jenny Gowen states: “Animal experiments is a devolved issue in Northern Ireland, officials and ministers have the power to impose stricter controls on the use of animals and provide more transparent information for the public. Given the rise in animal experiments last year we are disappointed they do not seem to be taking this opportunity."

ENDS

For further information, please contact pressenquiries@buav.org

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

New Belgian laws announced to ban animal testing and fund alternatives

PRESS RELEASE - 17 November 2009

New Belgian laws announced to ban animal testing and fund alternatives

The Lord Dowding Fund (LDF) today welcomed announcements made in the Flemish Parliament to introduce two groundbreaking laws which would ban all commercial animal testing and give extra funding to the development of non-animal research techniques.

LDF, the research wing of Animal Defenders International (ADI), attended a press conference in the Flemish Parliament on 17 November 2009, where the proposed laws initiated by the Flemish Green Party were unveiled.

LDF believes that the two laws should be implemented together as the restrictions to animal testing would be complemented by the promotion of alternatives. The ban on the use of cosmetic testing has led the way showing that this joined up approach is very effective. Animal testing must be banned to force companies and scientists to change their research methods or develop alternatives.

LDF supports new and advanced methods of research such as cell culture, biotechnology, brain imaging and computer packages which replace the use of animals and there is growing scientific consensus that the animal model in general is not effective in predicting human reactions.

Jan Creamer, LDF Chief Executive, said: "Moving away from animal testing requires an ambitious policy from public authorities, and the initiative from the Flemish Greens delivers precisely what the public and a growing number of scientists are asking for: a rapid and efficient switch from animal-based techniques to more advanced and ethical methods."

"Belgian elected representatives should vote in favour of these exemplary laws presented by the Green Party, which will put Belgium at the forefront of ethical and scientific progress, ahead of many other European countries."

Danny Flies, Stop Dier Proeven, commented: "I salute the bravery of the Belgian Green party in proposing these two groundbreaking laws. Let this be an example for politicians all over Europe to do whatever they can to invest in modern science without the use of animals in the interest of humans and animals."

Ends

For further information, contact Amanda Gent, LDF/ADI Public Relations, Office Tel: 020 7630 3344. Email: prdesk@ad-international.org


NOTES TO EDITORS

The Lord Dowding Fund (LDF)

Founded 30 years ago, The Lord Dowding Fund is the research wing of Animal Defenders International (ADI) and the National Anti-Vivisection Society (NAVS). The LDF awards grants totalling £300,000 a year to fund humane research across a wide range of fields, including microsurgery, toxicology, breast and lung cancer, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, cot death, cataracts and brain damage. Named after WW1 Air Chief Marshal, Lord Dowding, a former President of the NAVS, LDF also supports new and advanced methods of research such as cell culture, biotechnology, brain imaging and computer packages which replace the use of animals in the education of school and university level students.


For all media enquiries contact: prdesk@ad-international.org Media only, please
To make a donation: info@ad-international.org or online http://www.ad-international.org/take_action/donate.php

For campaign information: info@ad-international.org

For employment opportunities: execassist@ad-international.org

For volunteer enquiries: execassist@ad-international.org

For Intern enquiries: intern@ad-international.org

General enquiries: info@ad-international.org

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Enfield Council goes cruelty-free

The first in the UK !

The BUAV, the UK 's leading organisation campaigning to end animal experiments, is delighted that Enfield Council has voted to go cruelty-free at its meeting on the 11 th November. This makes Enfield the UK 's first council to adopt a policy to only use cruelty-free cleaning products in its offices.

Councillor Christopher Cole, who introduced this motion, supports the BUAV's Clean up Cruelty campaign which seeks to end cruel animal testing for household products and their ingredients.

Enfield is the first council in the UK whose cleaning contractors can only use BUAV approved products The BUAV's Humane Cosmetics Standard (HCS) and Household Products Standard (HHPS) is recognisable by the Leaping Bunny logo, an internationally recognised and patented cruelty-free certification.

The BUAV's Clean up Cruelty campaign received success in Parliament recently when all major parties pledged to put a ban on animal testing for household products in their manifestos for the next election.

81% of the public said they would support a ban[1] on the testing of household products on animals, though many ingredients in UK household products have been, and can continue to be, tested on animals.

BUAV's Chief Executive, Michelle Thew said: “The BUAV congratulates Enfield Council and its residents in taking this important stance. We urge other councils throughout the UK to adopt a similar position and support our campaign to end the cruelty and suffering inflicted on animals to test cleaning products."

ENDS

For further information, please contact pressenquiries@buav.org


For a list of BUAV approved products please visit www.gocrueltyfree.org.


Notes

1) In 1997 the Government decided to stop granting licences for cosmetics tests on animals, because the suffering caused was not justified given the trivial nature of the products tested. There is, however, no such prohibition for household products, despite clear public support and very similar arguments.

2) The BUAV (British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection) has been campaigning for over 100 years to achieve a world where nobody wants or believes we need to experiment on animals. We are committed to achieving our aims through reliable and reasoned evidence-based debate.

3) The BUAV's Humane Cosmetics and Household Products Standard is recognisable by the Leaping Bunny logo, an internationally recognised and patented cruelty-free certification. Approved companies must open up their supply chain to a robust but straightforward audit. The process ensures that neither the product nor, crucially, any of its ingredients have been tested on animals at any stage of the manufacturing cycle since a fixed cut off date. For more information on the auditing process and a list of approved companies visit www.gocrueltyfree.org.


[1] CIAO research 2006

Thursday, November 12, 2009

House of Lords backs measures to end capture of wild monkeys by laboratory dealers and to restrict monkey experiments

Every year thousands of monkeys are torn from the wild and their families to restock breeding colonies in factory farms in Asia and Mauritius that supply European laboratories. A new report published by the House of Lords EU Committee has this week backed proposals by the European Commission to end the practice.

Animal Defenders International (ADI), who gave written and oral evidence to the Lords EU Committee inquiry into the revision of the EU Directive 86/609 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, has welcomed this and several other recommendations by the Lords.

Earlier this year, following intense lobbying by primate suppliers and primate experimentation facilities, the European Parliament seriously weakened European Commission proposals to end the wild capture of monkeys by dealers and to restrict primate use.

The House of Lords, who received submissions from laboratories, including Huntingdon Life Sciences, and monkey suppliers involved in wild capture, have backed restricting experiments on monkeys to life-threatening and debilitating human diseases and supported a phase out of the use of monkeys born of wild caught parents, albeit "monitored closely".

Tim Phillips, ADI Campaigns Director who gave evidence to the Lords' Committee, said: "10,000 monkeys are used in experiments in Europe every year, most of these are born of parents snatched from the wild. Europe is therefore continuing to fuel the capture of thousands of wild macaque monkeys to stock breeding farms in Asia - a region where the species is now in widespread and rapid decline. We have filmed undercover with the monkey trappers, exposed conditions inside the factory farms that feed the labs, and revealed how monkeys live and die inside British laboratories. This is an industry of almost unparalleled animal suffering. We would have liked the Lords to have gone further, but this is clear recognition of the problem. "

The report also included several other measures that ADI has been campaigning to secure including:
* A ban on severe and prolonged suffering during animal experiments;
* Protection of embryonic life forms in the final third before birth (many experiments are performed on chick embryos);
* Compulsory authorisation of all animal experiments - amendments adopted in the European Parliament would mean millions of animal experiments would require no prior authorisation;
* Rejection of any form of notification or tacit approval which would allow animal testing to go ahead without proper safeguards;
* To guarantee uniform standards across Europe, the Committee firmly endorsed arrangements for effective national inspection in Member States, and for a robust role for the Commission monitoring those arrangements.

Tim Phillips continued: "With the Commission, European Parliament and Council currently in trialogue discussions on the revision of the Directive this is a timely and welcome development. This represents very basic protection: That all animal experiments must be justified before they start; that monkeys should not be torn from the wild; that animal laboratories must be regularly inspected; that severe suffering of animals must not be prolonged. What is shocking is that such minimal protection has met with such fierce opposition from the animal experimentation industry."

The new Directive for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, which was proposed in 2008 to replace the outdated EC Directive 86/609/EC, provides the greatest opportunity in over 25 years to influence the use of animals, and in particular primates, in laboratories.

More than half of all MEPs in the European Parliament signed a Declaration drafted by ADI in 2007, calling for a ban on the use of great apes and wild caught monkeys and for a timetable to phase out all primate experiments.

ENDS

For further information, contact:
Amanda Gent, ADI Press Office, Tel: 020 7630 3340, Mob: 07785 552548
Email: prdesk@ad-international.org


NOTES FOR EDITORS

ADI launched the Save the Primates campaign to secure measures to protect laboratory primates under the revision of the EU lab rules: http://www.savetheprimates.org/

Trialogue Discussions:
http://www.ad-international.org/media_centre/go.php?id=1649&si=12


ADI Technical briefing on the wild capture of primates for research
http://www.savetheprimates.org/files/adiprimatephaseout220409.pdf

----
ADI PR Desk
Animal Defenders International
Millbank Tower
Millbank
LONDON, SW1P 4QP, UK
tel. +44 (0)20 7630 3340
fax. +44 (0)20 7828 2179
www.ad-international.org



Your help urgently needed:
1. Please ask your MP to sign EDM 2179 on wild animals in circuses http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=39429&SESSION=899

2. Please sign our petition to replace animal testing in Europe http://www.ad-international.org/petitions/

Thank you!
www.ad-international.org

-------------------------------------
----------
www.YouTube.com/AnimalDefenders

www.CafePress.com/AnimalDefenders

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Group targets U animal scientist



The school raised security for one of its researchers after an animal
rights activist group singled him out on its website.
...
University of Minnesota police have increased patrols near the home of
a Medical School animal researcher after a posting on an animal rights
activist website displayed his name and photograph and noted that "...
we should not be surprised when the unconscionable violence inflicted
upon animals is justifiably visited upon their tormentors."

The Internet posting went up late last week on the website
NegotiationIsOver.com in reaction to a Star Tribune story about a
multimillion-dollar national campaign by biomedical researchers,
including U Prof. Dick Bianco, to increase lagging support for medical
and scientific tests using animals.

--
full story:
http://www.startribune.com/local/69622092.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUZ

News Alert: Animal group welcomes UK House of Lords report on animal experimentation in the EU




For immediate release

10 th November 2009

Animal group welcomes the House of Lords report on animal experimentation in the EU

The BUAV, the UK 's leading organisation campaigning to end animal experiments, has today welcomed aspects of the report published by the House of Lords EU Committee. The Committee carried out an enquiry into proposals to revise EU Directive 86/609 on the protection of animals used in experiments.

The report is the result of an analysis of submissions of oral and written evidence provided by all stakeholders, including the European Commission, researchers, the pharmaceutical industry, academic and funding bodies representatives and animal protection groups including the BUAV. The Council of Ministers (EU Member States representatives) is currently discussing the European Commission proposals, and it is expected that it will adopt its position within the next few weeks.

The Committee's report shows their position is in line with the European Commission proposals. The BUAV believes this report shows promise and represents an improvement on the latest provisions adopted at the European Parliament last May and the current proposals on the table of the EU Council of Ministers.

The report contains some important provisions such as the requirement for all animal experiments to receive authorisation by governments and calls for strict limitations on the use of non-human primates (although the BUAV believes strongly, as does the public, that primates should not be used at all). Key conclusions include:

· the use of primates should be restricted to life threatening/debilitating conditions

· a move towards the use of second generation captive bred primates

· a ban on suffering which is severe and prolonged

· authorization by governments required for all procedures

However, the BUAV does not believe that the House of Lords has gone far enough; in particular regarding the need to avoid duplicative experiments and on the issue of the re-use of animals.

The BUAV is also calling for the directive to reflect public opinion. A recent opinion poll, carried out by YouGov, in the UK , France , Germany , Italy , Sweden and the Czech Republic found

· 81% of people surveyed agree or strongly agree the new law should prohibit all experiments causing pain or suffering to primates

· 79% of people agree or strongly agree the new law should prohibit all experiments on animals which do not relate to serious or life-threatening human conditions

· 84% of people surveyed agree or strongly agree the new law should prohibit all experiments causing severe pain or suffering to any animal

· 80% of people agree or strongly agree all information about animal experiments should be publicly available, except information which is confidential and information which would identify researchers or where they work

· 73% of people disagree or strongly disagree that the new law should permit experiments causing pain or suffering to cats

· 77% of people disagree or strongly disagree that the new law should permit experiments causing pain or suffering to dogs

BUAV's Chief Executive, Michelle Thew states: “This is a critical time for animals in laboratories across Europe . Although we welcome aspects of the House of Lords report, it would still leave a chasm between public opinion and the reality for laboratory animals'

For further information, please contact Carla Owen on +44 (0)207 619 6965 or Carla.owen@buav.org
or BUAV (out of hours) +44 (0)7850 510 955 or visit our Web site http://www.buav.org/


Notes:

1. All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 7139 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 24th February - 4th March 2009. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of the population sizes of the countries surveyed.

2. The Lords has now submitted this report to the Home Office, as the Government Department in charge of the negotiating the UK position on the revised Directive. The Council of Ministers (EU Member States representatives) is currently discussing the European Commission proposals, and is expecting to adopt its position within the next months.

Monday, November 9, 2009

BUAV Investigation Action Alert



Dear Friend

The BUAV has revealed graphic disturbing evidence of the cruelty and suffering inflicted on thousands of animals every year in UK research; including for the first time, the appalling suffering inflicted on mice for the worldwide craze of using botox products to temporarily reduce facial lines and wrinkles.

We placed an undercover worker in Wickham Laboratories in Hampshire for 8 months to the end of October 2009. She secretly filmed the appalling suffering inflicted on thousands of animals inside the facility.

We are also accusing the Home Office, which regulates animal experiments in the UK, of breaking the law in several ways including not enforcing the use of non animal alternatives and failing to minimise the suffering inflicted on animals.

For further information and to watch the videos, see our website www.buav.org. You can also read The Sunday Times article about our investigation here and an article that appeared in the Sun newspaper: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2712388/Rabbits-are-squeezed-into-tiny-boxes-in-horible-conditions-to-test-anti-wrinkle-treatments.html?OTC-RSS&ATTR=News


For other media coverage, please visit: http://www.buav.org/mediacentre/inthenews


Please circulate this email widely, and take action now for the hundreds of rabbits and thousands of mice used at Wickham.

Thank you

Sarah Kite

Director of Special Projects

British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV)

16a Crane Grove

London N7 8NN

Phone: +44 (0) 20 7700 4888

Fax: +44 (0) 20 7700 0252

Web: www.buav.org


cid:image002.jpg@01CA5BC1.BB62A3A0

Click here: a major BUAV undercover investigation exposes the reality of life and death inside one UK laboratory

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Animal lovers say no to radioactive NASA monkeys



Animal rights groups are apparently not pleased with NASA's plan to
zap squirrel monkeys with repeated doses of radiation for science.

The US space agency will expose between 18 to 28 of the moneys to low
doses of radiation daily to better understand the effects of long-term
exposure outside Earth's protective magnetic shield.

American anti-animal testing group, the Physicians Committee for
Responsible Medicine, has launched a protest asking concerned citizens
to tell NASA Administrator Charles Bolden to put a stop the
experiment.

"Radiation experiments involving nonhuman primates commonly involve
restraint and other cruel procedures," the organization claims.
"Monkeys, like other primates, are highly intelligent, have strong
family bonds, demonstrate empathy, and, most importantly, suffer."

--
full story:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/07/animal_lovers_protest_nasa_monkey_expirement/

Friday, November 6, 2009

CRITICAL WEEK AS EUROPE DECIDES FUTURE OF LAB ANIMALS

Trialogue meeting to consider steps to end the capture of wild monkeys by dealers

Over the next few days the European Commission, European Parliament and Council of Ministers are holding trialogue discussions on new rules for animal experimentation throughout Europe. Key decisions will be made on whether to restrict primate use to certain areas of research and whether to stop the trapping of wild monkeys by dealers. The Council of Ministers' common position is expected in just two weeks.

At a meeting in the European Parliament yesterday, key MEPs examined shocking evidence, filmed by Animal Defenders International (ADI), showing the treatment of monkeys in animal testing labs and in supply facilities, and monkeys being caught in the wild for experiments. The meeting was also told how the latest scientific research shows that the monkeys most frequently used in Europe are now rapidly declining throughout their natural range.

Around 10,000 monkeys are used in experiments. Most of these monkeys are born of parents captured in the wild. Europe is therefore continuing to fuel the capture of thousands of wild monkeys to stock breeding farms in Asia.

A range of different perspectives was debated at yesterday's meeting in the European Parliament, which was hosted by Raul Romeva (Greens) with Shadow Rapporteur, Daciana Octavia Sarbu (S & D), also speaking.

ADI also showed examples of the latest alternatives to experiments on primates and called for the mechanisms under the new rules to ensure the development and implementation of replacements to experiments on animals.

Raul Romeva, MEP, said: "There can be no more excuses, it is time to act. A modern society will be judged according to the way it treats its animals. Thus, momentum is growing in Europe to protect animals from suffering. The animal welfare bills that have been proposed show that the will is there to take animal cruelty seriously. The terrible scenes of anguish and terror in the 'Save The Primates' film will force people to address this issue head-on, and make them question whether we can allow this animal cruelty to continue."

Tim Phillips, ADI Campaign Director, said: "This is the most important week in the animal experiment debate for over 20 years as Europe begins to finalise the new rules for experimentation with input from the Commission, Parliament, and Council of Ministers.
The decisions made will have an impact for years to come. It is vital that Europe has the courage to say clearly that tearing monkeys from the wild is unacceptable and that the EU is making a genuine commitment to replace the use of animals in experiments."

The new Directive for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, which was proposed in 2008 to replace the outdated EC Directive 86/609/EC, provides the greatest opportunity in over 25 years to influence the use of animals, and in particular primates, in laboratories.

More than half of all MEPs in the European Parliament signed a Declaration in 2007, calling for a ban on the use of great apes and wild caught monkeys and for a timetable to phase out all primate experiments.

For more information, visit: www.savetheprimates.com


Ends


For all media enquiries contact: prdesk@ad-international.org
Media only, please
To make a donation: info@ad-international.org
or online here

For campaign information: info@ad-international.org

For employment opportunities: execassist@ad-international.org

For volunteer enquiries: execassist@ad-international.org

For Intern enquiries: intern@ad-international.org

General enquiries: info@ad-international.org

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Staff maim lab mice with ballpoints

Thousands of animals being used to test a wrinkle-erasing rival to Botox are facing cruel and agonising experiments at a Home Office-approved laboratory, an undercover investigation has found.

Secret footage of the tests on Dysport, a drug used to erase frown lines in cosmetic surgery clinics, shows laboratory staff accidentally breaking the backs of mice when trying to kill them with ballpoint pens. The pens were then used to fill out their death records.

The film, obtained using a hidden camera inside Wickham Laboratories, a long-established facility in Hampshire that tests drugs for pharmaceutical companies, also shows rabbits being incompetently injected with other drugs.

Staff are filmed botching injections and swearing at struggling rabbits, which are immobilised in “stocks” for up to eight hours in experiments that test whether drugs cause fevers.

Many of the rabbit tests, although licensed by the government, are not required under international pharmaceutical testing standards. The Home Office itself boasts about how these tests can be replaced by “a new technique using human blood cells instead of rabbits”.

The footage, shot by an investigator from the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, has led the government to launch an inquiry. A Home Office spokesman said: “We take these allegations seriously and are taking urgent steps to look into them further. We authorise animal research only when it can be justified.

“We expect and require the highest standards, and will thoroughly examine any evidence that suggests these standards are not being met.”

The filming, compiled over a period of eight months, included a sequence in which a member of staff made a number of attempts to inject a rabbit.

She is recorded calling the animal “a little shit” and “a disgrace”. She warned the rabbit that it could end up with “ear-rings” — a reference to punctures in its ear from failed attempts at injections. Another member of staff is recorded remarking that blood is coming out of the rabbit’s ear.

William Cartmell, the official vet charged with overseeing the welfare of the animals used for testing at Wickham, is also a founder and a big shareholder in the company.

Last night he denied that this represented a potential conflict of interest and said he was “a professional”.

Lab records seen by the BUAV investigator show that Cartmell’s weekly inspections sometimes took 15 minutes, with one visit in March this year lasting only eight minutes. He argued this was adequate to check that the animals were being treated well and not suffering.

“The health status of the animals is at such a high level that the length of time involved is more than adequate,” he said. “The animals are under constant care unlike pet animals and farm animals.”

Dysport, which is made from botulinum toxin, is licensed in Britain for medical use to treat conditions such as involuntary eye muscle contractions, facial twitches and muscle spasms.

However, it is also used legitimately “off-label” as an alternative to Botox for cosmetic treatments to eliminate frown lines and wrinkles.

Each batch has to be tested by law to ensure that it is safe and of the correct potency. Lab records seen by the investigator show that 41,088 mice were used in Dysport tests at Wickham between January and June this year.

The method used — lethal dose 50 (LD50) — is classed as a “very severe” test by the government. Mice are injected with the toxin. They suffer progressive paralysis and the film shows them lurching from side to side as they become unable to walk properly. Some appear to suffer severe breathing difficulties before dying.

Government regulations require suffering animals to be put out of their misery. Wickham Laboratories’ records indicate that far more mice died during the tests than were killed humanely.

Official guidelines allow mice to have their necks broken to ensure a quick death, and pens are often used to do this. But film shot at Wickham shows that some were left writhing after their backs were mistakenly broken by staff.

Alternatives to the LD50 test have been developed and are being used at other laboratories in Britain.

The official government laboratory, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, uses non-lethal methods to test Dysport. Ten years ago it developed a test of the toxin using a test tube. It also uses a far less severe test on mice that does not kill them.

The BUAV, which has eight months of footage from Wickham, said the treatment of many animals was “appalling”.

Sarah Kite, BUAV’s special projects director, said: “The fact that extremely sick mice end up in the hands of incompetent staff, to have their backs broken and suffer such an agonising death is totally sickening.

“Our shocking findings show that crude, archaic and extremely cruel animal tests are still allowed in the UK even when an alternative test exists and animal testing is not required by official bodies.”

The revelations about the testing at Wickham have shocked dermatologists who use Dysport. Nick Lowe, who is known as Dr Botox and has conducted research into the toxin, said he was surprised that the LD50 test was still being used.

Lowe, whose clients at his London clinic include Anne Robinson, the television presenter, said he was “appalled” to hear that animals were being allowed to suffer in tests on the drug.

“I would like to know that all the drugs I prescribe for patients are evaluated in ethical ways. With my own range of skin-care products we do absolutely no animal testing. I am not in favour of that type of testing at all. I want the highest ethical standards,” he said.

Full Article and Video:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6898099.ece

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Novartis Again Denies Links to Huntingdon Animal Lab

Novartis has again denied it uses Huntingdon Life Sciences, the
animal-testing contract lab that is the focus of protests that have
resulted in the torching of Novartis CEO Daniel Vasella’s vacation
home and the desecration of his family’s grave.

BNET previously noted that although animal rights activists have
targeted the company because they believe it conducts grisly
live-animal experiments at Huntingdon, Novartis says it does not use
the lab. One side in the battle clearly has its facts wrong.

In an attempt to figure out the truth, BNET contacted Novartis, HLS
and Win Animal Rights, a group that protests again Novartis and HLS,
and which claimed as recently as Oct. 12 that Novartis was an HLS
customer.

--
full story:
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10004921/novartis-again-denies-links-to-huntingdon-animal-lab-activists-dont-believe-it/