Showing posts with label deer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deer. Show all posts

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Update: Diageo now discussing freeing deer**

We received news last night that Diageo are now discussing a plan to have the Banbeath deer handed over for rehoming possibly by the end of next week.

Above: The deer grazing at the Banbeath plant earlier in week

Les Stocker from St. Tiggywinkles who has offered to move them was contacted late yesterday evening by Micheal Alexander, head of corporate relations at Diageo stating that the firm were now prepared to negotiate the releae of the animals.

Our phone's are ringing non stop with updates but it's looking increasingly likely that the remaining deer are to be freed.

We'll keep you updated as things happen.

--

Reg. charity: SCO39109

info@scotlandforanimals.org
http://www.scotlandforanimals.org/

Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/scotforanimals

Myspace www.myspace.com/scotlandforanimals

Bebo www.bebo.com/Scotland_for_Animals

Friday, March 12, 2010

Anti-Hunting ARA's 1st Amend Rights Abused By Police--Please Support

*** CROSSPOST WIDELY ***

Background:

Jason Miller, founder of the AR blogs Thomas Paine's Corner and Bite Club of KC, was the victim of harassment by the Johnson County Police Department on Friday, March 5th, when he was interrogated at his place of employment regarding emails sent to Kansas State officials.

Apparently, government officials involved in the recent decision to slaughter hundreds of deer within Shawnee Mission Park, were upset by emails they received from several individuals as a result of their killing spree. These officials', in retaliation, decided to use Jason's local police dept. as their own personal goon squad, in an attempt to intimidate him. While Jason Miller's anti-hunting campaign included his own singular email, it appears he is taking the heat for every email sent by anyone in opposition to the bloodbath.

This is a clear ABUSE of Kansas State officials' and the police department's power! Increasingly, AR activists are being targeted for harassment and jail time for LAWFUL, First Amendment activities. Anyone who is under the impression that this escalating government campaign against the AR Movement is limited to what they refer to as "fringe extremists" is in for a SHOCK. The FBI and others in law enforcement are committed to destroying our movement -- period!

This is why supporting one another in cases of govt/police abuse is absolutely VITAL. Please take the time to email the following power abusers and let them know YOU WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED. Remind them that they are OUR employees and that they have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution -- including the FIRST AMENDMENT.

Sample letter below -- tweak it to make it your own

EMAIL THE ABUSERS:
governor@ks.gov; lloydf@wp.state.ks.us; michael.meadors@jocogov.org; randy.knight@jocogov.org; chairman@jcprd.com; vicechair@jcprd.com; treasurer@jcprd.com; assistant_treasurer@jcprd.com; secretary@jcprd.com; assistant_secretary@jcprd.com; annabeth.surbaugh@jocogov.org; jim.allen@jocogov.org; ed.peterson@jocogov.org; david.lindstrom@jocogov.org; ed.eilert@jocogov.org; doug.wood@jocogov.org; calvin.hayden@jocogov.org

SAMPLE LETTER:

Sirs:

By abusing your official power in order to harass and intimidate those in opposition to your blood-soaked policies, [e.g. Shawnee Mission Park deer massacre], it has become obvious that you do not have the character, personal integrity or good judgment to warrant retaining that position. Tyranny can only exist if the citizenry allows it. Using your official position of power to oppress lawful, ethical and morally correct social justice movements such as that of Animal Rights, will only garner anger and disgust against the reigning status quo, which has enshrouded itself in corruption for far too long. Reminder: YOU ARE OUR EMPLOYEE -- WE REFUSE TO BE PAWNS FOR YOUR PERSONAL AGENDAS. The Animal Rights Movement will continue, regardless of your Orwellian attempts to stamp out the First Amendment and the rest of the Bill of Rights which you swore an oath to uphold. I look forward to the day when we can actually be proud of those in government and not
remain in constant need of a vomit receptacle when dealing with our "representatives. "

Sincerely,

"SCOTLAND FOR ANIMALS" MAKES INTERNATIONAL PLEA FOR EMAILS TO STOP DEER SLAUGHTER ~

Background Info:

John Patrick, head of Scotland for Animals is pleading for an INTERNATIONAL response to the planned murders of a small herd of roe deer, which have been peacefully living on grounds owned by a company named Diageo, for the last 10 years. The company's planned expansion is being used as an excuse to kill the deer. So far, they are unwilling to listen to offers to relocate the herd. Scotland for Animals is asking caring people from around the world to inundate the company with emails in an attempt to apply pressure to stop the atrocity and convince them to utilize relocation and not murder to solve the problem.

PLEASE SEND A PROTEST EMAIL AND CROSSPOST THIS ALERT WIDELY!

From: Scotland for Animals
Subject: DEER CULL TO GO AHEAD
Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 6:42 PM

Please see email below which supporters have been receiving from Diageo re: deer cull, they are adamant that this will go ahead. We know we've been hammering you all with stuff over the past couple of days but if you can please email again to remind Diageo how bad they're going to look should this go ahead:

EMAIL: Global.General. Information@Diageo.com

(just cut+paste our email, or a variation of, and personalise it with your own details)

You can also phone 020 79275200 and tell them you want to speak to the CEO Paul Walsh.

We're trying to find out exactly when this is supposed to happen and who'll be carrying the killing out, we'll keep you posted. See Diageo's reply below and also Scotland for Animals' appeal to reconsider quickly.

Subject:
FAO Paul Walsh: Re: Deer cull/ Banbeath
From:
Scotland for Animals
Date:
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:07:35 +0000
To:
Global.General. Information@Diageo.com

Re: DEER CULL-- BANBEATH, FIFE

Dear Mr Walsh

We have received reports from the public that you are to go ahead with the culling of deer at your plant in Banbeath Fife. With regards to your firms statement that "the advice from the deer experts is that it would be irresponsible to relocate or release the deer and in the best interests of animal welfare all the deer should be culled." Could you please inform us who these experts are? We are extremely concerned about the integrity of these claims as we are aware that several expert organisations including the SSPCA have instructed you that these deer could be adequately preserved on site or alternatively easily transferred to another location. We are also aware that concrete offers have been made to yourselves for the use of suitable rehoming areas.

Further to your claim that you have been "Working with the key deer management experts, and with support of local community representatives, we have carefully examined every possible option for the management of the deer." we know that a petition containing over 2000 signatures was handed to you from local people asking for these deer to be saved and there is huge opposition to the cull from residents in surrounding areas. Again could we ask that you please tell us exactly which 'local community representatives' are supporting you in your actions?

We advise that it would be a grave mistake for Diageo to go ahead with this cull as the strength of public opposition to this is overwhelming and the advice you are being given and organisations which you appear to be receiving counsel from are looking extremely dubious.

After the massive amount of negative publicity that Diageo has had in Scotland through other matters we hope that you will reverse this decision immediately to avoid yet another PR disaster for your company. If you require any professional and reliable advice or assistance on welfare, resettling, transport, etc. issues regarding this case please do not hesitate to contact us.

John Patrick
Chairman
Scotland for Animals

From: Global General Information
[mailto: Global.General. Information@Diageo.com]

Sent: 10 March 2010 16:42
Subject: Re: DEER TO BE CULLED IN FIFE

Dear Madam,

Thank you for your email. Diageo has been working closely with deer welfare advisers at the Deer Commission for Scotland, the British Deer Society and the Scottish Deer Centre and with animal welfare officers at the SSPCA in a determined effort to address the animal welfare issues of a small herd of roe deer that has taken up residence at our Leven packaging site.

There have been deer on site for around 10 years, but recently there has been concern about the increasing numbers and health of the deer. In addition, the planned expansion at Leven – which includes the building of a new bottling hall – will result in a significantly reduced area of land available for the deer. Together these have important animal welfare implications, including even further restricted habitat, high stress levels and risk of injury.

Working with the key deer management experts, and with support of local community representatives, we have carefully examined every possible option for the management of the deer. However, the advice from the deer experts is that it would be irresponsible to relocate or release the deer and in the best interests of animal welfare all the deer should be culled.

We recognise that the deer are regarded fondly in the local community and by employees – this has been an extremely difficult decision to reach – but we have a responsibility to act on the advice of the deer experts in the best interests of the animals. The cull is being undertaken by qualified professionals in consultation with a vet and the police.

Yours sincerely,
Rechelle Jevon
Corporate Relations Assistant

*********
info@scotlandforanimals.org
www.scotlandforanimals.org

Follow us on Twitter
http://twitter.com/scotforanimals

Myspace
www.myspace.com/scotlandforanimals

Bebo
www.bebo.com/Scotland_for_Animals

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Actions Everyone Can Take to Stop Canned Hunts in D.C. Area Public Parks

No matter where you live, this should concern you. Even our
international friends can express outrage that this is being proposed in
parkland so close to our nation's capitol. There is enough bloodshed
in the world without promoting it in areas where visitors to Washington
D.C. bring their families to enjoy nature.

TIME SENSITIVE: Canned hunts are scheduled to begin on November 14th.

PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY AND CALL OR EMAIL TODAY!

ISSUE: Fairfax County, the largest, most prosperous County in northern
Virginia (which borders Washington, D.C.), plans to turn its public
parks into canned hunts for bow hunting beginning November 14th. After
sneaking plans past public scrutiny, the Park Authority plans to
initiate bow hunting in Colvin Run Park, and expand it to other Fairfax
County Parks.

ACTION : Please call or email both Sharon Bulova and John Dargle, Jr.
immediately. Please mention that you and your friends, family members
and children enjoy the parks and do not want to be exposed to the
horrors of bow hunting (see more talking points below the list of
additional officials.)

Sharon Bulova, Chairman of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

Email: chairman@fairfaxcounty.gov
(fairfaxcounty. gov
)

Tel: 703-324-2321

John Dargle, Jr., Director of Fairfax County Park Authority

Email: john.darglejr@fairfaxcounty.gov
(fairfaxcounty. gov
)

Tel: 703-324-8702

EXTRA HELP: If you want to go the extra mile to help the deer and our
surrounding population, please call or email one or two, or all of the
officials listed below. (All email addresses end in fairfaxcounty. gov )

Fairfax County Executive, Anthony Griffin, (703) 324-2536
coexec@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor John Foust (703) 356-0551(Dranesvill e District)
dranesville@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor Catherine Hudgins (703) 478-0283 (Hunter Mill District)
hntrmill@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor Michael Frey (703) 814-7100 (Sully District)
sully@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor Linda Smyth (703) 560-6946(Providence District)
provdist@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor Jeff McKay (703) 971-6262 (Lee District)
leedist@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor Penelope Gross (703) 256-7717 (Mason District)
mason@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor Gerald Hyland (703) 780-7518 (Mount Vernon District)
mtvernon@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor John Cook (703) 425-9300 (Braddock District)
braddock@fairfaxcounty.gov

Supervisor Pat Herrity (703) 451-8873 (Springfield District)
springfield@fairfaxcounty.gov

TALKING POINTS: Please be polite and use these talking points in your
call or email:

n Bow hunting is dangerous and unpredictable; visitors to the parks
and residents of the surrounding area can be injured by this brutal
activity.

n Even the "best" bow hunters almost never kill the deer
immediately. The hunter waits 45 minutes to an hour for the deer to
run, bleed out and become exhausted. Then, the hunter attempts to follow
the blood trail to find the deer and finish killing it, often in front
of children and visitors to the park.

n It exposes children and impressionable adults to extraordinary
animal cruelty and teaches them that killing animals is OK – mental
health officials and the FBI consider cruelty to animals a precursor to
more violent crimes against humans who are perceived as vulnerable; is
that the lesson we want our children to learn?

n Bow "hunters" are often inexperienced and have a high
rate of injuring, rather than killing deer, leaving them to die a slow,
agonizing death; many deer can be seen fleeing with arrows piercing
their limbs and organs.

n There is no way to know how far the deer will run, if she will
die, what injury will occur, if she will die over weeks, or run into
backyards and roads, and die a painful death.

n It causes a public safety hazard: panic-stricken animals often
flee their pursuers, running into roads causing car accidents.

n It serves no purpose; the deer return in subsequent years to
breed and multiply; nature abhors a vacuum

n It makes Fairfax County and the metropolitan Washington , D.C.
area look cruel, barbaric and primitive to the rest of the world.

n This is not rural park area; this is within densely populated,
urban land.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Stop The Deer Massacre In Shawnee Mission Kansas

www.thepetitionsite.com/11/please-dont-massacre-the-deer

DEAR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD WHO LOVE DEER:

SHAWNEE MISSION PARK IN JOHNSON COUNTY IS THE LARGEST PARK IN THE STATE OF KANSAS.

75% OF THE INNOCENT, DEFENSELESS DEER LIVING IN THE 1200 ACRE PARK ARE ABOUT TO BE MASSACRED.

INNOCENT CREATURES BAITED WITH FOOD TO LURE THEM TO THEIR DEATH.

SOME WITH BULLETS AND OTHERS WITH ARROWS.

ACCOMPLISHED ANIMAL ACTIVISTS HAVE PRESENTED CITY OFFICIALS AND THE GOVERNOR OF KANSAS WITH A VIABLE NONLETHAL DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT WON'T SPILL A SINGLE DROP OF BLOOD.

THIS ENTIRE LIFE SAVING PROGRAM COULD SET THE STAGE FOR THE GOVERNOR OF KANSAS AND THE JOHNSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO ANNOUNCE THAT THE 1200 ACRE PARK KNOWN AS SHAWNEE MISSION PARK WILL SOON BE NAMED SHAWNEE MISSION DEER PARK. THE FIRST NO KILL DEER PARK SANCTUARY OF IT'S KIND IN THE UNITED STATES.

http://thomaspainescorner.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/join-anthony-marrs-anti-huntingalliance-and-lets-roll/

BECAUSE SO MANY PEOPLE HAVE COMPLAINED ABOUT THE PROSPECTS OF A DEER MASSACRE IT HAS BEEN DELAYED AND WE HOPE WITH ENOUGH COMPLAINTS IT WILL NOT HAPPEN.

IF THE HIDEOUS MASSACRE BEGINS WE CAN STILL STOP IT IN TIME TO SAVE THE LIVES OF HUNDREDS OF DEER, AND HOPEFULLY STOP FUTURE HUNTS LIKE THIS ONE FOREVER.

View Video -- Shawnee Mission Death Park
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDT032HKWxo

Please Sign Petition --
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/11/please-dont-massacre-the-deer

PLEASE THINK ABOUT THE ANCIENT WORDS OF WISDOM AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS MESSAGE.THAT WERE WRITTEN OVER 2200 YEARS AGO.

THE DIALECTS HAVE CHANGED MANY TIMES THROUGH THE CENTURIES, BUT THE WORDS HAVE NOT!!!!

THEN PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION TO SAVE THE LIVES OF INNOCENT TAME DEFENSELESS DEER. FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW. DO IT FOR THE DEER.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/11/please-dont-massacre-the-deer

PLEASE HELP US SAVE THE DEER!

THOSE WITHOUT WEALTH MAY ONE DAY PROSPER, BUT THOSE WITHOUT KINDNESS ARE UTTERLY AND INCURABLY POOR.

THE FOLLOWING VIDEO REVEALS HOW WONDERFUL SHAWNEE MISSION DEER PARK COULD BE.

PLEASE MAKE SURE TO WATCH THIS!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rooyt3ptNco&feature=email

Bite Club of Kansas City
9220 Constance Street - Lenexa, KS 66215 US

Saturday, October 24, 2009

[FoA] NY Action Alert: Stop Bow-Hunting Deer in Westchester & Rockland County Parks

Action Alert: Stop Bow-Hunting Deer in Westchester & Rockland
County Parks

We at Friends of Animals need your help on behalf of the deer.
Westchester County plans to turn 850 acres in Lasden Park and Muscoot
Farm Park into deer-killing fields for bowhunters starting November 7th
A "task force" with a pro-hunting bent concluded that there was an
"overpopulation" of deer eating as deer eat in the forest. Its members
made the unprecedented decision to open up parklands where hunting was
formerly prohibited.

Hunting changes the way deer naturally evolve and can cause deer
populations to increase. Nature itself ensures that the deer population
is limited by available food, territory, and winter weather conditions,
which restrict both food and range. The reproductive rate and the
survival rate of deer will then decrease, creating a natural balance.
Deer simply need us to let them be, and that's the message that needs
to be communicated to your legislators.

Hunting is also known to increase the instances of accidents, with
people driving into scattering deer. A 2002
study by Friends of Animals indicated that hunting exacerbates
roadway deaths of deer. About half of all these accidents happen during
the three months of hunting season: October, November and December.

We ask Westchester and Rockland County residents: Please contact
the officials below and tell them that you demand an end to
the plan to turn your peaceful parklands into places where arrows fly.

Westchester County Executive Andrew J. Spano
148 Martine Avenue
White Plains, NY 10601
Phone: 914.995.2900
Fax: 914.995.2939
Email: ceo@westchestergov. com

Joseph A. Stout, Commissioner
Dept. of Parks, Recreation & Conservation
25 Moore Avenue
Mt. Kisco, New York 10549
Phone: 914.864.7000
Fax: 914.864.7053
Email: jas7@westchestergov .com

Rockland County Residents

Rockland County Legislator Gerold Beirker wants to follow Westchester' s
bloody lead, and has introduced bowhunting legislation that would allow
bowhunting of deer on county parkland.

We ask Rockland County residents to contact Legislator
Gerold M. Bierker and tell him that your parklands are not
appropriate places for bowhunters, and
that deer don't need to be managed unnaturally.

Gerold M. Bierker
Rockland County Legislature
11 New Hempstead Rd.
New City, NY 10956
Phone: 845.638.5753
Email: bierkerg@co. rockland. ny.us





Friends of
Animals 777 Post
Road Darien CT 06820 203-656-1522

Monday, October 19, 2009

Action Alert: Stop Bow-Hunting Deer in Westchester & Rockland County Parks





We at Friends of Animals need your help on behalf of the deer. Westchester County plans to turn 850 acres in Lasden Park and Muscoot Farm Park into deer-killing fields for bowhunters starting November 7th A "task force" with a pro-hunting bent concluded that there was an "overpopulation" of deer eating as deer eat in the forest. Its members made the unprecedented decision to open up parklands where hunting was formerly prohibited.

Hunting changes the way deer naturally evolve and can cause deer populations to increase. Nature itself ensures that the deer population is limited by available food, territory, and winter weather conditions, which restrict both food and range. The reproductive rate and the survival rate of deer will then decrease, creating a natural balance. Deer simply need us to let them be, and that's the message that needs to be communicated to your legislators.

Hunting is also known to increase the instances of accidents, with people driving into scattering deer. A 2002 study by Friends of Animals indicated that hunting exacerbates roadway deaths of deer. About half of all these accidents happen during the three months of hunting season: October, November and December.

We ask Westchester and Rockland County residents: Please contact the officials below and tell them that you demand an end to the plan to turn your peaceful parklands into places where arrows fly.


Westchester County Executive Andrew J. Spano
148 Martine Avenue
White Plains, NY 10601
Phone: 914.995.2900
Fax: 914.995.2939
Email: ceo@westchestergov.com


Joseph A. Stout, Commissioner
Dept. of Parks, Recreation & Conservation
25 Moore Avenue
Mt. Kisco, New York 10549
Phone: 914.864.7000
Fax: 914.864.7053
Email: jas7@westchestergov.com




Rockland County Residents

Rockland County Legislator Gerold Beirker wants to follow Westchester's bloody lead, and has introduced bowhunting legislation that would allow bowhunting of deer on county parkland.

We ask Rockland County residents to contact Legislator Gerold M. Bierker and tell him that your parklands are not appropriate places for bowhunters, and
that deer don't need to be managed unnaturally.

Gerold M. Bierker
Rockland County Legislature
11 New Hempstead Rd.
New City, NY 10956
Phone: 845.638.5753
Email: bierkerg@co.rockland.ny.us








Friends of Animals 777 Post Road Darien CT 06820 203-656-1522

Sunday, October 11, 2009

NY: Protect Westchester's Deer-Action Alert

Committee To Abolish Sport Hunting

PO BOX 13815, LAS
CRUCES, NM 88013-3815

(575) 640-7372

CASH@AbolishSportHunting.com


www.AbolishSportHunting.com



~~ ACTION ALERT ~~

STOP BOW
HUNTING IN NEW YORK’S WESTCHESTER COUNTY



Thanks to In Defense of Animals, C.A.S.H. has become
aware that Westchester County will allow hunters to use bows and arrows to kill
deer in county parks in an attempt to reduce the deer population. The killing,
which will begin on November 7, 2009, will take place in Lasdon Park and
Muscoot Farm Park, both in Somers. This
is being done despite the fact that bow hunting is an ineffective method of
wildlife population control.



Dr. Allen Rutberg of Tufts University, an expert on
wildlife management as well as wildlife contraception, states: "The most
visible weakness in the assertion that hunting is necessary to control deer
populations is that it has largely failed to do so over the last two
decades."



In a report on bow hunting in Rock Cut State Park in
Illinois, Department of Conservation biologist, Tom Beisel, states: "this
report recognizes that bow hunting has never been an effective tool for deer
control."



Texas Park and Wildlife biologist Horace Gore, comments:
"You cannot call bow hunting a

population control measure, it is a recreational pursuit." And adds:
"We do not advocate bow hunting when the objective is controlling
population."



WHAT YOU CAN
DO:



Please Contact the Westchester County Executive and the
members of the Westchester County Board of Legislators. In Defense of Animals has already set up the
County Executive letter for you at this link, where you can personalize it and
send it with just a few clicks. You

can also find his phone/fax contact info at this link:

http://ida.convio.net/site/R?i=c6sQTFZSkoIDS9wi_l1XCw..
Urge these county leaders to immediately repeal the
bowhunting provision for these parks and to implement non-lethal measures of
deer management.



Westchester County Executive Andrew J. Spano

148 Martine Ave.,

White Plains, NY 10601

e-mail: info@andyspano.com


web form http://www.westchestergov.com/aboutwestchester_emailce.htm

phone: 914-995-2900

Fax to Office of Communications 914-995-2939



Westchester County Board of Legislators

800 Michaelian Office Building

148 Martine Avenue, 8th Floor

White Plains, New York 10601

Main Tel: (914)995-2800;

Fax: (914)995-3884



William J. Ryan (Board Chair)

Michael B. Kaplowitz (Vice Chair)

Martin Rogowsky (Majority Leader)

George Oros (Minority Leader)

Judith A. Myers (Majority Whip)

James Maisano (Minority Whip)

Peter Harckham

John Nonna

Lois T. Bronz

William Burton

Vito J. Pinto

Thomas J. Abinanti

Lyndon Williams

Bernice Spreckman

Gordon A. Burrows

Kenneth W. Jenkins

José I. Alvarado



For more
information, please contact Barbara Stagno at 914-479-5276

or email Barbara@idausa.org





SAMPLE
LETTER:



Dear XXXX:



I am shocked to learn that Westchester County has
approved a special deer hunt using bows and arrows that is scheduled to start
on November 7 in Muscoot Farm Park and Lasdon Park in Somers.

Experts in the field of hunting have publicly stated that
bow hunting has never been an effective tool for deer control, and that hunting
is likely to increase the incidence of deer/car collisions. Experts also agree that hunting often causes
deer herds to increase in size.



Please immediately cancel all plans for bowhunting in in
Muscoot Farm Park and Lasdon Park and research and implement non-lethal
measures of deer management.



Sincerely,

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Animal-rights Zealot has a human side

Arriving on the doorstep one day last week, in a box packed with ice,
was the severed head.

“It took quite a while to find somebody who’d send me one,” Jason
Miller told me.

If you’ve been following events surrounding the coming deer slaughter
at Shawnee Mission Park, then you might have heard of Miller even
before last Friday’s gruesome display outside the Johnson County park
district offices.

Holding the deer head aloft, the 42-year-old Lenexa animal rights
activist read from a script he’d written, addressing his comments to
the park officials holed up inside.

“My name is Victoria,” Miller said, speaking for the deer as its blood
dripped to the curb below. “If you move forward with your planned
slaughter, I will be the future face of Shawnee Mission Park.”

Well, it sort of depends on how you view the coming cull. But there’s
no denying that Miller has become the face of the effort to prevent
the killing.

What began as one man’s effort to stop parks officials from
exterminating 300 of the 400 whitetails roaming in and around JoCo’s
premiere park has lately turned into something broader.

In July, Miller started Bite Club of KC, which he claims has 200 local
members. Dozens turn up at meetings and protests. There’s a Web site —
biteclubkc.wordpress.com — and enough money to rent a billboard near
downtown that screams “STOP THE SLAUGHTER. SAVE THE DEER!”

--
full story:
http://www.kansascity.com/news/columnists/mike_hendricks/story/1479631.html

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

CT- DEER HUNTING, Lies and Misinformation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Priscilla Feral
Phone: (203) 656-1522
feral@friendsofanimals.org



As Hunting Season Begins in Connecticut, So Do the Lies and Misinformation



Darien,CT--"Each year, apologists for hunting are pressed to justify their violent, unethical deer-killing schemes bolstered by state wildlife agencies which profit from hunting," says Friends of Animal's president, Priscilla Feral.

In a press release issued by the pro-hunting group Fairfield County Municipal Deer Management Alliance, traffic accidents, Lyme disease and environmental destruction are solely blamed on deer. The group even called for Fairfield County residents to sanction deer killings on their private property, to "do their part" to eradicate deer. As though deer must disappear to ensure public safety.


Hunting is on the decline, and has been for years; fewer than 1% of Connecticut's residents hunt.


It's no longer acceptable to call hunting recreation. Hunters invent social benefits to excuse their killings: "protecting" deer from "over-population" or people from disease, or feeding the hungry. They are "protecting" wildflowers from "over-browsing" and heading off collisions.

"What's missing," Feral says, "is respect for conscious life - - and for the truth."


Feral observes that humans-the only species on earth whose population is truly out of control-often fail to acknowledge how our reckless overdevelopment and penchant to overpopulate directly impacts our perceived problems with deer and other free-living animals.

Hunting changes the way deer naturally evolve and can cause deer populations to increase. Nature itself ensures that the deer population is limited by available food, territory, and winter weather conditions, which restrict both food and range. Numerous studies over the years have shown that both the reproductive rate and the survival rate of deer will then decrease-creating a natural balance.

Neither do deer cause Lyme disease; black-legged ticks carry the disease when immature, on smaller host animals than deer. Vigilant checks for ticks on the body and immediate removal, especially in the summer and early autumn weeks, are key for controlling the spread of Lyme disease.

It's true: there are about a 1.5 million reported instances of drivers hitting deer in the United States every year. "So, clearly there is a problem, yet the quickest way to reduce deer/auto collisions is to get the hunters out of the woods," Feral says. A 2002 study by Friends of Animals found that hunting actually exacerbates roadway deaths of deer because it can frighten deer into darting out to roadways. About half of all these collisions occur in just three months: October, November, and December -- hunting season.

Howard Kilpatrick, a biologist with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in Connecticut, celebrates the fact that more land has been opened up to hunting-telling the Stamford Advocate "that's what we need to manage deer populations." But what Kilpatrick doesn't mention is his own professional bias: The DEP is a pro-hunting agency that is funded, in part, by the sale of hunting licenses and a federal excise tax on guns and ammunition. This fact alone ensures only one thing: corrupt, one-sided "science."


Nature is being managed to death; it's time for communities to call for ceasefires. Deer simply need us to let them be.



About Friends of Animals: We are a non-profit, international animal advocacy organization, founded in 1957. Our goal is to cultivate a respectful view of non-human animals, freeing them from cruelty and institutionalized exploitation around the world.





Priscilla Feral
President
Friends of Animals
777 Post Road
Darien, Connecticut 06820

phone: 203-656-1522
fax: 203-656-0267
e-mail: feral@friendsofanimals.org

Web site: http://www.friendsofanimals.org

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Stamford's Bartlett Arboretum to hold deer hunt

STAMFORD -- Bartlett Arboretum & Gardens will hold a controlled hunt
this fall to reduce the deer population after years of seeing its
understory destroyed by a growing numbers of bucks and does.

The hunt comes eight months after complaints over security and prior
notification from animal rights activists led the city to end a deer
hunt on city property a day early.

Bow-hunters will visit the park at dawn at various days after Tuesday
and hunt deer from tree platforms and remove carcasses before anyone
visits the nature preserve in the morning. The exact start date of the
hunt is a secret, arboretum officials said. Arboretum officials sent
letters to North Stamford residents who live near the gardens and
trails in the past few weeks to notify them of the hunt and said deer
have eaten away at least seven species of wildflower and led to the
loss of five to seven species of shrub-nesting birds. They said
unchecked deer populations have disrupted the ecosystem in the
arboretum's 91 acres of open space in North Stamford and threaten
growth of new trees because the deer eat oak, maple and hickory
seedlings.

--
full story:
http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/ci_13434448?source=most_emailed

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Sharpshooters begin destroying elk herd



Glen Stubbe, Star Tribune

Elk at the farm.

In January, a female at the farm near Pine Island was found to have CWD, a fatal brain disease. A USDA agency is killing all 700 elk.

By DOUG SMITH, Star Tribune
Featured comment

Unfortunate but the only way
There are some researchers at the University of Colorado who developed a test on a biopsy from a live animal but it is not 100 percent … read more reliable. Perhaps this new bio science center could develop a reliable test for CWD without destroying an animal. The direct payments to the elk owners won’t be the biggest expense of this ordeal. Perhaps 700 animals times 1500 or about a million. I would bet that the other costs will be 10 times that amount for laboratory services, diagnostic and reagent kits, and of course the sharp shooters. Then add the inefficient public administration of the whole project and we are talking some major money.
Federal sharpshooters have begun destroying a herd of about 700 elk on a farm in southeastern Minnesota where chronic wasting disease (CWD) was discovered this year.

Sharpshooters with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services shot elk Friday and Monday on the farm off Hwy. 52 near Pine Island, after the federal agency reached an agreement with the herd's owners concerning compensation and cleanup. A cow elk at Elk Farm LLC -- the largest such farm in the state -- was found to have the disease in January, and the herd has been quarantined since.

The 1,300-acre farm was purchased in 2006 by Tower Investments of Woodland, Calif., and is part of 2,300 acres the firm plans to develop north of Rochester for a bioscience research and manufacturing center called Elk Run. It would include 15 to 25 bioscience companies, as well as offices, shops and homes, officials say.

"This is very sad situation for all of us at Tower Investments," project manager Geoff Griffin said.

"But it's totally out of our control. The good thing is, it does not affect our development."

All of the elk will be killed over the next 10 days or so and tested for the fatal brain disease, then will be disposed of, said Paul Anderson, assistant director of the Minnesota Board of Animal Health. None of the meat can be salvaged for human consumption.

"There's no evidence that it causes disease in people," Anderson said, "but with a known infected herd, we just would not take any risks with humans."

Tower Investments will be compensated for the animals by the Agriculture Department. Federal officials said Monday that they're unsure what the total cost will be.

To prevent the spread of CWD to wild deer, the top couple of inches of topsoil on the farm will be removed and stored behind a fenced area for five years, Anderson said. Tower Investments will pay for that, he said. "Normally, we'd require that fences stay up [on a farm] for five years," Anderson said, "but because of the need to develop that land, they will remove the soil and pile it up behind a fence for five years."

3,000 deer to be tested

The Department of Natural Resources also plans to test 3,000 deer for CWD that are expected to be killed by hunters this fall in southeastern Minnesota. The testing, which will cost more than $200,000, was prompted by the presence of CWD at the Pine Island elk farm and by the proximity of deer in the region to Wisconsin, where wild deer have been infected with CWD, said Ed Boggess, DNR policy section chief. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will pay about $70,000 of the cost, he said.

Though no elk have escaped from the Pine Island farm, Anderson said two wild deer somehow managed to get inside the fenced farm and were destroyed. Since the disease was first found in the state in a captive elk herd in 2002, DNR officials have been concerned that it could spread to Minnesota's approximately 1 million wild deer. There are about 20,000 captive deer and elk in the state, and the disease can be spread through nose-to-nose contact. The infected elk at Pine Island was the sixth captive deer or elk in the state found to have CWD.

The DNR has tested more than 30,000 wild deer, and none has tested positive.

The Pine Island elk farm has been an icon in the area for years, and the elk often were seen by drivers on busy Hwy. 52. The farm was owned by brothers John and Karl Hoehne. Karl Hoehne declined to comment Monday, and John Hoehne couldn't be reached.

Though the long-standing elk farm would have been phased out as development occurred, Griffin, the project manager, said that Tower Investments had intended to keep some elk there, and that that still might happen, even after the herd is destroyed. "We're going to wait five years, just to be safe," he said, and possibly add elk later to some enclosures on the site.

Meanwhile, Griffin said water and sewer lines are being laid at the development and that the state is expected to let bids for a Hwy. 52 interchange there. He said construction of some bioscience buildings should begin next year.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

FOA DEER ALERT!

Dear Friend,
Friends of Animals and area residents have been attending meetings and spreading the word through educational leafleting and peaceful demonstrations that the Conservation Commission Subcommittee on Deer Management is currently discussing ways to kill and manage deer in Open Space areas of Fairfield.
This subcommittee will be holding a meeting on August 24, inviting Fairfield residents to speak about this issue. Please mark your calendar for this date and plan to attend. Speakers will be limited to five minutes and must sign in as they arrive.
It is extremely important that the message be heard that we do not want Fairfield to become a place where deer are subjected to violence. The deer have the right to be left alone as they are part of this urban environment to which we all belong.
“This deer hunt isn’t justified morally or scientifically. It’s offered to appease a few local hunters who have long had far too much influence locally and nationally. The deer should be off-limits to hunters, and those who find pleasure in killing deer should instead control themselves,” says Priscilla Feral, President, Friends of Animals.
If you cannot attend, please send a letter to the Conservation Department expressing your thoughts about the killing of deer in Open Space areas. Letters should be directed to:
Thomas Steinke, Conservation DirectorConservation DepartmentTown of Fairfield725 Old Post RoadFairfield, CT 06824
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. I can be reached at nrice@friendsofanimals.org or 203-656-1522.
I hope you can attend this important meeting.
Sincerely, Nancy RiceOutreach Coordinator
FoA Website
FoA Causes
e-Archives
Spay/Neuter
Cookbooks & More
Make a Donation
Contact Us
Friends of Animals 777 Post Road Darien CT 06820 203-656-1522

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Cayuga Heights bans public comment on deer issue

http://tinyurl.com/pbnzmq




Enough! Board bans deer discussion

Cayuga Heights calls for 60-day moratorium

By Krisy Gashler
kgashler@gannett.com


The Cayuga Heights Board of Trustees has voted unanimously to forbid public
comment about deer during village board meetings for the next 60 days.

The board voted Monday "to limit presentations at privilege of the floor for
60 days to non-deer-related topics while still accepting input on the deer
topic in writing," Mayor Jim Gilmore said.

"These times when we're together must be productive and we need to cover a
lot of business," Gilmore said. "We can't do it if we have these long,
drawn-out privilege-of-the-floor shows."

Public comment at the July 20 village meeting lasted roughly an hour.

The board is considering a proposal to sterilize 30 to 60 deer, then hire
trained sharpshooters to cull or kill the rest of the deer in the village.
Cayuga Heights has been exploring strategies to deal with deer-related
problems for almost a decade. The most recent proposal came from a committee
that met for 10 months, most of that time in public and including time at
each meeting for public comment. The village also hosted two public forums
on deer earlier this year.

However, since the current proposal was publicly announced, there has only
been one regular, evening board meeting. At that July meeting, trustees
discussed making their decision by August or September in order to begin
sterilizing deer this winter.

Public comment at municipal board and council meetings, often called
"privilege of the floor," is not required by state law, though it is a
widely accepted practice.

Villager Mary Tabacchi, who opposes culling, said she thinks the board's
decision is "undemocratic."

"There have been a lot of comments pro and con, letters pro and con, but
most of those were before the specific proposal came forward," she said. "So
it takes a couple hours out of a month to hear people express their feelings
on a topic that is divisive. The people who are anxious - pro and con - when
you pull out that ability to express it, I just think you're asking for
trouble."

"They can still give us a written statement," Gilmore said. "The reality is
we have ample and voluminous amounts of information from our residents as
well as the greater populace. We are charged with making a decision, and to
me, continuing to get input ad infinitum is irresponsible. We could
effectively be dodging the decision by continuing to gather input. Now we
need to assess everything we've read and everything we've heard and vote on
it."

Cayugadeer.org, the citizens group opposed to culling, attended and recorded
Monday's village meeting, held at noon. The video of the board's discussion
is available at www.cayugadeer.org.

The board began holding a second monthly noon meeting in June this year.

"The purpose of this meeting, which is open to the public, is to hear
department reports and pay village bills," according to the village web
site. The proposal to limit public comment on deer during board meetings
came from Gilmore during his regular "report of the Mayor."

During their discussion, the trustees considered eliminating privilege of
the floor entirely for 60 days, but eventually decided to retain time for
public comment on anything not related to the deer decision.

"If we eliminate all privilege of the floor, we gain the extra time that's
been so sorely lacking for the past close to a year to deliberate," Trustee
Ron Bors said. "On the other hand, occasionally there will be non-deer
issues that residents have, such as planning board or something else and we
should allow those comments to be addressed."

Trustee Bea Szekely agreed, arguing that people keep repeating the same
things during privilege of the floor.

"Nothing new was said at the last meeting," she said.

Trustee Robert Andolina "played devil's advocate" on continuing to allow
public comment about the deer during the board's final months of
deliberation on the controversial issue.

"We're talking about a couple more late nights and I feel like we could make
that sacrifice for the purpose of having as complete a discussion as people
are interested in having," he said.

Trustee Diana Riesman asked how the board would enforce its new policy.

Trustee David Donner responded that they would ask people to stop in the
same way they enforce time limits on individual public comments.

"If they start talking about the deer, your time's up," he said.

The next village board meeting is 7 p.m. Aug. 17 in Marcham Hall, 836
Hanshaw Road.

Thursday, July 30, 2009

(US/mo) A defender of park deer steps forward





A new animal-rights group is pledging to defend the deer in Shawnee
Mission Park.

Jason Miller, founder of a new animal rights group called the Bite
Club of KC, recently asked to meet with the staff of the Johnson
County Park and Recreation District to discuss their concerns.
(http://biteclubkc.wordpress.com/)



Miller said that request was turned down.

So, he and his group plan to show up at the next park board meeting
Aug. 19 and present those concerns during the public comment portion
of the meeting.

In a unanimous vote last month, the board approved a plan to employ
sharpshooters and bow hunters to solve the problem of too many deer in
Shawnee Mission Park.
...
Miller is also a press officer for a national organization_ North
American Animal Liberation.

--
full story:
http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/19393

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

FROM FAMILY PARK TO KILLING FIELDS.....

Posted by thomaspainescorner on July 29, 2009
Johnson County, Lenexa, and Shawnee Kansas are preparing to perpetrate a slaughter of defenseless sentient beings. With our tax dollars!
The powers that be claim there’s a “deer problem,” but in reality, there’s a “people problem.”
Under the guise of fraudulent and hysterical assertions that Lyme disease could become rampant, deer-related auto accidents have sky-rocketed, and that the deer are in danger of starving or dying of chronic wasting disease, the Johnson County Board of Parks and Recreations Commissioners unanimously voted to carry out the agenda of bloodthirsty hunters and anally retentive residents (who chose to live near a park populated by deer yet are angry that the deer have the “audacity” to eat their precious gardens and shit on their precious lawns).
Coming this fall! Law enforcement “sharp shooters” will massacre 75% of the deer population in Shawnee Mission Park. The deer will be baited with food and subsequently shot to death. And if the rifle toters don’t kill enough bucks and does, professional bow hunters will descend upon our peaceful park to eradicate still more of our gentle, voiceless friends.
A Glimpse of what’s to come….
http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=qZ1wB0GdaXE
Who will clean up the gallons of blood spilled with our tax dollars?
And where will the potentially contaminated deer “meat” wind up? On your child’s plate in the Shawnee Mission school lunch program? Are we truly gullible enough to believe that the deer carcasses will be “processed according to USDA standards?” Or that the deer “meat” will go to feed the hungry?
Consider the malevolent, heartless, and gutless lies of bow hunters, like Ken Payne, a driving force behind the “cull:”
Ken Payne of Olathe, president of Heartland Suburban Whitetail Management, said archers shoot from about 20 yards away and aim for the heart or lungs of the deer. He said most die within second of being hit. Those who don’t are tracked down until they are found.
“We go to extreme measures to find everything we shoot,” he said, adding that bow hunting is used extensively throughout the nation to cull deer populations.
And now consider the realities of bow hunting and its sociopathic practitioners:
http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=Zw4MyyM1utc
If you want to join Bite Club’s campaign to stop the barbarity of the Shawnee Mission deer massacre, join our Face Book page at http://www.facebook .com/home. php?#/group. php?gid=10734553 7806&ref=ts, sign the online petition and contact Jason Miller at willpowerful@ hotmail.com (hotmail.com) to find out what more you can do!
For the latest updates on the animal liberation movement, visit NAALPO at http://www.animalli berationpressoff ice.org/
For the latest on anarcho-veganism, visit Thomas Paine’s Corner at http://thomaspaines corner.wordpress .com/
Watch the video at http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=VIjanhKqVC4 and go vegan. Do it for your health, for nonhuman animals and for the Earth!
http://biteclubkc. wordpress. com/2009/ 07/29/from- family-park- to-killing- fields/

"Let no animal die that I may live!"

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Wolves to the Rescue in Scotland

By Constance HoldenScience
NOW Daily News22 July 2009
No wolves have trod the Scottish Highlands for more than 250 years. Meanwhile, the local red deer, with no natural predators, have been grazing the hillsides bare, and there's been talk in Scotland about the possibility of bringing wolves back. Now a U.S.-Australian research team is arguing that wolves would be a good way to restore the ecology--not just by reducing the numbers of deer but also because they would significantly change deer behavior by creating a "landscape of fear."
Scientists headed by Adrian Manning of the Australian National University in Canberra have been studying the effects of the reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone National Park in the northwestern United States, which occurred in the 1990s. The purpose was "mostly to get the wolves back as native species," says William Ripple, a professor of forest ecosystems and society at Oregon State University in Corvallis. But there was an unforeseen bonus: Not only did the elk population go down, but there have been "major ecological effects," Ripple says. The elk now steer clear of areas where they perceive risk from wolves, leading to the regrowth of aspens, willows, cottonwood trees, and berry-producing shrubs. That in turn has supported the resurgence of beaver and bird populations.
Full story :http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/722/2?etoc

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Cayuga Heights studies deer-reduction costs

Source: http://tinyurl.com/kshkpb

Visit http://www.cayugadeer.org
to learn more

Cayuga Heights studies deer-reduction costs
Residents debate sterilization, culling


The first year of the Village of Cayuga Heights deer-reduction plan could
cost $85,000 to $90,000, village trustees estimate.

The plan to sterilize and cull deer in Cayuga Heights drew an over-capacity
crowd to Marcham Hall on Monday night, with villagers and neighboring
Ithacans arguing for and against the plan.

In their eventual discussion of the issue late Monday night, village
trustees focused their questions on how quickly the plan could be
implemented, and whether they could reduce the number of deer slated for
sterilization, which is more expensive than culling.

The village's Deer Remediation Advisory Committee submitted a proposal
recommending that a core group of 60 does be sterilized, then have the
remainder of the herd culled.

Those in favor of the plan argued it would reduce car-deer accidents, as
well as over-grazing by deer, which they said has reduced plant and bird
biodiversity in the village.

Opponents argued that it would be inhumane and unsafe to shoot animals in a
densely populated village, where the aftermath could be witnessed by
children. Among the group speaking against culling were several children.

Ten-year-old twins Maya and Matthias Hungnes live on Spruce Lane in the
village.

"I think the deer have just as much right to live as us," Maya said.

"There's a right to live, even if they eat the plants," Matthias said.

Deer committee chairwoman and village Trustee Kate Supron said the village
has attempted to address the emotional and complicated issue openly.

"We have approached this problem of deer management in that spirit of
enlightenment and education," Supron said. "We spent an immense amount of
time and effort studying all of our options for deer management."

Cornell University natural resources professor and deer expert Paul Curtis
attended the meeting to answer trustees' questions.

Culling is estimated to cost $400 per animal, while sterilization costs more
than $1,000. Curtis said retaining sterilized deer helps prevent or slow the
in-migration of other deer when village deer are killed.

The deer committee recommended sterilizing 60 does to err on the high side
for a core population, Supron said.

When there are more than 15 to 20 deer per square mile, "you'll begin to see
significant changes in the biodiversity of the understory," Curtis said. The
village totals 1.85 square miles.

Trustee Beatrice Szekely said she'd prefer to sterilize "30, maybe 40 does."

The $85,000 to $90,000 estimate included the cost for a proposed part-time
deer management director and sterilization of 30 does.

It doesn't include the cost for private sharpshooters to cull deer because
the recommended plan calls for sterilization in the first two years and
culling the third. Maintenance sterilization and culling would be required
thereafter to maintain a lowered herd size, according to the deer
committee's plan.

Upcoming meetings of village trustees are: noon Monday, Aug. 10, and 7 p.m.
Monday, Aug. 17, in Marcham Hall, 836 Hanshaw Road.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Help stop the slaughter of deer in Fairfield





Fairfield’s Conservation Commission subcommittee on “deer management” is pushing to kill deer in the town of Fairfield. Members have used scare tactics and misinformation to promote a violent and ineffective assault on innocent animals.

As we understand it, if the Conservation Commission approves of a killing scheme, Open Space regulations will need to be changed. We need to get the message out that we do not want Fairfield to become a place where violence is perpetrated against deer who are part of an urban environment and deserve to be let alone.

We will send out updates as necessary. In the meantime, please contact the Chairman of the Conservation Commission. Please let us know if you do send a letter and if you receive a response.

Stanton Lessor, Chair
Conservation Commission
Town of Fairfield
725 Old Post Road
Fairfield, CT 06824

You may also contact the Conservation Department 203-256-3071 and First Selectman Flatto’s office at 203-256-3030. While neither of these governmental offices have the authority to change regulations or stop the Conservation Commission as we understand it, it will help for them to be aware of the public’s opposition to this ghastly proposal.

“This deer hunt isn’t justified morally or scientifically. It’s offered to appease a few local hunters who have long had far too much influence locally and nationally. The deer should be off-limits to hunters, and those who find pleasure in killing deer should instead control themselves,” says Priscilla Feral, President, Friends of Animals.


Nancy Rice
Outreach Coordinator
Email: nrice@friendsofanimals.org
Phone: 203-656-1522
Fax: 203-656-0267

ACTION ALERT!KANSAS PLANS MASS DEER MASSACRE!

Dear Activists:

The Congressional Rep for the county where the deer massacre is planned is Democrat Dennis Moore. Use the info below to bypass his 'constituents only' email system, so that ANYONE can email him. Please let him know that sterilization is cheaper, more effective, and a viable solution to deer overpopulation. And that he should investigate ALL non-lethal methods over killing!


http://moore. house.gov/ contact/index. shtml

CONTACT FORM

NAME: YOURS

ADDRESS: GENERAL DELIVERY

CITY: LAWRENCE

STATE: KANSAS

ZIP: 66044 - 6420

PHONE: 555-1212

EMAIL: USE YAHOO, HOTMAIL, G-MAIL, ETC.


Sample letter: [There is VERY limited space for comments]

As representative of the district where sharpshooters and bow hunters plan to kill more than 500 deer this fall, I believe you have a FIDUCIARY obligation to taxpayers to investigate NON-LETHAL methods of controlling the deer. Please understand that mass killing does nothing more than exacerbate the problem. Nature will quickly fill the void left by these killings. Instead of taking the word of hunting organizations like the WILDLIFE FEDERATION and pro-hunting officials, educate yourself regarding sterilization options. Please contact a leading expert in the field: Anthony Marr anthonymarr@ gmail.com he has been giving lectures on this subject around the country for years.

Signed,



JOHNSON COUNTY TO USE SHARPSHOOTERS / BOW HUNTERS TO KILL DEER

http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/1258459-p2.html


“Legalized hunting is the only way to control deer,” Barling said.
But Anita Colman of Mission said that shooting the deer is a quick fix:

“There are long-term options that are cost-effective in the long run, such as sterilization. Let’s start planning a non-lethal program now that prevents another slaughter.”

The board’s decision means that more than 500 deer will be killed to reach the goal of 50 per square mile.

The “harvest” will be held sometime this fall. Feed will be set out and the deer will be shot when they come for it.

Volunteer police sharpshooters are to work during the morning and only where bait is set out, said Randy Knight, a park district spokesman. The park will be closed on those mornings and then reopened later in the day.

Park officials said the culling may need to be done a couple of mornings each week for several weeks.

Wildlife experts will then survey the deer population. If it’s still too large, Knight said, bow hunters will be called in, and the park will remain open. But he said that areas where they were working would be off-limits to the public.

The passion aroused by the deer situation in Shawnee Mission Park has been replayed in other locations nationwide, wildlife officials say.

A fervent love for deer heightens the debate.

“They think you’re killing Bambi,” sighs Mary Burnette, an associate director of the non-profit National Wildlife Federation.

But the blame is not all Walt Disney’s. He merely exploited the human tendency to prefer the cute to the carnivorous.

In fact, wildlife biologists have another term for it: “Anti-predator bias.”

In other words, if the problem is coyotes, the answer is to get rid of them.

Deer? Not so fast.

Tony Adams, a Johnson County park board member from Overland Park, said public reaction would be different if the problems were rats or snakes. “It wouldn’t even be an issue,” he said.

The debate is likely to grow more common because the wildlife federation says whitetail deer are overpopulated all over the country. Doug Inkley, senior scientist for the federation, has had three auto collisions with deer in suburban Washington.

On the Missouri side, managed deer hunts in overpopulated public parks have been commonplace for years under the supervision of the state Department of Conservation.

Wildlife Regional Supervisor Deb Burns said pushback from the public has been limited, although she recalled a Parkville woman who objected to a hunt there because she had named every single deer.

Inkley of the wildlife federation said deer overpopulation causes a ripple effect.

“It changes the plant composition in the forest and can change the species of songbirds in the treetops,” he said.

One alternative to a managed hunt would be to introduce natural predators.

“But the reintroduction of wolves and grizzlies (in a city park) is not something that’s viable,” Inkley said.

~END~



News Times, Danbury CT - by Susan Tuz
September 29, 2007
SCIENTIST BACKS BIRTH CONTROL FOR DEER

Wildlife preservationist Anthony Marr thinks fertility control can solve the problem deer overpopulation better than hunting. He talked about the subject Thursday night at the Newtown Meeting House in Newtown.

Marr worked in the Canadian outback for more than five years as a scientist for mining interests. His experience there led him to take courses in wildlife biology and to become an advocate for non-lethal deer management. "I developed a respect for the animals I saw in the wild," Marr said. "In the late 1990s, I went to India and worked on three Bengal tiger preserves, controlling the deer population there." Marr became interested in studies of deer fertility control vaccines in the U.S. and Canada. He believes culling deer herds by hunting leads to increased deer populations rather than reduced ones. He has come up with a method to vaccinate deer with contraceptive drugs that he thinks will be labor- and cost-effective. It is now being studied by the Environmental Protection Agency. "Vaccine delivery contraceptive GnHR (Gonacon) has been passed on from the FDA to the EPA. This is a sign that the vaccine is closer to the time when it will be approved for use," Marr said.

Marr said the major obstacle to using the vaccine is the labor-intensive nature of having to inject it into deer. But he believes a method he used in India to capture deer that strayed from the preserve would work for trapping deer in large numbers for vaccination. The method he recommends is to erect nylon netting corrals and bait the deer with food. The corrals would have gates they could enter but not exit. A hallway of nylon netting would be attached to the corral, and food would be used to entice the deer to enter the hallway. Scientists could then lift a flap on the hallway netting and inject the deer with the vaccine. They would lift another flap and tag the deer to show they had been vaccinated. State Department of Environmental Protection wildlife biologist Howard Kilpatrick questions Marr's idea.

"I don't know what the terrain is like in India, but I'm sure it is different than that in Fairfield County," Kilpatrick said Friday. "It doesn't sound feasible." Kilpatrick said there have been numerous studies with free-ranging white-tail deer in the U.S. in which fertility control didn't work. He noted that "too many vaccine-treated deer are still producing fawns" for fertility control to work at this point in the vaccine's development. "Things may change in the next 10 years," Kilpatrick said. "They may have a new agent that works on 95 percent of deer. Now the agent works on 60 to 70 percent of the deer on an average." Paul Curtis, the extension wildlife specialist with Cornell University, has studied fertility control in deer for several years -- using vaccines himself on test herds and following studies by his colleagues. Curits finds GnHR to be "very effective on deer population reduction, reducing pregnancies by 90 percent."

But the technique still requires booster shots every other year. "Contraception vaccine's scale is limited," he said. "GnHR can work in a small scale on a few square miles of herd travel. You can (vaccinate) a couple of hundred deer at a cost of $1,000 a deer. But that will work only in small, isolated parks. The scale is too big in large, suburban areas and large deer populations. " Marr still pushes for contraception over hunting. "Culling as a method is inhumane, cruel and does not give the effect wanted," he said. "For the first few months after the hunt, the number of deer is lower, but hunting only works for a short time." Marr cited numerous cases of controlled hunts where the deer population grew years after the hunts were started. This was due to an increase in available food, which resulted in increased reproduction.

One such case was at Monmouth Battlefield State Park in New Jersey. In 1990, Fish and Game officials "pushed through" an annual deer hunt there, Marr said. By 1998, the number of deer in the park had increased 27 percent from the time the hunt was initiated. "After nine years of killing 600 deer, hunting failed to reduce the deer herd," Marr said of the New Jersey park. But Carol Kandoth, a wildlife biologist with New Jersey Fish and Game, said Friday she did not know where Marr was getting his data. "Monmouth Battlefield State Park has its own deer management zone and they operate in special areas (where human use of the park is not extensive)," Kandoth said. "My records indicate a stable population there based on the hunts."

http://www.deeroptions.com/