Showing posts with label commercial whaling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commercial whaling. Show all posts

Friday, December 4, 2009

Protest Japanese Consulate in Support of Sea Shepherd Operation Waltzing Matilda




****Cross Post Freely****

IN SOLIDARITY & SUPPORT OF:
SEA SHEPHERD

Sticker: Operation Waltzing Matilda


OPERATION: WALTZING MATILDA

On the anniversary of the Japanese military's bombing of Pearl Harbor, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society will begin their new campaign "Operation Waltzing Matlida." Many have witnessed the brutal and heinous campaign of the Japanese government against the protected whales in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary from "Whale Wars." Now Sea Shepherd ups the ante and launches an even more aggressive campaign to stop the Japanese government's attack on whales. This year the Japanese whaling fleet will be targeting 935 Minke whales and another 50 fin whales. They have also threatened to add humpbacks to their quota.

We are demonstrating at the Japanese Embassy to bid bon voyage to the Sea Shepherds and to send a clear message to the Japanese government. Their illegal exploitation and bloody harpoons will not be tolerated. They are committing criminal and murderous acts, which they disguise as "research" and yet sell as food. The violence against whales that the government of Japan has committed is a shame to Japanese peoples all around the world. We must stand against illegal whaling because nobody else will and the whales desperately need our help.

For the whales and for the crew, Japanese Consulate we are coming for you!

This is a legal demonstration, signs and banners will be provided. Come out, bring your friends, and be a voice for the voiceless.

Japanese Consulate
49th and Park Avenue, NY, NY
Monday, December 7, 2009 @ 3:30 - 5:30 PM

If you can't make the protest today, you can still do your part for the
whales. Contact the Embassy and the US Consulate Office today or later
this week:

Ambassador Ichiro Fujisaki
Embassy of Japan in the USA
2520 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20008
Phone: 1.202.238.6700 or 6900
Fax: 202.328.2187
e-mail: jicc@embjapan.org


Ambassador Shinichi Nishimiya
Japanese Consulate General
299 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10171
Phone: 1.212.371.8222
Fax: 1.212. 371.1294
e-mail: inquiry@ny.cgj.org


And please support our friends at Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and
the whales:

http://www.seashepherd.org/


You can purchase Sea Shepherd merchandise at their store:

http://shop.seashepherd.org/store/default.aspx


You can purchase the new Operation Waltzing Matilda t-shirts and other
merchandise here:

http://shop.seashepherd.org/store/category.aspx?c=campaign_for_whales(base)


Coming events: Mark your calendars now!

Sat. & Sun. - Dec. 12 & 13th - Protest Vivisection, Fur and Carriage Horses
Until New Years Day WAR will be running protests every weekend.

Visit the WAR Calendar for future events:
http://calendar.yahoo.com/winanimalrights

Visit the WAR MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/winanimalrights

Visit WAR on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Win-Animal-Rights/25169195791


For more info contact Win Animal Rights at: winanimalrights@optonline.net

Call: 646.267.9934 or visit the WAR website at: http://war-online.org


W.A.R. (WIN ANIMAL RIGHTS) is an independent non-profit organization not
affiliated or associated with SHAC, SHAC USA or any other group or
organization and does not conduct or incite any illegal activity. The
above information is not meant to incite or request any illegal actions
or illegal activities of any kind. If you have any questions about the
legality of any act, we encourage everyone receiving this (or the)
action alert(s) to check your local laws and ordinances before
proceeding to do anything.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Sea Shepherd’s New Terrorist-Ninja-Batmobile-Ship




And so it begins: Earthrace, one of the fastest powerboats on the planet, has been given a full Sea Shepherd makeover. From kevlar body armor to undetectable broadband radar, nightvision systems, Iridium openport comms, and a new paint job that actually scatters radar signals and provides additional stealth. If Earthrace was badass before, it’s now firmly somewhere in the ninth circle of hell giving Satan a hard time.
Sea Shepherd’s Operation Waltzing Matilda against the Japanese whaling fleet begins this December.
Um, if the Japanese thought Sea Shepherd was a “terrorist organization” before (and so was Animal Planet, they said), I can’t wait to hear what they have to say after seeing Captain Paul Watson in control of this beast.
No word yet whether the U.S. Attorney’s Office will be investigating Bruce Wayne for violating the “material support” terrorism provisions of the Patriot Act.
Related posts:
Canadian Police Ask Sea Shepherd Officer if He is Planning “a 9/11 or something”
“Animal Planet Collaborated with Eco-Terrorists”

Sunday, October 4, 2009

UK and EU countries condemn Iceland for whale hunting



The UK and 25 other countries have officially condemned Iceland's recent decision to kill endangered whales.

By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent
Published: 6:48PM BST 02 Oct 2009

Iceland has been killing fin whales according to conservationists Photo: PÁDRAIG WHOOLEY
Iceland recently killed around 125 fin whales, more than at any time since an international ban on commercial whaling was brought in more than 20 years ago.

In addition 79 minke whales were killed making it the largest commercial whale hunt in North Atlantic waters for decades.


Related Articles
Fewer fin whales spotted in Biscay, prompting fears for fish stocks
Blue whales going deaf The UK and 25 other countries including the US, Germany, France, Portugal and Spain issued a formal diplomatic position to the Icelandic ambassador in the UK against the decision to hunt the whales. The démarche as it is known will put pressure on Iceland just as the country is hoping to restore its damaged economy by joining the EU.

Huw Irranca-Davies, the UK wildlife minister, was deeply disappointed that Iceland has failed to overturn a quota of up to 200 fin and 200 minke whales for the 2009/2010 season.

He pointed out that the animals are endangered and that Iceland could make more money from whale watching.

"I am extremely disappointed to hear that nearly 200 whales have been taken so far this year," he said.

Animal welfare groups are incensed that most of the whales slaughtered will not even be consumed in Iceland but will be exported to Japan.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Mercury danger in dolphin meat

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20090923f2.html



By ERIC JOHNSTON
Staff writer

SAPPORO — The annual dolphin hunt in Taiji, Wakayama Prefecture, as documented in the film "The Cove" has sparked an emotional international debate, with animal rights activists decrying the capture and slaughter as unnecessary and cruel, and those in Japan who defend the slaughter as both legally permissible under international treaties and an ancient tradition.

But for Tetsuya Endo, a professor at the Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, there is a far more important issue related to the hunt that the public and the government must address.





Dolphin and whale meat is high in mercury, and Endo, one of the world's foremost authorities on mercury levels in dolphins and whales caught off Japan's coastal waters, has discovered Taiji residents who eat the meat sold in local stores have extremely high concentrations in their bodies.

"Between December 2007 and July 2008, myself and a team of scientists and researchers took hair samples from 30 male and 20 female residents of the Taiji area. In three cases, the levels of mercury present were more than 50 parts per million, high enough that it was possible nerve damage, like that seen in victims of Minamata disease, could occur," Endo told The Japan Times in an interview last week.

Endo's tests revealed that one Taiji man in his 50s had a mercury level of 67.2 parts per million. The average mercury level of all 50 subjects was 21.6 ppm for the men and 11.9 ppm for the women.

The average level of mercury present in Japanese people as a whole is only 2.55 ppm for men and 1.43 ppm for women, which means Taiji residents had mercury levels about 10 times the national average.

Meat from pilot whales is quite common in Taiji area stores, and hair samples taken from people who said they ate pilot whale meat more than once a month had an average mercury level of 25.6 ppm, while those who ate the meat once every few months had an average level of 15.5 ppm.

"We discovered that people weren't eating whale meat every day. At most, they were eating it a few times a month. The problem is that although the frequency of eating the meat was low, the levels of mercury in the meat were surprisingly high," Endo said.

Three of the subjects agreed to stop eating whale meat after learning their mercury levels were high.

By the time Endo's study was concluded in July 2008, their levels of mercury had dropped considerably.

The revelation that Taiji residents who ate whale and dolphin meat had high levels of mercury was not a surprise to Endo, as previous testing showed that the meat had far higher levels than the government standard for fish in general.

Between 2002 and 2006, Endo led a team that purchased 60 different samples of whale and dolphin meat in Taiji and neighboring Nachikatsuura.

"The tests showed that the average levels of mercury and methyl mercury in the pilot whale meat bought in Taiji were 9.6 ppm and 5.9 ppm, respectively. Given that Japan's standards are 0.4 ppm and 0.3 ppm, respectively, these are extremely high levels," Endo said.

The standards are based on what is known as the provisional tolerable weekly intake of mercury. Prior to 2003, the international standard was 3.3 micrograms per kg of body weight per week. Based on these numbers, the government established provisional levels of total mercury in fish and shellfish at 0.4 ppm and methyl mercury at 0.3 ppm.

But taking into account the possible effects on pregnant women and children, the World Health Organization revised the 3.3 figure downward to 1.6 micrograms per kg of body weight per week in 2003. Japan, however, adopted a standard of 2.0 micrograms per kg of body weight per week, saying that as a fish-eating culture it is only natural its standard be slightly higher.

The tests on the 50 residents as well as the whale and dolphin meat findings have been made available to Wakayama Prefecture, which is now carrying out further tests. But although Taiji is now the center of international attention, Endo's studies on whale and dolphin meat showed that it was Okinawa, not Taiji, where the highest levels of mercury were found.

"In 2001, meat from a false killer whale that was being sold in Nago had 81 ppm of total mercury (mercury plus methyl mercury) present," Endo said.

Asked why the government doesn't do more to warn consumers of the possible dangers of eating whale and dolphin meat, such as putting warning labels on all meat sold, Endo says it's likely that officials simply don't see a problem.

"The official attitude is probably along the lines of because so few people eat dolphin and whale meat, and since they tend to be mostly older, it's not that big of an issue," he said.

The Japan Times
(C) All rights reserved

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Saving the Whales While Cameras Roll

“AT THE EDGE OF THE WORLD” may be a pirate movie, but it takes place
oceans way from Johnny Depp’s Caribbean. No one says “aaarrrr”; the
weapon of choice is the camera, not the cutlass; and the booty
consists of healthy whales, along with a bunch of frustrated, angry
whalers.

Directed by Dan Stone, “At the Edge of the World,” which opens Friday
at Cinema Village, chronicles the 2006-7 campaign by the Sea Shepherd
Conservation Society to prevent the annual “harvest” of whales in the
Ross Sea, near Antarctica. The foes are a Japanese fleet that has been
violating the international whaling ban since its adoption in 1986
(Norway and Iceland are also considered to be in violation). The
swashbucklers are the mostly young volunteers (“ill equipped,
undertrained and with no guarantee they’d be around to see the
credits,” Mr. Stone said). They spend 30 days at sea before anything
even happens. Then, as he put it, “all hell breaks loose.”

Paul Watson, 58, Sea Shepherd’s polarizing founder, treats the pirate
designation lightly. (His ships sail under no flag.) But he doesn’t
disavow it. “When people started calling us pirates, I said: ‘O.K.,
you want to call us pirates? We’ll be pirates.’ We even got the flag,”
a modified Jolly Roger, a skull above a trident and shepherd’s crook.
“And remember, it wasn’t the British Navy that shut down piracy in the
17th century. It was Henry Morgan, who was a pirate. John Paul Jones
was a pirate. Pirates get things done. Governments don’t.”

--
full story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/23/movies/23ande.html

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Whale Wars: activist heroes or eco-terrorists?

What’s not to love about whales? The zen-like creatures of the deep
are known to be intelligent, wise, and proficient at communicating
with each other. Evidently, some cultures also consider them to be,
well, sad to say…tasty.

Just the thought of whales being harpooned for the dining pleasure of
the Japanese elite under the thinly veiled guise of “research” is the
driving force behind a new hit show on Animal Planet called “Whale
Wars”. It premiered in November of 2007 and just launched into the
second season. This one promises to be more dramatic than ever,
because the Sea Shepard fleet has been increased from one vessel, the
Steve Irwin, to a total of three. The 2008-2009 season will include
numerous confrontations with Japanese whaling ships, intense chases
through ice, and several boat collisions.

Captain Paul Watson, founder of the Sea Shepard Conservation Society,
and his crew are dedicated to stopping the Japanese whalers from
killing the targeted Minke and endangered Fin whales and they are
prepared to take aggressive action to accomplish their mission.

Are the Japanese legally entitled to kill them? That depends on who
you ask. Watson and his organization, believe that killing whales in
the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary is illegal, even if Minke whales
are not considered endangered. They understand the risks and dangers,
but believe it is worth it to save as many whales as they can.
...
The documentary-style “Whale Wars” may be what some people consider
eco-terrorism, but there are plenty of others who think the Sea
Shepard’s crew are heroes—including, one can only speculate—the
whales.

--
full story:
http://www.examiner.com/x-5266-Seattle-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m8d2-Whale-Wars-activist-heroes-or-ecoterrorists

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Against the Current-Sea Shepherd Campaign Report


Current Issues (August 2009)





The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is an activist organization operating on a global level in all the world’s oceans on a very limited budget to intervene against illegal activities that exploit marine species and eco-systems.



The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is not a protest organization. Our clients are marine species and our approach is to uphold international conservation law in accordance with the principles of the United Nation World Charter for Nature.




Thirty years ago on July 16th, 1979, Captain Paul Watson hunted down and rammed the pirate whaler Sierra and ended her illegal career. In 1980, Sea Shepherd commandos sank half the Spanish whaling fleet. Since then, Sea Shepherd has become more effective and more active. There is no other organization on the oceans doing what Sea Shepherd does. We are unique, and we get results, measuring our success by inflicting economic loss on the criminals we oppose and saving the lives of their victims.




We have two rules. (1) We do not take actions that will cause death or injury to our opposition and (2) we act to uphold laws, not to break them.




Since Sea Shepherd was founded in 1977, we have not caused a single injury to any person and we have never been convicted of a felony crime.




We have four priority campaigns at the moment:




Objective – Ending illegal Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary



Since 2002, we have been actively opposing illegal Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. Our objective is to sink the Japanese whaling fleet economically. We have sent five voyages of intervention and we are presently preparing the sixth voyage of intervention to return to the coast of ..Antarctica.. in December 2009. The Steve Irwin operates from late November until the end of March and the rest of the year is spent in drydock and alongside the dock for repairs, maintenance and improvements. The down time is also used to raise the funding needed to finance the campaign. We have cost the Japanese whaling industry their profits for five years and cut their quotas in half. We will continue this campaign until we drive the Japanese fleet from the seas forever. This last voyage saved 305 whales. We saved 500+ in 2007/2008, 500+ in 2006/2007 and 83 whales in 2005/2006. We have the Japanese whaling fleet in debt and on the ropes financially. We will keep the pressure on until we bankrupt the industry.




Objective – The defense and protection of the Galapagos National Park Marine Reserve.



Since 1999, Sea Shepherd has been stationed in the Galapagos. We brought a fast patrol boat to give to the National Park. We help maintain a surveillance barge at Wolf and Darwin.Islands to intercept poachers. We have a canine unit attached to the police force to sniff out shark fins at the ports and airports. We have intercepted and arrested poaching vessels, confiscated tens of thousands of illegal shark fins and hundreds of thousands of illegally taken sea cucumbers. We shut down a planned iron dust dumping project and we cut the nets of tuna seiners fishing on dolphins and taking tuna illegally. The Galapagos is our line in the sand. If we cannot save this profoundly beautiful eco-system, we will be unable to save any threatened place on this planet.




In addition we have busted poachers at ..Cocos.. ..Island.. off the coast of ..Costa Rica and Malpelo Island off the coast of Colombia. We have supplied radar, rifles, radios, boats and equipment to the rangers of Cocos, Malpelo and the Galapagos.




Objective – Ending illegal whaling in the North Atlantic by Norway, Iceland and Denmark.



In 1986, we sank half the Icelandic whaling fleet and shut down their illegal operations for two decades. In 1992 we sank the whaler Nybraena in the ..Norwegian Lofoten Islands and the whaler Senet in Southern Norway in 1994. Since then five additional whalers have been sunk in Norway (one this year) keeping the insurance premiums on whaling ships extremely high. In 1994, the Sea Shepherd ship Whales Forever battled the Norwegian Navy off the coast of Northern Norway to disrupt Norwegian whaling activities. Sea Shepherd continues to oppose illegal whaling activities in the ..North Atlantic.. as a priority objective.



The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society first intervened against the slaughter of pilot whales in 1983 when we disrupted one of the hunts. We returned in 1985 and 1986 to disrupt the killing operations and to produce the BBC documentary Black Harvest. We returned again in 2000 to disrupt the slaughter. Captain Paul Watson is banned from Denmark and the Faeores but the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society continues to work towards the end of this horrific annual massacre of pilot whales.




Objective - The defense of the Bluefin tuna in the Mediterranean



Sea Shepherd is presently looking for a ship to defend the Bluefin tuna in the Mediterranean. With more than 600 poaching vessels operating, the Bluefin tuna is threatened with imminent extinction in the wild. We intend to do everything we can to prevent this ecological disaster.




Other Concerns and Objectives:




Instituto Sea Shepherd Brazil is taking major fishing companies to court in Brazil. for illegal fishing and the unlawful slaughter of dolphins. In South Africa we are working to protect Great White Sharks. We have donated $25,000 to Francois Hugo and Seal alert to oppose the killing of Fur seals in Namibia. but we had to discontinue support when he refused to account for expenditures. We are presently working on strategies to utilize against this slaughter but this project is made difficult by the fact that the killing takes place on Namibian soil. This is the same situation in Taiji ..Japan.. where in 2003 we freed 15 dolphins with the result that two of our crew spent four week in jail and we were banned from Wayayama Prefecture. Since then, working with other groups we contributed to the making of the film The Cove. We are hoping that this documentary will exert the pressure needed to shut down this atrocity. In ..Canada.. we have opposed the slaughter of seals on the ice since 1976 and we have lost ships, been beaten, jailed and banned from the country but this year with the ban on Canadian seal products by Europe, our efforts have been rewarded. The commercial seal hunt in Canada has been struck a mortal blow and we will keep the pressure on to end it forever.




Media




Sea Shepherd is mobilizing surfers and scuba divers, yachters and scientists in the cause of saving our oceans. We have helped produce a major television show Whale Wars on Animal Planet and Discovery and we have been featured in nine documentary films including Black Harvest by the BBC (1986), Blue Rage (1992), Ocean Warrior Both films by ..Peter Brown.. (1995), Sharkwater by ..Rob Stewart.. (2007, The Edge of the World by ..Tim Gorski.. and ..Dan Stone.. (2008), Pirate for the Sea by ..Ron Colby.. (2008). The Cove by Louie Psihoyoss (2009), Oceans by ..Jacques Perrin.. (To be released in 2010). A tenth documentary is in the works by Trish Dolman of Screen Siren in Canada




The camera is the most powerful weapon in the world and we use it when and where we can.




The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has recently had major profiles in major publications around the world including the New Yorker, The London Sunday Times, The Melbourne Age, Figaro, La Monde, etc and major surfing, scuba diving and boating magazines. Sea Shepherd campaigns regularly make headline news around the world.




The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is growing without having to use donor’s money to finance massive direct mail campaigns, advertising campaigns or public relation expenditures. Funds donated to Sea Shepherd go directly to campaigns. This has kept us small but efficient and effective.



The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society can be contacted at www.Seashepherd.org





The Society is headquartered in ..Friday Harbor, Washington with offices or representatives in the Netherlands, France, Belgium, Great Britain, Germany, Sweden, South Africa, Singapore, Ecuador, Brazil, the United States, Canada, Australia, Spain, Monaco,.Hungary and Switzerland.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Whale Wars Nominated For Outstanding Cinematography Emmy







Animal Planet cinematographers have been honored with an Emmy nomination for their work on-board the SS Steve Irwin for the television series Whale Wars. The group of five people braved intense conditions to shoot dramatic encounters between Sea Shepherd and the Japanese whaling fleet. Said one cameraman, “Filming was an ordeal, they were pretty difficult and extremely dangerous circumstances. I didn’t think it was good enough. It was such rough and ready cinematography because of the environment.”


Whale Wars continues to draw in the viewers for Animal Planet. The network has confirmed that cinematographers will be with the Sea Shepherd crew for the upcoming campaign against the Japanese. It should be an interesting season three for the series — as the organization recently announced the addition of the sleek Earthrace boat to assist in curbing the Japanese hunt.


Look for the Emmy awards to be presented this coming September.

Saturday, July 18, 2009

New rules for safe shipping may save the whales




End of the line ... Nisshin Maru runs into threatening waters.
THE world's only factory whaling ship may be driven from the Antarctic by tighter regulations.

The Nisshin Maru is vital to the operations of the Japanese whaling fleet, but it will run foul of new rules imposed by the United Nations' International Maritime Organisation, an investigation by the Herald has found.

The ship will fall foul of three new measures that will apply in Antarctic waters: the heavy fuel oil it uses will be banned; its hull-strength and safety will fail new requirements; and its annual dumping of thousands of tonnes of offal at sea will be rejected in the global nature reserve.

The regulations were backed by the Antarctic Treaty System after a series of accidents involving tourism cruise ships, including the sinking of the MS Explorer.

They pose a dilemma for Japan, one of the world's largest and most law-abiding shipping nations, and threaten to make the operation of its heavily subsidised whaling fleet even more costly.

The 22-year-old Nisshin Maru weighs 8000 tonnes. It is owned by Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha, a company in Tokyo that is owned by the government-funded Institute of Cetacean Research.
Full story:


Friday, July 17, 2009

Ian Campbell Calls for Boycott of Japanese Bid for the 2016 Olympics

eIan Campbell Calls for Boycott of Japanese Bid for the 2016 Olympics

Sea Shepherd Advisor Calls Japanese Dolphin Slaughter a “Travesty”
Former Australian Senator and Environment Minister Ian Campbell is calling for a boycott of Tokyo's bid for the 2016 Olympics, in protest at Japan's alleged annual slaughter of 23,000 dolphins.

Ian Campbell is now an advisor to the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.



From the Melbourne Age

Boycott Japan Olympics bid: ex-minister

July 15, 2009 - Former federal environment minister Ian Campbell wants a boycott of Tokyo's bid for the 2016 Olympics, in protest at Japan's alleged annual slaughter of 23,000 dolphins.

Allowing Japan to host the Summer Games only 300 nautical miles from Taiji, the Japanese port where the killings occur, would be a "travesty", Mr Campbell says.

"Japan is trying to pitch its bid for the 2016 Summer Games as a `Green Olympics' whilst just across the bay one of the greatest acts of environmental vandalism on our planet paints the waters red," he said in a statement on Wednesday.

The dolphin killing allegedly occurs every September off Taiji on Japan's south coast.

Mr Campbell was environment minister from 2004 to 2007 in the Howard government and joined the International Advisory Board for the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society in January 2008.

An anti-whaling activist, he rejected Japan's claims their whaling efforts were scientific, calling them `sick' and `absurd' in a 2005 ABC interview.

The Sea Shepherd Society says the Taiji dolphin killings have been filmed by the Oceanic Preservation Society for a documentary called The Cove, to be released in Australia on August 20.

Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Chicago have also entered bids to host the 2016 Olympics. A decision will be made at the International Olympic Committee's meeting in Copenhagen on October 2 this year.



The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society first exposed the horrific slaughter of the dolphins in 2003 when our photographs and videos of the massacre appeared on the front pages of newspapers and on the evening news of media around the world. That was the same year that Allison Lance and Alex Cornelissen were jailed for three weeks for saving the lives of 15 dolphins and pilot whales by cutting the nets at Taiji Bay.

Since then the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has been working with Surfers for Cetaceans and the Oceanic Preservation Society to end the slaughter of 23,000 dolphins by Japanese fishermen every year.

Monday, July 13, 2009

THE TRUTH ABOUT WWF

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=66178175201


Recent News
Thank you for your visit please find out more about the WWF and take action if you like... dont forget to tell your friends and invite them to discover the truth!
Millions of people have no idea about the WWF they think that they care about animals!!!!! Well they dont!

The WWF was the driving force in pressuring the U..S.. Congress to legislate the screening of chemicals for "endocrine (hormone) disrupting" effects and has subsequently been heavily involved in establishing the framework for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) massive chemical-testing program now under development. . As its Web site points out: "WWF invested substantial resources in the EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee," which "agreed upon a set of tests to form the foundation for the screening and testing program.." What the WWF neglects to mention, however, is that 10 of the 15 recommended screens and tests are animal-poisoning studies, some of which kill hundreds or thousands of animals at a time.. According to scientific estimates, the WWF-backed endocrine testing program will kill up to 1..2 million animals for every 1,000 chemicals tested, and with environmental organizations pressing for tens of thousands of chemicals to be retested under this program, the toll in animal suffering and death will be staggering.. The WWF is also pressuring government agencies in Europe to embark on a similar animal-testing program..

In addition to lobbying for more chemical testing, the WWF has teamed up with Procter & Gamble, S..C.. Johnson, and other chemical companies to create an institute to pursue "basic research" on endocrine disruptors.. On top of this, the WWF is now pushing the U..S.. Congress to pass a bill that would pour additional millions in public funds into endocrine research--much of which would likely be used to fund experiments on animals..

Unfortunately, the "endocrine disruptor" issue is not an isolated example.. The WWF has been a major force in pressuring the European Union to amend its Chemicals Policy to require companies to test and retest as many as 30,000 new and existing chemicals.. The British Institute for Environmental Health estimates that this process will kill upwards of 45 million animals if the standard battery of animal-poisoning tests is used.. The WWF's U..S.. and Canadian offices are also calling for more testing of pesticides, despite the fact that more than 9,000 animals are already killed for each pesticide product on the market.. The organization has called for certain pesticides to be tested for "developmental neurotoxicity" (DNT) using a test that kills upwards of 1,300 animals each time it is conducted.. This test has been heavily criticized by scientists, including the EPA's own Scientific Advisory Panel, which concluded that "the exposure of rat fetus/pups was not shown to be equivalent to human fetus/infant during equivalent stages of brain development" and that "the current form of the DNT guideline is not a sensitive indicator of toxicity to the offspring.." In other words, WWF is calling for thousands of animals to be killed in a test that scientists admit is not relevant to humans!

In its defense, the WWF says that "in the absence of effective, validated alternatives, WWF believes that limited animal testing is needed for the long-term protection of wildlife and people throughout the world.." However, there is nothing "limited" about the massive amount of animal testing that the WWF is endorsing.. Dr.. Joshua Lederberg, Nobel Laureate in Medicine, pointed out in 1981: "It is simply not possible with all the animals in the world to go through chemicals in the blind way we have at the present time, and reach credible conclusions about the hazards to human health.." Now more than 20 years later, millions of animals are still dying in agonizing chemical toxicity tests, and we are no closer to getting dangerous chemicals out of the environment. . In fact, despite killing hundreds of thousands of animals in painful chemical toxicity tests, the EPA has not banned a single toxic industrial chemical in more than a decade!...

The WWF Endorses the Killing of Wild Animals, Too!!!
The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) gives special meaning to the word "conservation. ." The organization, founded in 1961 by a group of wealthy trophy hunters, apparently believes that conserving animals means keeping them around long enough for well-heeled "sportsmen" to blast them out of the woods, oceans, skies, plains of Africa, and jungles of Asia.. Past WWF chapter presidents include C..R.. "Pink" Gutermuth, who also served as president of the National Rifle Association, and trophy hunter Francis L.. Kellogg, who is legendary for his massive kills.. In its early days, the WWF even used fur auctions to raise funds...

Since then, the WWF has learned that most people are appalled by hunting and trapping, so today, the organization veils its true stance under phrases like "sustainable development, " arguing that killing is acceptable under some circumstances. . When answering difficult questions about its policy on hunting, trapping, and whaling, the WWF is careful never to state outright that it approves of all these activities.. But don't be fooled, the WWF's intentions are all too clear and deadly!!

Sealing
According to the Web site of the WWF's Canadian office, "WWF is not an animal welfare organization. . We support the hunting and consumption of wild animals provided the harvesting does not threaten the long-term survival of wildlife populations. . WWF has never opposed a sustainable seal hunt in northern or eastern Canada.." However, despite the WWF's portrayal of the situation, the Canadian seal hunt is anything but a "subsistence" hunt--it is the largest slaughter of marine mammals in the world.. Quotas established by the Canadian government have soared to an all-time high: 350,000 seals per year for the next three years.. Not since the mid-1800s, when unrestricted slaughter saw a million seals per year killed, has so much blood been shed on the ice off Canada's East Coast...
Worse is that the Canadian government has stated in internal documents that having the WWF's support for any raise in seal quotas is important, and the WWF's position statement suggests that it had been working with the Canadian government before the quota was announced.. In other words, the WWF had the power to help avert the largest quota of harp seal pups in history but chose, instead, to let it happen without so much as a word of opposition!! !

Whaling!!!
While the WWF states that it opposes "commercial whaling," it does support the slaughter of whales by native tribes and under some other conditions.. When asked directly about its policy, WWF is vague, stating: "WWF's views on whether sustainable whaling should be permitted derive from its mission 'to conserve nature and ecological processes and to help build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature..'" In the past, WWF officials have clearly stated that "WWF International has the national WWF organizations behind it in the view that as soon as one can ensure a sustainable commercial harvest of the great whales under secure international control, then whaling will no longer be a WWF concern...."

Sport Hunting!!!
As one would expect of an organization founded by hunters, the WWF does not oppose the slaughter of animals with guns and other weapons for sport.. Rather than working to stop the killing, the WWF believes that hunting should be regulated, arguing that wealthy trophy hunters can bring income to poorer nations.. The WWF claims that it has no power to stop hunting, stating, "The decision to allow trophy hunting is a sovereign one made entirely by the governments concerned. . We will continue to monitor governments' enforcement of important trade laws to ensure that trophy hunting is done within the legal standards of that area...."

Elephants!!!
The WWF believes that culling-another way of saying "killing"-elephants is acceptable, as is the trade in ivory, because the profits that it brings spur governments to keep elephants from going extinct.. In 2000, U..S.. News & World Report reported that WWF representatives traveled to Nairobi to ask the United Nations to lift the ban on the ivory trade in order to allow a "sustainable harvest of ivory for horns and hunting trophies..."

The WWF's bizarre view-that we must kill some animals now in order to save animals to kill later-has proved false time and again.. The trade in ivory has only encouraged rampant poaching, the senseless slaughter of elephants.. The WWF tries to duck the issue by falsely stating, "The decision to cull, or to select animals from the herd for removal or death, is indeed an agonizing choice, but it is one made entirely by the governments concerned and there is no international involvement in those decisions.."

Trapping!!!
As with hunting and whaling, the WWF refuses to condemn the massive killing of animals with steel-jaw leghold traps.. While calling itself a "preservationist" organization that "seek[s] to be the voice for those creatures who have no voice," the WWF stands back from the issue, stating that "the trade in furs, skins, and other products of animals that are not endangered isn't the focus of our campaign.."
But no matter how hard the WWF tries to "greenwash" its support of animal slaughter, its real message rings out loud and clear: Animals are ours to hunt, trap, kill, poison, and use as we see fit.. And although appeals to preserve genetic diversity, ecosystems, and the planet sound good on paper, they mean little if what the WWF is really advocating is more efficient killing fields...

Wolf Hunting!!!
Despite an ongoing international tourist boycott that was called in response to the wolf "control" program in Alaska, in which at least 100 wolves have been shot as of March 2004, the WWF is promoting several trips to Alaska throughout June, July, and August 2004 as part of "WWF Travel," an "ecotourism" program.. When asked why the WWF was sending its members to Alaska, effectively undermining efforts to save wolves in the state, the WWF travel desk representative stated that the WWF did not consider the matter of wolf-killing a priority..

WHAT YOU CAN DO?

Please write to the WWF and express your opposition to its involvement in the slaughter of millions of animals in laboratories. . Let the WWF know that you contribute only to organizations that oppose outdated animal-poisoning tests and that there is no such thing as conservation through killing..

..

James P Leape, Director General WWF-International
Ave du Mont-Blanc
1196 Gland
Switzerland
Fax: 41 22 364 5468
E-Mail: jleape@wwfint. org

Carter S Roberts, President and CEO WWF-US
1250 24th St NW
Washington, DC 20037
Fax: 202- 778-9637
E-Mail: patricia.. gvozdich@wwfus. . org

MJ Russill, President and CEO... WWF-Canada
245 Eglinton Ave E, Ste 410
Toronto, ON M4P 3J1
Fax: 416-489-3611. ..
E-Mail: mrussill@wwfcanada.org...

Elizabeth Salter Green, Head...
European Toxics Programme...
WWF-UK...
Panda House, Weyside Park
Godalming, Surrey GU7 1XR
Fax: 011 44 148 342 6409
E-Mail: esaltergreen@wwf.org.uk
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=66178175201

Friday, July 10, 2009

Japan Attempts to Bully the Netherlands

By Captain Paul Watson
It appears as though Japan may have finally succeeded in gaining enough influence in the Netherlands to attempt to dictate Dutch law.
Because the Steve Irwin, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society’s flagship (used to obstruct activities by Japanese whalers in violation of international laws and in an internationally recognized Whale Sanctuary), is registered in the Netherlands, the Japanese authorities have lodged an official complaint regarding the conduct and behavior of the Steve Irwin.
In recent years, a number of incidents have taken place between the vessels of the Japanese whaling fleet and Sea Shepherd in the waters of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. According to the Dutch Transport and Water Management Inspectorate, both parties have been guilty of breaking international regulations concerning good seamanship and the safety at sea.
While it appears that this will not have any serious consequences for Japanese state-supported and illegal operations, it may carry serious consequences for Sea Shepherd.
On request of the Dutch Transport and Water Management Inspectorate, the Dutch Public Ministry investigated and determined it is not feasible to start a legal prosecution. The Dutch cabinet is now considering a ban against Sea Shepherd vessels sailing under the Dutch flag. Public Works State Secretary Tineke Huizinga said she wants to amend the law quickly to make this possible.
Japan has repeatedly complained to the Netherlands about Sea Shepherd. Current law makes it difficult to take action against ships already registered with the Dutch government, so the cabinet wants to speedily extend its legal options for withdrawing certificates of registry, according to Huizinga.
Unfortunately, the Dutch authorities would be closing their eyes to the fact that all the incidents between the illegal Japanese whalers and Sea Shepherd have taken place in the waters of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary and/or in others areas protected by international and Australian Federal law.
The Japanese whaling fleet is engaged in illegal activities, but lack of enforcement allows them to operate largely unopposed. Sea Shepherd is the only organization actively enforcing conservation law to stop these Antarctic poachers, and operates under the UN World Charter for Nature to that end.
For years now the Netherlands have stated they are against whaling, but have not taken any action to back up this statement. Now, given the opportunity to stand up to Japan, they intend to persecute the only organization worldwide actively striving to enforce international laws and protect whales.
Why does the Dutch government not show its independence and acknowledge the violations of the law committed by the Japanese whalers? Why is Japan apparently placed above international law?
Japan has placed itself above the law because it assumes no government in the world would show the will to actively accuse and legally prosecute Japan for their many violations of international conservation laws. The only entity that has dared to stand up and act is Sea Shepherd. The Netherlands now has an opportunity to join the legal and ethical side in this battle.
Will the Dutch government narrow-mindedly support illegal whaling operations, or will they support the only organization actively seeking to uphold those same laws by not pandering to Japanese objections?
It seems that Japan is attempting to amend Dutch law. We hope we are wrong. Regardless, we will continue to defend the defenseless against illegal activities in the Antarctic and elsewhere.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Save the Western Gray Whale from Extinction!Take Action!

Save the Western Gray Whale from Extinction!
In a recent victory, oil companies Gazprom, Shell, Mitsui, and Mitsubishi (Sakhalin II project sponsors) agreed to halt seismic testing on Sakhalin Island, Russia to protect a critically endangered whale population. This is an incredible victory that we couldn’t have done without your help!However, Exxon, BP, and Rosneft are still planning to operate in this sensitive whale habitat. Your quick action can save the Western Gray Whale from extinction. If allowed to continue, these activities could force the critically endangered Western Gray Whales from their primary feeding area.The Western Gray Whale is one of the most critically endangered whale populations on earth. Only about 120 individuals, and 25 breeding females, remain. These imperiled whales feed only in the summer and autumn, and almost exclusively near Piltun Bay in northeast Sakhalin. Unfortunately, in 2008, large Russian and international oil and gas companies’ operations in the area coincided with a sharp decline in whales observed in their primary feeding area.As a result, internationally recognized scientists of the Western Gray Whale Advisory Group (WGWAP) have urgently warned oil and gas companies operating in the area to implement a moratorium on all industrial activities in or near the whales’ main feeding area for summer and autumn of 2009. Failure to heed these scientists’ warnings could be devastating for the whale population.Gazprom, Shell, Mitsui, and Mitsubishi (Sakhalin II project sponsors) have already agreed to the urgent moratorium. However, Exxon, BP, and Rosneft have not yet complied with the moratorium. Please join us in urging the remaining companies operating in the area to join the moratorium and to support the proposed Sakhalin Marine Federal Wildlife Reserve.
Rex W. Tillerson, Chairman and CEO, ExxonMobil Tony Hayward, Chief Executive, BP Group Sergey Bogdanchikov, President, Rosneft RE: MORATORIUM NEEDED TO PROTECT WESTERN GRAY WHALE FROM EXTINCTION I call on you to join other corporations to implement a moratorium on onshore and offshore exploitation in and around the summer and autumn feeding habitat of the critically endangered Western Gray Whale near Russia’s Sakhalin Island. With only about 120 individuals remaining--including only about 25 breeding females--the Western Gray Whale is already on the verge of extinction. These whales feed only in the summer and autumn and their primary feeding ground lies in and adjacent to your company’s Piltun Bay area of operations. The number of observed Western Gray Whales in their primary feeding area declined sharply in 2008, according to the Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel (WGWAP), comprised of 11 prominent international scientists convened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). This decline coincided with disruptive oil and gas industrial activity in the area. Additional displacement of the whales from their primary feeding area in 2009 could be devastating for the population. As a result, the WGWAP urges a moratorium on all industrial activities on or near the whales’ main feeding area for summer and autumn of 2009. Gazprom, Shell, Mitsui, and Mitsubisi (Sakhalin II project sponsors) have taken a responsible course of action and have suspended their proposed 2009 seismic survey in the area. However, your company continues with plans for industrial exploitation activities that threaten the Western Gray Whale with extinction. Additionally, your company’s refusal thus far to cooperate with the WGWAP threatens to undercut the responsible actions taken by others. I urge you to join the growing call of scientists, local citizens, and companies to suspend these perilous operations and to support the creation of the proposed Sakhalin Marine Federal Wildlife Reserve. Sincerely,

Monday, June 29, 2009

APPEAL TO THE DUTCH GOVERNMENT -PETITION TO SIGN


Appeal to the Dutch Government Who Wants Emergency Act Against 'Environmental Pirates' Sea Shepherd
Target:
Dutch Government venwinfo@postbus51.nl,M.Thieme@tweedekamer.nl,E.Ouwehand@tweedekamer.nlE.Ouwehand@tweedekamer.nl M.Rutte@tweedekamer.nl R.Verdonk@tweedekamer.nl g.wilders@tweedekamer.nl
Sponsored by:
Claudia Peters . Supporters of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
The Netherlands wants to ban the controversial anti-whaling organisation Sea Shepherd from sailing under the Dutch flag. Public Works State Secretary Tineke Huizinga said Friday she wants to amend the law quickly to make this possible. The American organisation Sea Shepherd has two ships sailing under the Dutch flag. The Netherlands provided the necessary certificate of registry for this in 2007, after Sea Shepherd had promised in writing not to use violence and to comply with the safety rules. Nonetheless, a number of incidents have taken place between Sea Shepherd ships and Japanese whalers in the Antarctic. Japan has repeatedly complained to the Netherlands about the Sea Shepherd. It appears difficult at the moment to take action against ships that do not comply with the rules, so the cabinet wants to speedily extend its legal options for withdrawing certificates of registry, according to Huizinga. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This can NOT happen.As a dutch citizen,i'm proud that the Steve Irwin vessel sails under the dutch flag ! Violence??? There's no worse violence than illegally killing whales in the Antartic Whale Sanctuary,slaughtering seals and skin them alive,plundering the oceans ! Sea Shepherd is doing the job in conservation,something that all governments in this world FAIL at !!!!! All supporters of Sea Shepherd Unite !
The Netherlands wants to ban the controversial anti-whaling organisation Sea Shepherd from sailing under the Dutch flag. Public Works State Secretary Tineke Huizinga said Friday she wants to amend the law quickly to make this possible. The American organisation Sea Shepherd has two ships sailing under the Dutch flag. The Netherlands provided the necessary certificate of registry for this in 2007, after Sea Shepherd had promised in writing not to use violence and to comply with the safety rules. Nonetheless, a number of incidents have taken place between Sea Shepherd ships and Japanese whalers in the Antarctic. Japan has repeatedly complained to the Netherlands about the Sea Shepherd. It appears difficult at the moment to take action against ships that do not comply with the rules, so the cabinet wants to speedily extend its legal options for withdrawing certificates of registry, according to Huizinga. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This can NOT happen.As a dutch citizen,i'm proud that the Steve Irwin vessel sails under the dutch flag ! Violence??? There's no worse violence than illegally killing whales in the Antartic Whale Sanctuary,slaughtering seals and skin them alive,plundering the oceans ! Sea Shepherd is doing the job in conservation,something that all governments in this world FAIL at !!!!! All supporters of Sea Shepherd Unite !
We write in protest against your proposal to withdraw the Dutch ship registry for the vessel The Steve Irwin from Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. I refer to the article: Dutch Government to enact law to ban Sea Shepherd from sailing under the Dutch flag! Realising that tremendous pressure is being brought to bear on your government by the Japanese I would nevertheless urge you to rethink this drastic measure. The Japanese are breaking International Whaling agreements, they do so at will while the world stand by and do nothing, with the exception of Paul Watson and his Sea Shepherd crew. As an advocate of marine conservation I applaud the actions of Paul Watson, admiring him for his courage and integrity. Paul Watson is standing up to the piracy of illegal whalers. The least your government can do is allow him to retain his registration. For a nation like Japan to defy the entire world, without suffering retribution can only mean one thing, and I suspect it has something to do with the foreign trade balance between the Netherlands and Japan. Can money truly take the place of marine conservation? Can political pressure from a nation that hides behind the banner of scientific whaling truly take the place of marine conservation? I think not, and I believe that after due consideration you will agree with me. Your country has an excellent reputation in its fight against pet abuse. When all the whales have been harpooned into extinction, when the bloody seas bearing their cries crash against your shore, where will the Netherlands hide its shame? Kind Regards,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Geachte heer,mevrouw Met teleurstelling heb ik vernomen vandaag dat men een urgente mandaat wil instellenom het schip van Sea Shepherd Conservation Society de "Steve Irwin" wil gaan verbieden om niet langer onderde Nederlandse vlag te varen. http://www.nisnews.nl/public/270609_3.htmIk vind dit zeer onterecht,vooral wanneer men hun beschuldigt van geweld tegen de Japanse walvisvaarders.Is de illegale walvisjacht in de Antarctische wateren (Whale Sanctuary) door de Japanners niet meer geweldadiger dan wat Sea Shepherd doet? Sea Shepherd Society heeft in 30 jaar nog nooit slachtoffers gemaakt tijdens hun campagnes,zij zorgen er alleen voor dat er walvissen van de dood gered worden.De zogenaamde wetenschappelijke walvisjacht van de Japanners is een facade,een excuus,want vreemd dat de walvissen die zij gedood hebben (waar ze monsters van moeten nemen) al kant en klaar in pakketjes voor de vleesmarkt in Japan aankomen.Japan oefent druk op Nederland uit om de Nederlandse vlag van Sea Shepherd af te nemen.En de Nederlandse regering bukt hiervoor ?Sea Shepherd Conservation Society doet hetgene waar alle regeringen in de wereld in FALEN !!! Namelijk het redden van walvissen,zeehonden,het plunderen van de oceanen.Het zou mooi zijn dat regeringen eens opkwamen voor de Oceanen en alle dieren erin.Misschien eens meer onderzoek doen over Sea Shepherd,youtube filmpjes kijken om waarover het gaat.Sea Shepherd gebruikt geen GEWELD tegen mensen,wel maken zij directe acties tegen illegale activiteiten,maken zij materiaal onklaar.Ik hoop dat de regering de wijze en juiste beslissing neemt ! Anders zal mijn en van velen anderen het vertrouwen in de Nederlandse regering flink dalen. Met vriendelijke groeten

Sunday, June 28, 2009

FOR THE WHALES WE WEEP BEFORE FOREVER WE SLEEP

By Captain Paul Watson




From Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.







The sons of Adam descended upon the water

Without thought, devoid of love they began the slaughter

The children of Ahab baptized in hot gentle blood

Mercilessly seeking revenge for the ancient flood

.. ..



I am writing this on a tropical hillside over-looking the Atlantic Ocean. Behind me is the Pestana Casino Park Hotel on the island of Madeira. The 61st annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission is over. The hundreds of delegates have departed the island like guilty shadows back to their respective nations, leaving a foul taste and stench in the air over Funchal, from yet another IWC meeting that accomplished absolutely nothing.




After a week spent observing delegates to the International Whaling Commission in Funchal, Madiera, I have come to recognize just what it is that is missing from this annual bureaucratic orgy of inaction.




Whales!




The talk around the bar in the evening or at the tables in the restaurant during meals is your usual banter about football, kids, politics and the economy. I did not detect much concern for the whales. The African and ..Caribbean.. delegates in town on a Japanese funded junket in exchange for their votes, were more interested in the night life and most of the NGO’s were chit chatting about pretty much nothing.




The whalers were as usual getting stupidly drunk. I was most amused to see Icelandic whaling boss Krisj..ian.. Loftson trying to drunkenly impersonate the Jazz singer. It was eerie indeed to be sitting so close to such a serial killer. I had seen the pictures of him perversely shoving his entire arm into a raw open wound in a Fin whale. The man literally wallows in the blood of the whales and yet here he was sipping girly pink fruity drinks with little apricot coloured umbrellas. The contrast was chilling.




The entire conference was devoid of empathy, compassion and respect, reduced to purely utilitarian.. discussions that viewed the whale as nothing more than mindless objects to be bartered, and statistics to be debated.




Overall the impression that I was left with is that whales are some sort of vague abstraction and although they were the reason for this annual luxury fest, they did not seem to occupy much of a presence in the minds of, and certainly not in the hearts of most of these delegates.




As the delegates met and mumbled incoherently about all sorts of assorted nonsense in the windowless conference room, I was forced, due to being officially banned from the conference, into sitting around the lobby intimidating Japanese whalers or standing on the lawn over-looking the spectacular vista of the Desertas islands across the rich deep blue of the Atlantic.



I was recalling that in 1865, behind those very islands the Confederate commerce raider Shenandoah was covertly outfitted with the guns she would use to destroy the Yankee whaling fleet, when suddenly I saw a flash of white in the bay and a tingle of excitement ran up my spine as I saw a whale breach and spout.




There it was, a member of the most evolved group of minds in the sea, a real in the flesh whale and I wondered what that whale would think and feel about the collection of arrogant primates in the building behind me sitting around talking about his species and cousins as if they were little more than mindless unfeeling slabs of meat in the marketplace.




Although governments are funding scientists to explore the galaxy in search of extraterrestrial intelligence, they are spending nothing to explore the possibility of communicating with intelligent life forms on our very own planet. It occurred to me that even discussing the possibility of inter-species communication would be incomprehensible to most of the delegates in the conference room.




I was lamenting the fact that there were so few protestors appearing at these meetings compared to the thousands that once blocked the doors and threw blood on the Japanese delegates in years gone by. Even last year, courageous Chileans were carried off by soldiers as armoured vehicles stood guard with machine guns to keep emotion from contaminating the cold calculations of the discussions over scientific kill permits and aboriginal slaughter allowances.




Only two groups were openly opposing the slaughter this year in the streets of Funchal. Sea Shepherd crew members and Surfers for Cetaceans. There was not a Greenpeace, IFAW or WWF sign or tee shirt to be seen. The mainstream NGO delegates in their suits and ties had been blended into the domesticated uniformity of the delegate crowd.



Greenpeacers who once stood beside me to block harpoons and seal clubs were now dutifully boarding buses to have cocktails and polite conversation with whalers and swivel servants to discuss such mundane matters as compromises and reduced quotas, concessions and special cultural dispensations. It was plain that they had forgotten the horrific screams of the whales and the gut-wrenching plea in the eye of the whale for us to champion their cause before humanity.




Arne and Christine who flew in from Germany at their own expense to stand before the hotel with a banner pleading for the lives of whales and those sterile suits on the inside being paid to sip tea and pretending to be effective was an enlightening contrast. On the outside there reigned compassion, a human emotion, that the Portuguese police were determined was not going to pollute the goings on of those officially designated as dignitaries on the inside.




World class free surfer Dave “Rasta” Rastovich arrived and took his board to the sea to mediate on the chilly petty pseudo dramas of those in the darkened enclosed room of fears and jeers. He and his fellow surfers were the link between us on land and those awesome cetacean minds offshore.




When someone commented that it seemed strange that Rasta would come all the way to the IWC from Australia just to surf, the thought struck me that perhaps he was accomplishing much more out there on the water than any of the great pretenders on the inside with their spongy straw heads babbling garbled inanities about a majestic life form they knew absolutely nothing about.




Of course not all of them on the inside are unfeeling machines with their heads completely up their posteriors. They were divided into three colours. The blue of official delegations, the green of the non governmental organizations (NGO’s) and the red for the media.




The red represented a spectrum of postures from pseudo objectivity to propagandists with a sprinkle of genuine truth seekers like ..Andrew Darby.. and Mick McIntyre. The green represented another spectrum of diversity from banner wavers to socially acceptable activists and amongst the blue were politic..ian..s and bureaucrats who were not completely without feeling. Many of them in the pro-whale conservation delegations like Australia, the USA, Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, Monaco, the Netherlands and New Zealand etc, were quite genuine in their concern for the whales but trapped in the crippling corporate and governmental controlled vice of IWC protocols that render decision making practically impossible. I’m sure that Austral..ian.. Environment Minister Peter Garrett would like to see whaling ended in the Southern Ocean but the political and economic obstacles tossed in his way force him to stumble and appear ineffective. United States Commissioner Bill Hogarth to his credit did succeed in saving the lives of 100 Humpbacks over the last two years and for that he is to be commended but he also failed to budge the dead weight of IWC uselessness. But did he ever have a chance? The Japanese and their little bought and paid for puppet nations have managed to throw cog after cog into the workings of the machinations of the IWC to the point that the entire organization has become moribund and for all intends and purposes – dead.




The rank smell left drifting over Funchal in the wake of the IWC was simply the smell of years of rot and decay as the cancerous zombie like body once known as the International Whaling Commission has wasted away into bureaucratic slime and internal corruption, stumbling sightlessly towards nowhere with the scarlet blood of the whales dripping from gangrenous greyish black lips.




This organization at the age of 63 is quite simply a dead entity haunting a different luxury hotel every year. Toothless, useless and covered in bureaucratic boils, administrative hives, and ulcerous corporatepuscular tumours all of it reeking of greed and ecological ignorance.




This emasculated dog and pony show stumbles tediously on and will meet next year not far from where it failed this year, in Morocco where the delegates from St. Lucia, St. Kitts and all those other silly Saint whorish places that dare to call themselves real countries holding a vote, will descend for yet another Japanese paid holiday, this time with hashish and camel rides.




And meanwhile the gentle whales keep dying as the Japanese monstrously blow their sensitive guts apart with the burning shrapnel of their insidious harpoons and the Icelanders, Greenlanders and Norweg..ian..s, like cold blooded Nordic beserkers strike grisly and merciless death into the mighty hearts of endangered Fins and Humpbacks and defenceless Minkes.




These delegates cannot see, they cannot feel, nor can they understand the enduring pain that we, who love the whales, experience when we witness the deaths of these gentle g..ian..ts, these great armless Buddha’s, these maritime music..ian..s and poets. Where we see intelligence, family bonds and beauty, those on the darker side of humanity merely see materialistic profit. For us it’s music and magic, grace and beauty and for those cold blooded others it is simply blubber and meat, money and power.




In the hotel where the IWC were meeting, Charles Hambleton of the Oceanic Preservation Society aired the film The Cove to any delegate who cared to see it and unfortunately most who did care to see it already cared. Perhaps if the Japanese, Norweg..ian..s and their globe trotting gigolos were strapped down and forced to watch the malicious mass murder of the dolphins they would be able to understand what drives the fiery passion of a Ric O’Berry or an ..Allison Lance.. (who freed 15 dolphins from Taiji in 2003).




If some of those delegates inside could actually have the opportunity to swim with the whales, perhaps they would understand, instead of saying as the delegate from Antigua did that she knew there were whales near ..Antigua.. because she saw one on television once.




How do we get such bureaucrats who speak bureaucratese to even begin to understand the gentle vision of artist Howie Cooke or the courage of a Sea Shepherd crewmember.




Most likely we can’t. Those of us who care about the whales find that we can communicate more effectively with whales and dolphins than with these alien suits whose behavioural patterns are leading the world to collective suicide. They don’t understand that if we can’t save the whales, we will fail to save the oceans and if the oceans die, then we all die, and all the great dreams of humanity will be blown away as dust in the winds of time.



And the Inuits, the Alaskans, the Greenlanders, the Makah and all those aboriginal communities that confuse the debate with their chauvinistic obsession to slaughter for culture, will they ever realize that the cultural values of the first nations, those other species who were here long before us should and must take precedence over the rights of any hominid to chew whale blubber in a world where whales are fast disappearing?




Why must a Bowhead whale, two centuries old, die in abject agony, just so a very small minority of people can continue to chew their fat pretending that their archaic cultures are still viable in a world gone ecologically insane?Preserving a culture of slaughter in a world of mass extinction should be the least of our collective priorities.



Preserving biodiversity in the midst of a major extinction event should be our greatest of priorities. These so called ancient hominid cultures were not wise nor were they sacred, and all human cultures without exception have contributed to the extinction of species. To allow so called aboriginal cultures to finish off the survivors is simply selfish, shallow, and short-sighted. To allow the Inuit to continue to murder and destroy the more ancient and far wiser culture of the whales is no different than if we allowed the cannibals of ..Borneo.. to have preserved their culture of culinary homicide.




To the Humpbacks, the Greenlanders are murderers, to the dolphins the fishermen of Taiji are ruthless serial killers and to the pilot whales the ferocious butchers of the Faeroe Islands are savage barbarians. The massacre last year of over 500 narwhals by the Inuit in Canada was a vicious crime against nature perpetuated by sadistic killers who hid behind the hypocritical skirts of political correctness.

.. ..

How do we even begin to communicate the incredible despair that we feel in trying to communicate the pain and suffering of whales and dolphins to a humanity grossly alienated from the living reality of nature and armoured in layers of anthropocentric fantasies that proclaim the human to be a divine legend in our own pathetic little minds?




The act of harpooning a whale, of spearing a dolphin, of clubbing a seal, are simply incomprehensible to those of us on the outside of these regulatory agencies. We are constantly amazed at the repetitive accusations of terrorism and violence from vicious killers as we seek to stop the killing. It is like there are two species of humanity on the planet – the ruthless anthropocentric killing machines who slaughter without mercy or remorse and those of us whose alleg..ian..ce is to the biocentric view that all Earthlings regardless of species, have the inalienable right to life and the pursuit of happiness.




I have heard the screams of dying whales. I have seen their hot steaming blood gush into the cold waters of the sea. I have heard the sickening thud of a seal club as it smashes the skull of a baby seal and I have seen dolphins, mad with fear, blood pulsing from gaping raw wounds as they desperately try to save the lives of their children from the insane spears and knives of their laughing human tormentors.




I have seen, heard, smelt, felt and experienced these horrors most of my life as I have done all in my power within the bounds of the law and non-violence to halt the killing, to exercise compassion and to promote an understanding of the rights and the dignity of those fellow Earthlings who suffer so tremendously from the blood-stained hands of my fellow humans.




I hope that next year will see the demise of the IWC. We need to remove this embarrassing posturing of an organization that pretends to regulate whaling and we need to replace it with an organization dedicated to the complete protection of all cetaceans, that will draft and enforce laws that will end the murder of the uniquely intelligent and socially complex communities of whales and dolphins.




The slaughter of these magnificent sentient beings has no place in the 21st Century, no place in any human culture and no place in this world of the homocene mass extinctions..




Somewhere, tens of millions of miles away, a manmade spacecraft is hurtling towards the outer reaches of the galaxy. Within that spaceship named Voyager, thanks to the wisdom of Dr. ..Roger Payne.. and Dr. Carl Sagan is a recording of a song by a Humpback whale. I wonder which voice, human or whale will entice a far distant intelligent extraterrestrial species? Will either whale or human even exist on this planet should visitors grace us with their presence?




And as for these horrific annual meetings, I wonder which voices will be remembered and respected hundreds of years, or even millions of years from now?




I smile to myself when I envision that song engraved on a disc of gold and released into the stream of infinity. Mick Jagger’s voice on that space wandering disc lamenting that humankind cannot get any satisfaction and the song of the whales bearing a message of magic and mystery to borders beyond the unknown.




Who will our own provincial history remember with respect? The whale killers or the whale defenders? If history is any guide at all, it will be the whale defenders that our ancestors will thank and not the villainous killers of such unique, graceful and intelligent sentient beings.




It will be the image of artist Howie Cooke gifting a mural to Funchal school children or Dave Rastovich surfing alongside a dolphin in the waters of Madeira or the ..Azores.. or Dr. Sidney Holt smiling in hope for a future for both whales and humans. It will be Dr. Bill Hogarth’s gift of a hundred Humpbacks to posterity and it will be Ric O’Berry walking courageously through the meeting at St. Kitt’s with the images of the reality of blood, gore and horror flashing in a nauseating flicker of delirium from a video screen on his chest. It will be ..Hannah Fraser..’s mermaid tail flashing like a beacon of hope at the Santiago meeting or little Skye Bortelli confronting Japanese whalers with children’s poems and art, as burly bodyguards stood ready to pounce on her as a suspected terrorist. It will be Peggy Oki’s thousands of origami whales displayed at the meeting in ..Anchorage.. or former Australian Environment Minister Ian Campbell returning to Santiago as an activist after experiencing the frustration of being a delegate.




The story of the IWC will be remembered for those who spoke for the whales and defended them and not for those who slew and destroyed them. Slavers, whalers and other serial killers, war mongers and dictators may enjoy power and prestige in the present but are invariably condemned in the future by more enlightened descendants. .





Where do we go from here? I intend to return to the Southern Ocean to mount a sixth expedition aimed at saving as many whales as possible from the illegal harpoons of the Japanese whaling fleet and if given the resources we will sail to the North Atlantic to see what we can do to stop the Nordic serial killers.




And if my body does not sink silently into the cold dark depths of the Southern Ocean or is confined to a dungeon under the shadow of Fujiyama, I will be back in Morocco next summer.




We cannot retreat. We can never surrender. We need to continue throwing documentaries like The Cove and television programs like Whale Wars into the faces of the ruthless practitioners of brutal cetacide. We need to continue to block the harpoons and we need to continue to sink outlaw whalers, and we must use our imaginations, our humour, our art, our music, our poetry, and our lives to defend and protect the graceful and gentle giants of the deep.




In the end we will triumph, we must triumph or at least we will have done all that we could with the resources available to us to defend and protect a legacy that we can bequeath to the future.




In doing so, we will have lived lives of honour and selflessness and when you think about it, what better endeavour is there than to devote one’s life to than bestowing the gift of life and survival to a species successfully protected into the future of our most wondrous jewel of a planet?




From dust we came and to dust we will go, but in between, we can create and fight for the light of beauty and truth against the forces of greed and darkness.



After all is said and done, the fact remains is that the forces of light were represented this year in Madeira, peering into the dungeon of darkness from the outside looking in, a reminder that a light of compassion still flickers within the heart of humanity, waiting for the darkness of the human heart to be illuminated with a new understanding that we are not alone on this planet, and that somewhere out there on the vast shroud of the ocean, in her mysterious depths, there swims whales and dolphins, and in their evolved brains dwells a separate reality and perhaps therein lies forgiveness for the lethal and obscene sins we have collectively inflicted upon their gentle souls.




For the ultimate truth is this – if we fail to save the great whales, we will fail to save ourselves and thus we weep for the whales in fear that if they disappear than so shall we – forever!

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Whaling chief says no guarantee of end to killing

By BARRY HATTON Associated Press Writer



There are no guarantees that negotiators from pro- and anti-whaling nations will settle their dispute within a 12-month deadline they have set themselves, the new head of the International Whaling Commission said Friday.

"I can't promise a final solution within a year. I hope at the very least we have the framework of an agreement at the end of that period," Cristian Maquieira said at the end of the IWC's weeklong annual meeting.

Delegates from more than 80 countries at the talks in Portugal's Madeira islands remained split between nations which support whaling and those that demand its end. However, they agreed to keep pursuing an agreement in time for next year's meeting in Morocco.

The stalemate, which has angered conservation groups, has lasted since a 1986 ban on commercial whaling.

Japan, Norway and Iceland together continue to harpoon around 2,000 whales annually. They argue that many species, such as minke whales, are abundant enough to continue hunting them. They are backed by around half the IWC's member nations.

The United States, Australia and the European Union, among others, want whaling to stop or at least be reduced.

Maquieira, a veteran Chilean diplomat who was elected IWC president Thursday, said both sides would have to compromise.

"In the final outcome, not everybody's going to get what they want. If they want to have an agreement they're going to have to swallow some very tough decisions," he said in an interview.

Maquieira noted an improvement in the tenor of negotiations in recent years. In the past, delegates have stormed out of meetings and environmentalists were not allowed to attend.

Conservation groups attending the Madeira meeting as official observers were mostly unhappy about the IWC's decision to extend the negotiations for another year.

"The culture of avoiding clear decisions, including by voting if necessary, won't simply resolve any problem," said Nicolas Entrup of the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society.

Other groups, however, said they were encouraged by IWC's willingness to address climate change and other environmental concerns.

The IWC was set up by whaling countries in 1949 to oversee their industry but it now has to deal with 21st-century threats to whales such as noise and water pollution.

"The tone and substance (of the talks) reflect a steady drift towards the IWC becoming a conservation forum and away from being a whalers' club," said Patrick Ramage of the International Fund for Animal Welfare, a U.S.-based conservation group.

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

OF SCIENCE AND FETAL WHALING

Science News - Of Science and Fetal Whaling
By Janet Raloff
More than one-quarter of the 679 whales taken from Antarctic waters by Japanese research crews, during the past seven months, were pregnant, according to a report released Monday at the International Whaling Commission meeting, in Madeira, Portugal. Another four of the females killed as part of this whale “sampling” program were lactating; so there’s concern that their calves were additional casualties of Japan’s Austral summer “research program.”
Although commercial whaling is all but banned, Japan has maintained an active “scientific” whaling program for years. On March 22, it completed the second year of what it terms a six-year research program. Its .. to gauge population sizes of various species of whales in southern waters, identify their age at maturity, assess their diet, measure tissue-contaminant levels and study various internal organs, such as ovaries and “earplugs,” according to Shigetoshi Nishiwaki of the Institute of Cetacean Research in Tokyo and his colleagues this week. “Governments of [organizations] engaged in whale fishing claim that they are not engaging in ‘commercial fishing’ but ‘scientific fishing,’” notes the International Union for Conservation of Nature, based in Gland, Switzerland. In fact, most cetacean biologists argue, whale populations exist at only a fraction of their former abundance and are far from large enough to sustain commercial harvesting for meat or oil — or even the culling of some 1,000 whales a year for science. Australia, a party to the IWC, campaigned this year to end any "scientific whaling" that involves the deliberate killing of whales.
On its website, the Japan Whaling Association counters that “No whales have ever been hunted to extinction, nor are they likely to be. . . . [And] there are species which are abundant enough that marine management is needed,” such as for the Antarctic and northwestern Pacific minke whales and northwestern Pacific Bryde's whales. Marine management, presumably, is whaling lingo for harvesting.
Japan has a long whaling tradition. The Japan Whaling Association likens asking the Japanese to forego whale meat to “Americans being asked to stop eating hamburgers.” It argues that “Attitudes toward animals are a part of national cultures. No nations should try to impose their attitudes on others.”
Where I’m sympathetic to cultural claims is with subsistence hunters, like the Inupiat living on Alaska’s North Slope. They have hunted bowhead whales for millennia, and eat the entire animal. It’s not a luxury. It’s how their communities have survived harsh winters where fish were hard to reach and any crop-growing season lasts a few short months. Moreover, Alaska’s subsistence hunters don’t take more than they can eat.
Currently, the National Marine Fisheries Service allows subsistence hunts by Alaskan native peoples of up to 67 bowheads a year, of which a few takes are allocated to Russian subsistence hunters.
As for whales in Japan being comparable to burgers in the U.S. — the two are hardly parallel. Cows are not wild game but livestock bred expressly as food and in herd sizes meant to meet market demands. Moreover, there’s no question of cows going extinct.
But what I find particularly disturbing about this week’s report on Japan’s whale “science” is the huge number of fetal losses. If 63 percent of the females were pregnant at the time they were sacrificed — we're talking about 192 moms-to-be — then maybe this isn't the season to "sample" southern cetaceans.
Whales are long lived animals. I’ve written about bowheads that appear to have lifespans in the 200-year range. Whales take a very long time to mature. And once they do, they seldom give birth to more than a calf or two every few years. So losing moms — while carrying the next generation — is not good for the species. In fact, I shudder at how the Japanese justify this as good science.
If they need to know pollutant levels, do harpoon biopsies that steal a bit of tissue and leave the animal reproductively sound. Need to know age structures? Take a lesson from orca researchers in Alaskan waters who spend season after season charting populations, their calving success and longevity. But let the babies live. Let lactating moms continue to nurse the next generation until those young’ens can survive on their own.
In a report that Nishiwaki and his colleagues prepared for the IWC meeting, they maintain that certain cetacean data require sacrificing some animals. Towards this end, Japan has obtained permits to annually collect up to 935 Antarctic minkes (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) out of resident populations that the Japan Whaling Association estimates to contain 761,000 animals, 50 humpbacks (Megaptera novaeangliae) and 50 fin whales (B. physalus). But doesn’t 1,000 of these huge specimens seem excessive?
Despite having approval to sacrifice so many whales, Nishiwaki’s group reported Monday that during this year’s 103 day hunting season, as also occurred last year, Japanese researchers were thwarted from acquiring their full legal complement of carcasses. The reason: “the violent actions of an anti-whaling group over 16 days.” Indeed, the scientists named their nemesis: the Sea Shepherd, the principal vessel of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. (This activist group’s activities are chronicled in weekly installments of "Whale Wars," a television series broadcast on the Animal Planet network.) But Sea Shepherd was hardly the only fly in the researchers' ointment. Nishiwaki's institute hosts videos of other groups that also engaged in "illegal harassment and terrorism" against its research.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

THE INTERNATIONAL WACKY WHALING COMMISSION GETS UNDERWAY IN MADEIRA

Report from Captain Paul Watson

Captain Watson lands in Portugal and is
promptly detained in Customs for four hours



The trip to the 61st annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission became an adventure as soon as the TAP airliner landed at Funchal airport and Deborah Bassett and I walked from the runway into the arrival lounge.

I had no reason to be concerned as I walked up to Immigration Control and handed them my passport. The officer took the passport, ran the electronic strip through the machine and then I saw a serious look cross his face.



“Excuse me sir, there appears to be a problem,” He said.” I think someone else may have a name similar to yours. Do you mind waiting until we process the rest of the passengers?”



So Deborah and I retreated to the end of the line. When we reached the officer, he requested that we follow him to a small room where we then proceeded to sit for nearly four hours as our case was being investigated.



At one point the officer came into the room and asked if I had ever been in trouble in Portugal and then added, “Something about a Dutch ship about 10 years ago?”



“Hmmm, I don’t know anything about a Dutch ship 10 years ago,” I answered.



A few moments later he returned and said, “Excuse me, did you do anything illegal in the 70’s in Portugal?”



“I don’t think so. I uphold laws I don’t break them,” I responded.



“Well, it appears that you did something in Northern Portugal in the 70’s,” He said.
“Oh, they’re probably referring to when I chased the pirate whaler Sierra into Lexioes Harbor and rammed it twice. I don’t think that was illegal, I was never informed of any charges. The Port Captain was going to charge me with gross negligence but I told him there was nothing negligent about it, I hit the ship exactly where I intended to hit it. He told me he could not determine who the owner of the Sierra was and that I was free to go.”



The officer looked at me in disbelief then said, “There seems to be an outstanding warrant for something in connection with an incident in Northern Portugal, please wait here until I can get more information.”



I did not have much choice so I took a seat again. Deborah asked me what I thought would happen.



“Well,” I said, “there are three options that I can see. I get arrested and we have a news story, I get deported and we have a news story, or they let us into Madeira and we will have a news story, and all three options have potential.”



Finally, the officer returned and said we were free to go and free to enter Madeira. Apparently there was indeed a warrant for my arrest, and it had been issued in 1980. The warrant was in connection with out total destruction of the pirate whaler Sierra that we rammed in 1979. On February 6th, 1980, after repairs of over one million dollars, the Sierra was sunk dockside in Lisbon harbor.”



The warrant however expired in 2008.



Deborah and I proceeded through Customs where two friendly officers who were Whale Wars fans inspected our bags and then it was a taxi ride to the hotel to check in for the conference.



The next morning we could see the dozens of Portuguese police guarding the entrance to the hotel. Ironically, the major opponents against Japanese whaling (ourselves) were on the inside. We had booked rooms a year before and as registered guests we could not be ousted from the hotel.



The Portuguese government had deliberately decided to host the meeting in Madeira to make it difficult for protestors to come from mainland Europe. The police had also been instructed to prevent anyone entering the hotel wearing Sea Shepherd logos.
The 61st annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission opened in the same boring manner as meetings in previous years. Dr. Roger Payne sarcastically commented that the same papers and discussions from 1971 would fit right into the present agenda.



On the bright side, the Australian delegation was actually talking tough for the first time since Senator Ian Campbell was Australia’s outspoken delegate to the Commission. The Japanese are muttering about putting Humpback whales on their kill list again. Greenland wants to kill humpbacks. Iceland wants to kill fin whales. Korea now wants to kill whales, Norway wants to kill more minke whales and Japan wants to kill everything that swims and breathes air.



Because Sea Shepherd is banned from attending the IWC meetings, the Sea Shepherd crew coming from Australia, Canada, Great Britain, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Germany and the United States hung around the entrance to the hotel and intimidated the whalers which is always fun.



A dozen members of the Japanese delegation were about to enter the outdoor poolside restaurant when they saw me sitting at the table. It was comical to see them stop, their jaws drop open wide, and then they quickly turned to scurry off in search of another restaurant.



The high point of the day for me was when Dr. Sydney Holt, one of the world’s leading and most distinguished authorities on whales and whaling and the IWC approached me to tell me how much he supported Sea Shepherd and accepted my invitation to become a member of the Sea Shepherd advisory board.



At the end of the day the delegates and approved NGO’s and media headed off in buses for the Portuguese government’s cocktail reception. We of course were not invited, but we stood by the door and saw them off with smiles to the Japanese delegation, one of which snuck a picture of me. The U.S. whaling commissioner Bill Hogarth stopped and shook my hand in public, much to the horror of the on-looking Japanese delegates.



And thus ended Day One. My prediction is that once again, nothing will be resolved and nothing will be decided. Japan will bring up another motion to condemn Sea Shepherd, the whalers will whine for more victims, the whale defending nations will posture and pose and the outlaw whalers will continue to kill whales without any opposition other than that of the Sea Shepherd crew.



It is both ironic and absurd that the only organization that is actually saving the lives of the whales, that is actually intervening against illegal whaling, is the one organization not officially allowed into the IWC meetings.



This evening as the whalers and the anti-whalers rubbed elbows and drank Portuguese wine and port and both mutually criticized Sea Shepherd’s excessive tactics, the Sea Shepherd crew was meeting to organize the announcement in the next two days of our 6th whale defense campaign to the Southern Ocean.



It’s a great thing being the Ladies of the Night of this movement. There are many delegates on the conservation side that agree with us but don’t want to be seen with us in the light of day. But the one great advantage of being banned from the IWC is that we don’t have to attend the boring meetings. We just need to monitor the rules and then head down to the Southern Ocean in December to kick the ass end of the Japanese whalers again.