Showing posts with label animals in reserch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label animals in reserch. Show all posts

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Animal rights gang face sentence




Six animals rights activists who targeted companies linked to
Huntingdon Life Sciences in an attempt to close down the animal
testing lab will appear in court at the start of their sentencing
hearing.

Sarah Whitehead, 53, Nicole Vosper, 22, Thomas Harris, 27, Jason
Mullan, 32, Nicola Tapping, 29, and Alfie Fitzpatrick, 20, were all
members of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty SHAC.

The gang waged an international campaign of intimidation over a
seven-year period against a host of supply companies to try to force
the closure of HLS.

--
full story:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5jY27scDu465Q73RiWaxgt5ZsoFBw?docId=N0008401287626420750A

Saturday, September 25, 2010

NOT IN OUR NAME: ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL CALLS FOR A GLOBAL STAND AGAINSTSPACE EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS

AND CALLS ON THE PUBLIC TO PROTEST TO THE US & RUSSIAN EMBASSIES

LONDON, Sept 24, 2010 -- Animal Defenders International (ADI), the leading animal welfare organisation that works globally for the protection of animals, has launched a major international drive to stop NASA and the Russian Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos) from performing radiation experiments on monkeys as part of plans to travel to mars.

The ADI offices in Los Angeles have instigated a campaign in Congress to halt the NASA experiments and the London headquarters of ADI are co-ordinating a global drive urging people to contact the US and Russian Embassies.

The campaign has attracted the backing of astronauts, former NASA employees, and a commitment from the European Space Agency not to perform monkey experiments.

At the heart of the new campaign is a compelling 4-minute video entitled 'Space Experiments on Monkeys - One Giant Leap Backwards' which recaps the prior use of animals in space research, cites reasons NASA's irradiation experiments are flawed and premature, and presents viable alternatives to primate testing. The DVD also includes an exclusive ten-minute interview with April Evans, former NASA engineer who explains she resigned her dream job with one of the world's top space agencies because of NASA's radiation tests. Both videos are also being launched online as part of a major awareness drive.

Every member of the US Congress will receive a copy of the DVD and copies will be sent to the US and Russian Embassies around the world.

Tim Phillips, Animal Defenders International Campaign Director said, "These tests are cruel, unnecessary, premature and a waste of $1.75 US million of taxpayers' money. Our video shows that these monkey experiments have been criticised from every side, scientists, animal protectionists, astronauts, former NASA employees, and even the European Space Agency. We are not opposed to space exploration, but these experiments are cruel folly."

The video reveals the horrific nature of the monkey experiments which will include: Burns, weakness, hair loss, failing organs and nausea. It also points out that there are already a significant number of sources for data on the impacts of high doses of radiation on humans including the victims of atomic bombs, X-rays and radiotherapy, the nuclear power industry, and astronauts who have spent time in space.

Tim Phillips said: "Those in the space programme often talk in lofty terms that this is about making advances for the whole of humankind. We want the world to make it clear that this cruelty is not in our name, and there are plenty of people in the space research community who agree with us."

Cosmonaut Valentin Lebedev, who set a world record for time in space, describes the tests as "inadmissible for humane reasons" citing the wealth of data available from astronauts.

Jim Bates, NASA retired, formerly Co-Chairman of the JSC Space Radiation Environment Group (SREG) 1968-1970, has noted the decades of similar experiments on animals and said: "We have probably sacrificed enough monkeys for these data, something else is needed."

The European Space Agency's (ESA) Director Jean-Jacques Dordain stated that he and ESA categorically opposed and "declines any interest in monkey research and does not consider any need or use for such results." The statement confirms the unnecessary character of NASA's tests and reveals the uneasiness of a large segment of the scientific community involved in space research about the use of monkeys in experiments.

Tim Phillips said: "These experiments are wrong every way that you look at them. There is a wealth of data available and alternatives which include cell and tissue culture study, the simulated human torso in space, and the use of scanning techniques to examine neurological function in patients undergoing partial brain radiotherapy. Even if you ignore all of this, NASA does not yet have the shielding technology to protect the astronauts on such a mission, and this would determine any type radiation exposure, so these tests are shamefully premature."

Aerospace engineer April Evans resigned her position earlier this year as a space architect on the International Space Station (ISS) program because of NASA's decision to conduct primate irradiation testing. Evans believes this experiment is a major step backward for NASA's animal testing record.

"After much deliberation, I resigned from NASA because I could not support the scientific justification for this monkey radiobiology experiment," Evans wrote in a letter to Samuel Aronson, director of the Brookhaven National Laboratory, which was contracted by NASA to conduct the tests on squirrel monkeys.

"NASA needs to focus on developing space radiation shielding because both astronauts and hardware are at risk from the space radiation environment, an issue that will have to be addressed by all space agencies. Space vehicle radiation shielding is necessary technology for a sustainable long-term human space exploration program and scientists and engineers should be given the chance and time to advance shielding technology."

For more information on the campaign, visit: www.ad-international.org/NASA where you can view and download the videos and join in the fight to stop NASA's planned experiments.

Please address polite letters to NASA requesting that they reconsider financing such horrific experiments by writing to NASA Administrator Charles F. Bolden Jr, Public Communications Office, NASA Headquarters, Suite 5K39,Washington, DC, 20546-0001

Please write to the US Ambassador saying you oppose the NASA experiments: Mr Louis B. Susman, US Embassy, 24 Grosvenor Square, London, W1A 1AE.

Please write to the Russian Ambassador saying you oppose Russia's Mars500 experiments: Mr Yury Fedotov, Ambassador of the Russian Federation, 13 Kensington Gardens, London W8 4QX.

About Animal Defenders International (ADI):

With offices in London, Los Angeles, and Bogota, Animal Defenders International (ADI) campaigns to protect animals in entertainment; replacement of animals in experiments; worldwide traffic in endangered species; vegetarianism; factory farming; pollution and conservation. ADI also rescues animals in distress worldwide. ADI-gathered evidence has led to campaigns and legislative action all over the world to protect them.
ADI's Mission: To educate, create awareness, and promote the interest of humanity in the cause of justice, and the suppression of all forms of cruelty to animals wherever possible to alleviate suffering, and to conserve and protect animals and the environment.

www.adiusa.org

http://www.ad-international.org/adi_world/


Note to the editors
The White House statement on radiation shielding President Barack Obama declared in April 15, 2010: "after decades of neglect, we will increase investment -- right away -- in other groundbreaking technologies that will allow astronauts to reach space sooner and more often, to travel farther and faster for less cost, and to live and work in space for longer periods of time more safely. That means tackling major scientific and technological challenges. How do we shield astronauts from radiation on longer missions? How do we harness resources on distant worlds? How do we supply spacecraft with energy needed for these far-reaching journeys? These are questions that we can answer and will answer."
The full speech is available here:

http://www.nasa.gov/news/media/trans/obama_ksc_trans.html

# # #

Media Contact: Phil Buckley, Media Relations Director, Animal Defenders International, 0207 630 3344, 07716 018250, prdesk@ad-international.org

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

ONTARIO VETERINARY COLLEGE ENDS INDEFENSIBLE KILLING OF HEALTHY DOGS

HALIFAX (SEPTEMBER 22, 2010) ­ Effective this academic year, the Ontario
Veterinary College (OVC) will end the training of students through terminal
surgeries which have taken the lives of hundreds of healthy dogs. The
termination of these animal experiments, and their replacement by models,
cadavers and supervised clinical learning opportunities with shelter
animals, was announced September 10, 2010 on the OVC website following a
sustained campaign. The process of change began in 2009 with a friendly
beagle, Rainbow, who was one of the OVC dogs whose fate was to be killed
after surgical practice. Dr. Anya Yushchenko, InterNICHE National Contact
Assistant and then veterinary student at OVC, conscientiously objected by
refusing to participate in the killing of an otherwise healthy dog. With the
help of Dr. Olivier Berreville, InterNICHE National Contact for Canada, and
lawyer Nick Wright, Dr. Yushchenko fought for her right to a veterinary
education free of harmful animal use. In the process, Dr. Yushchenko was
able to save Rainbow¹s life, and placed her in a loving home. Following this
achievement, a collaborative effort between InterNICHE and Animal Alliance
led this year to the rescue of several other dogs, and the subsequent
decision by OVC to eliminate terminal surgeries. ³We congratulate the
Ontario Veterinary College and Guelph University for stopping outdated,
cruel terminal surgeries and for choosing to join the increasing number of
universities and colleges worldwide that now use modern, ethical methods to
teach their students², says Berreville. ³We will strive to provide any help
needed by the OVC to ensure that the new curriculum and methods used are
fully ethical.² InterNICHE provides a range of resources to support the
implementation of humane alternative methods and replace the harmful use of
animals in education. These include the book and database of alternative
methods Œfrom Guinea Pig to Computer Mouse¹ (2nd ed.); a number of
Alternative Loan Systems (libraries) for free access to humane learning
tools; and a Humane Education Award grant program to help fund progressive
curricular transformation.

### MEDIA CONTACT: Olivier Berreville, PhD, InterNICHE National Contact,
Canada.
email: interniche_ca@yahoo.ca
; phone:
(902)-488-5573

InterNICHE (International Network for Humane Education) is a non-profit
organization that seeks the full replacement of harmful animal use in
education and training. www.interniche.org


Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Superdrug becomes BUAV Approved

The BUAV is delighted that the high street giant Superdrug has become BUAV approved as an animal testing free cosmetics and toiletries retailer under the BUAV's internationally recognised Humane Cosmetic Standard (HCS). It joins a host of other companies including Marks and Spencer, The Co-op, Argos and The Body Shop.

Superdrug's entire own brand toiletries product range now carries the globally recognised leaping bunny logo. With over 900 stores in the UK, ethical shoppers will be able to purchase typically hard to find cruelty-free products such as hair dye, sun screen and shaving products. The logo guarantees that no animal testing has occurred in any part of the product's manufacturing process.

Michelle Thew, BUAV Chief Executive said: “We are delighted that Superdrug has taken this important step to become BUAV Approved and congratulate it for doing so. I am now calling on other high street retailers to follow suit and clear all animal tested products from the shelves once and for all."

http://www.buav.org/

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Animal transplants imminent




AUSTRALIA has lifted its five-year ban on the transplantation of
animal cells and organs into humans, allowing hospitals to use pig
cells to treat diabetes, Parkinson's disease and strokes within
months.

The National Health and Medical Research Council made its decision
despite pleas from animal rights activists and transplant specialists
that the procedure had not been proven safe and could result in the
creation of deadly viruses.

Xenotransplantation was banned in 2004 because of concerns that pig
endogenous retrovirus could spread to humans.

--
full story:
http://www.smh.com.au/national/animal-transplants-imminent-20091209-kk3g.html

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Animal rights group dicusses MSU's practices




A national organization is calling on MSU officials to consider
alternatives to how the university teaches its veterinary students.

Representatives from Animalearn, a division of the nonprofit animal
advocacy and educational organization American Anti-Vivisection
Society, questioned MSU’s past practices of purchasing live animals
from Class B animal dealers at a lecture Wednesday, but said the
university is making progress. Students Promoting Animal Rights, or
SPAR, hosted the event.

The group released a report in April detailing its analysis of public
universities in 24 selected states based on information it received
from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Institutional Animal
Care and Use Committee.

--
full story:
http://www.statenews.com/index.php/article/2009/11/animal_rights_group_dicusses_msus_practices

Saturday, November 7, 2009

ANIMAL RESEARCH POSING AS RESCUE OR TRANSPORT

Many of you are already aware that there are groups associated with animal
research who pose as Rescue and/or Transport Groups periodically with the
full intent of stealing the animals in transport and delivering and/or
selling them for animal research.

The complete listing has been included in a new file in the FILE section of
our index. Please copy and paste for your convenience and refer often to
the names listed.

I'm sure there are other groups or names associated with animal research
that we are not aware of - but this will at least aid us in keeping safe.
As you come across additional names that should be added to this list -
post them here and they will be added to the filed list.

Thanks - Christy

ARIZONA :
86-B-0050 Ranaco Corporation, DBA: Delta Biologicals ( Tucson ) (deals in
dead cats--from outside th e US)

ILLINOIS :
33-B-0007 Michael Cooper,
DBA: Triple C Farms ( St. Joseph )

INDIANA :
32-B-0045 Mark and Penny Lynch,
DBA: LBL Kennels (Reelsville)

KENTUCKY :
61-B-0124 Perry and Crystal Foster,
DBA: Mountain Top Kennels
( Wallingford )

MICHIGAN :
34-B-0001 Roberta and James Woudenberg,
DBA: R&R Research (Howard
City)
34-B-0002 Fred Hodgins, DBA: Hodgins Kennels (Howell)

MINNESOTA :
41-B-0017 Kenneth Schroeder (Well s)

MISSOURI :
43-B-0032 Danny & Mildred Schachtele,
DBA: Middlefork Kennels
( Salisbury )

NORTH CAROLINA :
55-B-0010 Carolina Biological Supply Company ( Burlington ) (deals in dead
cats)

55-B-0081 John H. And Eva Wise,
DBA: Hillside Kennel (Four Oaks)
(deals in dead cats)
55-B-0107 LBS Biological Inc. (Graham) (deals in dead cats)

55-B-0076 S. E. Lab Animal Farm Inc. (Raleigh) (deals in dead dogs and
cats)

OHIO :
31-B-0104 Robert Perry ( Mt. Sterling )

OKLAHOMA :
73-B-0130 Henry Lee Cooper,
DBA: C & C Kennels (Wewoka)

PENNSYLVANIA :
23-B-0004 Bruce Rotz (Shippensburg)

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Undercover investigation exposes shocking animal cruelty and major failings by the UK government

The BUAV, one of the world's leading organisations campaigning to end animal experiments, has today revealed graphic disturbing evidence of the cruelty and suffering inflicted on thousands of animals every year in UK research; including for the first time, the appalling suffering inflicted on mice for the worldwide craze of using botox products to temporarily reduce facial lines and wrinkles.

The BUAV has also accused the Home Office, which regulates animal experiments in the UK, of breaking the law in several ways including not enforcing the use of non animal alternatives and failing to minimise the suffering inflicted on animals.

The BUAV placed an undercover worker in Wickham Laboratories in Hampshire for 8 months to the end of October 2009. She secretly filmed the appalling suffering inflicted on thousands of animals inside the facility. The laboratory carries out poisoning tests on thousands of mice every month for a product called Dysport ® (manufactured by Ipsen), which contains the deadly botulinum toxin. Botulinum toxin is licensed in the UK for some relatively rare medical conditions – and the Home Office claims it only allows the animal tests for these purposes - but is increasingly being used “off-label” in cosmetic clinics for purely cosmetic purposes where it is commonly referred to as 'botox.'

In practice it is impossible for the Home Office to ensure that the Dysport ® tested at Wickham on an industrial scale does not end up in cosmetic clinics. The Government has banned animal testing for cosmetics since 1997.

The test used is the archaic poisoning test LD50 (lethal dose 50 - this is the dose at which 50% of the mice would be expected to die when injected with the toxin), one of the cruellest and most controversial tests carried out on animals. Even the Home Office classifies it as 'substantial severity.'

Wickham also uses rabbits in pyrogenicity (fever) tests where a test substance is injected into an ear vein to detect contaminants. The rabbits are restrained by their necks in stocks with a temperature probe deep in their rectum for many hours at a time, with no access to water. According to the laboratory, damage to the ear and rectum can occur as well as damage to the rabbits' backs from struggling in the stocks. Rabbits can be starved for up to 30 hours and are re-used repeatedly in further pyrogen tests, adding to their distress.

Key findings:

The UK government is failing in its legal obligation to enforce the use of the 3R's (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) principle for non-animal alternatives where they exist and to ensure that, if animals are used, then it should be the minimum number and with the minimum amount of suffering.

The appalling suffering inflicted on thousands of animals in cruel, crude and archaic tests. Animals kept in small, virtually barren cages that failed to meet their behavioural and social needs.

The total inadequacy of measures to intervene before death with the LD50 poisoning tests - far more animals died an agonizing death than were euthanased.

Mice crudely killed by having their necks broken on a corridor floor with a ball point pen. Some staff breaking the backs of mice rather than their necks resulting in excruciating additional suffering.

Some animals suffered in tests that are no longer required by national and international regulations. This destroys the often made claim that companies have to do animals tests because regulators require them.

A glaring conflict of interest by the statutory 'Named Veterinary Surgeon,' responsible for advising on the animals' welfare. He is a director of Wickham and with his wife owns virtually all the shares. Recorded weekly visits by him often lasted just for a few minutes.

Tests such as the LD50 test for botulinum toxin and the pyrogenicity test have valid in vitro alternatives and it is outrageous that they are not being implemented. The Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay (LAL) is an 'in vitro' method that can often be used for detecting bacterial pyrogens and is recognized by regulatory authorities in both Europe and the USA as an alternative to the rabbit pyrogenicity test. Indeed, European guidelines stress the alternative is often more reliable..

The SNAP-25 assay, a method that does not use live animals but instead measures the activity of the toxin in a test tube, can be used to replace the botox mouse LD50 tests. The BUAV believes that under UK law this test should be used. Furthermore, this test has been validated by an official UK government laboratory, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), and has been used by them since 1999, specifically for Dysport ®. Inexplicably, the UK Home Office is not insisting on this test even after all these years.

BUAV's Director of Special Projects, Sarah Kite states: “Time and time again the government and animal research community claim that animals are only used as a last resort for vital medical research and that animal suffering is kept to a minimum. This BUAV investigation has blown those claims wide open. Our shocking findings show that crude, archaic and extremely cruel animal tests are still allowed in the UK even when an alternative test exists and animal testing is not required by official bodies.”

For further information, images and video footage, please contact: Sarah Kite

sarah.kite@buav.org

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

National Primate Liberation Week

October 17 - 24, 2009



NYC Protests Focus On
Huntingdon Life Sciences & Fortress Investment

Each year, the animal rights movement takes a week to focus on the
plight of primates in vivisection and research laboratories. This year
the week chosen is October 17 - October 24, 2009.

During the weekend of Saturday, October 24th and Sunday, October 25th,
2009, Win Animal Rights will stage protests against Huntingdon Life
Sciences, their financial supporters and their customers, to call
attention to the suffering and death of primates at Huntingdon Life
Sciences.

On Sunday, although we will begin at a nearby address, we will be
walking one block north to the residence of the Chief Executive Officer
of Huntingdon Life Sciences, Andrew Baker. WAR considers Baker the most
heinous primate murderer in corporate America and as such is a fitting
target for National Primate Liberation Week.

Fortress Investment Group executives will be the focal point of
attention this weekend. All evidence points toward a discrepancy between
Fortress' statement and their actions. We firmly believe that they are
still in collusion with Huntingdon Life Sciences. Until we are satisfied
that they have cut all ties to Huntingdon Life Sciences/Life Sciences
Research, we will continue to deliver our message in person at their
doorsteps.

For anyone who believes that Fortress' statement should be enough to
terminate the campaign against them, consider the fact that if Fortress
had not given financial aid to Huntingdon Life Sciences, they would most
likely have closed 3 years ago. In that timeframe, approximately 540,000
innocent animals were killed by Huntingdon Life Sciences.

Please join us:

Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 @ 5:00 pm

Where: 1345 Avenue of the Americas (54th & 55th Sts.), NYC

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Date: Saturday, October 24, 2009 @ 4:00 pm

Where: 20 W. 55th St. (5th & 6th Ave.), NYC

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Date: Sunday, October 25, 2009 @ 2:00 pm

Where: 271 Central Park West & W. 87th St., NYC

Banners, posters and literature will be provided. Just bring your
enthusiasm and a loud voice to speak out for "Primate Liberation". Dress
comfortably and come prepared to do some walking as we will most likely
be calling on other animal abusers in the neighborhood. Demos will be
spirited and peaceful and will follow all local ordinances.

For more info call: 1-646-267-9934 or e-mail: centcom@war-online.org


If you cannot make the protests, consider e-mailing or writing to
Fortress Investment Group top executives at:

Mr. Wesley Edens - Co-Chairman & Principal
wedens@fortressinv.com


Mr. Peter Briger, Jr. - Co-Chairman & Principal
pbriger@fortressinv.com


Mr. Daniel Mudd - Chief Executive Officer
dmudd@fortressinv.com


Fortress Investment Group LLC
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105, USA
Tel: 212 798 6100

For more information about Fortress visit:

http://war-online.org/Alert_FortressLies.htm


Please keep all communications with the above polite and informative.
Let them know that abusing and torturing animals is not the right way to
go. A picture may be more convincing. Visit:

http://www.shac.net/HLS/photos.html#photos/2008b.jpg


Coming events: Mark your calendars now!
(Details on many of the listings can be found on the WAR Yahoo Calendar
linked below)

Oct. 31, 2009: Halloween Parade - March for Animal Liberation - Parade
& Protests

November 27 - 29, 2009 - Fur Free Friday Weekend

Visit the WAR Calendar for future events:
http://calendar.yahoo.com/winanimalrights

Visit the WAR MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/winanimalrights

Visit WAR on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Win-Animal-Rights/25169195791


For more info contact Win Animal Rights at: winanimalrights@optonline.net

Call: 646.267.9934 or visit the WAR website at: http://war-online.org


W.A.R. (WIN ANIMAL RIGHTS) is an independent non-profit organization not
affiliated or associated with SHAC, SHAC USA or any other group or
organization and does not conduct or incite any illegal activity. The
above information is not meant to incite or request any illegal actions
or illegal activities of any kind. If you have any questions about the
legality of any act, we encourage everyone receiving this (or the)
action alert(s) to check your local laws and ordinances before
proceeding to do anything.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Help End Nicotine Experiments on Monkeys at OHSU

SPINDEL'S NICOTINE EXPERIMENTS ARE FUNDED FOR FOUR MORE YEARS!

Spindel has received an astounding $7.6 million from the NIH since 1992 to
conduct experiments like those on babies such as Thimble, and their
mothers. He is scheduled to get funds from the National Institutes of
Health's (NIH's) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to continue
killing baby monkeys until 2012!

http://www.vivisectioninfo.org/campaigns/spindel/

Monday, October 12, 2009

Protest Drug Companies on Columbus Day



Focus: Huntingdon Life Sciences Customers
Sanofi Aventis, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb

Join Win Animal Rights, this Monday, as we turn our attention once again
to the the companies that allow Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS) to
continue the killing. Right now, Huntingdon Life Sciences (trading on
the NYSE Arca as LSR) is concentrating all of their effort on a
management buyout spearheaded by Andrew Baker, CEO of Huntingdon Life
Sciences.

Regarding Fortress, SHAC UK has re-instated the campaign against
Fortress. This week, we will offer Fortress the opportunity to respond
to SHAC's charges. If proof is not forthcoming quickly, it is likely
that WAR will also reactivate the Fortress campaign. We will keep you
posted.

Huntingdon Life Sciences is a company whose primary business is death
and suffering. 500 animals are killed there every day. Their customers
are the ones that contract and pay for the killing. Without customers,
Huntingdon Life Sciences would go out of business. Join us as we mourn
the 180,000 that die every year at HLS and fight for the ones that are
still alive and waiting to die.

The best way to stop the killing at HLS is to influence their
customers. The companies that we will be visiting on Monday have the
power to discontinue the contracts that allow HLS to torture and kill
animals daily. All of our protests are peaceful and legal. If you are
free on Monday, please consider joining your voice with ours as we
advocate for the poor suffering animals at HLS.

Date: Monday, October 12, 2009 @ 2:00 pm
Where: 90 Park Ave (between 39th & 40th Sts.)
New York City

After the initial protest, we will be walking to other locations in the
general area. Please wear comfortable walking shoes or bring carfare if
you wish to take the bus or train to the next location. Posters,
banners and literature will be provided. Just bring a loud voice and
your dedication to use that voice to speak up for the animals who suffer
in silence.

If you cannot join us, please consider writing to the following:

Sanofi Aventis
90 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016
Phone: (212) 551-4000

James Cornelius
CEO & Chairman of the Board
Bristol-Myers Squibb
345 Park Ave.
New York, NY 10154
Tel: 1.212.546.4000
james.cornelius@bms.com

residence: 25 Columbus Circle #ST59E, New York, NY 10019

Lamberto Andreotti
President and Chief Operating Officer
Bristol-Myers Squibb
345 Park Ave.
New York, NY 10154
Tel: 1.212.546.4000
lamberto.andreotti@bms.com

residence: 1 W. 64th St., New York, NY 10023

Robert Pelzer
President & CEO
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
608 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10020
Tel: 1.212.307.1122
robert.pelzer@novartis.com

residence: 400 E. 51st St. #24B, New York, NY 10022

Please keep all communications with the above polite and informative.
Let them know that abusing and torturing animals is not the right way to
go. A picture may be more convincing. Visit:

http://www.shac.net/HLS/photos.html#photos/2008b.jpg

Coming events: Mark your calendars now!
(Details on many of the listings can be found on the WAR Yahoo Calendar
linked below)

October 17 - 24, 2009: National Primate Liberation Week
Oct. 31, 2009: Halloween Parade - March for Animal Liberation - Parade
& Protests
November 27 - 29 - Fur Free Friday Weekend

Visit the WAR Calendar for future events:
http://calendar.yahoo.com/winanimalrights

Visit the WAR MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/winanimalrights

Visit WAR on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Win-Animal-Rights/25169195791

For more info contact Win Animal Rights at: winanimalrights@optonline.net

Call: 646.267.9934 or visit the WAR website at: http://war-online.org


W.A.R. (WIN ANIMAL RIGHTS) is an independent non-profit organization not
affiliated or associated with SHAC, SHAC USA or any other group or
organization and does not conduct or incite any illegal activity. The
above information is not meant to incite or request any illegal actions
or illegal activities of any kind. If you have any questions about the
legality of any act, we encourage everyone receiving this (or the)
action alert(s) to check your local laws and ordinances before
proceeding to do anything.

Fortress lie, animals die!-Action Alert!

Campaign relaunch against top HLS lender, Fortress Investments.


Following on from Fortress' statement last week, where they stated that:
..."immediate agreement to fully divest itself from an investment with
Huntingdon Life Sciences/Life Sciences Research" Fortress thought they could
make a false statement and we would go away. They thought wrong - we always
find out liars, and Fortress' own staff have told us what is really going on.
We will now be targeting Fortress as a priority target until they give a real
statement and supply proof that they have deinvested in HLS. Also, there has
been no filing on the SEC or any other indication that Fortress have actually
de-invested in HLS as they stated on 1st October.

We always find out the liars and call for an immediate re-launch of the
campaign against Fortress Investment Group. Fortress are helping keep HLS
afloat with their blood money loan and in doing so are helping to kill 500
animals every day and then to lie about their dealings as well!

We are calling on activists across the globe to protest at Fortress Investment
Group. For details of their office locations, go to:
www.shac.net/action/financial/fortress_locations.html

For more information about Huntingdon's financials please visit
http://www.shac.net/action/financial/


===

SAMPLE LETTER

Dear Sir/Madam

I am writing to you in relation to a $30 million loan that has been made to
Huntingdon__Life__Sciences (H-L-S) via your Drawbridge Special Opportunities
Fund. Without this loan H-L-S could not remain open and therefore Fortress are
in large part responsible for the cruel and violent actions going on inside
H-L-S. The fact that Fortress have set up a front company in Luxembourg called
Anchor_Sub_Funding shows that a lot of effort has been put into keeping this
loan secret, presumably to stop H-L-S' horrific record of cruelty, violence and
law breaking from tarnishing Fortress' reputation.

H-L-S have a long history of violence; they were most famously exposed in 1997
when channel 4 TV filmed workers punching beagle puppies in the face. In 2005
ex-workers spoke out about cruelty they had witnessed and in 2008 Animal
Defenders International went undercover inside H-L-S exposing cruel primate
experiments and disgusting conditions. H-L-S also have a track record of law
breaking and manipulation of data. During just one primate study, H-L-S broke
the law 526 times; and workers have been caught taking drugs and drinking on
site.

H-L-S' financials are in a dire state, and there is a high risk that H-L-S
would fail to make its loan repayments to you, you may already be aware that
they have failed to meet loan commitments during 2009. This is due to a
significant loss in custom and terrible share price, on top of this many of
their shareholders are filing class action lawsuits against H-L-S after H-L-S'
board of directors accepted CEO Andrew_Baker's offer to buy out the failing
company for a very low price of $8.50 a share.

Please don't take my word for it, if you want to see the state H-L-S are in
please read the Plymouth_Report which H-L-S recently filed with the SEC:
www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1158833/000115883309000045/exhibit99.htm

I am urging you to explore all get out clauses in this loan and reel it in. I
also urge you to raise these issues with everyone you can within the company
and do everything in your power to halt your support of
Huntingdon_Life_Sciences.

Please raise this issue at any meetings you attend, and let all your colleagues
know about H-L-S.

For further information, please visit: www.shac.net

Yours faithfully

[YOUR NAME]

===

CONTACTS:
Fortress' Board of Directors

Wesley R. Edens
Principal and Co-Chairman of the Board
wedens@fortressinv.com

Peter L. Briger, Jr.
Principal and Co-Chairman of the Board
pbriger@fortressinv.com


Robert I. Kauffman
Principal and Director
rkauffman@fortressinv.com


Randal A. Nardone
Principal and Director
rnardone@fortressinv.com


Michael E. Novogratz
Principal and Director
mnovogratz@fortressinv.com


Dr. Richard N. Haass
Director
rhaass@fortressinv.com

Daniel N. Bass
Chief Financial Officer
dbass@fortressinv.com

Douglas L. Jacobs
Director
djacobs@fortressinv.com


Howard Rubin
Director
hrubin@fortressinv.com

Takumi Shibata
Director
tshibata@fortressinv.com


George W. Wellde Jr.
Director
gwellde@fortressinv.com


Fortress employees directly involved in the Anchor loan:

Michael Polidoro
mpolidoro@fortress.com


Michael Eggenberg
meggenberg@fortress.com


Scott Silvers
ssilvers@fortress.com

Misc:

Legal Dept.
legaldepartment@fortressinv.com


UK reception:
ukfrontdesk@fortress.com


wkonops@fortress.com
wkonops@fortressinv.com


All emails in this alert

wedens@fortressinv.com, pbriger@fortressinv.com, pbriger@fortressinv.com,
rkauffman@fortressinv.com, rnardone@fortressinv.com,
mnovogratz@fortressinv.com, rhaass@fortressinv.com, dbass@fortressinv.com,
djacobs@fortressinv.com, hrubin@fortressinv.com, tshibata@fortressinv.com,
gwellde@fortressinv.com, mpolidoro@fortress.com, meggenberg@fortress.com,
ssilvers@fortress.com, legaldepartment@fortressinv.com,
ukfrontdesk@fortress.com, wkonops@fortress.com, wkonops@fortressinv.com

-------------------------------------
Disclaimer and Information:

The details in this action alert are provided for information purposes only,
and should not be used for any illegal activities as defined by the
jurisdiction you live in. SHAC does not support or encourage any form of
harassment; nothing in this alert has the purpose of inciting such behaviour,
and we request that all communications are kept polite.

For general information on the campaign to close Huntingdon Life Science,
please visit our website www.shac.net

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

EU blasted by campaigners over lab animal cruelty

EU blasted by campaigners over lab animal cruelty - crucial meeting on
12 October

The BUAV has today condemned the EU for ignoring public opinion after a
leaked document shows that the Council of Ministers wants researchers to
have the right to cause suffering to animals in laboratories which is
not only severe but which is also long-lasting. Such a move would result
in untold cruelty and suffering to thousands of animals across Europe.
Only recently a YouGov poll in the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Sweden
and the Czech Republic showed that a resounding 84% believe that
experiments causing severe pain or suffering - i.e. whether or not
long-lasting - should be prohibited.

The leaked document ("Proposal for a Directive of the European
Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for
scientific purposes") from the EU Presidency has been sent to the
Working Party of Veterinary Experts to be discussed at its meeting next
week, 12th October. The document also gives examples of shocking
experiments that researchers want to be allowed to continue to carry out
on animals. They include: poisoning animals to death; submitting animals
to repeated electric shocks from which they cannot escape (in order to
induce 'learned helplessness'); restraining animals to such an extent
that they develop stomach ulcers or heart failure; forcing animals to
swim until they give up in exhaustion; and giving animals a lethal dose
of radiation or chemotherapy.

The animal research industry community acknowledges that these
experiments cause severe suffering but claim, absurdly, that the
suffering is not long-lasting and would therefore not even need special
permission.

The same YouGov poll showed very large majorities wishing to see bans on
the use of primates, dogs and cats in experiments causing suffering, a
ban on all experiments which are not for life-threatening or serious
human conditions; and maximum openness, with only information which is
confidential or would identify individuals or establishments withheld.
Again, EU politicians seem determined to do the exact opposite.

BUAV's Chief Executive, Michelle Thew said: "We are appalled to learn of
the proposals that the Council has made. This is a major step backwards
for animal welfare. It's high time European politicians started
listening to the public rather than the self-interested pleading of the
multi-billion pound animal research and supply industry."

ENDS

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Vasella debates animal-rights extremists

Unlike other victims of animal rights extremists, Daniel Vasella isn't
lying low, the Financial Times reports. Instead, he's personally
warned 140 people who sent him critical emails "willingly or not you
are associating yourself with criminal activity." And he defends his
and his company's pharmaceutical testing, saying that those who try to
prevent medical research should be "ashamed."

The warning and scolding comes via a letter seen by the FT, sent to
people who had emailed the Novartis CEO about the company's animal
research activities. ...

--
full story:
http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/vasella-debates-animal-rights-extremists/2009-10-05


SEE ALSO:
Animal research deserves defending, say our members

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Killing One Primate to Save Another: The Ethics of Animal Rights

A disturbing story emerged this week of a scientist leaving his
research out of fear for his and his family's lives. What are our
responsibilities in this area and what do our traditions have to say
about it?
...
A fire-bomb is left (undetonated) on the porch. Lives and careers
shift. Laws are made and broken. What is it? Religious conflict?
Ideological rifts? Kind of.

In this week's Nature, the scientist Dario Ringach tells the
disturbing story of how, because he did research on primates, he was
targeted for violent treatment by so-called ‘animal rights
extremists’; how after the fire-bomb incident (the bomb was
accidentally left on the wrong scientist’s doorstep), for fear of his
and his family’s safety, he discontinued his animal research; how he
is speaking up now, three years later, because “we’re getting awfully
close to the situation where somebody may be killed. There is a
general trend toward polarization in our society. . .”
...
When I teach research ethics to the future scientists of the
world—graduate students and post-doctoral fellows—we spend a lot of
time talking about this. Not just the important party line of the
special offices at research facilities devoted to animal care:
“refine, reduce, and reuse.” But also about deeper questions: should
we do research with animals at all? With certain animals and not
others (much of basic research is done on yeast, worms, fruitflies,
and mice)? And what kinds of research (research that might cause pain
or even death, observational research, etc.)?
...
There are, after all, more than enough rich and important questions to
chew on: (1) one day—a day some (not me) believe is nigh—we will no
longer need animal models at all; we will develop artificial models
which will work as well to accomplish our goals and test our ideas for
basic knowledge, drugs, and other therapies; (2) another animal we do
a lot of testing on is ourselves, humans; if we’re going to raise
questions about research on animals, we must carefully examine
research on humans; (3) and a final irony: the more research we do on
animals, the more we discover, for better or worse, just how similar
they are to us.

--
full story:
http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/scienceenvironment/1851/killing_one_primate_to_save_another:_the_ethics_of_animal_rights

Thursday, September 24, 2009

In Defense of Animals Wins Landmark FOIA Victory in Federal Court

USDA Forced to Disclose Records from Controversial Animal Test Lab
Huntingdon Life Sciences

http://idausa.org/news/currentnews/nr_092309.html


Washington, DC —After a seven-year court fight, including the first
trial in years involving the federal Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture has been ordered by a
federal judge to disclose 1,017 pages of records obtained during an
investigation of controversial toxicology lab Huntingdon Life Sciences
(HLS) to In Defense of Animals, the animal protection group said
today.

“These records will shed light on the USDA’s failure to enforce the
Animal Welfare Act,” said IDA Research Director Eric Kleiman. “Why did
the USDA, later joined by HLS, fight so hard and so long to prevent
the public from seeing these records? We’ll know within the 60 days
ordered by the Court.”

The records – 503 pages withheld in full, 514 withheld in part (with
most heavily redacted) – include test results, notes of observations
of primates involved in toxicology testing, Animal Care and Use
Committee minutes as well as necropsy reports and requests for
veterinary care from six studies.

IDA filed the lawsuit in 2002 against the USDA, but later HLS
“intervened” and also became a defendant. At trial, the USDA did not
produce a single witness; HLS had two.

The December 2008 trial, the first in years involving FOIA, resolved
the issue of whether HLS would suffer competitive harm if the records
were disclosed. These records, obtained by the USDA during its
investigation of the lab, formed the basis of the USDA’s formal
complaint against HLS, alleging multiple and grave violations of the
Animal Welfare Act (AWA). The charges included multiple counts of
failing to provide adequate veterinary care and inadequate research
oversight.

Within days of filing the complaint against HLS, the USDA settled it
with what IDA termed a “slap-on-the-wrist” fine. This was consistent
with multiple USDA Inspector General reports regarding the agency’s
lax enforcement of the AWA. The most recent, in 2005, stated that USDA
imposes “minimal” fines that “violators consider…a normal cost of
conducting business rather than a deterrent for violating the law.”

The FOIA trial came about as a result of an opinion by another judge,
who, after reviewing a sampling of the unredacted records in camera
(in private), expressed his doubt that defendants could prevail at a
trial focusing on the issue of competitive harm. This judge stated
that the USDA and HLS came “mighty close” to “’blatantly’
contradicting the record” in the case. He also noted that the USDA had
violated a prior court order by failing to produce an analysis of what
could be redacted from the records.

Kleiman noted that IDA has won multiple FOIA victories, including a
court-ordered public interest fee waiver for thousands of pages of NIH
records after IDA had proven its “dissemination methods and history
demonstrate that the disclosure will contribute to a greater
understanding” by the public. IDA has also used FOIA records to
document data manipulation and researcher misconduct (see “Drug Study
Hid Chimp Deaths,” at http://www.startribune.com/templates/Print_This_Story?sid=11617276


“This victory is the latest in a long line of IDA campaigns that often
take years,” concluded Kleiman. “No matter how long, IDA will continue
to persevere on behalf of those who cannot speak for themselves.”

The public interest law firm Meyer, Glitzenstein & Crystal represents
IDA in this case. The District Court opinion is available online at
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2002cv0557-121


First Pan-African Seminar on Alternatives to Animal Experiments

A groundbreaking initiative to promote and implement replacement
alternatives across Africa begins today in Nairobi, Kenya.

The First Pan-African Seminar on Alternatives to Animal Experiments in
Education and Training is being held 23-24 September 2009 at the Kenya
Institute of Education.

Co-organised by InterNICHE and its Partner organisation the Africa Network
for Animal Welfare (ANAW), the 2-day Alternatives Seminar brings together
22 campaigning organisations from 12 African countries, InterNICHE experts
from England, Mexico, India and Egypt, and over 100 Kenyan teachers,
surgeons and government officials.

The Kenyan Minister for Wildlife and Forestry, Hon. Dr. Noah Wekesa,
opened the animal protection workshop that is being held in advance of and
in preparation of the Alternatives Seminar. In his presentation, Dr.
Wekesa appreciated the importance of pan-African events, and acknowledged
the potential of new technology and alternatives.

The Alternatives Seminar builds on the experience of InterNICHE outreach
tours and alternatives demonstrations by dovetailing the organisation’s
skills and resources with the initiatives and local knowledge of
campaigners and teachers in the host country.

Previous outreach tours have included the training of over 400 teachers in
10 cities across India, and a 5-country tour of Latin America with over 30
seminars and meetings. The InterNICHE Multimedia Exhibition at the recent
VII World Congress on Alternatives showcased a range of teaching and
training tools from the InterNICHE Alternatives Loan System. This library
is providing over 100 software alternatives, models, mannekins and
simulators for demonstration at the event in Kenya.

Following an introduction and review of the Kenyan and African situation
by ANAW Director Josphat Ngonyo and colleagues, international experts will
provide lectures and demonstrations on humane education and the process of
replacement. InterNICHE Co-ordinator Nick Jukes will introduce the range
and quality of alternatives and explain the organisation’s commitment to
the 1R of replacement to help guarantee ethical and effective acquisition
of knowledge and skills.

India’s foremost campaigner for alternatives, Snehal Bhavsar, will
describe her strategies for catalysing curricular change across the state
of Gujarat in India, including her success in achieving 80% reduction of
animal use in education. Sofia Ponce will present the vision and
activities of the Center for Animal Alternatives in Education (CAAE)
program at the University of Guadalajara in Mexico. Fawzy Elnady from the
University of Cairo in Egypt will address information and communications
technology in relation to alternatives, with a global and African
overview.

Further presentations will include the rationale for seeing caring as an
essential clinical skill which must be placed at the heart of veterinary
and medical training; the use of the POP-trainer for live laparoscopic
surgical training without animal experiments; and the use of the Biopac
Student Lab for self-experimentation as an alternative in physiology
practical classes.

InterNICHE works with teachers and producers of alternatives to encourage
the freeing of learning tools from license restrictions and limited
geographical availability. Demonstrations and hands-on experience of
alternatives at the Alternatives Seminar will therefore be followed by
distribution of resources to the participants, including freeware and
other low-cost or no-cost alternatives whose impact can now be measured
globally.

Discussion workshops will address the opportunities and challenges within
Africa and allow for sharing of experience. The talks and diverse
international perspectives will encourage the pan-African and Kenyan
campaigners to reflect on culturally-appropriate strategies for the
introduction of alternatives in their countries.

Josphat Ngonyo from ANAW said today: “We intend that the Alternatives
Seminar will empower participants to be ambassadors for alternatives in
their own countries. They will shortly have the information, resources and
support from InterNICHE for this to be achieved. The impact on Kenya will
be considerable, particularly now with government support for humane
approaches and innovative technology in education and training.”

Nick Jukes from InterNICHE added, “We applaud the Kenyan government’s
interest in humane education and are confident in the pedagogical, ethical
and economic advantages of replacement alternatives. We hope that other
countries will follow Kenya’s lead, and that the Alternatives Seminar will
play a role in facilitating the process of change right across the
continent.”


Notes:

(1) The organisation of the event has been made possible thanks to the
generous support of the Anti-Vivisection Union (South Australia), the
Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation (Switzerland), the Maria Norbury Foundation
(USA), and an anonymous donor (USA).

Further thanks go to the International Association Against Painful
Experiments on Animals (IAAPEA) (UK), the On Shore Foundation (USA), the
New England Anti-Vivisection Society (NEAVS) (USA) and Hope Ferdowsian
(USA).

(2) African countries represented include DR Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia,
Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania,
Uganda and Zimbabwe.

(3) Kenyan government officials include Hon. Dr. Noah Wekesa, Minister
for Wildlife and Forestry; Dr. Julius Kipng’etich, Director, Kenya
Wildlife Service; Hon. Adan Duale, Asst. Minister of Livestock
Development; Dr. Peter Ithondeka, Director, Department of Veterinary
Services



*************************************************

Nick Jukes
InterNICHE Co-ordinator

98 Clarendon Park Road
Leicester LE2 3AE
England

tel: +44 116 210 9652
e-mail: coordinator@interniche.org

web: www.interniche.org

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUPS MUST STAND UP TO HUMAN EXTREMISM

Open letter to [UCLA] Vivisectors:

If what you do is ethical, moral and humane, then let it be done with transparency -- build glass laboratories with open doors, so the world can judge for itself your meritorious works. Why crouch and hide behind blatant lies in which your industry continuously omits its massive failures, while exaggerating its progress? This, as your colleagues huddle in windowless cubicles, behind bolted doors; busily "saving" the human race amid worthless, repetitious, hideous and often outrageously ridiculous experiments. Selling yourself to the highest bidder -- your corporate partners in animal terrorism -- is a conscious decision, which you and others who choose careers in areas of research using live victims, eagerly buy into. It is a business of corruption and murder for profit. Rife with scientific fraud. Perpetrating obscenities on living beings so vile, it would make any psychopath wet with pleasure. Billions tortured and slain, tossed onto the neverending
pile of souls sacrificed, just to keep the behemoth gravy train flowing. Money is the motive for what you do; and disguising that evil through public displays of pseudo-heroic rhetoric -- "saving mankind" -- is as rotten and nauseating to those of us who know the truth, as are the bodies of the abused, innocent beings which fill your labs.

Your narcissistic arrogance has you believing that those outside of your [delusional] vivisectionist clan, are too stupid and uninformed to "appreciate" your efforts on their behalf. And yet, you represent one of the most shamefully clueless, morally and ethically retarded groups within our race. A group so dense, that it must repeat the same failed experiments literally millions of times, while expecting a different outcome. Is this not the behavior of a classic moron? Or, in reality, is it about the trillions of dollars raked in by keeping the public believing that a cure to their woes is almost within reach? The carrot and the stick. Continue giving us your money [and dying from our failures] and in return we will save you...someday. It's a con game; where obscene riches, courtesy of the masses which buy the lie, feed an ever-growing, bloated monstrosity. A lie set forth by corporate vampires sucking off the decaying corpses of billions of animals
and humans, victimized and murdered by them, so they can continue to expand and thrive.

Now, more than ever, the public must be made aware of the real agenda behind the vivisection industry -- profits -- and only profits!

Please, actively encourage friends, family, co-workers and others to STOP supporting death walks -- via 5 and 10K runs -- or donations where profits are funneled into torture programs. START supporting anti-vivisectionist alternatives; create your own fund-raisers for ethical, non-invasive research and petition our govt to stop funding slice & dice research with our tax dollars. We need to drive those who perform barbaric, medieval animal experimentation back into the slime from whence they came.

Brennan Browne

The concept of 'animal rights' values the simple premise that ALL living creatures have a "right" to be allowed to live their lives without victimization- -free from brutality. It is a right that EVERY being strives for.

~Brennan Browne~

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Sanofi buys Merck's half of animal health business

September 18, 2009 By The Associated Press LINDA A. JOHNSON (AP Business Writer)

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — French drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis SA has completed its $4 billion purchase of Merck & Co.'s half interest in their veterinary medicine business, Merial Ltd., the companies said Friday.

The move was required by regulators before Merck can close its $41 billion purchase of New Jersey neighbor Schering-Plough Corp., which also sells animal health products.

Merial, a joint venture founded in 1997, sells two widely used pet medicines, flea-and-tick blocker Frontline and chewable heartworm preventer Heartgard. It also sells Ivomec, which kills parasites in hogs and cattle, and other medicines and vaccines for livestock.

Sanofi-Aventis said the acquisition should boost its net income in the first year after the deal.

"This acquisition strengthens Sanofi-Aventis' position in the attractive animal health market," Sanofi Chief Executive Christopher Viehbacher said in a statement. "It illustrates our strategy to grow and diversify our business in order to become a global diversified healthcare leader."

That's the same strategy behind Merck's plan to buy Schering-Plough — and the other huge merger pending, Pfizer Inc.'s $68 billion acquisition of Wyeth.

Pfizer will get Wyeth's booming biotech and vaccine businesses, the Fort Dodge animal health business and a consumer health division with well-known products including Chap Stick, Advil and Anacin pain relievers, and Preparation H for hemorrhoids.

Similarly, Merck will acquire Schering's biotech division, a consumer products business with staples like the Dr. Scholl's and Coppertone lines, and one of the industry's strongest pipelines of experimental drugs in development.

"The sale of Merck's interest in Merial allows us to remain on track for the closing of our merger with Schering-Plough in the fourth quarter, as planned," said Merck's chairman, Richard Clark.

Sanofi-Aventis retains an option to buy Schering-Plough's animal health business after the combination of Merck and Schering-Plough is completed, although any such deal would have to be approved by regulators here and in other countries.

Merial ranked third last year in global animal health sales, with a market share of nearly 14 percent and revenue of about $2.7 billion. Schering-Plough's Internet animal health business was just ahead of that, with almost $3 billion in revenue last year.

Sanofi's executive vice president for global operations, Hanspeter Speck, will oversee Merial as a subsidiary of Sanofi. Merial has about 5,700 employees and operates in more than 150 companies worldwide.

In New York trading Friday morning, Sanofi shares jumped 63 cents to 36.79, while Merck shares were up 29 cents at $32.30.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

4.5 Million Animals to be Spared in the EU

Groups Applaud Swift Action by EU Chemicals Agency

Brussels (16 Sept. 2009)--Animal protection groups today welcomed a
response from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to their request for
clarification regarding safety testing requirements under the EU's REACH
chemicals regulation, which promises to spare approximately 4.5 million
animals from suffering and death in chemical-poisoning tests..

Animal groups--including the European Coalition to End Animal
Experiments, Eurogroup for Animals, Humane Society International -
Europe, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and PETA Europe and
the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine--wrote last month to
ECHA raising concerns about the risk of companies conducting duplicative
animal tests for some types of toxicity when registering their chemicals
under REACH. The groups' concerns arose due to the cumulative nature of
the way information requirements are listed within REACH, according to
which chemicals are required to undergo progressively more animal
testing as their production volume increases.

In particular, there was a danger that companies would conduct
'screening' tests for reproductive and general toxicity (which still
consume dozens to hundreds of animals per chemical), and would later be
required to conduct more comprehensive tests for these same effects. The
language within REACH and its guidance was ambiguous on this point.

ECHA has today issued a press statement clarifying that animal tests
need not be conducted if similar, more comprehensive tests are going to
be proposed. Companies registering chemicals that are produced in
quantities of 100 tonnes or more can therefore fulfil initial
registration requirements without performing the screening tests if they
are proposing to do more comprehensive tests later in the process.

The animal groups estimate, based on ECHA's own figures that 6,000
chemicals may fall under the relevant information requirements, that
this clarification alone has the potential to save the lives of 4.5
million animals.

The task at hand now is to make sure companies abide by this clear
instruction and do not conduct duplicative testing on qualifying
chemicals.

"We are delighted that ECHA has responded so promptly and positively to
our request and helped prevent potential duplicative testing using more
than 4 million animals. We still have other concerns regarding REACH and
its implementation, but this common sense approach is a good start."

ENDS

REACH is the EU's Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of
Chemicals regulation.

The 13 Aug. joint letter to ECHA is available online at
http://bit.ly/8Y4T5


http://echa.europa.eu/doc/press/pr_09_13_animal_testing_carification_200 90915.pdf



More specifically, 28-day general toxicity studies and screening tests
for reproductive toxicity do not need to be conducted if 90-day general
toxicity studies or pre-natal developmental studies are proposed.